The Search Bar

(Philosophy of Names Directory) ************************** An enormous hole in my heart, Gave me a good reason to depart, From a former self, an inferior being, For survival he was too unfit. For others he defeated too quickly, What he truly wanted to be... A masterless slave, he was too depressed, Thus his true self he was quick to oppress. Love letters, to send, he dared, To those for himself didn't care. Too unfeeling, too cowards, they were, To flee, while putting him in nightmare. Normality's poor excuse, To choose, to disrespectfully, refuse. Hopefully, these ladies' regret, Will be not see him turn, An empire's man. Because I dared to bury Tom. The sissy I used to be. I don't frown, as now I wear the crown, The one you all now, see. And I will not say, "Rest In peace", Such respect he's unworthy to recieve. Because now we are all, in good company, A company of greater philosophy. I was too busy to philosophize, That only few, outside, I actualized. Former handicap, user of a CPAP, Depraved of many a touch. And in the absence of much, My accomplishments, became, unmatched. I refuse to move on, although I can, For the past makes me, Always be back again. Because I dared to bury Tom. The sissy I used to be. I don't frown, as now I wear the crown, The one you all now, see. And I will not say, "Rest In peace", Such respect he's unworthy to recieve. Because now we are all, in good company, A company of greater philosophy. And as more power I accumulate, A sight in my eye, a possible mate. Whoever she'll be, rest assured, I'll make, Her never feel irrelevant. For I can be loyal as a dog, Show my love, with more than just songs. That's because, I'm he who muredered Tom, And thus, I grew more strong. Because I dared to bury Tom. The sissy that I used to be. I don't frown, as now I wear the crown, The one you all now, see. And I will not say, "Rest In peace", Such respect he's unworthy to recieve. Because we are all, in superior company, An empire, of greater, philosophy.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (French Translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc, Below) PUBLICATION YEAR,: July 27th , 2023 AUTHOR: Mr. Machiek A. Cayier EDITOR: Mr. Tomasio A. Rubinshtein ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Machiek Machiek Akuocpiir Cayier, is a South Sudanese intellectual elite, public influencer, poet, philosopher, scientific communicator, who is based in East Africa. He was born on December 30th, 1993, at Hoor Machiek Amuong, Berle-Sophi Village, near Mapuordit, Yirol West, Bahrl El Gazal, Southern Sudan Autonomous region (2005-2011), The Republic of Sudan (1985-2019) **************** Foreword: In the pursuit of a better South Sudan, we, the members of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM), "A Vanguard Party of South Sudan," come together with a shared vision and determination to bring about positive change for our nation. We stand for Social Democracy, Pan-Africanism, and South Sudanese Nationalism. SSNRM is a National Social Democratic, Pan-African, and South Sudanese Nationalists Non-violent Revolutionary Movement to change South Sudan. We envision a country in which: Youths are represented and given opportunities to lead their people, have basic rights, proper education institutions, and opportunities to serve in their government. Elderly people have access to a better healthcare system. Women and children have a promising future for their own lives and fair economic statuses. And for that, we write a political manifesto and constitution of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM) and its youth wing, the South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM). **************** Table of Contents: SECTIONS OF THE POLITICAL MANIFESTO: 1. Foreword: Appearing above. 2. Section One: History of South Sudanese Peoples. 3. Section Two: The Visionary and Mission of South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM). 4. Section Three: Mission of South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM) as a youths wing. 5. Section Four: The Main Important Values of South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM). 6. Section Five: South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM), Strategic Visions, and Leadership. CONSTITUTION: 7. Section Six: The Constitution of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM). This manifesto outlines our values, mission, and strategic visions, as well as the mission of our youths wing, the South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM). **************** SECTIONS OF THE POLITICAL MANIFESTO: Section One: History of South Sudanese Peoples: In this section, we acknowledge the rich history and struggles of the South Sudanese people since: * The Turco-Egyptian conquest of Sudan between (1820-1824). * The Mahdist State, (1885-1899), * Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1899-1956) * And Republic of Sudan (1956-2011), * SPLM/A, Government of Southern Sudan, Autonomous Region (1983-2011), * South Sudan Independence (2011- Present day). We recognize the importance of preserving our cultural heritage through the 64 tribes of South Sudan, while also learning from the challenges of the past. Our history serves as a reminder of our resilience and unyielding spirit in the face of adversity. Section Two: The Vision and Mission of South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM): 2.1 Vision: Our vision is of a united, prosperous, and inclusive South Sudan. A vision, where all citizens, irrespective of age, gender, background, or religion, have equal access to opportunities, basic rights, and a promising future. 2.2 Mission: Our mission is to spearhead a nonviolent revolution that seeks to bring about social justice, equal representation, and better governance in South Sudan. Through democratic processes, we aim to empower the marginalized and address the pressing issues facing our nation. Section Three: Mission of South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM) as a Youths Wing: The SSYRM functions as the youths wing of the SSNRM, with a specific focus on advocating for the rights and interests of young people in South Sudan. The mission of the SSYRM includes: 3.1 Empowerment of Youth: The SSYRM aims to empower young individuals by providing them with educational opportunities, skill development, and platforms to actively participate in decision-making processes. 3.2 Representation: We seek to ensure that the voices of the youths are heard and that they are adequately represented in all levels of government and policy-making bodies. 3.3 Youth-Centric Policies: The SSYRM will work towards the implementation of policies that address the unique challenges faced by young people, including access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Section Four: The Main Important Values of South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM): 4.1 Social Justice: We stand for social justice, equality, and fairness, ensuring that no one is left behind and that all citizens enjoy equal rights and opportunities. 4.2 Democracy and Rule of Law: The SSNRM advocates for a democratic system that upholds the rule of law, transparency, and accountability in governance. 4.3 Inclusivity: We promote inclusivity by valuing diversity, respecting the rights of minority groups, and fostering national unity. 4.4 Peace and Nonviolence: Our movement is committed to resolving conflicts through peaceful means, promoting dialogue, and building bridges between different communities. Section Five: Strategic Visions, and Leadership: 5.1 Strategic Visions: The SSNRM aims to engage in constructive dialogue with stakeholders, including government institutions, civil society, and international partners, to forge a path towards positive change. 5.2 Leadership: Our leadership is committed to leading by example, upholding the values of integrity, and prioritizing the interests of the people of South Sudan above all else. Section 5 Conclusion: The South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM) and its youth wing, the South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM), are dedicated to effecting transformative change in South Sudan. We call upon all citizens to join us in this noble endeavor, as together, we can create a nation-state that we can all be proud of—a nation that offers hope, opportunity, the pursuit of happiness, and prosperity for generations to come. Section Six: The Constitution of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM): The South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement: A Social Democratic, Pan-African, South Sudanese Nationalist, Non-Violent Revolutionary Movement. Preamble: We, the members of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM), in pursuit of national prosperity, social justice, and unity, hereby establish this Constitution to guide our actions and aspirations. Committed to the principles of social democracy, Pan-Africanism, and South Sudanese nationalism, we seek to build a united and inclusive South Sudan where every citizen can flourish. This Constitution outlines the structure, objectives, and core values of the SSNRM as a national social democratic, Pan-African, and South Sudanese nationalist non-violent revolutionary movement. Article I: Name and Nature: 1.1 Name: The name of the organization shall be the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement, hereafter referred to as the SSNRM. 1.2 Nature: The SSNRM is a non-violent revolutionary movement, committed to effecting positive change through peaceful means and democratic processes. It upholds the principles of social democracy, Pan-Africanism, and South Sudanese nationalism in its pursuit of national development and unity as a vanguard party of South Sudan. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: A vanguard party is a political party that is the "spearhead", or the leader, of a political revolution). 1.3: The Ultimate Guiding Principle: The SSNRM shall adhere to the ultimate guiding principles, which shall serve as the foundation of our movement. 1.4: National Unity and Reconciliation: We will always strive for unity and reconciliation of all South Sudanese People, transcending ethnic and regional divisions. Article II: Vision and Mission: 2.1 Vision: The SSNRM envisions a united, prosperous, and inclusive South Sudan, where all citizens, irrespective of age, gender, background, or religion, have equal access to opportunities, basic rights, and a promising future. We aspire to create a society that upholds the values of social justice, democracy, and human dignity. 2.2 Mission: The mission of the SSNRM is to advocate for social justice, equal representation, and better governance in South Sudan. Through peaceful and non-violent revolutionary means, we aim to empower the marginalized, promote democratic values, and address the pressing issues facing our nation. Article III: Core Values: The SSNRM is guided by the following core values, which shall be upheld by all its members and leaders: Section 3.1:Social justice: We believe in creating a just and equitable society, where the needs of all citizens are met, and no one is left behind. Section 3.2: Democracy and good governance: We are committed to democratic principles, ensuring that the will of the people guides decision-making and that leaders are accountable to their constituents. Section 3.3: Inclusivity: We value diversity and strive to foster a sense of national unity by respecting the rights and interests of all South Sudanese communities. Section 3.4 Peaceful co-existence and non-violence: We advocate for peaceful resolutions to conflicts and promote dialogue as a means to achieve lasting stability and development. 3.5 Social welfare and sustainable development: We prioritize the welfare of all citizens, aiming to provide access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities for all. We are committed to achieving sustainable development and economic prosperity for the benefit of all South Sudanese citizens. 3.6 Human rights: We prioritize the welfare of all citizens, ensuring the protection of human rights and the provision of essential services. Article IV: Provisionary Mandates: The SSNRM shall focus on the following provisionary mandates, to adress the immediate needs of the nation: 4.1 Ensuring basic rights: we shall advocate for the protection of basic rights, including access to education, healthcare and clean water. 4.2 Promoting youth empowerment: We shall prioritize youth empowerment through education, skill development, and opportunities for political participation. 4.3 Enhancing healthcare: We shall work towards all the establishment of a comprehensive and accessible healthcare. 4.4 Addressing economic challenges: We shall propose policies to address poverty, unemployment, and economic inequalities. Article V: Membership: 5.1 Eligibility: Any South Sudanese citizen who subscribes to the principles and values of the SSNRM is eligible for membership. 5.2 Rights and Responsibilities: Members shall have the right to participate in the decision-making processes of the SSNRM, uphold its values, and contribute to its activities. Members shall also be responsible for abiding by the Constitution and promoting the objectives of the SSNRM. 5.3 Accepting declarations of a membership: Any individualseeking membership in the SSNRM must make a formal acceptance declaration, pledging to uphold the constitution and principles of the revolutionary party. Article VI: Organizational Structure: 6.1 National Assembly of National Revolution: The supreme governing body of the SSNRM shall be the National Assembly of National Revolution, comprising of representatives from all states of South Sudan and relevant constituencies. 6.2 Executive Committee of National Revolution: The Executive Committee of National Revolution, shall be responsible for formulating policies, implementing decisions, and representing the SSNRM to external entities and make critical decisions. It shall be elected by the national assembly. 6.3 Responsibilities: The National Executive shall oversee the implementation of party programs and ensure coordination among different bodies. 6.4 Youth Wing: The SSNRM shall have a dedicated youth wing, known as the South Sudan Youths Revolutionary Movement (SSYRM), to advocate for the rights and involvement of youths in their government. Article VII: The Political Bureau of SSNRM 7.1 Composition: The Political Bureau shall be the highest decision-making body and shall be composed of senior party leaders. 7.2 Responsibilities: The Political Bureau shall set the overall direction and strategy of the SSNRM and provide guidance on key policy matters. Article VIII: Secretariat of National Revolution 8.1 Composition: The Secretariat shall be responsible for administrative tasks and organizing party activities. 8.2 Responsibilities: The Secretariat shall maintain records, handle communications, and support the smooth functioning of the SSNRM. Article IX: Main Duties of Revolutionaries of SSNRM 9.1 Main Duties: Revolutionaries of the SSNRM shall actively promote the party's principles, participate in party activities, and engage in grassroots mobilization. Article X: State Level Bodies 10.1 State Level Bodies: Each state shall have a state-level body responsible for coordinating party activities within its respective jurisdiction. Article XI: Duties of SSNRM State Level Members 11.1 Duties: State-level members shall advocate for the implementation of party policies and ensure effective representation of their constituencies. Article XII: County Members 12.1 County Members: Within each state, county-level members shall work towards the party's objectives at the county level. Article XIII: Main Duties of County Members 13.1 Main Duties: County members shall mobilize communities, address local issues, and promote party initiatives within their counties. Article XIV: Payam Level Bodies 14.1 Payam Level Bodies: Each county shall have Payam-level bodies responsible for party activities at the Payam level. Article XV: Main Duties of Payam Level Members 15.1 Main Duties: Payam-level members shall facilitate local engagement, implement party programs, and report to county-level bodies. Article XVI: Boma Bodies 16.1 Boma Bodies: At the grassroots level, the SSNRM shall have boma-level bodies responsible for community engagement and organizing. Article XVII: Main Duties of Boma Level Members 17.1 Main Duties: Boma-level members shall mobilize their communities, disseminate party information, and encourage participation. Article XVIII: Sources of Funding of SSNRM as a ” Vanguard Party of South Sudan”. 18.1 Funding Sources: The SSNRM shall derive its funding from voluntary contributions, fundraising activities, and transparent donations. Article XIX: Other High-Level Provisions 19.1 Other Provisions: The SSNRM shall have the authority to establish other high-level bodies as needed to advance its objectives. Article XX: Leadership and Elections 20.1 Leadership Election: Leaders of the SSNRM shall be elected through democratic processes, reflecting the will of the members. 20.2 Term Limits: Leadership positions within the SSNRM shall be subject to term limits to ensure regular and inclusive leadership transitions. Article XXI: Amendment of the Constitution 21.1 Amendment Procedure: Any proposed amendments to this Constitution must be presented to the National Assembly of National Revolution, and approved by a two-thirds majority vote. Article XXII: Dissolution 22.1 Dissolution Procedure: The SSNRM may be dissolved through a democratic decision taken by the National Assembly of National Revolution, subject to a two-thirds majority vote. Article XXIII: Ratification 23.1 Ratification: This Constitution shall come into effect upon ratification by the National Assembly of National revolution of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement, (SSNRM). ******** Final Words: In witness whereof, we, the members of the South Sudan National Revolutionary Movement (SSNRM), do hereby adopt and enact this Constitution, underscoring our commitment to the principles of social democracy, Pan-Africanism, and South Sudanese nationalism in pursuit of happiness, a united, and prosperous nation-state. *********************************************** (French Translation) ANNÉE DE PUBLICATION, : 27 juillet 2023 AUTEUR : M. Machiek A. Cayier ÉDITEUR : M. Tomasio A. Rubinshtein À PROPOS DE L'AUTEUR : Machiek Machiek Akuocpiir Cayier, est une élite intellectuelle sud-soudanaise, influenceur publique, poète, philosophe, communicatrice scientifique, basée en Afrique de l'Est. Il est né le 30 décembre 1993 à Hoor Machiek Amuong, village de Berle-Sophi, près de Mapuordit, Yirol West, Bahrl El Gazal, région autonome du Soudan du Sud (2005-2011), République du Soudan (1985-2019) **************** Avant-propos : Dans la poursuite d'un Soudan du Sud qui se veut meilleur, nous, les membres du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM), "Un parti d'avant-garde du Soudan du Sud", nous nous unissons avec une vision et une détermination partagées pour apporter des changements positifs pour notre nation. Nous défendons la social-démocratie, le panafricanisme et le nationalisme sud-soudanais. Le SSNRM est un mouvement révolutionnaire non violent national social-démocrate, panafricain et sud-soudanais qui vise à améliorer le Soudan du Sud. Nous envisageons un pays dans lequel : Les jeunes sont représentés et ont la possibilité de diriger leur peuple, ont des droits fondamentaux, des établissements d'enseignement appropriés et des opportunités de servir dans leur gouvernement. Les personnes âgées ont accès à un meilleur système de santé. Les femmes et les enfants ont un avenir prometteur pour leur propre vie et des statuts économiques équitables. Et pour cela, nous écrivons un manifeste politique et une constitution du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM) et de son aile jeunesse, le Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM). **************** Table des matières: SECTIONS DU MANIFESTE POLITIQUE : 1. Avant-propos : Apparaissant ci-dessus. 2. Première section : Histoire des peuples sud-soudanais. 3. Deuxième section : Le côté visionnaire et la mission du mouvement révolutionnaire national sud-soudanais Mouvement (SSNRM). 4. Section trois : Mission du Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM) en tant qu'aile des jeunes. 5. Section quatre : Les principales valeurs importantes du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM). 6. Cinquième section : Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM), visions stratégiques et leadership. CONSTITUTION: 7. Section six : La Constitution du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM). Ce manifeste décrit nos valeurs, notre mission et nos visions stratégiques, ainsi que la mission de notre aile jeunesse, le Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM). **************** SECTIONS DU MANIFESTE POLITIQUE : Première section : Histoire des peuples sud-soudanais : Dans cette section, nous reconnaissons la riche histoire et les luttes du Sud Peuple soudanais depuis : * La conquête turco-égyptienne du Soudan entre (1820-1824). * L'Etat Mahdiste, (1885-1899), * Condominium anglo-égyptien (1899-1956) * Et République du Soudan (1956-2011), * SPLM/A, Gouvernement du Sud-Soudan, Région autonome (1983-2011), * Indépendance du Soudan du Sud (2011- Aujourd'hui). Nous reconnaissons l'importance de préserver notre patrimoine culturel à travers les 64 tribus du Soudan du Sud, tout en apprenant des défis du passé. Notre histoire nous rappelle notre résilience et notre inflexibilité face à l'adversité. Section deux : La vision et la mission du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM) : 2.1 Vision : Notre vision est celle d'un Soudan du Sud uni, prospère et inclusif. Une vision où tous les citoyens, quels que soient leur âge, leur sexe, leur origine ou leur religion, ont un accès égal aux opportunités, aux droits fondamentaux et à un avenir prometteur. 2.2 Mission : Notre mission est de mener une révolution non-violente qui cherche à améliorer la justice sociale, la représentation égale et une meilleure gouvernance au Soudan du Sud. Grâce à des processus démocratiques, nous visons à autonomiser les marginalisés et à résoudre les problèmes urgents auxquels notre nation est confrontée. Section Trois : Mission du Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM) en tant qu'aile de la jeunesse : Le SSYRM fonctionne en tant qu'aile jeunesse du SSNRM, avec un accent particulier sur la défense des droits et des intérêts des jeunes du Soudan du Sud. La mission du SSYRM comprend : 3.1 Autonomisation des jeunes : Le SSYRM vise à autonomiser les jeunes en leur offrant des opportunités éducatives, le développement de compétences et des plateformes pour participer activement aux processus de prise de décision. 3.2 Représentation : Nous cherchons à faire en sorte que la voix des jeunes soit entendue et qu'elle soit adéquatement représentée à tous les niveaux du gouvernement et dans les instances décisionnelles. 3.3 Politiques centrées sur les jeunes : les SSYRM travaillera à la mise en œuvre de politiques qui répondent aux défis uniques auxquels sont confrontés les jeunes, notamment l'accès à l'éducation, aux soins de santé et aux opportunités d'emploi. Section Quatre : Les principales valeurs importantes du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM) : 4.1 Justice sociale : Nous défendons la justice sociale, l'égalité et l'équité, en veillant à ce que personne n'est laissé pour compte et que tous les citoyens jouissent des mêmes droits et opportunités. 4.2 Démocratie et Etat de droit : Le SSNRM plaide pour un système démocratique qui respecte la primauté du droit, la transparence et la responsabilité en matière de gouvernance. 4.3 Inclusivité : Nous promouvons l'inclusivité en valorisant la diversité, en respectant les droits des groupes minoritaires et en favorisant l'unité nationale. 4.4 Paix et non-violence : Notre mouvement s'engage à résoudre les conflits par des moyens pacifiques, en promouvant le dialogue et en construisant des ponts entre les différentes communautés. Section Cinq : Visions stratégiques et leadership : 5.1 Visions stratégiques : Le SSNRM vise à engager un dialogue constructif avec les parties prenantes, y compris les institutions gouvernementales, la société civile et les partenaires internationaux, pour tracer la voie vers un changement positif. 5.2 Leadership : Notre direction s'engage à montrer l'exemple, à défendre les valeurs d'intégrité et en donnant la priorité aux intérêts du peuple du Soudan du Sud par-dessus tout. Chapitre 5 Conclusion : Le Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM) et son aile jeunesse, le Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM), se consacrent à la réalisation de changements transformateurs du Soudan du Sud. Nous appelons tous les citoyens à se joindre à nous dans cette noble entreprise, car ensemble, nous pouvons créer un État-nation dont nous pouvons tous être fiers - une nation qui offre l'espoir, l'opportunité, la poursuite du bonheur et la prospérité pour les générations à venir . Section six : La Constitution du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM) : Le Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud: un mouvement révolutionnaire social-démocrate, panafricain, nationaliste sud-soudanais et non violent. Préambule: Nous, les membres du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM), dans la poursuite de la prospérité nationale, de la justice sociale et de l'unité, établissons par la présente cette Constitution pour guider nos actions et nos aspirations. Attachés aux principes de la social-démocratie, du panafricanisme et du nationalisme sud-soudanais, nous cherchons à construire un Soudan du Sud uni et inclusif où chaque citoyen peut s'épanouir. Cette Constitution décrit la structure, les objectifs et les valeurs fondamentales du SSNRM en tant que mouvement révolutionnaire non violent national social-démocrate, panafricain et sud-soudanais. Article I : Nom et Nature : 1.1 Nom : Le nom de l'organisation sera le Soudan National du Sud Mouvement Révolutionnaire, ci-après dénommé SSNRM. 1.2 Nature : Le SSNRM est un mouvement révolutionnaire non violent, engagé à effectuer des changements positifs par des moyens pacifiques et des processus démocratiques. Il défend les principes de la social-démocratie, du panafricanisme et du nationalisme sud-soudanais dans sa poursuite du développement national et de l'unité en tant que parti d'avant-garde du Soudan du Sud. (Note de M. Rubinshtein : Un parti d'avant-garde est un parti politique qui est le « fer de lance », ou le leader, d'une révolution politique). 1.3 : Le principe directeur ultime : Le SSNRM doit adhérer aux principes directeurs ultimes, qui serviront de fondement à notre mouvement. 1.4 : Unité nationale et réconciliation : Nous nous efforcerons toujours d'atteindre l'unité et la réconciliation de tout le peuple sud-soudanais, en transcendant les divisions ethniques et régionales. Article II : Vision et mission : 2.1 Vision : Le SSNRM envisage un Soudan du Sud uni, prospère et inclusif, où tous les citoyens, quels que soient leur âge, leur sexe, leur origine ou leur religion, ont un accès égal aux opportunités, aux droits fondamentaux et à un avenir prometteur. Nous aspirons à créer une société qui défend les valeurs de justice sociale, de démocratie et de dignité humaine. 2.2 Mission : La mission du SSNRM est de plaider en faveur de la justice sociale, d'une représentation égale et d'une gouvernance améliorée au Soudan du Sud. Par des moyens révolutionnaires pacifiques et non violents, nous visons à autonomiser les marginalisés, à promouvoir les valeurs démocratiques et à résoudre les problèmes urgents auxquels notre nation est confrontée. Article III : Valeurs fondamentales : Le SSNRM est guidé par les valeurs fondamentales suivantes, qui doivent être défendues par tous ses membres et dirigeants : Section 3.1 : Justice sociale : Nous croyons en la création d'une société juste et équitable, où les besoins de tous les citoyens sont satisfaits et où personne n'est laissé pour compte. Section 3.2 : Démocratie et bonne gouvernance : Nous sommes attachés aux principes démocratiques, en veillant à ce que la volonté du peuple guide la prise de décision et que les dirigeants soient responsables devant leurs électeurs. Section 3.3 : Inclusivité : Nous apprécions la diversité et nous nous efforçons de favoriser un sentiment d'unité nationale en respectant les droits et les intérêts de toutes les communautés sud-soudanaises. Section 3.4 Coexistence pacifique et non-violence : Nous plaidons pour des résolutions pacifiques des conflits et encourageons le dialogue comme moyen de parvenir à une stabilité et à un développement durable. 3.5 Bien-être social et développement durable : Nous accordons la priorité au bien-être de tous les citoyens, dans le but de fournir un accès à l'éducation, aux soins de santé et aux opportunités économiques pour tous. Nous sommes déterminés à parvenir à un développement durable et à la prospérité économique au profit de tous les citoyens sud-soudanais. 3.6 Droits de l'homme : Nous accordons la priorité au bien-être de tous les citoyens, en veillant à la protection des droits de l'homme et à la fourniture des services essentiels. Article IV : Mandats provisoires : Le SSNRM se concentrera sur les mandats provisoires suivants, pour répondre aux besoins immédiats de la nation : 4.1 Garantir les droits fondamentaux : nous plaiderons pour la protection des droits fondamentaux, y compris l'accès à l'éducation, aux soins de santé et à l'eau potable. 4.2 Promouvoir l'autonomisation des jeunes : Nous accorderons la priorité aux jeunes l'autonomisation par l'éducation, le développement des compétences et les possibilités de participation politique. 4.3 Améliorer les soins de santé : Nous travaillerons à tout mettre en place pour avoir un système de santé complet et accessible. 4.4 Relever les défis économiques : Nous proposerons des politiques pour lutter contre la pauvreté, le chômage et les inégalités économiques. Article V : Adhésion : 5.1 Éligibilité : Tout citoyen sud-soudanais qui souscrit aux principes et aux valeurs du SSNRM est éligible à l'adhésion. 5.2 Droits et responsabilités : les membres ont le droit de participer aux processus décisionnels du SSNRM, défendre ses valeurs et contribuer à ses activités. Les membres sont également responsables du respect de la Constitution et de la promotion des objectifs du SSNRM. 5.3 Acceptation des déclarations d'adhésion : Toute personne souhaitant devenir membre du SSNRM doit faire une déclaration formelle d'acceptation, s'engageant à respecter la constitution et les principes du parti révolutionnaire. Article VI : Structure organisationnelle : 6.1 Assemblée nationale de la révolution nationale : le corps de gouvernance suprème du SSNRM est l'Assemblée nationale de la révolution nationale, composée de représentants de tous les États du Soudan du Sud et des circonscriptions concernées. 6.2 Comité Exécutif de la Révolution Nationale : Le Comité Exécutif de la Révolution Nationale sera responsable de la formulation des politiques, de la mise en œuvre des décisions, de la représentation du SSNRM auprès des entités externes et de la prise de décisions critiques. Il est élu par l'assemblée nationale. 6.3 Responsabilités : L'Exécutif national supervisera la mise en œuvre des programmes des partis et assurera la coordination entre les différentes parties. 6.4 Aile jeunesse : Le SSNRM aura une aile jeunesse dédiée, connue sous le nom du Mouvement révolutionnaire des jeunes du Soudan du Sud (SSYRM), pour défendre les droits et l'implication des jeunes dans leur gouvernement. Article VII : Le Bureau politique du SSNRM 7.1 Composition : Le Bureau politique est l'organe de décision le plus élevé et est composé des hauts dirigeants du parti. 7.2 Responsabilités : Le Bureau politique doit définir l'orientation générale et la stratégie du SSNRM et fournir des orientations sur les questions politiques clés. Article VIII : Secrétariat de la Révolution Nationale 8.1 Composition : Le Secrétariat est responsable des tâches administratives et de l'organisation des activités du parti. 8.2 Responsabilités : Le Secrétariat doit tenir des registres, gérer les communications et soutenir le bon fonctionnement du SSNRM. Article IX : Principaux devoirs des révolutionnaires du SSNRM 9.1 Principaux devoirs : les révolutionnaires du SSNRM doivent activement promouvoir les principes, participer aux activités du parti et s'engager dans la mobilisation populaire. Article X : Organismes au niveau de l'État 10.1 Organismes au niveau de l'État : chaque État doit avoir un organisme au niveau de l'État chargé de coordonner les activités du parti dans sa juridiction respective. Article XI : Devoirs des membres du SSNRM au niveau de l'État 11.1 Devoirs : les membres au niveau de l'État plaident pour la mise en œuvre des politiques et assurer une représentation adéquate de leurs électeurs. Article XII : Membres du comté 12.1 Membres du comté : dans chaque État, les membres au niveau du comté doivent travailler à atteindre les objectifs du parti au niveau du comté. Article XIII : Principaux devoirs des membres du comté 13.1 Principales tâches : les membres du comté doivent mobiliser les communautés, résoudre les problèmes locaux et promouvoir les initiatives du parti dans leur comté. Article XIV : Représentants de niveau Payam 14.1 Représentants de niveau Payam : chaque comté doit disposer d'organismes de niveau Payam responsables des activités du parti au niveau Payam. Article XV : Principales fonctions des membres du niveau Payam 15.1 Tâches principales : les membres de niveau Payam doivent faciliter l'engagement local, mettre en œuvre les programmes du parti et rendre compte aux responsables au niveau du comté. Article XVI : Représentants de niveau Boma 16.1 Représentans de niveau Boma : Au niveau local, le SSNRM doit avoir des représentants responsables de l'engagement et de l'organisation communautaires. Article XVII : Principaux devoirs des membres de niveau Boma 17.1 Principal Devoirs : Les membres de niveau Boma doivent mobiliser leurs communautés, diffuser des informations sur le parti et encourager la participation. Article XVIII : Sources de financement du SSNRM en tant que « Parti d'avant-garde du Soudan du Sud ». 18.1 Sources de financement : Le SSNRM tirera son financement de contributions volontaires, d'activités de collecte de fonds et de dons transparents. Article XIX : Autres dispositions de haut niveau 19.1 Autres dispositions : Le SSNRM aura le pouvoir d'établir d'autres représentants de haut niveau selon les besoins pour faire avancer ses objectifs. Article XX : Leadership et élections 20.1 Élection des dirigeants : les dirigeants du SSNRM seront élus par un processus démocratique, reflétant la volonté des membres. 20.2 Limites de mandat : Les postes de direction au sein du SSNRM seront soumis à des limites de mandat pour assurer des transitions de leadership régulières et inclusives. Article XXI : Modification de la Constitution 21.1 Procédure d'amendement : Tout amendement proposé à la présente Constitution doit être présenté à l'Assemblée nationale de la Révolution nationale et approuvé par un vote à la majorité des deux tiers. Article XXII : Dissolution 22.1 Procédure de dissolution : Le SSNRM peut être dissous par une décision prise par l'Assemblée nationale de la Révolution nationale, soumise à un vote à la majorité des deux tiers. Article XXIII : Ratification 23.1 Ratification : La présente Constitution entrera en vigueur dès sa ratification par l' Assemblée nationale de la révolution nationale du mouvement révolutionnaire national du sud-soudan (SSNRM). ******** Derniers mots : En foi de quoi, nous, les membres du Mouvement révolutionnaire national du Soudan du Sud (SSNRM), adoptons et promulguons par la présente la présente Constitution, soulignant notre attachement aux principes de la social-démocratie, du panafricanisme et du nationalisme sud-soudanais à la recherche du bonheur, un État-nation uni et prospère.

Neuroplasticity describes our minds' ability to adapt to new situations. Adapting to our environment is an imperative concept because we need to survive. The world will not always accommodate us, so we must be willing to change ourselves in order to thrive. For example, if you are highly sensitive, you may need to adapt to a reality that is unforgiving and remorseless. This can be difficult, but it is essential for your mental health. Different environments require different adaptations, so it is important to be flexible and adaptable. Our neuroplastic potential is affected by many factors, for good and for bad. For example, stress can harm it, and it is one of the reasons stress is harmful for us. On the other hand, there are several ways to improve it, regardless of who we are and what is our age. We need to understand the importance of what we already experienced thus far in life, as our experiences shape our neuroplasticity. If we have poor-quality experiences, we will only damage our ability to survive in our environment. The brain must rewire itself in order to prepare for the future, and it can only do so by relying on what it has already experienced. This is in the name of a more endurable present. Succumb to depression due to your powerlessness on the external world, and you will pay in accordance to your own impracticality. Make sure you prepare for life, using the power you do have, and your chances of survival will increase. Throughout the years, from all the trauma I gathered from life, I have developed my own neuroplastic technique, in order to avoid suicide. It is not for the weak of heart, and it is not for the sensitive or the naive. So if you are any of those, or generally a person who easily succumbs to discomfort, now is the time for you to leave this article. You will lose, however, by not taking your risks in the name of mental survival. I at least, made my warning. ..... Now, time to begin the impartment of this technique, to the less sensitive parts of humanity. "Inner-Murder" is a Rubinshteinic neuroplasticity technique where you actively force your brain to rewire in order to survive in a life where you are deprived of love, touch, and physical human company. I developed this technique because I wanted to endure the hardship of solitude and because I was rarely shown affection in this life, outside of the nuclear Rubinshtein family. It is said that humans need love and affection in order to survive. This is true, as love and affection are essential for our mental and physical health. However, we need to take into account that both love and affection are not as accessible to all of us. For some of us, high emotional sensitivity is a problem. This means that we are more easily overwhelmed by our emotions, which can make it difficult to cope with difficult situations. Additionally, not all of us receive the sympathy and empathy we need from others. This can be especially true for people who have been abused or neglected. It is possible that we will be met with apathy when we present our mental distress. Our abusers may not care about our suffering, or they may use poor excuses to deny the fact that they abused us. They may have done things to us that they should not have done, such as hitting us, threatening to kill us, taking away our homes, or almost murdering us, intentionally or not. They may use logical fallacies such as: * Whataboutism -- Telling us things we did, unrelated to things they did. * Appeal to ignorance -- Using their incomplete understanding of what they did, as a justification to what they did. * The Nirvana Fallacy -- Stating the obvious by notifying us of reality's imperfection, as an excuse to the abuse they caused. * Not being able to tell the difference between cause and between justification -- Reason and justification are not the same. The chain of events do not justify the fact that they occured. * "The Way Things Are" Fallacy -- It is normal for something to occur, therefore it's okay. Or, someone specifically has certain traits or a traumatic past themselves, therefore what they did to us was okay. See this article, specifically regarding trauma. * The Strawman's Fallacy -- When the gravity of the matter is distorted and thus is regarded as easier to refute. You see, in the absence of knowledge in the field of logic, people may do dumb things and also justify said things. With said absence, they might do these things again, with little to no regret. Because without understanding of logic, our understanding of reality, and of our own deeds, will remain deficit. Deeds they should not have done. Like hitting us. Like threathening to kill us. Like taking away our homes. Like almost murdering us, intentionally or not. And we need to survive in a world of irrational people who don't bother studying logic, nor develop their reasoning. We must become better than them, in order to survive, and in order to not be morally depraved like them. Should they deny their lack of logic or morality, it is because they are in denial about it. Because being an abuser contradicts who they are, if they are capable of empathy that's more than cognitive. We are not born logical beings. Logic is to be taught, aquired. It is not innate. And we do not get more reasonable as we grow up, because growing up does not mean learning logic. By my very core, beyond what I learned about reason and beyond the fallacies I devised through contemplations -- my self is irraational. My self is Tom, not Tomasio. A naive, highly sensitive, frightful child. A crybaby. A pathetic weakling who seeks to be pitied by the world because he exists. What I did and do is what I call "Inner-Murder" -- I killed him. And I in fact kill him constantly in my mind. I have no love for him, because he was in my way. And no one needs to be in my way for self-preservation and actualization. Not even the innate, natural parts of myself. I do not care for toxicity when my greatest bias is to survive the reality within and outside my traumatized mind. So I regularly visualize very, very gruesome imagery, happening to what I was, to Tom. I make sure to put him in his place. Since I cannot be arrested for practicing this technique, as the only victim is a psychological part of myself, I have no remorse, no filtering in the inner sanctum of my mental being. I have no empathy towards Tom. I am more than him, greater than him, for I am Mr. Tomasio, The Undead Philosopher. It's my real name, Tomasio. I see it as my duty to murder him mentally. Again and again. And again. Ruthlessly. Mercilessly. I do so like Darth Vader did to Anakin Skywalker. They were the same personas, being hosted by the same body. Know that a boy named Tom Rubinshtein died prematurely. He isn't me. He was too much of a wuss to endure the hardships of life. He was to whiny, too incompetent, too infantile. He even believed he was powerful enough to rule a medium-sized military force of real players in a game, the pathetic Storm Alpha Squad. He disbanded it because he was a coward and because his own lieutenants rebelled against his weak leadership. They took away his base from him. He had some of his items in that base's facilities. Subcommanders Eijak and Bobak did not care. They ruined his SAS base and he stood atop a hill and observed his former empire, broken forever. His best soldier left, as well, and the one in charge of crafting items, ghosted him, never to be heard from again. And in this world, it is the weak and the unfit who gets to be weeded off. I merely did what was inevitable. What was already likely to be done by others. By future abusers. By human beings in general. And with the rise of me, of Tomasio, I will make things right. And I will become the man Tom would've never been. He would've grown to be a spineless, b***-ess momma's boy. No. I will build this empire, and an organization behind it. That's the only way my vengeance can be fed. By power. By respect. By business. That's what you get when you are rarely shown love by the world. You become disappointed. You become depressed and broken inside. "Murder" yourself, mentally, and things can change for the better.... just as they do for me. I hope I'm clear. I murdered part of myself, for you. For my readers, other writers, and successors. Because I care for you, more than I care for myself. Acknowledge my sacrifice. Did I do the right thing? Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback Is the point of life to be more aware of our sensitivity to things? All about controlling it I guess. I think we need to be more sensitive to things oh a physiological level but remain tough on a psychological one. You must understand neuroplasticity also has to do with our neuroanatomy actually rewiring itself. It’s how I overcame brain damage such as my memory improving. Nothing but the result of my brain rewiring itself in order to work better. You do neuroplasticity on yourself by working on making your memory stronger. You do so by using it intensively. Set something down and see how long you can remember it is there. Practice remembering to go grab stuff around your house. It’s little activities like this which actually make our memories better.  You can actually do neuroplasticity on yourself by working on your memory. Cool right? Mr. Tomasio talks about it as a way to kill a part of who you are. Does that part still not exist somewhere deep down? I just feel like neuroplasticity doesn’t occur for the sake of characteristics. Even if it does it wouldn’t get rid of the fact that they exist. [I think he's] talking more about willpower and choosing to not let certain parts of yourself out.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Audiobook verison of the game at hand) ********************************* The major aspects of philosophy that can be found in Silent Hill 2 include metaphysics, ethics, and existentialism. A popular survival horror video game released in 2001, offers a rich and deeply philosophical experience that delves into various existential and psychological themes. As with any form of art, interpretations may vary, but here are some common philosophical views that players and critics have discussed in relation to Silent Hill 2: Existentialism and Identity Existentialism is centered on the individual's quest for meaning and purpose in an otherwise seemingly absurd and indifferent world. James's journey to Silent Hill can be seen as an embodiment of this search. He is driven by an overwhelming desire to understand the contents of the letter, which leads him into the depths of his own consciousness, seeking answers and validation for his actions and emotions. Existentialism emphasizes the importance of authenticity, being true to oneself, and taking responsibility for one's actions. James's experiences in Silent Hill force him to confront his actions, whether they are absolute or subjective. Moral Ambiguity and Guilt: Silent Hill 2 invites players to question traditional notions of morality and judgment. As they progress through the game, players may find themselves empathizing with James' guilt and conflicted emotions, challenging the idea of absolute right and wrong. Silent Hill 2 often blurs the lines between right and wrong, good and evil. The characters in the game are complex and flawed, and their actions are often driven by guilt and trauma. This ambiguity raises philosophical questions about the nature of morality and whether it is absolute or subjective. The Nature of Reality: Silent Hill 2's exploration of the nature of reality is rooted in the human psyche and the ways in which our experiences, emotions, and memories can shape our perception of the world. It is a game that challenges players to confront their own fears and insecurities while offering a unique and thought-provoking narrative experience. The town of Silent Hill itself is a manifestation of the characters' subconscious and desires. This surreal and nightmarish setting raises questions about the nature of reality, the mind's ability to construct its own reality, and the blurred boundaries between dream and waking life. Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious: Silent Hill 2 incorporates elements of psychoanalysis and explores the concept of the unconscious mind throughout its narrative. Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theories heavily influence the game's themes, character motivations, and symbolic representations. Here's how psychoanalysis and the unconscious play a significant role in Silent Hill: At the heart of Silent Hill 2's narrative is the theme of repressed memories and guilt. James Sunderland, the protagonist, struggles with repressed memories of his wife, Mary, and the guilt he feels over her death. The town of Silent Hill becomes a manifestation of his unconscious mind, creating a world where he must confront his suppressed emotions and face the truth he has been avoiding. The creatures and environments in Silent Hill 2 are symbolic representations of James' inner turmoil. For example, the Pyramid Head monster embodies James' guilt and self-punishment for his actions. The game uses these symbolic representations to externalize James' internal conflicts and desires, making the unconscious manifest in the physical world. The Otherworld, the nightmarish and twisted version of Silent Hill, can be seen as a representation of the unconscious mind breaking through into reality. It is a place where James' suppressed emotions and memories become manifest in terrifying and distorted forms. However, Silent Hill 2's use of psychoanalytic themes and the exploration of the unconscious mind add depth and complexity to its narrative. It delves into the inner workings of the human psyche and challenges players to confront the darker aspects of their own minds. Silent Hill 2 contains many symbolic and psychological elements that invite psychoanalytical interpretations. The game's monsters, environments, and puzzles can be seen as representations of the characters' repressed fears, desires, and traumas, inviting players to delve into the depths of the unconscious mind. Notably; Silent Hill 2 holds significant gip on philosophy for several reasons: Exploration of Complex Themes: The game delves into profound philosophical themes, such as existentialism, psychoanalysis, and moral ambiguity, providing players with an interactive experience that encourages introspection. By immersing players in the protagonist's psychological journey, it challenges them to grapple with questions about human nature, guilt, identity, and the meaning of existence. Psychological Realism: Silent Hill 2 portrays the human psyche in a raw and realistic manner, confronting players with the dark and unsettling aspects of the mind. It brings to the forefront the complexities of human emotions, traumas, and desires, offering a unique medium through which players can explore the intricacies of the unconscious and its impact on behavior and perception. Blurring the Line Between Reality and Illusion: The game blurs the boundaries between reality and illusion, making players question the nature of truth and the reliability of their own perceptions. This aspect reflects philosophical discussions about the nature of reality, subjective experience, and the limitations of human consciousness. Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Choices: Silent Hill 2 presents players with moral dilemmas and forces them to make difficult choices that affect the outcome of the story. By engaging players in morally ambiguous situations, the game encourages them to contemplate the nature of morality and the consequences of their actions, echoing ethical debates in philosophy. In all, Silent Hill 2 is not just a video game, but also an embodiment of psychology and philosophy. It is, perhaps, one of the deepest games in gaming history, in terms of these two departments.

Many people see life as something to be desired, something that's there to be enjoyed. I find no joy in life. In fact, I haven't found joy in it for about a decade. For me, life isn't to be desired. Life is to be done. Completed. Accomplished. Fulfilled. Done through hard work. Because work builds people, benefits others, and helps successors obtain a better future than that of their predecessors/ancestors. It's the only reason I still choose to live. Because for me, life is just a task to be carried out. Nothing more. A job that put me where I am today. I am not loved. I am rarely shown affection. I [September 2023: no longer am, fortunately] a prisoner of my own physical disability. Why would I live life voluntarily? I instead force myself to live. Perhaps, only when I will be shown affection regularly, will I see a desire to live, and not just force myself to live. I've had enough with just showing love without receiving it. The pain, the trauma. All have been haunting me for about 10-20 years. They hurt me in accordance. I yearn for the day when my task in this reality will finally come to an end. However, I refuse to hasten it. I want the resignation from life to come naturally. And only naturally. Hopefully then, I will cease the agony and the trauma. Only then might I, at last, be free of both. Hopefully. I take great solace in the notion that we are not immortals. That I, too, will rest eternally in peace. No work, no fatigue. No thought and no emotion. Only eternal silence. Until my mortal contract is done, I will leave myself no choice, but to live. And to me, living means work. I don't know how to get love. How to get affection. I don't know how to release all the trauma from my body. A decade of therapy failed to heal me. I don't even know for sure why I've been keeping people away from me. That also includes my cat. I've been keeping a lot of people away by simply existing. Is it... vibrational energy? My verdict of being? Either way, I see little reason to expect any degree of affection from anyone, instead resorting to be a relentless altruist. I only know that there is work to be done. Work that I designate it to be such. And that I must work in order to justify my existence. Perhaps, only then, will I be loved. If not by a lady, then by my successors. Love/affection are the nectars of life. They can make one feel truly alive. Beyond that, I feel... usually nothing. Silence from within. Like at a graveyard at night. But I will live either way, by consent. I only felt alive very rarely. When a certain someone actually showed me love once. I was the happiest since a whole decade. Yes, it will all be over one day. I no longer find dread in it. In mortality. In the eternity fallacy. Only a sense of relief. Because to be fired is to be relieved from one's duties. And like with a work shift, I just want to get this over with. So I would be able to return. Beyond love, I want nothing more, nothing less other than my purpose as a worker and a leader. I only live for that. Join my empire, and it will only grow. It's what I live for, too, as it also revolves around work -- work that I buy. New land, new territory for my growing rule of my article empire. It’s about writing or helping the the site, of course. And if you want positive content here (such as this one) then volunteer. I assure you, your work will be well-preserved for at least a century, by my successors. And unlike social media platform, I don't take down content so easily. I treat it with care. Unless I will feel alive once again, I will live by consent and not by desire. Perhaps only love will give me another reason to live. A reason to desire life, too. Until then, do not stand in my way. For it is unwise to do so with depressed people. Be wiser. Be better. Some of us can be quite unhinged if meddled with. None of us want that. When you have no love from this world, you instead seek respect as a substitute. Religious people may claim that we all came here for a purpose. That we are here for a "tikkun". And that it is the choice of a divine power, whether one is to live or to die. I am merely filling my part, and nothing more. My agnostic-driven secularism does not matter in this. Seeing life as a task has the power to give you purpose, and purposefulness, often found in philosophy, can lead to hope. Have purpose, and life can be endured far better. Those who can't live without meaning, need hope. Hail Philosocom.

(Note: From now on, every article with a title that has no author name in it, is written by me, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein) (Philosocom's Money Directory) (Background music) ********************* Why We Form Nations People establish nations for many reasons, whether or not these nations are recognized by others, or left unrecognized (AKA, micronations). The U.S was founded in the name of human liberty and rights. The Soviet Union existed to practice Karl Marx's communist philosophy. Israel was partly formed because of anti-semetic persecution, and so on. Nations are not founded in a vaccum. The choice to create and develop a nation is backed up by some kind of rationale. Thomas Hobbes suggested a universal rationale, called the social contract theory. The social contract says this: In order to survive, we must exchange our individual freedoms and our independence. As such, Hobbes was an absolute monarchist who supported the British monarch in his time, several centuries ago. Shared Identity, Social Contracts, and the Rubinshteinic Rationale Allow me to propose a Rubinshteinic (I.E, my own brand of) universal rationale for the establishment and preservation of nations: Nations exist also to serve the functionally of business and commerce. They are, in a sense, corporations. And no nation can survive without funds. By developing the financial aspect of the nation, it can allow many other aspects of its management and support. From within and from outside its territory. Why? Because money is the lifestream of any business, just like with nations. For money allows us not only to survive, but have far more possibilities in life. Hence why money is also a form of power. It is, perhaps, the reason as to why almost all nations are currently capitalist. Because prosperity allows them to elevate beyond survival, and focus on other tasks at hand. Tasks that do not have to solely be defined as mere luxury. Funds are "energy" to the state, like food is energy for the organism. Because my mistake over the years was to ignore the third functionality of money. It is not only used for either necessity or unecessity. But also, for benefit. And benefit can be of ourselves, of others, or both. Even when it is for our own benefit or for the benefit of others, it can also be for the harm of others. It does not have to contradict when, for example, you supply aid for a tyrannical country. Because when you provide benefit to that country, you also add to the misery of those it oppresses. And adding suffering to this world intentionally, is a form of evil. I suppose there isn't much of a need to be this naive on that matter, correct? The matter of hope. Of a better future. Of world peace. Ultimately, the nation is a business. And when its revenue is all good and well, why would its leader/s wish to risk it? After all, war is also a profitable business. Selling weapons and military technology, is profitable. Even state-funded criminal empires, are profitable. Profit... is not only for the greedy. And not only for survival, either. It is also to actualize your hopes and dreams. It is also to build a better future for your children or successors. When you seek profit purely or mostly for luxury and unecessities, then consider the idea that you might be greedy. The same goes for politicians. Some people, politicians included, cannot afford not being rich. Why? Because some people have plenty things they need to afford. Even if you want to donate to charity, you need to afford the money first. When you are a state leader, you need to work on your own, personal finaces as well, if you want to afford things yourself, without relying too much on the state and its many taxpayers. Overly rely on the state, as its leader, and you'll have to raise taxes. Raise taxes to draconian rates, and you can displease your voters. This, return, can harm your continutation in office. Even if you are to run for it after your term has ended. Politics are also a matter of survival. Social survival, of course. Because even as dictator, disapproval from the people could lead to treachery, and treachery could kill you. The tyrant may want to be rich in order to survive through the means of corruption. Like paying bribes to keep certain officials in line. Like participating in illegal trades to ensure a nuclear program (Like with North Korea). And the list may go on and on. When it comes to money, you may need to put, sometimes, your own morality aside. Hence why evil may indeed exist in capitalism. Because there are some acts that are more profitable than others, despite their moral nature. And being able to provide and to generate profit, can ensure your relevancy in this social and political world. Even if you're not a politican or even a public figure like me. Your relevancy to others may also be measured by the profit you can generate for your household. Whether a man or woman, does not have to matter. Because no one really likes freeloaders that are able to generate profit. The Philosocom Vision Knowing the importance of money in relation to relevancy, I stopped using Philosocom as a volunteering service... By building an infrastructure that has the potential to sustain itself for centuries, along with content preservation, I can give you a promise social media does not. For anything on social media, that you post there, can be deleted. Philosocom is made for longevity for both my and your content. Join my growing empire, and you can contribute to a good cause that will preserve your content for generations in potential. And unlike in a country, I intend Philosocom to be read for free, no paywalls. Taxes are paywalls because you need to pay them in order to have access to life within civilization. I will demand no such "taxes" from any of my readers. And there is no shame in wealth that is gained legitimately. Remember: This wealth can be used to serve others, too. Family, employees... citizenry. We can use that power for good. Especially to those who need it more than us. And a country that does it, is most definately a good one, morally. Philosocom aspires to be a different kind of "nation" – one built on the power of ideas, not on taxes. Here, everyone has free access to knowledge and discussion. As wisdom deserves to be accessible to all. After all, wisdom is the key to freedom. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback: A government must be run like a business. It is the reason why governments survive. It is through taxation, seen on goods and services, that governments obtain money to operate. It’s been many years, I believe, since a more capitalistic approach was taken and a government enforced a stipend to all residents which stated that they must pay x amount of money to the government. Nowadays, in America at least, it is seen that you get charged x amount of money depending upon the activity which you are undertaking. Luxury tax might be a good example of this. But more or less, the government must operate in that way in some capacity in order for them to continue to serve the people’s interests. Aren’t all governments, democratic, formed out of public opinion? They start because enough people want them to form in the way that they do. Monarchs are another kind of example. Citizens giving up certain rights in exchange for a government which is backed by someone else’s wealth and not the state’s itself. A monarch will remain in power as long as they possesses the wealth to securely finance the government if necessary. I’m referring to this as buying power at its core. You can buy enough people's support that others will just blindly follow you out of herd mentality. You can’t expect to maintain all your freedoms without giving up a little in return. Financially paying through taxes so that the government can operate and allow you to keep your freedoms, in a democratic state. I don’t understand the ins and outs of military, not saying I never will only that I currently don’t. I still understand enough that they protect us so I’m fully ok with contributing my part to it. Plus, not to mention: More cash in flow equals lower taxes. In this case it switches from quality to quantity. More transactions equal more taxes which equals more money for the government: Capitalism at its core. Most people aren’t even aware of these taxes because the corporations cover the cost and add it to the price.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: Understanding this article I recieved, I realized I am not asexual) ******************* Sexual Transmutation produces a conversion of sex into something else. Sexual energy is said to be related not only to sexuality, fertility and reproduction, but also to setting healthy boundaries. Willpower, motivation and creativity. Making money. Feelings that we deserve to enjoy. Whether it's about money, sports, work, career advancement, or empowerment of any kind. The aspiration of being a true, authentic self is necessary for this energy to develop properly. Our selves have been developing since childhood. We are active to obtain money, power, strength, hobbies; All this requires energy and persistence that is associated with such vital energy. How to set boundaries? What does my body represent? Such questions are of sexuality, but also of other fields on our existence. Arguably, it all boils down to the libido. Even in having children, there is also an ambition to provide for them, so you need money, a job. What do you want to learn? And how do you develop your professional direction? What do I start with? Is there anything for me in savings to start my life and achieve something? What is my expectation of myself as a person or as a breadwinner? The world operates according to actions. Actions are done by energy. Creating money, creating children, creating an understanding of life. Mainly setting boundaries of what one's boundary is with myself or with others. All this comes from the channeling of sexual energy for livelihood, relationship, family, career, the pleasures of life, some of which are of course orgasms even if alone. Excursions. Planning for trips. Planning things in general. Each person produces energy in his body that this energy is spent on resources. To keep the energy flowing, and to channel it for a living, as well, is very important. And for our relationships and for the children. We must prioritize each topic we have chosen. How much and to whom to give this important energy. We also have to, learn to hold this energy for the purposes of self-improvement, career development, prioritization, planning, increased mood and give it to a place that is really relevant. That is why it is also important to have restraint. We have to hold this attraction and sensitivity thing in favor of our success. Something that will make us more motivated even afterwards. And to spiritual understanding. Sexual energy is limited and depends on biological age, hormonal changes, health status and so on. But it can be helped to become more efficient for our benefit. We must understand that sexual energy is limited. We shouldn't waste it limitlessly. We have to set limits for ourselves as well. and make us priorities and time for everything. We must understand that this energy can be depleted immediately after an orgasm or a certain excitement and then it can be lost. We must know and understand to suspend it, whether not to reach sexual emission (in men) or whether to save it for other actions and things. To convert this energy, you can use Indian mantras, tantra ceremonies where you can dance naked to the sounds of music. Without judging our bodies. Understand like children that our body is our sexual energy can be strengthened and preserved by starving sexuality. For 7 days, to decide that even if there is a desire, do and channel it into better directions. It is possible to do guided imagery and feel sexual pleasure in our body without reaching the thrill of orgasm. but still feel wanted. You can dance without judgment and move your body however you want. Courage, strength and power can be imagined. Increase in sexual energy, sexual levitation without intimate touching. A person should ask himself what is his passion? What will do him good financially? What will make him happy? Measure his actions... and the time he invests in it. Some channel this by balancing the sex chakra which is 3 centimeters below the navel. There are meditations that refer to this chakra. There are people who for a certain period of time are not with a partner and invest more in their career, wanting to achieve financial success. This is also a conversion of the sexual energy. The more we know how to allow the sexual energy a greater place, the more we will channel it in our direction according to our desires. Feelings that come from sexuality are also real feelings, alternations of desire. And this is also a real energy that flows through us. To raise this energy we must think about ourselves and focus on our breathing. Deep breaths. Showers with ice or cold water also help us. Suspend this energy in the directions we wanted. After a few months of conversion of sexuality to other direction and goals, the thinking changes accordingly. We do not need approvals from the environment. And we can be and feel authentic. Capable. Motivated. And carry a strong willpower. This is how we will achieve self-acceptance and compassion for ourselves more and more: We can feel good even if we are alone at home or at all. A higher self-worth and self-image is built. We can live in the here and now. And enjoy the love life that we really want. With excellence. Use this tool and feed it all the time. Like a brain that works all the time. We must use it wisely. For positive purposes, for others. And also for ourselves. Never underestimate it, as long as you have it.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) Summary by Mr. Bright Joseph The article begins by emphasizing the importance of phrases like "I'm sorry," "Please," and "Thank you" in human relationships. It delves into the reluctance people often have in apologizing and the significance of genuine apologies in healing relationships. The author also discusses the importance of politeness and appreciation in communication, highlighting how neglecting these aspects can harm relationships. Moving on, the article explores the concept of friendship, distinguishing between mere friendliness and genuine friendship. It emphasizes the value of cultivating true friendships based on shared interests, goals, and mutual respect. The author stresses the investment required in nurturing friendships and warns against exploiting or taking advantage of friends. Next, the article delves into the depth of true love, portraying it as a powerful force that transcends individual interests. It discusses the complexities of love, including its capacity for both joy and sorrow, and emphasizes the importance of giving and receiving love unconditionally. The author then transitions to discussing strategies for navigating human relationships, including the need to be discerning and sometimes deceptive in dealing with deceptive individuals. This section encourages readers to be mindful of their own behavior and to recognize when to assert themselves in relationships. The article concludes by cautioning against the politicization of every aspect of life, urging readers to prioritize ethical behavior and long-term consequences over short-term gains, particularly in the realm of politics. "Social engineering is a discipline in social science that refers to efforts to influence popular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments or private groups." -- (Source) (Background music) *************************************** The Efficancy of "I'm sorry", "Please" and "Thank you" in Human relationship The words of the first headline of this article are socio-communication lubricants. Without them, social communication would not only be difficult, it would probably be impossible. They are the salt and pepper of our daily interactions. No day passes without our using at least two of them. Experience shows that they are the most difficult sentences to make, despite the fact that they are the shortest sentences available in our daily conversations. Among these three sentences, "I'm sorry" is the most difficult. Cocky-eyed and pompous humanity does not like to apologize. Humanity prefers to brace up and, with a stern face, behave as if all is well. Meanwhile, our relationships are decaying! A lot of people think that it is not necessary to apologize, particularly to a younger person or a person of lower relevance. A big boss in the office wrongly accuses a messenger for doing something that the latter did not do. Later, it is established that the messenger did not do that, and instead of the "big boss" saying "I'm sorry" to the messenger, he sets his face in a stern expression and pretends as if nothing has happened. But this is wickedness! Mr. Big Boss thinks that his "bigness" would be in doubt if he apologizes. But unknown to him, he is building up his public relations. Respect is earned, it is not something you enforce or legislate upon. My younger brother once annoyed me a few years ago. I wanted to beat him, but he ran away. So, I pursued him. As I did, he ran to a family I respected a lot. I was not deterred. I threw the belt I had. The iron buckle struck the woman. I refused to apologize. All the occupants in the block of flats came out and engaged me in an abusive duel. When I was tired, I left them. They abused the hell out of me. When I got home, I felt terrible. Later in the evening, I took a shower, rubbed a good cream, changed my clothes, and went and knocked on the woman's door. When I entered, I knelt down and apologized. She said (and I will never forget those words): "You're the smartest boy I have ever met. I have been wondering what I will think of you next time I see you." It was such a healing experience for me. When I left her flat, I felt as if I had won a million-dollar jackpot. However, there is a group of people who say "I'm sorry" with reckless abandon. They say that they are sorry only to go back and do the same wrong again. As far as they're concerned, all they need do is say "sorry" and all will be fine. This is a mocking attempt at healing a relationship. "Please" is the next in the difficulty hierarchy. For some people, saying "please" is beggarly, so they'd rather bulldoze their way and get what they want. "Please" neither comes before their demand nor does "thank you" precede it. And even when you point that out to them, saying "I'm sorry" becomes even much more of a Herculean task! Some people say, "Why should I beg him? Is he the one feeding me?" "Please" when it is said with a sincere heart is not a beggarly expression. It is an appeal, it is a recognition of the fact that the person you're talking to can help you if your case can touch his heart. "Please" also means that you're not taking the person for granted. A lot of people do not know that the closer you come to people, the more careful you should be while dealing with them. But, unfortunately, when such closeness is established, "please," "thank you," and even "I'm sorry" begins to disappear from the interaction. And it is really very unfortunate. For me, the closer I get to people, the more delicate I am in dealing with them. I can play around a lot, but when anyone takes my "lowly play" for granted, it gnaws at my liver. And I think it does the same to many. A managing director who says to his secretary, "Could you please get me the file?" is more likely to get appreciated and respected by not just the latter but all the other people in the office. That would be much better than if he had barked, "Get me the file!" After all, the MD's saying "please" does not reduce his status. It rather enhances it. How many times have we remembered to say "thank you" to our wives for cooking a good meal or even any meal at all? Or is it the woman who is condemned to saying "thanks sir" because "it's a man's world"? Appreciation is fast disappearing from our daily conversations and relationships. It is a jet-age world where people are so much in a hurry to appreciate themselves. But a dangerous dimension has been added to our mentality. And that is where people are always expecting material, especially financial, "thank yous." That is why many people, even on their birthdays or other celebrations, do not regard greeting cards as important anymore. The result is that many people who would have come to felicitate with us stay away because they can afford "only cards" and no other things to give. There is also a hypocritical dimension that has existed for too long in the thanksgiving realm. Some people, in fact many of us, say "don't mention" (whatever that means -- since the person has already said it) when people tell them "thank you" for doing something good for them! Yet, if the person does not thank them, they'd be the first to tell everyone who cares to listen: "That guy is an ungrateful wretch; imagine after going through all these troubles, he could not even thank me!" “I’m” and “thank you” are little statements that matter a great deal. They diffuse tensions, make our communication free-flowing, and many a time, cool our rising tempers. My local adage says, “Please does not contain salt or spice, but it cools the heart.” And the Holy Writ says, “A soft answer turns away wrath.” The circumstances and conditions under which our interactions take place are usually crucial, and our ability to keep a cool head when there is tension is usually considered a sign of maturity. The way we treat other people is a crucial factor in our lives. There is a need for us to recognize that we are not humans while others are animals or pieces of wood! Apologies, appeals, and appreciations, when interjected into our daily dealings, help to heal hurting hearts and serve our solution-seeking souls. The Concept of Friendship FRIENDSHIP is the costliest merchandise in the social market! You cannot pick up friendship on the streets and in the markets the way you pick up s*x on the byways. Everyone says, "he is my friend," "oh that friend of mine," bla bla! But on a closer look, you'd discover that those people are not friends because they're not known. I say, Someone meets someone once in a bank and then the next time he would be talking to some other person, he'd say "ah, I have a friend in that bank." "Friend"? Ha! Are you sure? Haven't you forgotten his/her name? Yet you call him/her your friend? Being friendly does not mean you are friends. However, it is a good way to start. The Bible says that a man who has friends must show himself friendly (Proverbs 18:24). Those who do not have friends cannot be friendly; it is practically impossible. People do not have to seek or search for friends. You just find one. Any friendship that is sought for has an ulterior motive. Friendship develops independently when it is cultivated. It merges from a convergence of same interests, same hobbies, same purposes/goals, and same routine, sometimes same persons. Friendship is also the highest degree of relationship we can cultivate. It is cultivated and nurtured, watered and watched (carefully) as it grows to full maturity. Some do not want to invest anything in friendship, yet they want to reap its dividends. You will be charged for stealing if you do that. But why is friendship the highest and costliest relationship that we can cultivate? It is because you become someone's friend by choice. No one ever forces friendship on you. Every other relationship has some degree of arbitrariness about it: father-son, brother-sister, cousin-cousin, mother-daughter, daughter/son, employer-employee, even husband-wife and (pitifully) creator-creature! You don't choose your father. You just wake up one growing-up-morning, one knowledge-morning, and find someone whom you're told to call "daddy". You didn't choose him! You also discover that as a man if you get to 40 and you don't have a wife, society would slam you with the tag of persona non grata. So, under pressure, you find someone you keep in your house and then call her "wife" even if you have five others outside! Then, following some acrobatic display in the night seasons, she delivers, after nine months, one tiny creature; and for perhaps the third time in your life you're called into a relationship you didn't choose -- you now have a "son" or "daughter" -- whether ugly or fine! The most pathetic relationship is, perhaps, that of creator-creature! You have been created by God. So, you have got no choice! You must follow Him! Even if he is going into a ditch! You're told not to worry, that He created the ditch also! But some people rebel! They want to worship the sun, the moon and stars. They want to serve stones and deadwoods! But sweetheart, can't you see that you don't have any choice in this matter? You're a mere creature who didn't choose your Creator. So, the earlier you start becoming friendly with this your Creator, this your father, this your wife or that your son, the better you would live through life smoother than you're doing now! Try and see. For when you have a wife that is your friend as well, it is sweet; or a father with whom you can discuss anything, just about anything! For some people, their spouses are simply strangers to them. So, they are just mere "acquaintances". Acquaintanceship is only but seed of friendship, and a planted seed for that! Acquaintanceship must need grow into friendship or it would be of no use. Friendship is higher than any other relationship because it is the product of freedom, it is a deliberate choice. That is why Holy Writ says that there is a friend that sticks closer than a brother! (Proverbs 27:6). This is why your brother has to be your friend so that there can be a flow of virtue, the virtue of friendship. Friendship is costly because to be a good friend, you must give your resources, your ego, your time and sometimes (without intending to) your life! I once had a friend who suddenly turned against me for something she could not tell me. But she was to go for surgery at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) and needed three pints of blood! And even though she was not talking to me then, I followed her sheepishly to LUTH and donated my blood pint to her as well. It was hard on my ego, but I had to push ego aside to pay a friend. I felt she was just going through pains and needed to be in her own world, a world of silence, for a while. Indeed, friendship is the ability to speak to yourselves, sometimes in silence! Mencius once said, "Friendship is one mind in two bodies." And although I later lost this friend of mine three years after (a fall out from the sickness), I was glad that I kept faith and tried to make her live again! She never forgot me after her hospital ordeal! James F. Byrnes once said that "Friendship without self-interest is one of the most beautiful things in life." A lot of people use people and call them friends. How can you have a friend for whom you cannot inconvenience yourself a little? Cheap friendship won't last long. Sooner or later, it will fold up like a mat. A friend is someone you would welcome to your house at 1 AM with a smile -- because he or she needed help. He or she saw other doors but could knock on yours because he or she doesn't have to. Something made him or her choose your door! What was it? For the sake of a friend, you can open your mind and ears, and receive everything; take the useful seeds of that "everything", and with a touch of kindness and gentleness, blow the chaff away! That's friendship! How much does that friendship cost you? Have you been using that person you call a "friend"? What do you know about him or her? These questions would be standard measurements for your friendship. Answer them sincerely. The Depth of True Love Is the human heart the oval-shaped pumping machine that is barricaded by the ribs in the chest region? Or is it something esoteric that dwells both within our members and controls the outside experience, which we call action? These questions are crucial. That's because unless we understand that there is a link between our biological heart and the other that leaps for joy when we feel happy or breaks down when we feel betrayed, we will not fully understand what this thing and person called heart is. Indeed, the biological heart is a thing, but the one that lurks around our entire being is a person. Religious people sometimes call it the "spirit," but I prefer "heart" because it is more graspable by secular humanity. The heart is the greatest gift the human being has. The physical human heart works for an entire lifetime. If the body would live 100 years, it works for 100 years also. And when it breaks down, life ceases, and death comes. But a man is his heart. The heart is the center of activity. It is that which talks when the mouth is shut. The heart talks to the eyes, the ears, the nose, and reacts to feelings. I have found out that the emotional activities of the heart automatically affect the physical heart. The heart revolts, and the man begins to feel as if the heart would drop into his stomach from the chest. Oftentimes, this emotional disposition weakens the entire organs of the body, and even the legs do not seem to be able to carry the body anymore. Sometimes it feels as if the legs don't have any bones anymore. They begin to wobble. Take the human heart away, and the words love, passion, religion, courage, sympathy, feeling, compassion, pity, and emotion would become meaningless. But by far the greatest problem that man has with his heart, a delusion of some sort, is that he thinks that he can control it. It was the French social contract theorist, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who once said, "Nothing is less in our power than the heart, and far from commanding we are forced to obey it." The heart leads, the person follows, almost mechanically. Since it appears that man has no control over what the heart would do, how and when it would do it, what then can he do? Well, man can and should guard his "heart with all diligence, for out of it flows the issue of life." If we can't control what the heart does, we can at least control what data the heart feeds on. We can barricade, cordon off, protect, or defend what enters the heart. For once these things enter there, it becomes only a matter of time before "out of the abundance of that heart, the mouth speaks," the eyes roll, the ears hear, and the body generally reacts. The inability to guard the human heart has tended to make it acquire the propensity to be "desperately wicked." No wonder the Holy Book, in reference to the human heart, asks a million-naira question, "who can know it?" It appears that only the person "carrying" his heart can know it. And, of course, the Creator who both made man and his heart. Or was it not in his heart that Adolf Hitler conceived the chain of events that resulted in the extermination of close to six million Jews? Was it not in his heart that Osama bin Laden conceived and nurtured the terror that was unleashed on the United States of America on September 11? Is it not in his heart that a man would harbor the idea of sneaking into his neighbor's house and commit adultery? Is it not in his heart that a university professor would conceive that it is better to abuse his authority with his 20-year-old female student, in order to allow her pass his course? The heart is a mystery, but it is also a gift. It is the source of our greatest joys and our deepest sorrows. It is the engine that drives our lives. We must learn to guard it well. The heart is where ambition is conceived and nurtured to grow, before they come to fruition. But the heart, like democracy, is a nebulous concept if left without any qualifying adjectives. The heart can be soft, compassionate, hard, caring, gentle, tender, shallow, wicked, merciful, or loving. We remember that democracy is either majoritarian, liberal, consensual, social, or representative. Do you remember that former Nigerian leader, Sani Abacha added his own adjectives and we ended with what was to become "Home Grown Democracy"? Please, forgive me for digressing. But I want to say that the greatest legacy bequeathed to man by his heart is the ability, the capacity, the capability to love. And this is where folks with fragile, glass-like hearts have suffered the most. Their fellow human beings toy with their emotions, break their hearts, and move on as if nothing has happened. Such hearts would bleed and heal, but the scars are there as reminders that they have suffered before. When this happens, the person is forced to retreat to lonely, solitary confinement. It is difficult to impress such hearts. However, sooner or later, because, "Love gives itself, it is not bought" (Henry Wadsworth Longfellow). The person would reach out again. For to give love is to keep it. A truly loving heart would rather suffer the loss of love than bear the burden of hoarding it. But the truth is, love can never be lost; it is not love until it is given. That is the only place where loss becomes gain. When it is said that "love is blind," it does not express the inability to see. It rather expresses the refusal to see anything other than what would delight love. For love is not irrational, but infatuation and lust are. However, when love is not appreciated, when it is not reciprocated, it can be the most traumatic experiences the heart can go through. At such a point, the lover becomes an emotional wreck and, like a tinderbox, anything can detonate it. A heart that can still love in the face of such situations. A heart that can have love for the unlovable, is the heart that humanity desires, even if it does not deserve it. Anyone can love someone who is cute, nice, intelligent, easy-going, and rich. But it takes a man with a heart of gold to love the destitute, the poor, and the unqualified folks at the ghetto part of town. However, it takes much more than a "heart of gold" to love in the face of rejection, hostility, or indifference. It takes someone who knows the "God of love" (not the god that leads people to commit fornication and adultery on February 14 every year in the name of "Lovers Day") to love a hurting, aching, and unlovable humanity. A heart of gold is a good place to start, but a "heart for God" is the ultimate principle that can lead to a true love for men. Love is more powerful than an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), a nuclear-powered submarine, or all the petrodollars in the world. The blood from a bleeding heart is seed for more love. And as Alfred Lord Tennyson once said: "it is better to have loved and lost, than not to have loved at all." However, though a lover may lose, love never loses. Know When to be Smart Recently, I have come to realize that people are easily deceived, lied to, and manipulated. This is why I always recommend that you have a mind of your own. Some humans are very treacherous by nature, and they will often get in your way, trigger you, torture you, and cause you pain. Our task is to outmaneuver them in their games. We can do this by subtly planning several moves ahead, lying when it is necessary, and recognizing when it is time to be bad. We cannot be good all the time, as people will take advantage of us. We also need to know when to say no. We should make our face like that of an actor who plays a different role. We should play with our appearance and master the art of deception. Doing all of this when it is necessary will always keep us one step ahead of our enemies. If we do not do this, and we try to play innocent or holy all the time, the gods of power might frown on us and ignore us when others play a power game on us or take advantage of us. I always know when to be bad. Human or Inhuman? What makes us human? We have two eyes, like most mammals. We have four limbs, just like them. We have teeth, intestines, hair, senses, and we need to eat. Basically, most animals are the same. We have DNA, and they do too. If we take non-living things, minerals don't have DNA, but they do have a specific composition. We can find them unique in the periodic table. So, if we compare the composition of any mineral to our DNA, we can probably say that there are some differences, but basically, each mineral is like living creatures, they do have differences. Essentially, we have to narrow down to our minds, our intelligence, our creativity, and our innovation. Our ability to change the environment is what makes us human. That includes other people. And that can include humanity at large. A Basic Fact about Relationships One secret to a successful relationship is to genuinely accept that you are also difficult to date. You have issues too. It's natural to think that the problem in your relationship is your partner or your ex. But the only truth that will set you free is that you are also a problem. Accepting this truth will automatically help you maintain a calm and positive posture during moments of misunderstandings. One of the major intractable and perennial problems in every human relationship is that we blame others more than we blame ourselves. We nag and shift blame. We never accept responsibility for anything. Our eyes are often too open to see the faults of others, but always too blind to see our own mistakes or problems. This is too bad! Learn to take some of the blame sometimes. Be verbal about this too. Speak to your partner and assure them that you are also working on yourself to change for the better. Say to your partner, "Babe, I need to remind you that I'm still working on myself. I know I'm not perfect. I know that I can be very selfish sometimes. I know that I can be difficult to be with sometimes. But I promise to continue to work on myself to change this version of me and become better for you. I love you." One way to avoid shifting blame always is to first of all tell yourself, "I'm responsible" anytime things go amiss in your relationship with people. Accept responsibility first, whether you are right or wrong. This will save you from a lot of emotional torture and also save your relationship. The Matrix From the shadows, they have engineered every major war, revolution, and recession. They control what you read, what you hear, and what you see. They have managed to indoctrinate an entire populace to their way of thinking, and have infiltrated key positions in places of authority. It is from the shadows that they have created a new political order, a new economic order, and, most sinisterly, a new religious order. Their ultimate aim is total global domination, and they will stop at nothing to reach their goal! Not Everything is Politics As a youth, if you hear that mothers are gathering somewhere and a politician urges you to go and chase them away, because they are not members of their political party, tell that politician to lead such a movement themselves. Or to send partners, children, or blood brothers to lead such an atrocious movement. Not everything is politics. When you see African women gather, you are seeing women who are often widows, grannies, disabled, nursing mothers, and natural prophetesses. who have the power to curse or bless, sometimes without even knowing it. While we're aware of the fact that some of us have no regard for our mothers, sisters, and womanhood generally, we must be aware of the risks we are taking for politicians today. These risks could lead to a failed future, untimely death, poverty, and penury. If the politician I am working for today chooses atrocity and gross animosity, as a strategy to win an election that with a term limit, I will resign my engagement with them, and start working for my wife and daughter. Once you are alive today, you should worry more about tomorrow. Be careful, some of us are killing our future in the name of helping another man's political interest, ambition, and future. Remember: Your actions and inactions today are your own failure tomorrow. May I not shame my generation in the name of politics.

(French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English version, below) Un amour israélien interdit – Une sage fable d’une dame anonyme (Avertissement : les messages d'invités ne correspondent pas nécessairement aux convictions, aux pensées ou aux opinions du directeur de Philosocom, M. Tomasio Rubinshtein. Le but des messages d'invités est de permettre un large éventail de récits émanant d'un large éventail de personnes. Pour postuler pour un message d'invité, veuillez envoyer votre demande à mrtomasio@philosocom.com) ******************** Je me souviens de son regard. Il m'est apparu et m'est resté. Quand je me levais le matin et quand je m'endormais. Cela a commencé quand j’avais 20 ans. Une fille israélienne née de parents qui l’ont pratiquement abandonnée toute sa vie. J'ai étudié la gestion hôtelière et je suis allé dans un certain kibboutz. Il y a environ 20 ans. Je l'ai regardé. Son corps était musclé, brun, galbé, ses yeux dégageaient un goût de passion. Je suis allé dans sa direction et je l'ai regardé. Son regard rencontra le mien. J'avais l'impression de le connaître depuis au moins 2 incarnations. Tout d’un coup, des images me sont venues à l’esprit. Des images dans mon imagination montrant que nous nous sommes mariés moi avec une robe de mariée et lui en tant que futur marié. Je le voyais tout le temps avec moi. Je me tournai vers lui. Nous avons dansé ensemble et il a gagné un concours de danse. J'étais avec un ami quand je l'ai vu. Je l'ai vu comme une personne différente. Différent comme moi. Un type d’autiste de haut niveau ou de personne qui n’est pas gêné par les conventions. J'ai vu son sourire. Ça avait un goût de moka. Quand j’ai demandé son nom, j’ai moi-même su que c’était un amour divin. Nous avons commencé à danser, nous étions les meilleurs danseurs du club. Nous avons tous les deux un comportement différent. Nous aidons tous les deux les autres. Mais nous sommes trop dépendants mentalement de l’approbation des autres. Je ne savais pas que nous étions comme ça. Dans mon imagination, je croyais enfin être en paix avec lui. La vraie paix. Nous avons commencé à sortir. Il m'a même appris à conduire. Il m'emmenait faire des promenades depuis le tramway. Nous sommes arrivés dans des lieux abandonnés, des maisons abandonnées, des hôtels pour lesquels nous avons payé de l'argent. La première fois que nous nous sommes touchés, c'était après 3 mois de sorties ensemble tous les jours. Nous avions une attirance folle. Nous avons commencé à nous connaître. J'ai marché sur la promenade. La promenade, c'est notre place. Nous avons toujours eu de l'amour, de la compassion et de l'attention. A chaque fois nous ne nous sommes pas penchés sur les enjeux de la relation entre un couple mixte… Les problèmes sont apparus. Les religieux ont commencé à me traiter de traître. "Il va te faire avorter dans son village !" "Il t'apprendra à lui faire du pain pita !" Tous les préjugés et ainsi de suite. Après environ six mois passés à faire connaissance, je l'ai invité chez moi. Et j'ai décidé de lui dire au revoir.... à l'amour de ma vie. L'amour que j'adorais lui donner, et il aimait me le donner aussi.... Mais nous ne pouvions pas lâcher prise. Ainsi, cela a continué pendant encore 5 plus belles années. J'étais au début de la vingtaine et j'avais beaucoup d'énergie. Mon énergie positive et mon amour se sont épanouis pour lui. Et seulement lui. Nous avons commencé à comprendre... que l'amour ne suffit pas. Même si j'étais dans son village et que j'ai vu certaines de ses sœurs, nous avons senti que la religion est ici essentielle. En Israël. La police l'a arrêté à plusieurs reprises parce qu'il conduisait une Subaru noire. Nous nous sentions jugés par les autres. Nous nous sentions différents. Des gens différents, mais des gens qui croyaient en la paix. Différentes personnes qui voulaient vivre en coexistence. ...Nous avons dû rompre. Et il n’y a pas un jour où je ne pense pas à lui et lui à moi. Nous étions un couple de colombes. Le véritable amour de la racine de l'âme. Malheureusement, il n'était pas assez mûr pour faire face aux difficultés de la société et au jugement qu'elle portait sur lui. Il s'est enfui. Pas parce qu'il ne voulait pas de moi. ...Mais parce qu'il pouvait pas supporter cette pensée, que la société ne l'accepterait pas comme normal. Et j'ai attendu et désiré son retour. A cette époque, je suis tombée enceinte. Cependant, ce n'est pas pour cela que je n'ai pas eu de ses nouvelles.... le reste est un sujet pour un autre jour. Il a épousé une autre femme. Il a eu 3 enfants. 2 fils et une fille. Quand j'ai vu leurs photos, cela a été extrêmement difficile pour moi. Mon coeur était brisé. Le sien aussi, mais encore une fois, c'est une histoire pour une autre fois. Mon histoire... exprime un amour véritable et inconditionnel entre un couple mixte. Je l'ai volontairement écrit de manière simple, pour que tout le monde puisse comprendre. J'aimerais savoir ce que vous pensez des couples mixtes? Voici ce que vous pouvez apprendre de mon histoire 1. Chacun interprète selon ses expériences personnelles, sur le plan politique, sexuel, social et de façon régulière. Il s'agit de savoir s'ils en sont conscients ou non. 2. Ouverture : les gens ont peur de la différence et de l'inconnu et il existe également beaucoup de ressentiment à l'égard du passé. Un couple devrait se parler avant de se séparer, même si c'est difficile. Nous méritons de nous assurer que tout a été réglé et oui, réglé avant de continuer dans la vie. 3. Ne pas cacher l'information : il est préférable d'informer chaque partie que la famille est contre notre amour et de se préparer en conséquence à être unie, si jamais c'est possible. Nous devons également être ouverts avec ceux que nous aimons et en qui nous avons confiance. 4. Les actions sont plus éloquentes que les mots – il voulais me voir. Il venait tout le temps. Il était en contact et s'est montré. Ses actions montraient qu’il m’aimait et qu’il m’était fidèle. S'il n'avait pas « suivi » son « discours », il aurait été plus difficile de faire confiance à ses paroles. 5. Soyez attentif, posez des questions, mais ne le faites pas de manière agressive. Prenez des risques lorsque vous êtes ensemble. Car uni, notre amour peut surmonter bien des difficultés et des forces antagonistes. 6. Aimer inconditionnellement n’est excellent que si les 2 parties s’engagent dans une relation et comprennent le sens d’une relation aussi complexe. Il s’agit d’un type de connexion sérieuse qui ne doit pas être prise à la légère. Ne jouez pas avec le cœur d'une fille, quand ce cœur est le vôtre. J'espère diffuser la sagesse de notre amour plus loin dans le monde, en utilisant la gentillesse de M. Tomasio Rubinshtein pour partager mon histoire avec vous sur son blog. ************************* (English, original) (Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Background music) ********************* I remember his look. It popped up and stuck with me. When I got up in the morning and when I went to sleep. It started when I was 20. An Israeli girl born to parents who pretty much abandoned her all her life. I studied hotel management and went out to a certain Kibbutz. About 2 decades ago. I looked at him. His body was muscular, brown, shapely, his eyes exude a taste of passion. I went in his direction, and I looked at him. His gaze met mine. I felt like I knew him at least 2 incarnations back. All of a sudden, images came to my mind. Pictures in my imagination that we are married with a wedding dress and himself as the groom. I saw him all the time with me. I turned to him. We danced together and he won a dance competition. I was with a friend when I saw him. I saw him as a different person. Different like me. A type of high-functioning autistic or person who is unbothered by conventions. I saw his smile. It tasted like mocha. When I asked his name, I myself knew it was love from God. We started dancing, we were the best dancers in the club. We are both different in behavior. We both help others. But we're too mentally dependent on the approval of others. I didn't know we were like that. In my imagination I believed in peace with him at last. True peace. We started going out. He even taught me to drive. He would take me for rides from the tram. We arrived at abandoned places, abandoned houses, hotels that we paid money for. The first time we touched each other was after 3 months of going out together every day. We had a crazy attraction. We started getting to know each other. Walked on the boardwalk. The boardwalk that is our place. We always had love, compassion and care. Each time we did not look at the issues of the relationship between a mixed couple... The problems arose. Religious people started calling me the names of a traitor. "He will give you an abortion in his village!" "He will teach you to bake pita bread for him!" All the prejudices and so on. After about six months of getting to know each other, I invited him to my place. And I asked to say goodbye to him.... to the love of my life. Love that I loved to give him, and he loved to give me too.... But we couldn't just let go. So, continued for another 5 most beautiful years. I was in my early 20s with lots of energy. My positive energy and love blossomed for him. And only him. We began to understand... that love is not enough. Although I was in his village and saw some of his sisters, we felt that religion is critical here. In Israel. The police stopped him more than once because he was driving a black Subaru. We felt judged by others. We felt different. Different people, but people who believed in peace. Different people who wanted to live in co-existence. ...We had to break up. And there wasn't a day that I didn't think about him and him about me. We were a pair of doves. True love from the root of the soul. Unfortunately, he wasn't mature enough to face the hardships of society and its judgment of him. He ran away. Not because he didn't want me. ...But because he could bear the thought, society would not accept him as normal. And I waited and longed for his return. At that time I got pregnant. However, that's not why I didn't hear from him.... the rest is a topic for another day. He married another woman. He had 3 children. 2 sons and a daughter. When I saw their pictures it was extremely difficult for me. My heart was broken. His was as well, but, again that's a story for another time. My story... expresses true, unconditional love between racially-mixed couples. I purposely wrote it a simple way, to allow everyone to understand. I would love to know what you think about mixed couples? Here is what you can learn from my story 1. Each person interprets according to his personal experiences, on a political, sexual, social level, and on a regular basis. That is whether they are aware of it or not. 2. Openness -- people are afraid of the different and unknown and there is a lot of resentment from the past as well. A couple should talk before they break up, even if it's difficult. We deserve to make sure everything has been settled and dealt with, before moving on in life. 3. Failure to hide information -- it is better to inform each party that the family is against our love, and prepare accordingly, to be united, if ever possible. We should also be open with those whom we love and trust. 4. Actions speak louder than words -- he wanted to see me. He came all the time. He was in touch and showed. His actions shown that he loved me and was loyal to me. Had not he "walked" his "talk", it would've been more difficult to trust his words. 5. Pay attention, ask questions, but don't do so aggressively. Take risks when together. Because united, our love can overcome many difficulties and antagonistic forces. 6. Loving unconditionally is excellent only if the 2 parties are committed to a relationship and understand the meaning of such a complex relationship. It is a serious type of connection that does not need to be taken lightly. Do not play with a girl's heart, when that heart is yours. I hope to spread the wisdom of our love further into the world, using Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's kindness to share my story with you on his blog.

(Philosocom's Masculinity Directory) (French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English Below) Le guide Rubinshteinic de la survie mentale La survie en tant qu'être humain n'est jamais exclusivement physique. Je voudrais suggérer que la hiérarchie des besoins de Maslow peut déformer notre perception des besoins humains, même si elle est généralement acceptée. Autrement dit, nos besoins mentaux restent des besoins, même s'ils sont moins exigeants que nos besoins physiques. Si vous minimisez l'importance d'un besoin simplement parce qu'il est plus petit en comparaison, vous risquez de vous faire du mal sans vous en rendre compte. Pourquoi? Parce que beaucoup d'entre nous ont besoin d'être aimés, de se sentir des êtres accomplis et de se réaliser. Si vous minimisez ces besoins mentaux, vous risquez de nuire à vos chances de survie dans ce monde. La hiérarchie de Maslow en est une de priorité, pas d'importance. Cela signifie qu'une fois que vous avez sécurisé vos besoins physiques, vous devez ensuite sécuriser vos besoins mentaux si vous voulez augmenter vos chances de survie ! Ce qui est généralement considéré comme la survie n'en est qu'un aspect : le physique. Même ceux qui sont aisés doivent encore survivre en fonction de leurs besoins. S'ils négligent leurs besoins mentaux, leur état mental peut être endommagé. Pour survivre, il faut aussi maintenir une bonne santé mentale. S'ils ne le font pas, ils pourraient risquer de nombreux dangers, notamment devenir dépressifs. En matière de survie mentale, nous devons comprendre que nos mentalités sont différentes les unes des autres. Nos besoins mentaux peuvent différer selon nos personnalités, nos intérêts et nos objectifs de vie. Par conséquent, afin d'améliorer notre survie mentale, nous devons mieux nous connaître afin de nous empêcher de faire des choses que nous pourrions regretter plus tard, ce qui pourrait diminuer nos chances de survie. La survie est essentiellement ceci : faire tout ce qu'il faut pour éviter une mort prématurée. Bien que nous ne puissions pas complètement éviter la mort prématurée, nous pouvons réduire les risques qu'elle se produise. Après tout, un mauvais état mental peut l'emporter sur notre conformité à notre instinct de survie. Cela peut nous empêcher d'agir en conséquence, ce qui est très imprudent. Comprenez -- Les hommes sont plus susceptibles de mourir plus tôt que les femmes. Bien que les femmes soient plus sujettes aux problèmes de santé mentale que les hommes, le sujet de la santé mentale chez les hommes est de ce fait pris moins au sérieux. On s'attend à ce que nous, les hommes, soyons plus forts et plus résistants même si nous ne le sommes pas. En fait, nous pouvons avoir plus de mal à trouver un soutien émotionnel que les femmes. Par conséquent, nous devons prendre en compte les risques mentaux d'être un homme - et je parle à la fois aux hommes et aux femmes. C'est parce que notre survie mentale, semble-t-il, peut aussi dépendre de notre sexe. Et selon cet article, les personnes autistes sont plus sujettes au suicide que le reste de la population, pour de nombreuses raisons, mentionnées ci-dessous. Donc, si vous êtes un homme et/ou un autiste, pensez que vous pourriez mourir plus tôt et que vous avez donc moins de chances de survivre qu'une femme. Et donc, ne prenez jamais votre santé à la légère, et quand je dis santé, je fais aussi référence à votre façon de voir la vie. Les psychologues peuvent aider, oui, mais rappelez-vous qu'ils sont avant tout des gens qui veulent régler des problèmes. Ce ne sont pas des guérisseurs. J'ai moi-même consulté des psychologues pendant plus d'une décennie. Cela ne m'a pas beaucoup aidé personnellement. Les solutions que j'ai trouvées étaient les miennes, donc je n'aime pas gaspiller mes finances sur des solutions qui pourraient ne pas fonctionner. J'ai l'impression de jouer mon argent et je n'aime pas le jeu. Et je ne vais pas risquer ma vie à cause d'un erreur de perception que j'ai inventée. En tant que personne souffrant d'un trouble anxieux, j'ai utilisé ce stress constant pour mieux survivre et devenir plus fort mentalement. Après tout, l'anxiété peut être considérée comme un mécanisme de survie. Je pensais que je devais travailler vers la sérénité, mais j'ai réalisé à quel point l'anxiété est importante pour ma survie - et celle des autres aussi. Je dois constamment m'inquiéter pour mieux survivre, pour pouvoir faire des choses comme faire des dons à des œuvres caritatives et financer mes écrivains les plus pauvres. Après tout, une personne sans souci dans le monde pourrait être moins disposée à aider non seulement elle-même, mais aussi les autres ! Donc, je ne me soucie plus autant de la sérénité comme auparavant. Il y a des émotions et des sujets plus importants à cultiver, pour moi, au moins, pour survivre. En tant que personne qui a souvent la perception de devoir"fuir ou combattre", j'expérimente vraiment la vie telle qu'elle est : une vie qui a ses limites, qui est incertaine et, qui peut se terminer à tout moment par tous les moyens inimaginables, intentionnels ou non. J'ai utilisé les abus que j'ai subis de la part des autres pour bien comprendre cela. Ne soyez jamais trop insouciant, ou vous pourriez en mourir, ou du moins être traumatisé inutilement. N'ayez jamais une confiance totale en quelqu'un, car il peut endommager votre mental sans le vouloir. N'utilisez jamais le manque d'intention comme excuse. C'est parce que les abuseurs peuvent aussi l'utiliser, tout comme certains l'ont fait envers moi. Par exemple, chaque fois que quelqu'un me crie après, je leur crier après jusqu'à ce qu'ils cessent. Si quelqu'un se moque de moi dans un espace physique, je serai en colère contre lui jusqu'à ce qu'il arrête. Je ne me soucie pas des sentiments de ceux qui se dressent sur mon chemin, parce que mon chemin est le chemin de la survie. Car je ne survis que pour travailler ! Tout le reste a moins d'importance en comparaison ! N'oubliez jamais cela. Ainsi, au lieu d'être victime d'un traumatisme, je cherche à l'utiliser pour devenir plus résilient et réduire les traumatismes inutiles à l'avenir. J'espère simplement le faire jusqu'à ce que je meure de vieillesse. Car ce sera alors, et seulement alors, que je pourrai optimiser mon travail de philosophe. Vous pouvez appliquer la même logique au nom de ce pour quoi vous vivez. Et vous avez besoin d'un bon état mental pour le faire. Car aujourd'hui encore, n'oubliez pas que les forts sont ceux qui dominent les faibles. Le statut social, l'argent, l'influence — ce ne sont que des outils pour sa propre survie par rapport aux autres. Et la domination sociale, même si elle est toxique, est une caractéristique inévitable des animaux socio-politiques que sont les humains. Pourquoi? Parce que la réalité est toxique, et espérer une vie pure de toxicité est un fantasme qui appartient aux ermites physiques. Et jamais aux personnes qui vivent et interagissent régulièrement les uns avec les autres. Et les autres ne vont pas nécessairement se soucier de votre état mental. Même s'ils travaillent à le détériorer, intentionnellement ou non, ils pourraient ne pas se sentir responsables de leurs actes. Que ce soit parce qu'ils sont immatures, illogiques ou carrément psychopathes, incapables de remords (ou capables, mais très peu). Faites tout ce que vous pouvez pour ne pas laisser votre esprit se détériorer au point de décider de vaincre votre instinct de survie. Car la tendance à mettre fin à ses jours peut être trop forte. Et c'est quelque chose qui appartient aux faibles. Et dans ce monde, les forts survivent. Mentalement aussi. Non. Vous devez agir en conséquence. Agissez par instinct. Et à cette fin, je considère la vie comme une version contemporaine d'une jungle sauvage. Alors je vais entretenir ma façon de voir comme elle le mérite. Et je ne laisse personne le faire à ma place. C'est ma responsabilité, en tant qu'adulte. En tant qu'homme. Parce que ma quête de pertinence est la quête de ne pas me tuer. Et c'est pourquoi j'en ai voulu à Chen. Donc je ne mourrai pas mentalement. J'ai tout fait pour lui prouver le contraire. Parce que si elle avait eu raison, si j'étais trop '' non pertinent'', je n'aurais trouvé aucune autre raison d'exister. J'ai donc tué une grande partie de ma sensibilité en conséquence. Devenu plus masculin et ainsi de suite. Tout est fait pour survivre. Et en écrivant cet article, je veux que vous aussi vous surviviez. La philosophie en général peut aider à cette fin. Et je ne m'attends pas à ce que vous soyez d'accord avec moi, ni avec mes méthodes. Je m'attends à ce que vous débattiez de mes idées. Agissez selon cet instinct. N'attendez aucune pitié. Survivez. Ne vous contentez pas de marcher. Courez. ***************************** (English, original) Survival as a human being is never exclusively physical. I would like to suggest that Maslow's hierarchy of needs may distort our perception of human needs, even though it is generally agreed upon. In other words, our mental needs are still needs, even if they are less demanding than our physical needs. If you minimize the importance of a need simply because it is smaller in comparison, you may be harming yourself without realizing it. Why? Because many of us have a need to be loved, to feel accomplished, and to actualize ourselves. If you minimize these mental needs, you may damage your chances of survival in this world. Maslow's hierarchy is one of priority, not importance. This means that once you have secured your physical needs, you should then secure your mental ones if you want to increase your chances of survival! What is generally considered to be survival is just one aspect of it—the physical one. Even those who are well-off still need to survive in accordance with their needs. If they neglect their mental needs, their mental state can be damaged. In order to survive, one must also maintain good mental health. If they do not, they could risk many dangers, most notably giving up on life. When it comes to mental survival, we need to understand that our mentalities are different from one another. Our mental needs may differ depending on our personalities, interests, and life goals. Therefore, in order to improve our mental survival, we must know ourselves better in order to prevent ourselves from doing things that we may regret later on, which could result in our death. Survival is essentially this: Doing whatever it takes to avoid premature death. While we cannot completely avoid premature death, we can reduce the chances of it happening. After all, a poor mental state can override our compliance to our survival instinct. It can make us not act on it, which is very unwise. Understand -- Men are likelier to die earlier than women. Although women are more prone to mental health problems than men, the subject of mental health among men is taken less seriously. We men are expected to be stronger and more resilient even if we are not. In fact, we may struggle more in finding emotional support than women. Therefore, we need to take into account the mental risks of being a man -- and I'm speaking to both men and women. That's because our mental survival, so it seems, may depend on our gender as well. And according to this article, autistic people are more prone to suicidie than the rest of the population, due to numerous reasons, mentioned within. So, if you are a man, and/or autistic, entertain the thought that you might die earlier, and thus, are less likely to survive than a woman. And so, never take your health lightly, and when i say health, I also refer to your mentality, as well. Psychologists can help, yes, but remember that they are first and foremost, problem solvers. They are not healers. I myself went to psychologists for over a decade. It didn't help much personally. The solutions I found were my own, so I am not fond on wasting my finances on solutions that might not work. It feels like gambling my money away, and I dislike gambling. And I'm not going to gamble my life away due to a fallacy I devised. As someone who suffers from an anxiety disorder, I utilized this constant stress to better survive and become mentally tougher. After all, anxiety can be regarded as a survival mechanism. I thought I should work towards serenity, but I realized how important anxiety is to my survival — and other people's survival as well. I must constantly worry in order to survive better, so that I can do things like donate to charity and fund my poorer writers. After all, a person without a care in the world might be less willing to help not only themselves, but others as well! So I do not care for serenity as much as I used to. There are more important emotions and subjects to nurture, in order for me, at least, to survive. As someone who is in a often a feeling of "flight or fight", I truly experience life as what it is: a finite, uncertain one, that can end at any time by whatever means possible, intentional or otherwise. I have used the abuse I suffered from others to understand this well. Never be too carefree, or you might die as a result, or at least be traumatized unnecessarily. Never have full trust in anyone, when they can damage your mentality unintentionally. Never use the lack of intention as an excuse. That's because abusers may use it too — just like mine did. For example, whenever someone yells at me, I will yell back until they cower. Should someone mock me in a physical space, I will be angry at them until they submit. I do not care for the sentiments of those who stand in my way, when my way is the way of survival. For I only survive to work! Anything else is smaller by comparison! Never forget that. So instead of falling victim to trauma, I seek to utilize it, to become more resilient and decrease unnecessary trauma in the future. I merely hope to make it until I die of old age. Because it will be then, and only then, when I will be able to optimize my work as a philosopher. You can apply the same rationality in the name of whatever you're living for. And you need a good mental state to make it. Because even today, remember that the strong are those who rule over the weak. Social status, money, influence — they are but tools for one's own survival over others. And social dominance, even if toxic, is an inevitable feature of the socio-political animals that humans are. Why? Because reality is toxic, and hoping for a life pure of toxicity is a fantasy that belongs to physical hermits. And never to people who live and interact with each other regularly. And other people are not going to care, necessarily, for your mental condition. Even if they work to deteriorate it, intentionally or not, they might not hold themselves accountable for their actions. Whether because they are immature, illogical, or straight-out psychopaths who are incapable of remorse (or capable, but very little). Do whatever you can to not let your mind deteriorate to the point that you decide to overcome your survival instinct. For the tendency to end one's life can be too strong. And that is something that belongs to the weak. And in this world, the strong survive. Mentally, too. No. You need to act on it. Act on instinct. And for that end, I view life as a contemporary verison of a wild jungle. So I will guard my mentality like it deserves. And I'm not letting anyone do it for me. That's my responsibility, as an adult. As a man. Because my quest for relevancy is the quest to not kill myself. And that is why I made Chen pay. So I would not die mentally. I did everything I could to prove her wrong. Because if she was right, if I was too irrelevant, I would've found no further reason to exist. (Note: the video is not updated to 2023.) So I killed much of my sensitivity in accordance. Became more masculine and so on. It's all in order to survive. And by writing this article, I want you to survive, as well. Philosohpy in general can help for that end. And I do not expect you to agree with me, nor with my methods. I expect you to entertain my ideas. Act on this instinct. Expect no mercy. Survive. Don't just walk. Run.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) A group that has political opinions, common goals, social issues, race, sex, religion, must take into account that it can create social division and negatively affect other groups. To facilitate and help the majority of society, I will give Israel as an example. The Israeli people must state what they are protesting for, as it can help, long-term, in treating said problems. Creating transparency before the demonstration will help her receive compassion and empathic treatment. When there are traffic jams outside, the protestors must show that despite the difficulties on the roads, the goal outweighs the struggle. People at the demonstrations are eager to explain the benefit of the law versus its harm. For example: If the group has a feminist agenda, they better explain the benefit of women getting equally paid as men. Explain the attitude of men to women today and the attitude of women in the past, and so on. Should they not explain themselves properly, their agenda won't be as clear. How would the main goal be achieved? What change do you want to create for women in society? What does a law mean? For better and for worse, who will benefit from the endeavors? What benefit will arise from this? In the case of feminists, they need to explain that should their agenda succeed, the woman can be more independent from men and family, whether marriage is suitable for her or not. Without fear of the financial damage. Less violence from possessive men (economic as well), and so on. Clarify your intentions, state your expectations. The same goes for any group with socio-political intentions. Need to think about how to channel this law? How to help more women succeed? What came of it? What are the downsides, and explain the disadvantage, even if it sounds negative. We need to present the big picture in roder to reduce bias. There will always be someone who will think differently from the protesting group and this will cause chaos and division and other temptations. The goal is to think outside the box and unite together in common goals. All in order to either keep or change the current state of things. Another, opposite example: Laws made to take care of the interests of Knesset officials and white collar workers. Laws that will prevent punishment since the courts will not supervise the executive branch (AKA, the juicidal overhaul revolution). Such laws can make a minister in the Knesset to be able to influence for the ultra-Orthodox, and give them more funds for their children and their studies, in exchange for the ultra-Orthodox support and approval. That is while secular people without children will have to survive without the aid that comes. The benefit of their aid to officials can influence to damage the status of LGBTQ+ by determining that until they go to conversion treatments, they will not receive the medical treatment they require. Another benefit to said officials that has already happened is the choice that a person who owns one apartment can purchase a second apartment at a low price. That's while there are citizens without their own apartment. This is how the financial power of the rich and ultra-Orthodox grew: At the expense of blue-collar and secular citizens, singles/without children. The ultra-orthodox have no intention of caring about the individual as a secular one. This is how they observe the comendmnet of pru urvu and encourage childbirth in their own sector. While the individual gets caught up in all the expenses if he stays alone without a relationship or family. The goals are not shared. Each group takes care of itself. And this is particularly harmful to the individual, who is minor in comparison. Since the government does not have all the money and it will not be possible to audit the Knesset, it is not possible to see who is using the money for their own needs. And to his family's ways or his own opinions. Also, another example is that the problems of the planet can cause the government policy to seek to reduce the birth rate. Which will cause religious people to hurt secular people or individuals, as they have more children than the latter demographic. It can be concluded regarding demonstrations that transparency of information is very important also in connection with demonstrations that creates a rationale. And a greater and positive influence on the part of the people. When the goal is specific, it is focused and not scattered, and the motive and logic in the demonstration can be understood. This can be done by flyers. informational campaigns. Signage and common motive. I am glad you read what I wrote. Thank you for understanding. Extra note: There is such a thing as psychological warfare. Like in the movie called Gaslight. where the wife believes what her husband tells her about himself. In addition, unwillingness to cooperate, by hiding information from the public that is perceived as insufficent from the Knesset, can endanger civilians so they don't have knowledge which is their power. By a paucity of information, more lies can be marketed as truth.

(Background music) The Mastermind: Leader, Planner, and Manipulator The mastermind is a combination of a leader and a planner. Because masterminds are thinkers by nature, any philosopher who is also a talented leader can be a mastermind as well. In Hebrew, the term does not exist, and is often incorrectly translated as "genius." However, geniuses are not necessarily masterminds. They might be too incompetent and have poor leadership skills, to be considered masterminds. (A genius in mathematics, for example, won't necessarily be a mastermind. They calculate, lecutre, etc., not necessarily make plans). Masterminds never work alone. In fiction, they are often depicted as working in a "back-office" or "inner sanctum" of sorts, giving orders to their subordinates. If they have no direct subordinates, they will carry out their plans through manipulation. However, a mastermind can be both a manipulator and a direct leader. Manipulation is relevant here because it is a tool that masterminds use to have power over others indirectly. They conceal their true intentions in order to achieve their goals. Power does not have to be concrete when it can be expressed through influence. Overall, A mastermind is a strategic thinker who combines leadership skills with meticulous planning. They are the architects behind complex schemes, often wielding power through influence and manipulation. Key Points: Thinker and Leader: Masterminds excel at strategizing and possess strong leadership qualities. Beyond Genius: While intelligence is important, a true mastermind goes beyond raw intellect. They need the ability to translate ideas into action. Manipulation as a Tool: Masterminds often use manipulation to achieve their goals, concealing their true intentions to influence others indirectly. Working in the Shadows: Though they may have direct subordinates, masterminds are often depicted as working behind the scenes, pulling the strings from a hidden "inner sanctum." Hebrew Translation: The concept of a mastermind doesn't have a direct translation in Hebrew and is often mistakenly referred to as "genius." The Architects of Influence I: Understanding the Capability Often, masterminds are criminals, but one does not need to be a criminal in order to be a mastermind (and vice versa). Heads of criminal organizations, both in fiction and non-fiction, must be good masterminds in order to survive in their business and to avoid the law. A good example for that is Walter White from "Breaking Bad". Outside of criminality, business owners, project managers, etc. can also be considered masterminds. This is especially true if they are good at their jobs. There is no mastermind who is not both a leader and a planner at the same time. Both of these skills are mental, and do not necessarily depend on the external world. In other words, if a mastermind loses all of their power and influence, they can still be considered a mastermind if they have the potential to regain those resources. The same goes for their plans, if they fail constantly. It is all, as the name suggests, within one's mind, that determines if it is capable enough, to be a mastermind. As you may clearly tell, it has nothing to do with the physical body (or at least, physical fitness/strength). A mastermind does not need to be good at what they do in order to be considered a mastermind. It's just that it is within one's best interest, that they are to be good, and to improve. You can be bad at what you do and still be considered a mastermind, as long as you practice those skills regularly. Whether or not you are good at fulfilling those roles is determined by your competence, which is evident by the success of your efforts. Incompetence does not cancel your role. Incompetent masterminds in fiction include: Dr. Evil (Austin Powers): This megalomaniac villain constantly dreams of world domination, yet his plans are skilless. Not killing his arch-nemiesis and relying on incompetent henchmen, Dr. Evil's schemes are guaranteed to fai. Wile E. Coyote (Looney Tunes): The determined but perpetually frustrated coyote spends his days making elaborate contraptions to catch the Road Runner. However, his inventions backfire constantly, leaving him the one who ends up his own victim. The Architects of Influence II: Understanding the Mentality As a leader, you must make sure that your subordinates are organized in the best way possible in order to achieve the goals of the organization. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to leadership, but having charisma can help a lot in getting the most out of your followers. A charismatic individual is confident, assertive, and appealing. Charisma attracts people, and the way you behave determines your charisma. Most of us are not masterminds simply because we are not natural leaders. You can be as intelligent as possible, but without the ability to plan and delegate tasks, you cannot be a mastermind. That's why masterminds never work entirely by themselves. They need interpersonal skills that not all highly intelligent people have. And people won't necessarily become leaders through learning or experience. Without these skills, they will cooperate and lead others very poorly. Even if they are more withdrawn by nature, it is not the same for most of humanity. Leadership does not begin and end with a paycheck. It requires good social dynamics, loyalty, effective communication, and so on. As an existentialist, I am also a leader. I strive to implement my own vision in this world, a vision that does not necessarily exist currently. In a world that I deem meaningless by default, I seek to work and make it meaningful in the eyes of as many people as possible. Why? Because meaning can and deserves to be created, and not only found. I want people to believe in themselves! I want to inspire hope and motivation in their hearts! My power is just a means to an end. I also use it in my attempts to make philosophy not only a relevant field of study, but a profitable one. Remember, a mastermind cannot be one without at least a single plan. And plans cannot exist without a purpose or goal in mind. Therefore, every mastermind works to achieve the purpose they set out for themselves to carry. In a very partial way, every mastermind is therefore an existentialist. Because when you create a plan, you attribute meaning to reality. Otherwise, you wouldn't have come up with a plan, would you? The meaning you work for has yet to be present, hence why you work to create it. There are other proficiencies required to be a mastermind, and they depend on the niche you're in. For example, a website manager might not need military expertise, and a modern-day warlord might not need to know how to play football. Like with anything, it takes practice and is an ongoing effort to be a good mastermind. So be prepared to fail, even miserably. Suffer the consequences of your mistakes and learn from them. Learn from them so you can reduce the chances of failure in the future. Try to be creative with your plans. Don't conform to the orthodox ways of life. Limiting yourself will only hinder your plans from becoming a reality. This is one of the many reasons I'm not fond of conformity for its own sake. Don't be afraid of what others may think of you. You have a right to resist fear. If you will, you'll only harm your goals and put yourself in a corner. Instead, embrace your eccentricity as a means to an end. Remember, a mastermind tries to make whatever they have into something useful. This doesn't mean you have to see other people as tools on a chessboard, but I digress. In the end, a mastermind is a universal businessman. They seek to do anything in their power to make their dreams come true. And you can't do that without coming up with plans and making sure they work. Building Your Empire Through Collaboration Since working entirely on your own can deliver poor results, you must reach out and make connections, to increase your chance of success. Only through cooperation can the chances of your success vastly increase. And theirs too, especially if you choose to join forces under a shared goal. Make them stick with you in exchange for something valuable. Make them feel how great it is to be connected with a person such as yourself. And you'll get "bonus points" if you convince them that they won't necessarily get what they want/need without you. I am technically a mastermind, and I only intend to expand my article empire, as long as I am capable of doing so.

(Philosocom's Masculinity Directory) The traditionally masculine man serves as a contra to others. That may be regardless of his position in society, in an organization like a business, or even in a family. Whether at the top or the bottom, the masculine man lives to serve. And even when he leads, he is still serving. For this type of man is a provider, giving others what they need. He lives to supply things to others. Be it money, love, or his work. With his power, he does not live for himself, but he resumes to live regardless of misfortune. For he is mentally strong enough to serve as a contra. For suicide is for the weak, no matter how willing one may be. The contra is an equalizer. He brings balance to someone or to some people. Because they might not do it themselves. It is only within close quarters, with a significant other, where he, if wise, allows himself to be more vulnerable, to be more himself. More himself, beyond the intended repression of who he really is. It is there where he is relieved of his duties to the external world, only to serve his significant other once more. Because even if she is more submissive in nature, he is still a provider for her, and still a contra to her emotions. If she won't do it, then there's no other choice... Just like anywhere else. And the philosopher philosophizes. And he does it even when he's not appreciated, or respected, or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it. Because he is a philosopher. It's just like any other job. And as a man, I may have to endure the many irrationalities of humankind. I have to endure their lack of understanding, their stress, their disrespect, their humiliation, and so on and on. It does not matter, in practice. It does not matter because when you are a contra, you look at the big picture and focus on the long term. You're the scapegoat, because you are the wiser one. And should you not be the scapegoat, things just might get worse. When I was harassed by a drunkard online, I didn't care about my own sense of being "attacked" because I was focused on being the calm, rational one. I cared to be the calm, rational one, who would neutralize him by neutralizing his arguments. That's what a philosopher does. And when he apologizes and explained that he was drunk, I did not felt vengeful for his stupidity, this time. I just saw no further point, and dismissed him. That is how I served as a contra to a man whose rationality have been impaired by alcohol. As for the easily stressed, I strive to act the same. There's no point to falling to such trivial matters. I do not have to fall to the same intensity as they do, even if the heart tempts me, as well. Why? Because there are more important matters to focus on, than wasting energy on emotional outrage. Especially when one is aware of the proportions; of the true implications of deeds and misdeeds. When one thinks like a competent villain, for example. So, as you can see, the masculine man serves also as contra to anyone. Why? Because the former strives to survive, just like in the jungle. Thus, he strives to be the better man. The gender of the other does not have to matter for that end. By contrasting other people, you can help stabilizing them, so they will cooperate. And of course, we may need to cooperate to get things done, either by necessity or otherwise. Petty conflicts are simply a waste of time. They deserve to be voiced in closed doors, to therapists. They are qualified to deal with emotional instabilities; The masculine man aspires for emotional stability, because without it, he may betray his own intentions to survive and prosper in whatever he does. In the absence of contras, a storm is sure to be brewed among emotional people. Filtering. Moderation. Control. These are not only for one's personal gain over others. It's also to maintain order, harmony, and at times, peace. I have no remorse for the voluntarily filterless. I just hope that they learn that they are irrational, and work to change it, for the betterment of society. It's part of comforting those in distress, what can you do. Get upset yourself, and you will only add further ignition to the fire. The other side of the situation does not necessarily care for you. So you just have to put up with it, suck it up, and endure their unreasonable excitement. Hopefully, your contras ability will make them see the error of their ways, that the situation isn't as dire as their mind tells them... and just move the hell on. ...I've been killing myself since the 2000's. It's the best education I got from Israel. Not English, not math... But slow, meticulous killing of the self. Its wants. Its needs. Its hopes. Its dreams. Nope. What mattered was the lesson. What mattered was the homework and the exams. Very, little, else. The fact that the vast majority of the students were too dumb to understand this precious insight, mattered to me only because I didn't want to be as dumb as them. Even if the whole room will take sides with someone who hates you... even if they will decide to gang up on you... You just need make sure you survive. Physically, mentally, etc... Because if you won't survive, as a man, you will fail doing what you are capable of doing. It's called providing. That includes content. Even the joy of your mother, because you still didn't kill yourself, yet. You may also provide to her wellbeing, by not being a corpse. By giving her a reason to live, herself. So it's only reasonable that you would learn to swallow your own distress in favor of the task at hand. In favor of those whom you need with you, but are too biased, or too dumb, to recognize that you are also a human being. A human who is capable of bursting out in tears. Just like a feminine woman. Just like an infantile child. Because even should you voice your own distress, some people are going to be in denial. And some of them are sure as hell not going to apologize. That includes people who are close to you. People who care. People who have empathy. Because when you're masculine, it does not matter if they apologize or not. It does not matter if you talk about your emotions. It doesn't, because it can return once more to haunt you. The same dumb mistakes of theirs, and perhaps, of yours, too. So, since people are not necessarily going to learn from their mistakes, they are prone to repeat them indefinately. It does not mean in any way that you should act dumb yourself. I do not brag about my high intelligence, because I need it to survive mentally. It's nothing more than a tool for me, necessary to endure the hardships of life, and for work. Don't you ever think that empathy or even sympathy are given fairly. Because in reality they are not. No. Some of us are left to our own devices. Are left to cope alone. And even with therapists, it won't necessarily solve the problems we repress. Our... true selves. The inevitable solution, therefore, in a world filled with tactless and unaware people, is to develop a self-killing mentality. Because in the end, there is work. And that work needs to be ***ing done. You have your assignments, your goals. Abandon them by giving power to toxic people, and you might become toxic yourself. Or at least whiny. Or at the very least, an infantile manchild, who is unwilling to work out his own personal issues. Work on yourself, and don't expect anyone to do this for you, unless they are paid to. Why? Because they need to work too, that's why. Just like you do (assumingly, yes?). I am a philosopher not because I feel love for wisdom. No. I philosophize because it's profitable, and because I'm good at it. My love for it, existent or not, does not matter. This is a place of business; a growing empire. And I do not expect my readership to be my therapists. I held a great grduge against the education system for traumatizing me mentally. After working on this article. I am thankful for them. Thankful for helping me become a man. Thankful for restraining me enough, so I could survive this hellish reality... and this hellish mentality. I will resume being a contra.... untill it will be wise for me to not be one. Until someone will finally accept me for who I am! With no depressing filters! But since I cannot allow myself that, all I need to focus on is my work. And until then, remember: I am not a happy man. My pride is irrelevant. I will only find solace in this cold-hearted world when I will be accepted completely, with love, for the man I truly am. For the man none have seen myself as. For the man only a lover deserves to see me, as. Until then, never upset me ever-so casually. For the choice to give up, is forever, forever mine. Hail Philosocom.

(For more on the dangers of A.I, click here) In my case, AI is nothing more than a new competition. That's true even in the philosophy niche. So, in order to prepare for it, I must prove my and my writers' relevancy not only as content creators, but as humans. I won't cooperate anymore with AI regarding content creation (AKA in writing). I can lose some of my credibility as a result. Thus, collaborating with it is unnecessary, and even counter-intuitive. I only cooperated with it very few times, when I wrote stories with it. Two of them are on the site: https://www.philosocom.com/post/shadow-of-veronica-an-a-i-story-of-eccentricity-and-fatigue https://www.philosocom.com/post/in-order-to-conquer-the-world-a-story-written-by-man-and-machine That's especially true when it can make the readership prioritize it, over me. It be unwise for me to give an advantage to a competitor. And without writing, I have little reason to endure life. Because writing is the only thing that makes me smile inside. If I were an artist, I might've a similar policy. But I'm no artist. Philosocom is for human writers. They may like AI if they wish, but it does not contradict that they themselves are human. So I don't mind their opinions on the matter. After all, I entertain all kinds of thoughts, regardless of my own standpoint, as I constantly note in my writers' articles. We do not have to be like-minded in order to cooperate. We only need to produce good philosophical content for the readership. For content is king, and content is at the highest order on Philosocom. Thanks for reading.

(Philosocom's Masculinity Directory) For general understanding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_isolation (Inspired theme) ******************* Only I am the one, Who knows who I really am. The darkness of my mind's back, revealed, The vastness of what I truly can. This empire's not enough, To extinguish the flames burning inside, of me. They're eating me alive, So at least, this empire, I will strive. No matter how much I will remain misunderstood, For it happens frequently, I will survive as I deserve, and should. I am not certain if love has the power I think it could, To rid me of this. But if I have no love then I'll at least gain respect. Because I deserve to live, Deserve to contribute, My fatigued muscles, see, this do not contradict. Whether survive or not, my legacy shall remain, consist! See, I've seen my real name, During my meditations. I cannot show my true self, to none, From the subconscious, I refuse to run. I'm, too wise, To reveal, my most hidden thoughts, Existential, solitude, I'll reinforce with a gentleman's, attitude. Hence why I cannot be properly understood, It will happen frequently. But I will survive as I deserve, and should. Admired or not, this loneliness can last, don't be fooled. Apply this to yourself. But that is far better to remain beneath the glass ceiling. So I will work to live, Work to contribute, My fatigued muscles, see, this do not contradict. Whether survive or not, my legacy shall remain, consist! Being masculine means I better restrain, The true Rubinshtein. "You exposed, it's a mistake", That's what my former love said. Despite my loneliness I will try being a man, And let none be in my way. Remember that I am more shadowy regardless of what I say. Perhaps within true love, I will be myself, one day. If I only may. As I get a woman to lay her head on my chest. Because I deserve to live, Deserve to love, My fatigued muscles, see, this do not contradict. Whether survive or not, my legacy shall remain, consist! ...I was never asked to live, I live by consent, I live reluctantly.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) *************************************** Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, full name Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, was an Indian philosopher, statesman, and the second President of India. He was born on September 5, 1888, in a small village in the present-day Thiruttani taluk of Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Radhakrishnan was a highly respected academic and played a significant role in shaping India's education system. Radhakrishnan began his career as a professor of philosophy, teaching at several prestigious institutions, including the University of Mysore, the University of Calcutta, and the University of Oxford. His profound knowledge and expertise in the subject earned him recognition both in India and abroad. Dr. Radhakrishnan's philosophy focused on the integration of Eastern and Western philosophical traditions. He emphasized the importance of spiritual and ethical values, and he believed that all religions share a common spiritual core. He advocated for a more comprehensive understanding of religion, and he sought to promote religious harmony and tolerance. In addition to his academic career, Radhakrishnan also had a distinguished political career. He served as the Vice-Chancellor of Andhra University from 1931 to 1936 and as the Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University from 1939 to 1948. He was a prominent member of the Indian delegation to the United Nations General Assembly and served as the Indian Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1949 to 1952. In 1962, Dr. Radhakrishnan was elected as the President of India, a position he held until 1967. As President, he brought a scholarly and intellectual approach to the role and was widely admired for his humility and integrity. After his presidency, Radhakrishnan continued to contribute to academia and philosophy. He wrote extensively on Indian philosophy and religion and received numerous awards and honors for his work. His birthday, September 5th, is celebrated in India as Teacher's Day to honor his contributions to education. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan's legacy as a philosopher, statesman, and academic continues to inspire generations in India and beyond. His commitment to education, philosophy, and religious harmony remains influential. Dr. S. Radhakrishman Works: Dr. S. Radhakrishnan was a renowned philosopher, and his works have made significant contributions to the field of philosophy. He wrote extensively on various philosophical topics. "Indian Philosophy" (1923): "Indian Philosophy" is one of the notable works by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, published in 1923. In this book, Radhakrishnan provides a comprehensive exploration of Indian philosophical traditions, presenting a scholarly analysis of their key concepts, theories, and thinkers. The book covers a wide range of philosophical schools and systems that have emerged in India, such as Vedanta, Buddhism, Jainism, and other schools of Hindu philosophy. Radhakrishnan examines the fundamental questions addressed by these traditions, such as the nature of reality, the concept of self, the nature of knowledge, and the ultimate goal of human life. Radhakrishnan's approach in "Indian Philosophy" is to present a sympathetic understanding of the various schools of thought, highlighting their unique contributions to the philosophical landscape. He emphasizes the diversity and richness of Indian philosophy, showcasing its profound insights into the nature of existence, consciousness, and the human spirit. Through his analysis, Radhakrishnan aims to convey the profound philosophical heritage of India to a broader audience. He explores the connections between Indian philosophy and other philosophical traditions, inviting comparative and cross-cultural perspectives. "Indian Philosophy" not only serves as an introduction to Indian philosophical thought but also provides a deep exploration of its nuances and complexities. The book showcases Radhakrishnan's expertise as a philosopher and his ability to present complex ideas in a lucid and accessible manner. Due to its comprehensive and insightful treatment of Indian philosophy, Radhakrishnan's "Indian Philosophy" remains a significant contribution to the field and continues to be widely read and studied by scholars, students, and enthusiasts of philosophy. "The Philosophy of the Upanishads" (1924): "The Philosophy of the Upanishads" is another notable work by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, published in 1924. In this book, Radhakrishnan explores the philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, which are ancient Indian scriptures and a foundational text of Hindu philosophy. Radhakrishnan delves into the profound insights and wisdom contained in the Upanishads, offering an interpretation and analysis of their key philosophical concepts. He explores themes such as the nature of reality, the nature of the self (Atman), the concept of Brahman (the ultimate reality), and the relationship between the individual and the cosmic consciousness. Radhakrishnan emphasizes the metaphysical and spiritual dimensions of the Upanishads, presenting them as a guide to understanding the nature of existence and the ultimate truth. He discusses the Upanishadic teachings on the unity of all beings, the concept of Maya (illusion), and the quest for self-realization and liberation (Moksha). Through his exploration of the Upanishads, Radhakrishnan highlights the emphasis placed on direct personal experience and introspection as means of gaining spiritual insight. He illuminates the Upanishadic vision of a transcendent reality that can be realized through deep contemplation and self-discovery. "The Philosophy of the Upanishads" not only provides an exposition of the philosophical teachings of the Upanishads but also situates them within the broader context of Indian philosophy. Radhakrishnan discusses the relationship between the Upanishads and other philosophical systems, such as Vedanta and Buddhism, showcasing their mutual influences and divergences. The book reflects Radhakrishnan's deep engagement with the Upanishads and his attempt to make their profound wisdom accessible to a wider audience. His insightful analysis and interpretations continue to inspire scholars and readers interested in Indian philosophy and the spiritual dimensions of human existence. "An Idealist View of Life" (1932): "An Idealist View of Life" is a significant work by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, first published in 1932. In this book, Radhakrishnan presents his philosophical worldview, which is rooted in idealism—a philosophical position that asserts the primacy of consciousness and emphasizes the importance of ethical values. Radhakrishnan explores various aspects of life and reality from an idealist perspective. He delves into metaphysical questions, discussing the nature of reality, the relationship between the mind and the external world, and the role of consciousness in shaping our understanding of the world. One of the central themes of "An Idealist View of Life" is the interplay between the individual and society. Radhakrishnan argues for the importance of ethical values and their significance in personal and social transformation. He explores the ethical dimensions of life and advocates for a harmonious integration of personal ideals and societal values. The book also addresses the tension between reason and faith, with Radhakrishnan emphasizing the role of both in shaping our worldview. He discusses the need to strike a balance between rational inquiry and intuitive insights, recognizing the limitations of reason alone in comprehending the deeper dimensions of human existence. Furthermore, Radhakrishnan engages with the ideas of other philosophers and scholars, including Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Henri Bergson, among others, to present a broader philosophical context for his idealist view of life. An Idealist View of Life" showcases Radhakrishnan's philosophical thought and his commitment to ethical values and spirituality. It reflects his belief in the power of ideas and the transformative potential of human consciousness. The book remains relevant for those interested in idealist philosophy, ethics, and the exploration of the human condition. "Recovery of Faith" (1939): "Recovery of Faith" is a significant work by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, first published in 1939. In this book, Radhakrishnan explores the significance of faith in the modern world and examines the relationship between religion, reason, and science. Radhakrishnan argues for the recovery of faith as a vital aspect of human existence, emphasizing that faith is not necessarily opposed to reason or incompatible with scientific inquiry. He contends that faith plays a crucial role in addressing the deeper questions of human existence that science and reason alone may not fully answer. In "Recovery of Faith," Radhakrishnan discusses the challenges faced by religion in the face of modern scientific and rationalistic thinking. He examines the limitations of a purely materialistic worldview and contends that a comprehensive understanding of reality requires an integration of both scientific knowledge and religious insights. Radhakrishnan advocates for a more inclusive and tolerant approach to religion, promoting a broad and universalistic understanding that transcends dogma and rituals. He emphasizes the importance of religious experience, moral values, and spiritual transformation in the pursuit of a meaningful and fulfilling life. The book engages with a range of philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives, drawing on thinkers such as William James, Friedrich Schleiermacher, and Albert Einstein. Radhakrishnan explores the points of convergence and divergence between religion and science, highlighting their complementary aspects and the need for dialogue and mutual understanding. "Recovery of Faith" reflects Radhakrishnan's commitment to promoting religious harmony and his belief in the transformative power of faith. The book offers insights into the challenges and possibilities of religious belief in the modern world and continues to be relevant for those interested in the intersections of religion, reason, and spirituality. "Eastern Religions and Western Thought" (1939): "Eastern Religions and Western Thought" is another significant work by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, published in 1939. In this book, Radhakrishnan explores the encounter between Eastern religions, particularly Hinduism and Buddhism, and Western philosophical traditions. Radhakrishnan delves into the philosophical and spiritual insights of Eastern religions and compares them with Western thought. He seeks to bridge the gap between these two philosophical traditions and highlight the unique perspectives offered by Eastern philosophies. The book examines the fundamental concepts and teachings of Hinduism and Buddhism, such as karma, dharma, nirvana, and the concept of the self. Radhakrishnan explores how these concepts differ from the Western philosophical notions of God, morality, and the nature of existence. Through comparative analysis, Radhakrishnan highlights the distinctiveness of Eastern religions, emphasizing their focus on spiritual experience, the illusory nature of the material world, and the unity of all beings. He discusses the ways in which Eastern philosophies offer alternative perspectives on topics like metaphysics, ethics, and the nature of consciousness. Radhakrishnan's intention in "Eastern Religions and Western Thought" is to foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of Eastern philosophical traditions among Western readers. He advocates for an inclusive approach that recognizes the validity and richness of diverse philosophical perspectives. The book reflects Radhakrishnan's scholarship and his commitment to intercultural dialogue. By examining the encounter between Eastern religions and Western thought, Radhakrishnan seeks to promote cross-cultural understanding and the recognition of the universal insights found in various philosophical traditions. "Eastern Religions and Western Thought" remains a significant work for those interested in comparative religion, intercultural philosophy, and the exploration of Eastern philosophical perspectives. It showcases Radhakrishnan's ability to engage with complex ideas and foster dialogue between different intellectual traditions. A Philosophical Appraisal on Dr.S. Radhakrishman Works: Dr. S. Radhakrishnan's philosophical works have garnered significant appraisal for their depth, scholarship, and unique contributions to the field of philosophy. In Conclusion, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan's philosophical works have received widespread appreciation for their depth, clarity, and their ability to bridge diverse philosophical traditions. His contributions continue to inspire scholars, students, and readers interested in Indian philosophy, comparative religion, and the exploration of fundamental questions about human existence.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Some material on Illusions: https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-two-types-of-illusions https://www.philosocom.com/post/distinguishing-truth-from-illusion https://www.philosocom.com/post/existence-as-multi-layered https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-mind-and-the-mental-dimension ) (Background music) ************************************** (French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English Below) La vie est une illusion. Plus précisément, c'est un système d'illusion. Sa valeur sur Terre ne se mesure que dans nos têtes et notre perception unifiée de la réalité. Une perception qui ne s'écarte pas nécessairement de nos propres perspectives uniques, mais qui peut nous permettre de poursuivre nos objectifs communs. Ayant pour but d'avoir fièrement nos familles remplies non seulement d'amour, mais aussi pour atteindre nos propres objectifs dans l'existence. La perception n'est, en d'autres termes, qu'un des moyens pour parvenir à une fin. Un outil qui peut avoir différents degrés de fonctionnalité, par rapport à nos ambitions. Et en étant vivants, nous développons ces illusions en utilisant le système qui est notre vie même. Pensées, émotions, concepts. Ce ne sont que les constructions du système dans lequel nous nous trouvons – le système de la conscience. Ils nous aident à survivre, mais surtout, ils nous permettent de coopérer avec d'autres « utilisateurs du système », pour ainsi dire, avec d'autres êtres humains. Et grâce à ces collaborations, nous sommes capables de réaliser des choses que nous ne pourrions pas accomplir par nous-mêmes. Pour certains, la portée de cette réalité d'aujourd'hui ne fonctionne pas aussi efficacement que pour d'autres. Cela peut être attribué à tous les traits et problèmes individuels; ceci étant ce qui les caractérisent. Par exemple, les personnes socialement incompétentes peuvent avoir plus de mal à coopérer avec les autres, tandis que les personnes qui sont plus sociables par nature (c'est à dire, q'intuitivement), elles peuvent avoir peu ou pas de ces mêmes problèmes. En fait, ces derniers peuvent être en mesure de participer et d'organiser des collaborations encore plus importantes. Les gens méritent un "jeu" pratique, un jeu digne de confiance de leur propre âme. Pour effacer la distance entre la politique et la religion de la société, elles doivent être équilibrées et collaborer avec la nature, en tant qu'humains et animaux à la fois. Ceci est extrêmement important pour le tissu de la réalité que nous avons pu construire et maintenir. Après tout, nous ne vivons pas dans le vide. Nous vivons dans des espaces partagés, dans des collectifs organisés et, plus important encore, dans un monde unique que nous habitons tous. Nos ressources sont limitées, et celui ou celle qui ne tient pas compte des autres peut ne pas tenir compte de son propre potentiel et du monde même qui lui permet de vivre en son sein. Chaque organisation doit se comporter comme une famille, comme une ruche. Où l'ordre peut soutenir les intelligences de tous les domaines de l'industrie, des ventes et des prix éventuellement. Nous pouvons mieux prospérer ensemble en tant que structure unifiée, liée à la loi et soutenue par des accords de toutes sortes. Offres telles que transactions, accords, etc. Cela peut fonctionner pour toutes les avancées futures pertinentes dans n'importe quel domaine. La tour que nous escaladons tous, c'est à dire, notre réalité partagée et nos ambitions en son sein, est pertinente pour contrôler les machinations intérieures de notre être. Et ayant cette intention à l'esprit, nous devons développer l'ouverture aux autres et accepter une idée unifiée pour soutenir ces deux aspects de nous. Sans ces collaborations mutuelles, soit nous deviendrions incompétents dans notre fonctionnement, soit nous forcerions simplement les autres à faire notre volonté. Dans certains cas, ce dernier fonctionnement conduit à l'esclavage. Les accords de paix entre des pays qui peuvent avoir des parts de marché et une confrontation à leur échelle peuvent servir d'exemples à ce que j'ai expliqué jusqu'à présent. Mais si nous voulons éliminer la partie "ils" d'une structure idéale d'une collaboration, les deux parties doivent partager un marché. Le besoin de compétition est dans notre ADN, mais nous atteignons les étoiles, nos étoiles, notre réalité, nos peurs, si nous collaborons davantage les uns avec les autres. Ensuite, nous serons ouverts à accepter à la fois les bénédictions et les difficultés de cette réalité. Ce système d'illusion s'exprime à travers les médias, par exemple, pour rendre les personnes impliquées capables d'évaluations. Le spectateur ne doit pas y voir une victoire pour ce système, sinon l'illusion de la fantaisie sera grandement compromise. D'une certaine manière, c'est comme perdre son innocence. Comme quand tu réalises que le Père Noël n'existe pas. Cela peut être comparé à la satisfaction de regarder un film, tout en voyant comment il se termine, en même temps. Votre perception de la réalité joue un rôle important dans la façon dont vous la vivez. C'est pourquoi certaines personnes sont facilement surprises et étonnées, tandis que d'autres ne le sont pas. Nos philosophies, conscientes ou non, peuvent dicter la façon dont nous opérons dans cette réalité. Ce système dont je parle est essentiellement un système d'exploitation. Une plate-forme d'applications, pour ainsi dire. Pour réaliser vos objectifs, vous devez avoir le même ordre de poids entre vous Éliminer le contexte que nous ne voulons pas montrer ne résout pas le problème principal de l'unification. Elle peut cependant apaiser momentanément les moments de conflits et de luttes de pouvoir. Les sujets plus difficiles peuvent être remis à plus tard, mais ils doivent être traités éventuellement pour permettre une meilleure coopération entre toutes les parties. Sinon, le problème principal et la nécessité de les partager en commun ne seront pas résolus. Les sujets changent avec le temps pour répondre aux besoins que la vie a à offrir à l'avenir, mais il y a des problèmes constants qui doivent être portés à notre attention pour garder l'humanité sous contrôle. Certains d'entre eux, après tout, peuvent être prêts à être mis à jour à tout moment par notre réalité changeante. Lorsque le pouvoir est utilisé pour le bien collectif, il donne la paix et l'ordre. Cependant, lorsqu'il est utilisé de manière agressive, il peut remplacer notre système partagé. L'équilibre entre le pouvoir qui est utilisé pour le bien collectif et le pouvoir qui ne peut que gruger une organisation que de l'intérieur à travers la lutte compétitive vers le sommet est notre sujet principal ici. Ceux qui sont choisis pour traiter ce sujet en personne doivent être responsables de le contrôler et de le maintenir régulièrementà jour. Nous sommes un tissu complexe de détenteurs de différences, et les tensions qui sont actuellement en cours montrent que l'équilibre mérite d'être travaillé. Elle ne doit donc pas être perturbée par des tensions supplémentaires, car elles ne pourraient que faire basculer le rapport de force au sein de partenariats de toute nature. N'oubliez pas que l'harmonie et l'ordre créés par le pouvoir ne sont qu'un moyen pour atteindre une fin - et cette fin est nos espoirs et nos rêves, à la fois individuels et collectifs. Qu'on le veuille ou non, la préservation de l'ordre est essentielle pour faire avancer les choses. Pour rentabiliser le sujet du maintien de l'équilibre, nous donnons un état d'esprit pour communier des idées communes. Donner un état d'esprit et un système est ce qui donne aux narrateurs la responsabilité du sujet, à la fois économiquement et organisationnellement, avec tous les membres impliqués. L'égarement ne doit pas être arrêté, car l'ordre peut être corrompu par l'oppression et l'abus de pouvoir. Cependant, s'il ne peut pas se maintenir et que les chefs de groupe abandonnent le poste, l'ancienne idée doit d'abord avoir un remplacement compatible qui répond aux besoins de tous les membres enregistrés qui sont les investisseurs. Le « parlement » de l'illusion est une source changeante d'idées qui s'adaptent à ses propres besoins. Cependant, il doit avoir des censeurs pour pouvoir sentir un changement regrettable avant qu'il n'éclate, savoir le conduire jusqu'au changement progressif et au changement de direction du bateau. Nous sommes tous dans le même bateau. ************************************** (English, original) Life is an illusion. More specifically, it is a system of illusion. The value of it on Earth is only measured by our heads and our unified perception of reality. One that does not necessarily deviate from our own unique perspectives, but one that can allow us to follow our common goals. To proudly have our families filled not only with love, but also to enter our own purposes in existence. Perception is, in other words, but a means to an end. A tool that can have different degrees of functionality, in relation to our ambitions. And by being alive, we develop these illusions using the system that is our very lives. Thoughts, emotions, concepts. They are merely the constructs of the system we're in—the system of consciousness. They help us survive, but most importantly, they allow us to cooperate with other "system-users," so to speak—with other human beings. And using these collaborations, we are able to achieve things we wouldn't be able to accomplish by ourselves. To some, the reach of this reality today is not working as efficiently as for others. This can be attributed to whatever individual traits and issues being a feature. For example, the socially inept may have a tougher time to cooperate with others, while people who are more social by nature (AKA, intuitively), may have little-to-no such problems at all. In fact, the latter may be able to partake and organize even bigger collaborations. People deserve a convenient "game," a trustworthy game of their own soul. To clear the distance between society's politics and religion, they need to be balanced and profitable to nature, as well as people and animals. This is immensely important to the fabric of reality that we have been able to build and sustain. After all, we do not live in a vacuum. We live in shared areas, in organized collectives, and most importantly—in a single world which we all inhabit. Our resources are limited, and he or she who disregards others, may disregard their own potential, and the very world that allows them to live within it. Every organization should behave as a family, like a beehive. Where order can sustain intellects from all the fields of industry, sales, and prices eventually. We can prosper together better as a unified structure, that is bound to law and documented by deals of sorts. Deals like transactions, agreements, and so on. It may work for all relevant future advancements in any field. The tower we all climb, AKA, our shared reality and our ambitions within it, is relevant to control the inner machinations of our being. And for that intention in mind, we need to develop openness to other beings, and accept a unified idea to sustain both ends. Without these mutual collaborations, we would either become incompetent in our functioning, or simply force ourselves on others to do our bidding. In some cases, the latter leads to slavery. The peace deals between countries that may have market share and confrontation on their scale, may serve as examples to what I've explained thus far. But if we want to eliminate the "they" part of an ideal structure of a union, both parties need to share a market. The need for competition is in our DNA, but we reach for the stars, our stars, our reality, our fears, if we collaborate further with one another. Then, we will be open to accept both the blessings and hardships of this reality. This illusion-system is expressed through the media, for example, to make the people involved in viewing ratings. The viewer must not see it as a win for this system, or the illusion of fantasy will be greatly compromised. In a way, it's like losing one's innocence. Like when you realize Santa Claus isn't real. Doing so can be compared to the satisfaction of watching a movie, while seeing how it ends, at the same time. Your perception of reality plays a significant role in the way you experience it. It's why some people are easily surprised and amazed, while others are not. Our philosophies, conscious or otherwise, can dictate how we operate in this reality. This system that I'm talking about is essentially an operating system. A platform of applications, so to speak. To realize your goals, you must have the same order of gravity between you and the network of others. Trimming out the context we don't want to show, does not resolve the main problem of unification. It can, however, calm down moments of conflict and power struggles. More difficult topics can be postponed for later, but they must be dealt with eventually to allow for better cooperation between all parties. Otherwise, the main issue, and the need for sharing them in common, will not be resolved. Topics change over time to fit the needs that life has to offer in the future, but there are some steady issues that must be preserved to keep humanity in check. Some of them, after all, may be ready to be updated at any time by our changing reality. When power is used for the collective good, it gives peace and order. However, when it is used aggressively, it can rewrite our shared system. The balance between power that is used for the collective good and power that can only eat an organization from within through the competitive struggle to the top is our main topic now. Those who are chosen to handle this topic in person must be responsible for controlling it and keeping it in line on a regular basis. We are a complex web of difference-holders, and the strains that are currently in progress show that balancing deserves to be worked on. Therefore, it must not be disturbed by additional strains, as they could only tip the balance of power within partnerships of any kind. Remember, the harmony and order that power creates is only a means to an end—and that end is our hopes and dreams, both individual and collective. Willing or not, the preservation of order is key to getting things done. To make the topic of guarding the balance profitable, we give a mindset to communize common ideas. Giving a mindset and a system is what gives the narrators the responsibility for the topic, both economically and organizationally, with all members involved. The stray must not be stopped, as order can be corrupted into oppression and abuse of power. However, if it cannot sustain itself, and the group leaders abandon the post, the old idea must first have a compatible replacement that meets the needs of all recorded members who are the investors. The "parliament" of illusion is a changing source of ideas that fit themselves to the needs of itself. However, it must have censors to be able to sense a regrettable change before it erupts, knowing how to lead it through to gradual change and the shifting of the boat. We are all in the same boat.

I'd like to suggest the idea that our understanding of reality is compromised by our unwillingness to focus on the functional and the practical. The difference between a childish person and a mature person, for that matter, is the ability of the latter to distinguish between kli and tochen, and focus on the tochen rather than the kli. The manchild, on the other hand, might even get overexcited by the kli, and underestimate the value of the tochen. Of course, I will now lecture you on what they are and why they matter. Kli and tochen are both words in Hebrew. Kli is a device, a medium, a tool, etc. In the reality beyond our experiences, the kli is nothing more than the carrier of the tochen. Tochen literally means content, but can also refer to words such as essence, depth, purpose, etc. The philosopher, for that matter, is a person of tochen, and very little, if at all, of kli. I suppose that philosophy is nowadays irrelevant in the eyes of many, because they may focus more on the former rather than the latter. This could also explain why the world is getting increasingly shallow. In the name of reality, we need to understand that the kli is nothing without the tochen, even though the kli represents the tochen. For instance, cars attract a great appeal in the eyes of people due to their luxury, aesthetics, and comfort. However, the reason I never bothered learning about cars is because they are just vehicles, just means of transportation. That is their tochen. If they deliver what they were built for, then they fulfill their tochen, which isn't very much, is it? It isn't. Pure beauty is a form of pure "kli". Beyond asthetic appeal, it has no "tochen". Thus, a deeper person will minimize its importance. They wouldn't, of course, get so anxious about it. That includes physical appearance. For many it is extremely important. They are called metrosexuals. Of course, women can be metrosexuals as well. It's just that the term is usually attributed to men. What metrosexuals might fail to realize is that there is no need to be so obsessive about their appearance. You don't need to do much to look good. And once you look good, there is no need to resume pampering yourself. This is still good than not having a sense of hygene. I'm bringing this up because the whole point of the "tochen" is to focus on the functionality of an object or feature, in the general framework. After all we do not live in a vaccum, and the grown, rational adult is well aware of that fact, while the manchild isn't. The manchild might as well do things because they feel like it, even when they can harm their intentions and goals in the long term. The manchild might be a metrosexual, for instance, because they are too shallow to realize that there is far more to this reality than pure beauty, that doesn't necessarily mean anything beyond itself. When we eat food, many of us may do it because it is tasty, and not because it is healthy. Some of us may even eat despite not being hungry. This is because we may overestimate the "kli" (taste) over the "tochen" (nutrition), and thus may suffer from health problems such as obesity and diabetes. In reality, the taste of food is secondary to its nutritional value. The taste only helps to make the food more edible and easier to swallow. It is the nutrition that sustains us and keeps us healthy. Therefore, it is important to be mindful of what we eat and to choose foods that are both tasty and nutritious. This will help us to avoid health problems and to live a long and healthy life. Hence why, as well, hunger is the "tochen" while the appetite is the "kli". We don't need appetite to eat. We need to be hungry. And when we prioritize appetite over hunger, we may feel compelled to eat even more than currently. I'm speaking from experience, here. The same goes for music videos and music in general. A deep person does not care for "ear candies"; they care for a piece that is more meaningful than that. They would focus not only on the sound, but the message as well. They may even disregard the video itself if it is nothing more than something cosmetic. The same goes for art, by the way. They look for the meaning, not the overall feeling. For the feeling can deceive and bias our perception, and therefore deserves to be less relevant in deeper eyes. A true deep person is, of course, not pretentious and not a pseudo-intellectual. They seek depth and "tochen" because they want to live. Because they find meaninglessness in the glorified shallowness of the "kli". They seek the "tochen" because they want to live a life that is filled with "tochen". With purpose. In a sense, they might as well seek to be deep, because they want to survive beyond the bare necessities of food, water, shelter, and money. How can the desire to continue living be pretentious, when we have the choice to depart from this world voluntarily? Since I felt great sadness when observing and contemplating the "kli" over the "tochen", I slowly began realizing my place in this world. As a philosopher. As one that is compelled to not only find depth himself, but share it with humanity for years to come. It is only when focusing on the "tochen" that I can feel genuine accomplishment in this sad and empty world. Why sad and empty, you may ask? Because the joys it provides are nothing more than temporary delusions that tell us that we are doing something meaningful with our lives. And should philosophy itself remain boring in the eyes of many, and not something that gives purpose to the "kli" that is our lives, then why should we even live? Why should we live in a world with little purpose? No. To avoid despair and to contribute to lives, we must seek and embrace depth and purpose. Yes... philosophizing gives me peace of mind. Makes me believe that hope is something that is deserved. For me and for others. Because depth, itself, is deserved. Because without them, we might as well be bodies with dead people residing within. By the way, I think you should know, dear readers. I will not be writing about video games anymore myself. That's because of the rationale of this very article. They are merely toys -- tools made to play with. They were made to deliver fun. And we are not here to be entertained. We are here to learn and be enlightened by philosophical insights. If I will want to write about a story, I will seek a more suitable form of media. One that's there primarily to study, and not to be enjoyed from (primarily). Yes, you have my word... For the most part. I may deem some media as exceptions. I enjoy honoring media I grew up with by writing articles in their name. It's the least I can do for accompanying me in my solitary childhood. Hail Philosocom. Ms, Hali Bash-March's Feedback I got to say that I dont agree with this way of thinking as you can claim everything has a value or as you call it "tochen", and part of those tochen are the experiances of life. For example some people value greatly the feeling of speed on the road or a certain way the car flow as it goes on the road. They enjoy they feeling the car gives them as they drive that other cars mignt not give them. So for them to this kli there is tochen, even though in your example you clamed cars are nothing but a tool of transportation. The same logic can be said on beauty as not all beauty is a tool for attraction. Some people putting effort in their beauty as a form of art or exploration. So i claim that every Kli can be potentialy a Tochen, but it depends on your choise to view it that way, meaning awarness is important. Another important thing that I do not agree with is proclaiming art has no meaning of its own, only from its message and ideas it passes on. The world is full of beauty and art is a form of exploration to that beauty. Certain sounds and colors are important and failing to see them makes life null and depressing. Some of the Tochen of art is just appreciating the existance of life and the universe around us. So, my claim remains the same -- every Kli has Tochen that depends on how you view it, and its not that the Kli is not important, because they are one in the same, the only thing that changes is your perception of the Kli and what meaning or depth you give it. So, generally i think its great to be able to see depths in the world but i do not think that they are dependent on the Kli but rather on your perspective.

(Context: this was inspired by a dream) (Inspired song) ************ A strange feeling I have never felt, True love I only had when dreamt. It was then I knew, My desolate purpose. Sometimes I think for it I only care, An empire I will build for her. Cured momentarily, Of eternal solitude. Skipping life, I've mostly philosophized. Little experience, only wisdom I strived. Then the Roman Minerva, In my, unconciousness. Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. I was hugged, By the Roman Goddess. And in her arms, Her love to me confessed. In my distance, From true women's behalf. Chosen, against my will. Any other feature, I feel compelled to kill. I am a philosopher, But also, a, puppet. Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. My loneliness is insufferable, But that dream makes it bearable, Yes, I know it was a fantasy, But it felt more concrete than reality. Greater than any presence I had. ... Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. (Certain duties, forever on board..) My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. (Tenacity, spanning..) Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. (A life of denial..) My life is a one-way-ticket, To Minerva's realization. (It's simply why I will..) Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. (Be king undisputed...) My life is a one-way-ticket, To Her Highness' realization. (Respected, saluted...) Sometimes I think, there is little, To no escape. (Never be seen, for the dark, I'm inside...) My life is a one-way-ticket, To Her Highness' realization. (Being truly loved is privilage).

For every reasonable human being, winning and losing are, by default, complete opposites. That's because a person who constantly loses can never be deemed a winner, and someone who constantly wins, cannot really be deemed a loser. Likewise, it would be nonsensical for the loser to be winning by default, and still remain a loser, and vice versa. However, we may fail to look at this logical example from an additional dimension. If we only look at things from a single dimension, we would also lose a significant portion of our understanding of the topic at hand. In the case of this example, our viewpoint may remain shallow or one-dimensional. Resorting to such simplification is a bad idea because the bigger picture needs to be considered in order to understand reality. Therefore, if we add the second dimension of time ('B') and not only the state of being ('A'), we would soon realize that the picture is more complicated. In this case, winning and losing could be seen as a process or an evolution, rather than a static state of existence. It would only make sense to do so as philosophers, given that reality is not static but dynamic. We can also learn from this that it is extremely important not to give in to confirmation bias. Because if we gave in to this bias, we would judge reality by a trait it does not regularly have (being static). In general, attributing confidence to doubtless claims would therefore be a mistake. Make sure you are open-minded enough to explore the possibilities that exist beyond your personal impressions. Anyways, not only winning and losng can exist on a sequence, but they can also cooperate, or lead to one another. Let me give you a more concrete example: When Nazi Germany lost in WWII, some Germans won as well. After the fall of Hitler, that regime had a second dictator. In other words, thanks to Hitler's death, someone actually got to be in charge of his empire, even if briefly. A more obvious example in this context is the forced workers at labor camps, who won their freedom thanks to the defeat of their forced employers by the end of the war. In other words, if Nazi Germany had not lost World War II, people would not have won anything related to the war. Therefore, loss is beneficial not only to opponents, as seen in the example of the second and last dictator of the Nazi regime. Ironically, even if the cause you work for, willingly or otherwise, loses, you might still earn something in return. Arguably, there is no win that is without investment. Investment is essentially the loss of resources for a particular cause. Please note that not every loss is a complete loss. A complete loss has no return; any other "impure" loss, has. If it had not, it was "pure", as in "complete". Thus, any loss that is not "pure"/"complete" can be used in synergy for a greater win. And even if you win, or achieve something, very swiftly and easily, you still invested some time into it. Therefore, there is no such thing as a win that is pure of any loss. In business, you must sacrifice/invest funds in order to gain funds in return. Speaking from experience, in order to run a successful blog, for example, you must invest in marketing. Losing money to marketing means that you increase your chance of growing the money that you make from your blog. Never expect to become a successful blogger without any sacrifice on your part, monetary or otherwise. There is no cost that is not a loss, by the way. If you earn when paying, you would create a paradox. And arguably, paradoxes do not exist in reality, if reality is logical and not purely absurd. That of course includes optical illusions, as they are intentionally made to decieve, not convince. As with the initial premise of the article, in order to overcome such paradoxes, the contradictions must not overlap within the same period of time. It would be like putting more than one meal on a plate that is intended for one meal maximum. Looking at the bigger picture means giving the participants/agents of a situation the importance they deserve. The importance they deserve is in relation to your attempt to understand reality, and not necessarily as of itself. You cannot look at the general picture without attributing value, because the different components of that picture have different values, relative to your own purposes. If a rocket from a hostile nation is headed your way, and you just dropped your ice cream on the sidewalk, surely your own safety is far more important than going back to the vendor and buying a new ice cream. Should you prioritize the ice cream, you may lose your life, and not just your money. Should you look for shelter or simply lie on the ground, you will have to be still, safe but not refreshed. This analogy teaches us that we should value our own safety over comfort because survival deserves to be above temporary pleasures. Should we fail to give things the importance they deserve, in the general picture of a subject or situation, we may easily become more irrational. Hence why we must evaluate the things we gain and the things we lose within many actions we perform, if we want to be reasonable and wise. Overestimating a loss may lead to negative surprise. Overestimating a win may lead to disappointment over your own lack of proportion. And it is in our interest to win, AKA, to succeed within the intentions of our actions. Should we decrease our losses, we will become more successful and more of "winners". This can be applied to any field of activity, from academic to romantic. Because if you want a partner to stay by your side, logic would only dictate that you must sacrifice some for them in order to prove your love and loyalty to them, which is the exchange of your losses. Should you not compromise yourself, not give gifts, not treat them somewhere nice, you will be losing them instead of your own resources. How can we function wisely without having our priorities in check? Should you neglect a partner because you don't want to sacrifice for them? This is exactly where the different values of wins and losses exist within the general picture. My advice is: Strive to prioritize the things and beings which are most valuable to you. That way, you may reduce regretable mistakes by taking on more important tasks for them, first. I can tell you by experience that it's preferable when you have deadlines. And I haven't broke a deadline for years. Did anything important on time. Perhaps the last time I broke a deadline was a round a decade ago. Never understood those who underestimated importance, when importance is clearly present. And even if you don't have a definite deadline for something, the deadline to your life can happen at any time. That is why I couldn't care less about the fact that I'm 25. I already have a will and am working on a regular basis. It is more important to take care of the more important things first, because there might be a time where you would not be able to do them. So seize the moment and at least try making sure you will win more than lose. (More on such success here) (Why I value success more than happiness) Waste too much of your time stalling and idling, and you will lose time and opportunities for winning in the name of your ambitions. The win of a vacation might not be worthy as the loss of time spent being productive. Maybe for rejuvination, which is a loss of time synergized for winning. Not necessarily anything else, if you care enough to be productive. All I can say is that I know the many sacrifices I made in this line of work. Philosophy and management can be very emotionaless. I began repressing myself significantly, to the point of losing much of my capacity to feel... I often feel dead inside. Maybe one day I'll find someone who loves me enough that they will accept me entirely. Thus far, I never had such person. But sacrifices are needed to be made in the name of work, regardless. And for me, life is just business. Workday after workday. For I live to win at work. I only intend to lose at death, when I will be discharged. It's all because I see much reason to think at the far greater picture. Hail Philosocom.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) What is the need to examine some issues our sociopolitical lives? Humans according to According to Aristotle's view are political animals. This implies that man is a social animal who needs the social relation of others for his act and potency to fully manifest. In other words, humans are human only in the mix of others. The social influence of others affects human in their conscious and conscience development thus in turn affects human conception towards a particular reality. It's no wonder there are variaties in culture, traditions, belief, norms and values which is based upon human relationships in a particular society, despite these diffrences some can still be captured the similar with others view, pointing to the fact that society is an organic whole by which each elements is inter-related. Man by nature is so egostic who seeks for anything that can only be favorable to his individualistic existence but despite that, Humans still maintain that social aspect, the egostic part of man keep influencing his socio-political relationship which was captured in the first state of human nature as it was a game of might and the 'fits' are made to survive. Man according to Aristotle is a rational animal, which implies that man posses the act to think towards his existence, environment and his relationship with others. It is in this sense that one can understand that society is an organization of the people, for the people, and by the people. If you don't think about others, others will think for you, thus has been the base where all the socio-political ideology and practices have been theorized. Most of this theories includes: Communalism, socialism, capitalism, democracy and to mention but a few. Therefore, to discover the best way man should be in the society man need to think and be able to examine his relationship with others in order to negat the danger of Hunan activities which might not really be immediate but in future to come. The quest of examining the sociopolitical issues is not for one person, it is for everyone but better analyzed by the sound minds. This question however is very important in human life and development as it stands as the base on how best the society and the relationship of man should be. African Culture In Nigeria: Obajne (A case of study) A Myth or Reality The Myth Of Ogbanje is regarded as an influential spirit that possesses little children in Igbo traditional society,this spirit influences little children and makes them behave negatively to the norms and instincts of the their parents and the society . Most People believes that Ogbanje is merely a myth,but the wonderful part is that it influences most of their children even till adult stage. A cultural myth Ogbanje have existed among the Igbo people of Nigeria. These children may have morbidities that are manageable while some normal children may have to live with the stigma of being labelled such. The objective of this work was to assess Nigeria’s perception of ogbanje phenomenon and morbidity in ogbanje children. The Belief of Obanje It has since been a literary and cultural phenomenon, however is of clinical interest since the children may have some symptomatology pointing to a clinical entity. Also the belief of mothers on the phenomenon may affect their health seeking behaviour ultimately affecting morbidity and mortality rates. The modern day Igbo mother may no longer patronise native doctors who heal with voodoo, but may patronize herbal practitioners where they receive herbs of which their content and dosages are unknown. Belief in cosmic powers and supernatural causes to ill-health may also make mothers seek help at churches and prayer houses rather than seek orthodox help. The Effects of Obanje on Nigerian Children However, many cultural and religious beliefs exist in Nigeria and amongst the Igbo tribe of Nigeria. One of such beliefs is the “Ogbanje phenomenon. Ogbanje is an expression of the Igbo tribe of Nigeria which means a repeater. It describes a magical child who repeatedly dies, reenters the mother’s womb only to be born again. The ogbanje spirit is said to be a malevolent spirit which plagues the family with misfortune and grief. Ogbanje children are believed to be committed to a shortened life span to the deities. With this commitment they receive a desirable appearance or outstanding psychic talent but at the expense of human relationships. They are said to have spiritual companions with which they always communicate supernaturally resulting in hallucinatory experiences or dreams. They are also said to arrange to die at an agreed time of a brief illness usually at about puberty or a significant day of their life such as their birthday. Conclusion: Obanje -- a Myth or Fact? The picture below shows how African conceive the efficacy of Ogbenje is been conceive, critically looking at the picture above we could see the simple analysis pointing to the ontological look of all African. In their simple sense,before a Child is come into existence,there are several forces driving their being, these forces are always pacify and control by natal rituals by offering sacrifices to the deities that influences their being and that's the only way most of the children do away with those forces while the careless parents neglects this implication and their offsprings are mostly trapped by this spirit. Nevertheless,it also good to know that this Ogbanje spirit falls on Nigerian Children with or without natal rituals because those forces are believed to still have influences on human daily activities but are said to stop after proper rituals to librate the child in question. While in Why -- Ask Why? Why are people been pushed with multiple desire, passion, emotion, aniexty and the likes...? Psychologically, some people allow their id to suppress their ego and thus influence their human nature bur why should it be so? Though we are aware of our innate desires which we strives to attain in every minute on earth but why should it be multiple? Forgetting that we all are striving to fill up nothingness! Have you took time to think about this nonsensical world... The purpose of this life Which we try to make meaningful with our primitive-cultural beliefs, dogmatic beliefs of our religious doctrine and all other selfish opinion claiming to have found life meaningful... all are opinion confered on pressumtion and not Truth... though humans claims that to be wise enough but indeed they're cleaver ...painting their self opinion to be Truth. Then having known this facts, why should you be overwhelmed by burdens of pains, pleasures, emotions, desires whereas you know that life is too short? Among those things you desire to get,if you end up getting one out of ten then be happy and if you end up getting all be happy too but always remember that nothing is permanent including yourself and nothing external is yours then why should you be angry when your external things leaves you? Are those things yours? You strive to have a child as if it's our purpose of being here? Giving birth does that justify why you're here? You will still leave them and their can never be you then why should you be angry? Why should people's life influence you? How sure are you whether they're right? Your friends fails you and you're angry? You are angry because you the one whom you loves ended up failing you or cheating on you, then why should you panic? It's true that you love him/her but does he or she belongs to you? Even at that, he or she claims to be smart, being smart for how many years then everything will fade away, why should you be angry? Let them go, there are not yours and let them cheat after all for how many years? You strives to diffuse in pains and suffering here in order to attain a better world to come, how sure are you that such world ever exist? Then if here should be the rout that leads to another end,then it is even good to die on time but if everything ends here then why should we panic? The best is to live in peace and contribute to humanity (development of people and transformation of the society). The Question of Existance and Non-Existance Nothingness is basic to understanding existence. Nothingness is the absence of being. It is ontologically dependent on being, meaning that it can only exist in relation to being. Existentialism holds that humans are the beings that bring nothingness into the world. We understand the world by questioning being. For example, if a mechanic is trying to find out what is wrong with a car that has broken down, they might look in the carburetor. In doing so, they must be considering the possibility that there is nothing in the carburetor. If there is something in the carburetor, then the problem must be somewhere else. Sartre illustrated this point in Being and Nothingness by saying, "If I question the carburetor, it is because I consider it possible that there is nothing there in the carburetor." In other words, the mechanic's questioning of the carburetor is only possible because of the nothingness that exists within the carburetor. If the carburetor were full of something, there would be no need to question it. This shows that nothingness is essential to our understanding of existence. It is through our understanding of nothingness that we are able to make choices and understand how things might be if they were not as they are. Sartre also used the example of an arrangement to meet a friend called Pierre in a cafe in which Sartre arrives fifteen minutes late and looks around the cafe to see whether Pierre has waited for him. Sartre wrote: "To be sure, Pierre's absence supposes an original relation between me and this cafe; there is an infinity of people who are without any relation with this cafe for want of a real expectation which establishes their absence. But, to be exact, I myself expected to see Pierre, and my expectation has caused the absence of Pierre to happen as a real event concerning this cafe. It is an objective fact at present that I have discovered this absence, and it presents itself as a synthetic relation between Pierre and the setting in which I am looking for him. Pierre absent haunts this cafe and is the conditioning of self-nihilating organisation as ground. By contrast, judgments which I can make subsequently to amuse myself, such as, “Wellington is not in this cafe, Paul Valery is no longer here, etc.” These have a purely abstract meaning; they are pure applications of the principle of negation without real or efficacious foundation, and they never succeed in establishing a real relation between the cafe and Wellington or Valery. A Guide Towards a Good Relationship Dear singles and those searching, I have this for you: A wise person would always manage a relationship to something meaningful, such aas marriage. Unfortunately, most times before we understand and know the real essence of that thing called "love", a number of past breakups, heartbreaks and selfless care rewarded with uncountable betrayals and cheating without remorse must have killed it. That is the case most times. Then you sit and wonder if this love thing is really for you or you are just wasting your time that should have been channelled in more productive ventures. Yes, it can be devastating sometimes. Again, most times we dare all odds and insist on marrying for love alone, irrespective of the series of pains and rewards of love with cheating but eventually end up gaining perpetual pain as marriage. Then it may be too late. Allow Your relationship to be born out of genuine friendship first because real friendship is bold and courageous in truth but mare expression of love laced with irrepressible emotions, premarital sex and romance is usually fearful and weak in truth. This is why some of you cannot face Your fear and correct the people that you claim You love when they are wrong because You are afraid they might get angry. Also, unending tolerance and the inherent ability of your partner to genuinely compliment Your consistent efforts and strength and also moderate/tame Your weaknesses should be Your primary guiding principle to finding a different soul in a different body. Be extremely careful so as to not run away from loneliness as a single person and end up gaining a sour and solitary life as a relationship. That is why You must not rush anything. Everything must come at it's own time. Build a healthy relationship with and possibly marry your friend and peace of mind coloured with happiness and success will happen. But ignorantly succumb to mare love built on illicit sex and romance alone and endurance will happen in Your relationship, even in marriage if you eventually marries that person. FAILED NATION: Nigeria: a case of study. Nigeria is a nation that is characterized by its lack of weaving, eating bread that is not harvested, acclaiming bullies as heroes, and valuing conquerors as bountiful. It is a nation that despises passion but submits in awakening. It is a nation that does not raise its voice, boast, or rebel when faced with adversity. It is a nation with a fox as its statesman and a juggler as its philosopher, and whose art is patching and mimicking. It is a nation with sages who are dumb with years and strongmen who are still in the cradle. It is a nation divided into fragments, each deeming itself a nation. Fact About Human Society Human history can be viewed as a slowly dawning awareness that we are members of a larger group. Initially our loyalties were to ourselves and our immediate family, next, to bands of wandering hunter-gatherers, then to tribes, small settlements, city-states, nations. We have broadened the circle of those we love. We have now organized what are modestly described as super-powers, which include groups of people from divergent ethnic and cultural backgrounds working in some sense together — surely a humanizing and character building experience. If we are to survive, our loyalties must be broadened further, to include the whole human community, the entire planet Earth. Many of those who run the nations will find this idea unpleasant. They will fear the loss of power. We will hear much about treason and disloyalty. Rich nation-states will have to share their wealth with poor ones. But the choice, as H. G. Wells once said in a different context, is clearly the universe or nothing. Morality in Subjection "A morally sound person does not support evil, even when that evil is done by friends, family, or party. You will still object to it". -- Sir Ray Murphy. The above saying brings forth the following question: Each day, we clamor about how corrupt people or politicians have become. We attack them endlessly with words. The honest question is: If we were to be their children or their partners, and knowing fully well that our father or partner is corrupt in the position they hold or in what they do, would we: Voice out and challenge our father? Voice out and hand our husband to the authorities? The answer is blunt: no. We might even get corrupt together with them. I have never seen the children of powerful people trumpeting their parents' bad personalities to the public. Have you? The reason is that personal interest is involved. We can only clamor and bring them to book if our interest is not involved. As a student of human nature, I say to us all: The world is ruled by selfish interests, and it is nearly impossible to meet morally sound people in a society full of selfish interests.

(Background music) (September 2023 note: I am no longer handicapped. I explained why in this article). ************************************ (French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English Below) Le guide moraliste rubinshteinique de l'hospitalité L'hospitalité est une tradition honorable qui se retrouve à travers l'histoire de l'humanité, à travers le monde. Lorsque vous offrez sincèrement votre hospitalité à quelqu'un, vous lui montrez votre respect. Un hôte authentique ne peut donc pas héberger sans avoir aucun respect envers ses invités. Je ne parle pas forcément des hôtels et autres commerces où l'on héberge des personnes en échange d'un gain monétaire. Après tout, le gain monétaire peut facilement dépasser l'aspect d'honneur dans cet échange, alors que le seul intérêt du chef d'entreprise est de capitaliser sur les besoins des étrangers.Ainsi même, la qualité de l'entretien est un signe de respect, même dans de tels cas. En tant qu'être moral, l'hospitalité est très importante pour moi, chaque fois que j'héberge quelqu'un dans mon appartement. Je me sens obligé de leur accorder le respect qu'ils méritent et d'offrir tout ce que je peux, bien que je sois une personne handicapée. Bien sûr, je n'héberge personne sur mon territoire. Car mon territoire est le mien. C'est moi qui décide qui entre et qui sort. L'influence dans mes décisions n'est pas pertinente. Car je sais que mes actions ont des conséquences. Et en tant que tel, j'ai le respect de ne pas héberger ceux qui ont été affreux envers ceux que j'apprécie. Je n'ai aucun désir de faire honte aux autres en respectant ceux qui leur ont fait honte. Je suis un Maître Hérétique de Grâce. Cela signifie que je remets profondément en question et m'oppose à la moralité perçue de la société, au nom de la grâce. Au nom de la vertu, de l'équité et de l'honnêteté. Je regarde les dépravés moralement, et ceux qui justifient leur immoralité, et j'ai honte. Je ressens de la pitié. Je ressens la disgrâce, le chagrin et l'humiliation. J'ai honte, car je refuse d'être comme eux. Car je veux être un meilleur être humain. Un homme meilleur, et être un meilleur hôte, sont certainement des caractéristiques de ma noble ambition de devenir plus moral qu'une grande partie de l'humanité. Et je ne suis qu'un « maître » parce que c'est une compétence que je perfectionne et que je m'efforce de perfectionner indéfiniment. Comme tous les maîtres méritent de le faire. Non, je ne suis pas un saint. Mais être imparfait est une mauvaise excuse pour ne pas travailler à l'amélioration. Voir l'illusion du Nirvana, sur quoi j'ai déjà écrit. Il est imprudent de considérer la morale comme une notion purement subjective. Parce que lorsque nous avons besoin de survivre et que nous devons compter sur les autres pour survivre et prospérer, nous devons attribuer une certaine importance objective à la moralité. Parce que plus nous humilions et manquons de respect aux autres, plus nous pouvons nuire à notre propre survie et à notre coopération avec les autres êtres humains. Il est donc de notre intérêt de travailler et de devenir des êtres plus moraux. Cela signifie que, lorsque nous accueillons des personnes, nous ne devons pas seulement les respecter, mais aussi ceux avec qui elles sont associées et leurs relations avec ceux qui nous sont chers. Pourquoi? Car l'hospitalité est aussi une notion politique, et pas seulement morale ou financière, forcément. C'est comme un mouvement que vous pouvez faire sur un échiquier. Vous pouvez en tirer quelque chose, tout comme vous pouvez perdre quelque chose, en retour. Évaluez vos actions avec sagesse, si vous ne voulez pas faire plus de mal que de bien. Demandez-vous si faire une certaine action vaut le coût qu'elle peut entraîner. Soyez sage. Ne soyez pas naïf. Ne soyez pas innocent, comme un Tom. Et n'osez pas utiliser l'innocence comme excuse pour une mauvaise erreur. Ne justifiez pas vos erreurs. Réduisez simplement leur probabilité, à la place, pour aller de l'avant. Cela fait partie du fait d'être un adulte, n'est-ce pas ? C'est l'une des nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles je suis un Tomasio. Ceux qui utilisent l'innocence et l'ignorance comme excuse pour me maltraiter et/ou m'humilier ne méritent aucune place dans ma vie. Je ne permettrai à personne de se mettre en travers de mon chemin. J'ai été suffisamment traumatisé par les actes d'ignorance des imbéciles qui justifient leurs propres actions par le whataboutism (qu'est-ce que c'est), une erreur logique très infantile souvent utilisée par les enfants de la maternelle et même les élèves du secondaire. "Mais tu as fait des choses aussi !" certains diront. Quelle folie. La différence entre eux et moi, c'est que je m'efforce de m'améliorer et de rectifier mes erreurs. Ils ne font pas nécessairement la même chose. Ceux qui refusent de s'améliorer, parce que d'autres méritent de s'améliorer aussi, sont en dessous de ma moralité rubinsteinienne. (Remarque : Je ne me soucie peu de la terminologie. Je me soucie du sens et de la fonctionnalité des mots. "Rubinshteinic", "Rubinshteinian", dans les deux cas, c'est bien. Le plus sage se soucie de ces aspects. Les termes ne font que représenter. Concentrez-vous sur le primaire, pas le secondaire). Néanmoins, je crois que la vengeance a sa place dans la morale. Certaines personnes sont trop stupides pour réaliser les défauts de leurs erreurs jusqu'à ce qu'on les leur montre. La vengeance peut être utilisée pour enseigner à ces personnes les leçons qu'elles méritent, afin qu'elles ne répandent pas leur dépravation dans un monde déjà dépravé. Malheureusement, il est facile de sous-estimer de nombreuses personnes, car elles n'ont pas la capacité ou la volonté de remettre en question leurs propres moqueries et autres comportements honteux. Une partie de la description de travail du philosophe consiste à montrer aux gens l'erreur de leurs manières. La vengeance n'est qu'un des outils qui peuvent être utilisés à cette fin. Je n'hébergerai jamais ceux qui sont déshonorants impulsif, avec peu ou pas de honte non plus. La morale est avant tout une contrainte. Ceux qui m'ont maltraité ou qui m'ont été chers ne mettront jamais les pieds sur mon territoire. Mon territoire ne mérite pas d'être souillé par leur présence immorale. Chen ne sera jamais autorisée dans aucune propriété physique que je pourrais posséder. C'est elle qui m'a traité avec une expression de si mauvais goût. Il en va de même pour quiconque a levé la main sur moi ou m'a menacé. Si vous êtes précieux pour moi en tant que personne et que quelqu'un qui a fait des choses similaires veut être sur ma propriété, on lui montrera la porte. (En outre : aucun de mes agresseurs ne mérite de recevoir un centime de mon empire de contenu en pleine croissance). C'est mon droit d'héberger qui je veux. Cela signifie également que j'ai le droit d'agir honteusement. Parce que dans une société moralement dépravée, vous avez le droit d'être moralement dépravé vous-même. Tout ça parce que c'est accepté. Cependant, contrairement à beaucoup de gens, je refuse d'être honteux. Je n'utiliserai pas mes droits comme excuse. En ce qui concerne cet article, cela inclut ma propre mère. Quiconque abusera à l'avenir, ne sera pas admis sur mon territoire. Peu m'importe que le monde soit injuste et honteux. Peu m'importe que la société normalise l'injustice, la disgrâce, la moquerie et l'ingratitude. Aucunes! Rien de tout cela ne signifie que je devrais en être partie prenante. Si j'agis comme prévu dans une kakistocratie, je ne ferai que contribuer à sa honteuse normalisation des souffrances inutiles. Et je refuse de devenir un Kakistocrate. Je refuse d'être un patron abusif. En visitant ce site, chers lecteurs, vous êtes mes invités. Veuillez traiter cet espace avec le même respect que moi, comme s'il s'agissait d'un espace physique. C'est un espace public, mais il n'appartient qu'à moi et à moi seul. Après ma mort, il appartiendra à mon successeur, quel qu'il soit. Merci pour la lecture. Final : Je ne plaisante en aucune façon. Regardez profondément dans mes yeux, et j'espère que comprendrez le poids de mon sérieux. Car le plus souvent alors non, il n'y a pas d'humour à l'intérieur. ****************** (English, Original) Hospitality is a honorable tradition that can be found across the history of humanity, throughout the world. When you extend your hospitality to someone sincerely, you show your respect to them. A genuine host, therefore, cannot host without any respect to his or her guests. I am not speaking of hotels, necessarily, and other businesses where you host people in exchange for monetary gain. After all, the monetary gain can easily overcome the aspect of honor in this exchange, when the sole interest of the business owner is to capitalize over the needs of strangers. Even so, serviceability is a worthy sign of respect, even in such cases. As a moral being, hospitality is very important to me, whenever I do host someone in my apartment. I feel compelled to give them the respect they deserve, and offer whatever I can, despite being a handicapped person. Of course, I do not exactly host anyone in my territory. For my territory is mine. It is I who decides who gets in and who gets out. Influence in my decisions is an irrelevant matter. For I know my actions have consequences. And as such, I have the self-respect to not host those who have been awful to those who I value. I have no desire to shame others by respecting those who have been disgraceful to them. I am a Heretic Master of Grace. It means I deeply question and oppose the perceived morality of society, in the name of grace. In the name of virtue, fairness, and honesty. I look at the morally depraved, and on those who justify their immorality, and I feel shame. I feel pity. I feel disgrace, sorrow, and humiliation. I feel shame, for I refuse to be like them. For I want to be a better human being. A better man, and being a better host, are certainly features in my noble ambition to become more moral than much of humanity. And I am merely a "master" because it is a skill I hone and strive to hone indefinitely. As all masters deserve to do. No, I am no saint. But being imperfect is a poor excuse to not work towards improvement. See the Nirvana Fallacy, I wrote about. It is unwise to regard morality as a purely subjective notion. Because when we need to survive, and when we need to rely on others for survival and prosperity, we must attribute some degree of objective importance to morality. Because the more we shame and disrespect others, the harder we can damage our own survival and cooperation with other human beings. It is, therefore, our interest, to work and become more moral beings. It means that, when we host people, we should not only respect them, but those whom they are associated with, and their relations with those who are dear to us. Why? Because hospitality is also a political notion, and not only moral or financial, necessarily. It is like a move you can make in a chess board. You can earn something out of it, just like you can lose something, in return. Evaluate your actions wisely, if you do not want to cause more harm than good. Ask yourself if doing a certain action is worth the cost it may bring. Be wise. Don't be naive. Don't be innocent, like a Tom. And don't you dare use innocence as an excuse for a poor mistake. Do not justify your mistakes. Just reduce their probability, instead, moving forward. It is but part of being a grown adult, correct? That is one of the many reasons I am a Tomasio. Those who use innocence and ignorance as an excuse to abuse and/or humiliate me deserve no place in my life. I will not allow anyone to stand in my way. I have been traumatized enough by the ignorant deeds of fools who justify their own actions with whataboutism, a very infantile logical fallacy often used by kindergarteners and even high school students. "But you did things too!" others may claim. How foolish. The difference between me and them is that I strive to improve and rectify my mistakes. They do not necessarily do the same. Those who refuse to improve, because others deserve to improve as well, are beneath my Rubinsteinian morality. (Note: I care little for terminology. I care for the meaning and functionality of words. "Rubinshteinic", "Rubinshteinian", either way is fine. The wiser being cares for these aspects. The terms merely represent. Focus on the primary, not the secondary). Nevertheless, I believe that vengeance has its place in morality. Some people are too foolish to realize the faults of their errors until they are shown them. Vengeance can be used to teach these people the lessons they deserve, so that they do not spread their depravity to an already depraved world. Unfortunately, it is easy to underestimate many people, as they lack the ability or will to question their own mockery and other disgraceful behavior. Part of the philosopher's job description is to show people the error of their ways. Vengeance is just one of the tools that can be used for this purpose. I will never host those who are dishonorable or impulsive, with little to no shame to either. Morality is first and foremost a restraint. Those who have been abusive to me or to those I hold dear will never set foot in my territory. My territory does not deserve to be tainted by their immoral presence. Chen will never be allowed in any physical property that I may own. She is the one who treated me with such poor taste. The same goes for anyone who has laid a hand on me or threatened me. If you are valuable to me as a person, and someone who has done similar things wants to be on my property, they will be shown the door. (Furthermore: No abuser of mine deserves to get a penny of my growing content empire). It is my right to host whoever I want. It also means that I have the right to act disgracefully. Because in a morally depraved society, you are allowed to be morally depraved yourself. All because it is accepted. However, unlike many people, I refuse to be disgraceful. I will not use my rights as an excuse. In this article's regard, that includes my own mother. Anyone who either abused her or will absue in the future, will not taint my ground. I do not care that the world is unjust and disgraceful. I do not care that society noramlizes injustice, disgrace, mockery and ungratefulness. None! None of those mean that I should be one as well. Should I act as expected in a Kakistocracy, I will only contribute to its shameful noramlization of unnecessary suffering. And I refuse to become a Kakistocrat, to those whom I will hire. I refuse to be an abusive boss. By visiting this site, dear readers, you are my guests. Please treat this space with the same respect that I do, just as if it were a physical one. This is a public space, but it belongs to me and me alone. After my death, it will belong to my successor, whoever they may be. Thank you for reading. Final: I am not kidding around in any way. Look deeply into my eyes, and you'll hopefully understand the weigth of my seriousness. For most often then not, there is no humor inside.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Background music) ************************ Introduction -- The Value of Conduct Is there a need for code of conduct? Humans are not born with a conscience, but we develop one through our experiences and interactions with others. Love, moral values, religion, codes of conduct, and ethics are all ways that we try to live in harmony with ourselves and others. Debateably, there have been more atrocities in history than in today's modern world. But today, many of us are afraid to go wrong, because of one reason or the other, fear of hell fire, fear of the law, fear of what you will have to lose, fear of abandonment, fear of prison. Etcetera. Those who are not afraid to go wrong, may do so because they believe that the consequences are not as severe as they are often made out to be. When they are wrong in that regard, they pay the price they have underestimated. Although there is no one answer that is universally accepted, I believe no one is born moral: Society instills morals in us. Just so you know, in spite of all our success to instill morals, some people out there are each and every day displaying this dark side of humans, hurting their fellow humans day in and day out. A code of conduct is essential for setting behavioral expectations, promoting a positive environment, preventing misconduct, ensuring legal and ethical compliance, safeguarding reputation, providing guidance, and encouraging accountability. It serves as a valuable tool for organizations and communities to establish and maintain a culture of integrity and respect. Without this code of conduct, laws, and order, we would have been wild like other animals. Does Love Exist? Now let's talk about love... You think love exists, and I believe you might be right. Do you know why? I try to grasp its effect and feel the same way, though it's based on individual conception that can not be measured by others expect the person in question of experiencing it. Assuming that love really exists, there is a problem with how it is applied. Let's say I have love, I wish to love another being, and I desire the love to be reflected back to me. It is no wonder that not everyone is attracted to each other, but only a few do. The question is, who do you love, and how does he or she return your love, if love really exists? We know that to love is to be loved, and to be loved is to be sure that love really exists. The problem is not loving, because love is embedded in us naturally. We have the capability to give it to whoever we want. But the problem is, if love really exists, do we feel the love being reflected back to us from the people we give it to? If the love is not reflected back to us, that shows that it does not really exist. It might seem to exist in our imagination, but it is an illusion. Why do people fail to maintain this simple act of love? Why do we get disappointed? This proves that love does not exist. If there is disappointment in the end, it follows that we were only imagining its existence. Then if so, that justify that it doesn't exist... Because if there's a disappointment at the end... It follows that we were only having the imagination of its existence. Love is an illusion. What really exists is interest. It is the combination of interest and emotion that people think is love. When the emotion comes, people start looking for someone to place their immediate interest on, in the name of love. Love does not exist! If it does exist, then justify its existence with reason. How to justify love, then? The main condition for the achievement of love is the overcoming of one's narcissism. The narcissistic orientation is one in which one experiences as real only that which exists within oneself, while the phenomena in the outside world have no reality in themselves, but are experienced only from the viewpoint of their being useful or dangerous to one. The opposite pole to narcissism is objectivity. It is the faculty to see other people and things as they are, objectively, and to be able to separate this objective picture from a picture which is formed by one's desires and fears. (By "objectivity", I refer to beyond self-interests). In human life and society, Man in his rationality developed the idea of supreme Being (God) in whom all things must have came to be, as dictated by divine reason. The basic question here is: what are the means by which such a being can be related? And thus, the question gave birth to what we know as religion today. What is religion again if not a means of relating to God by an individual or as a collective? Many humans consider religion so special, holy and supernatural and thus influences human thinking, action and will, within society and communiy. Religion also constitutes other components like rituals, symbols & signs, worship, rites and many more. It is also good to know that religion is quite different from culture though some contradicts that but sometimes it overlaps. It does not overlap, for example, in cultures where religion is not a significant feature. Religion and Human Values Religion(s) is highly practiced by humans and truth be told, God intervenes; that has made people to be influenced by their choices of religion. But I think man should be authentic (free) in his choices (AKA, free will). However, Man has been into existence before religion. But in today's world (especially in Africa), religion remains one of the caustic problems in most of the African Societies. Countless cases of religion crises, dogmatic presumptuousness, segregations e.t.c and these have affected the development of today's African society. But why? People failed to understand that life is the most sacred there is. Any religion that disregard this value, deserves to be doubted. People failed to question most of their faith and thereby believing everything! Forgetting that man is the foundation of all beliefs (AKA, Religious Humanism) People failed to understand that religion acts as a means to an end, and stopped considering a particular religion as the best among all. Instead, many at least, stick to a particular religion, without much exploration. * People failed to apply reason before faith. It's good if we can acknowledge the fact that no one is sure of anything and stop fighting over religion! Bloodshed is not justified by ideas, religious or otherwise! Let peace and love flow. Niccolò Machiavelli's theory in the present day: Political Dispensation in Africa. In human society, many discover the variety of views as regard to human belief, thought, rationality, culture tradition and conception. These factors affects human social life in relations to others. Then, when it comes to the political life of humans, the above factors influences the political view of humans, but the basic question remains: What is the State? who should rule the State? Why should he or she do it? and what are the means of becoming a leader? These were the base of all the poltical theories that are seen today, though new theories keep coming up as everything is in the state of change. In Niccolò Machiavelli's (1469-1527) Theory, the summary of his main idea is that 'The end justifies the means'. Niccolò Machiavelli was born in Florence and worked as a diplomat in the court of Caesar Bongis. He is best known for his famous work The Prince, which expounded a new political vision that was a departure from idealism. Machiavellianism is a shrewd, cynical political realist philosophy which emphasizes that people should be considered as they are instead of what we might wish them to be. He advises that if one wants to succeed in office, they should not be preoccupied by normal moral rules and must do whatever is necessary to stay in power. To maintain power, one must have a strong military force that is loyal to him and always ready to defend him and his sovereignty when threatened. Machiavelli's 'The Prince' represents a complete break with conventional political theory. While Machiavelli outlined what political science is and how it works, while Plato and Aristotle promoted and felt what political society deserves to be. He (Machiavelli) believed that no leader can succeed by upholding moral principles. His Prince archetype had to use both human and animal techniques to respond to his acts. According to Machiavelli, depending on the circumstances, he had to kill, maim, oppress, deceive and cheat his friends and subjects. Clearly, the political philosophy of Machiavelli has a wide range of effects. (positive and negative). Positively, Machiavelli is regarded as the forerunner of a larger current resurgence of the values of classical humanism and was considered as the first among the modern socio-political philosopher. Consequently, Machiavelli's idea that power depends on the free will of the masses has been criticized for supporting universal egoism. And if the end justifies the means, are the means noble? Macavelli was interested in the implications of his idea which is very bad of him because the means supposed to be as good as the end no wonder Sir Peter Obi in his speech over the 2023 Nigerian presidential election: "It is my belief that for you to answer “your excellency”, the process through which you arrive to office must be “excellent”. (2 March 2023) (Rubinshtein's Note: In order to be deemed "excellent" as a leader, one must avoid becoming a kakistocrat) Now, to philosophically relate the theory of Niccolò Machiavelli in the present day political dispensation (freedoms, rights) in Africa. We discover that the African world today, those who seeks political powers, anchors it in that of Machiavelli's theory. While they seek whichever possible to get their interest, not minding the implications of it. These have made the system to loose the political value by negating the interest of the masses to selfish interest. And not the interest of the collective, nor the greater good. These have contributed to failed government, political cries, ethnocentrism and loss of interest among the masses (AKA, political apathy) and thus affects the development in Africa. In most of the African countries (especially Nigeria) have lost the test of good governance as regard to these and thus remains one the challenges of today's politics this continent. The effects of Machiavelli's political theory as regard to political dispensation in Africa have really affected African politics. This work of Machiavelli leads to absolutism and narrow nationalism. If power will be the end, and not the means, it will lead to autocracy and war just as it's been recorded today in most of the African countries. In conclusion, I think Sir Peter Obi actually captured the implication and the penancy in his assertions, as I will repeat his quote: "It is my belief that for you to answer “your excellency”, the process through which you arrive to office must be “excellent”. A Case Example: Facts About Nigerian Development NIgeria is a country that is blessed with great people of different tribes and enthinics. The name Nigeria was coined by Lord Lugard during the british colonization, Nigeria is known for peace, unity and development; Nigeria have contributed to development of other country by providing most of the things the world would need to be be a better place for humankind. Naturally, humans are the product of nature, thus point the fact that Men are not made to conquer the world, but rather to make it a better place for humanity to flourish and Nigeria has been known for this. Nigeria have contributed the growth of the world by providing most countries with electricity, petrolum, experts, and other natural and humane resources for other needy nations. It is certain that no individual state or society can survive or thrive alone. It shouldn't totaly isolate itself from relating with others, e.g (North Korea) despite President Kim Jong Un's policies which were intented to isolate North Korea from the affairs of the world, this isolation policies did not has a100% success rate, because no State can totally isolate itself from the world, and still thrive. There must be a combination of some neccesary factors that leads to change (development) which might not be found within themselves but in others. Counting some countries that have contributed to the development of others, Nigeria will not be left behind. This points to the fact Nigeria must be a great nation, in order to both survive and thrive. However, the basic questions of development is: Who is developing and for who? Is it trying to raise plusible answer to the above question in the context of Nigeria, we discover that the Nigerian People are always perfoming well in the development of others but going to the Caritas, regardless. We equally note that they have not be good in times of their (the Nigerians') own development. But what could be the causes? In a critical observation, we find out that the fault could be that Nigerian leaders have not understood the language of their problems or that they failed to discover the solutions to what might seems so problematic to them. These challenges might have been articulated in their historical activities, cultural and metaphysical conceptions which calls for strict observation. Therefore, for Nigeria, to do well in development it calls for critical investigation over their cultural and historical conceptions so to discover most of the things that are not pragmatic and strive to restructure them in other to make some changes in their Sociopolitical and economical development. These can not be achieved without a good leader. So Nigeria need rational thinkers, and moral beings, as leaders for them to achieve the goal that is the survival and prosperity of the nation. (Rubinshtein's note: And this article's conclusion and be applied to any nation whatsoever, not only Nigeria).

(September 2023 note: I am no longer handicapped. I explained why in this article). (Background music) Have you craved physical contact from other human beings? I'm not talking about anything romantic necessarily. I'm speaking about the hug of a friend, for instance. I'm talking of... umm.. Well, as someone who lived much of his lifespan as a monk, I didn't really have any other examples... Skin Deprivation, also known as touch starvation, is a condition where you crave for physical touch from another being. Those who claim that loneliness is a state of mind (something I used to believe too) is not entirely true, when we are prone to skin deprivation. As of writing this article I am unaware if it's possible to rid oneself of this bothersome feeling. I can only tell you that I tried it myself, as part of my initial philosophy as a self-imposed monk, around a decade ago. Surpsingly, there are quite significant benefits to human touch, and as a more seasoned philosopher I had enough with arguing with the truth. And I can tell you that, in the rare times I was hugged as an adult, that it does feel refreshing... especially when you live in forced seclusion due to a respiratory disability... In terms of functionality, touch is several things. It is: A need. I am unaware of a human being who never needed it. A limited resource. You are dependant on someone else to touch you, and that's their prerogative. A mental right. By "mental right" I refer to your wellbeing. That you may deserve to be in good wellbeing, psychologically, simply because you haven't done anything horrid that justifies otherwise. A privilage. Only those who secure other people to provide point 2, will get it. The field of romance can surely be ruthless and unforgiving, when you realize that your need is not something you deserve to be handed to you. It is something you deserve to at least try and get from those who don't owe anything to you. ...It's why other people's presence is a privilage. Never forget that. They can always leave. And in some cases, you may need them more than they need you. Compare it to a worker and an employer -- you may need the money more than he/she needs you. I'm sorry, but that's perhaps why we will never have pure equality. It's because the relations between supply and demand are rarely even, if at all. It would only make sense that we will compete, then, because then we have the choice between suppliers. And in "suppliers" I refer to other human beings, and the demands they can give us. If you, yourself, fail to compete against other suppliers, you may be left alone, even as a supplier, and then might become more of a demander than a supplier. Loyalty in any human connection is also one where there is this sufficent transactions between supply and demand. Of at least two sides, of course. Be a poor supplier to the other person and they will either be disloyal or straight out abandon you; Be an excessive demander, and you will overwhelm your "supplier", to the point that they will leave you. However, a supplier is not always around or even available to be made a connection with. If there were always people who could hug you, people won't be suffering from skin deprivation, correct? Other people's physical company is a privilage, far more than their virtual one. Thus, in the absence of a supplier of physical contact, we must still endure life in the name of survival... And in the name of purpose. A purpose helps me a lot to endure this hellish reality called my life. For those new to the site, feel free to read more in your free time using the search bar. Anyways, I believe it was Nietzche who said that “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.” And understand, I have a hidden reason, a hidden "why" for this site that I have yet to reveal to any of you. In order to ensure that "why", I will resume concealing this greatest "why", which still makes me endure this painful reality. Why? Because when you hold a purpose in such high regard like I do, nothing... nothing, is good enough of an excuse to stand in your way. That includes skin deprivation, and the fact that I turned an handicap due to my medical disability. Don't expect it to be easy to have friends in this world, let alone partners. According to a GoodTherapy blog, single men get lonelier than women, because women are socialized to build friendships, and thus, they are likelier to have more dense social networks than their counterparts, and foster greater intimacy with their close friends. Men, on the other hand, may be less willing to expose their vulnerabilities and distress, due to socialization. For they are expected to "suck it up" and keep things to themselves... ...Just as I was constantly told by a female teacher. She didn't really recognized my agony. She just thought I chose to look at things very grimly. No. I was simply rewarded for being stoic and obidient. And when I told another class I just learned to live with all the noise (despite suffering from misophonia), the whole classroom just laughed at me, thinking I was joking, for some dumb reason! Many people are, in a way, imbeciles, for choosing to laugh and mock before understanding one's distress. A distress which can be far greater than their minds may even bother to consider. The unwillingness to consider the possibilities, and be vulnerable to be proven wrong, SO EASILY, is humiliating. However, neither them, my medical condition, or my intense skin hunger, which can bother me greatly, will stand in my way. Disrespect me, and you will become part of the problem. I am not writing just for myself, you know. I'm not self-centered. And I have no use for your humiliating pity. Understand -- I just need you to not position yourself as an obstacle in my way for my hidden purpose. Because those who do, for whatever dumb reason, intentionally or not, are my enemies. Be a good person and just let me live in peace. I had quite enough with meaningless conflicts, online and offline. I am the one who chooses to still live. Keep it in mind.

(French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English version, below) La théorie de l'entreposage – Une philosophie du cœur – Comment évaluerr les humains L' œuvre d'art fournie par Mme Tamara Moskal Le cœur (la sphère émotionnelle de notre être, et non l’organe) est comme une salle de stockage ; un espace limité pouvant contenir une quantité limitée d'éléments. Mais quand cela sort du domaine métaphorique, cela inclut également les gens. Le cœur de certaines personnes est plus grand que celui de d’autres, à cet égard, et peut contenir plus de personnes que d’autres. Cela les rend plus capables de supporter et de préserver les liens dans leur vie. Il en va de même pour l'importance de ces personnes. Le froid est l’absence de chaleur, donc techniquement, le froid n’existe pas indépendamment de sa relation avec la chaleur. Un cœur froid, ou un cœur de glace, est une métaphore pour quelqu'un qui manque de chaleur humaine. En tant que tel, le cœur n’est pas seulement un contenant métaphorique, mais également un outil métaphorique que nous utilisons pour faire preuve de gentillesse, de compassion et d’empathie. Quoi qu’il en soit, quelle que soit la « taille » de votre « espace de stockage », il n’est jamais infini. Vous ne pouvez pas retenir tout le monde dans la vie, et vous ne pouvez sûrement pas tous les traiter avec la plus grande importance. C’est parce qu’il y a des gens qui ne méritent pas d’être contenus dans votre cœur. Pas nécessairement de manière romantique ; émotionnellement, du moins. Je donnerai des exemples de traits de personnes indignes, en cours de route. Une autre raison de notre incapacité à contenir et à sympathiser avec chaque être humain est que nous n’avons pas « le cœur » pour cela. Au contraire, très peu de gens seront capables de pardonner, par exemple, à chaque personne qui leur a causé du tort et/ouqui les a traité avec pitié. Autrement dit, le cœur est l’expression d’au moins 3 éléments fondamentaux : Capacité de contenir dans certaines limites Fonctionnalité Pouvoir Tout cela est limité, et cette limitation est basée sur l’individu. Le confinement nécessite de l'attachement, et en tant que tels, les personnes comme les psychopathes, qui ne sont attachées à personne, sont considérées comme sans cœur pour cette raison. L'attachement, bien qu'il constitue un risque potentiel de dépendance inutile, est important afin que nous ne puissions pas nous débarrasser des autres si facilement ou leur faire du mal de toute autre manière. Il ne serait donc pas judicieux de traiter tout le monde avec le même degré de considération, surtout si cette considération est large. Il y a beaucoup de gens indifférents dans ce monde. Cette indifférence s’est normalisée au point que l’aliénation est devenue naturelle. Ce sont des gens qui ne se soucient pas vraiment de vous, peu importe le temps et l’énergie que vous leur consacrez. Ils seront ingrats. Certains d’entre eux peuvent même vous utiliser comme victime. Ils ne se soucient peut-être même pas de l'intérêt que vous leur portez Qu'il s'agisse d'une relation que vous aviez avec eux ou, à tout le moins, d'une faveur que vous leur avez rendue. Ils ne s'en soucieront pas beaucoup, ils ne vous remercieront pas sincèrement, voire pas du tout. Ils vous abandonneront une fois de plus, une fois que vous aurez survécu à leur utilisation. Avoir un cœur est aussi un nombre 4 : 4. Un passif. Pour certaines personnes, il faut les laisser partir. Mais pour vous aussi, ce sont des exemples de personnes qui ne sont pas dignes de votre temps et qui ne sont pas dignes d’être contenues dans votre cœur. C'est vrai d'une manière mutuelle. Ils se soucient trop peu, voire pas du tout, de mériter cette place en vous. Donnez-leur cette place et vous pourriez être vite déçu. Ils se soucient peu de vous. Ne soyez pas tenté de vous soucier beaucoup d'eux, car lorsqu'ils décident que vous avez perdu votre utilité, vous devez vous adapter en conséquence, et le faire également, au nom du passage à autre chose. Prendre soin des autres n’est pas une capacité que tout le monde possède à juste titre, ni quelque chose que chacun est prêt à donner, même s’il a cette capacité. Ainsi, si vous voulez savoir qui est digne d’être contenu en vous et qui ne l’est pas, vous devez détecter les traits suivants chez les personnes : Ingratitude Disgrâce Apathie face à la détresse Sans filtre (pas de retenue, impulsivité). L'ingratitude se produit lorsque vous n'êtes pas reconnu pour vos contributions ou votre volonté de contribuer. Disgrâce – quand vous êtes humilié, malgré vos efforts. Apathie face à la détresse - lorsqu'ils s'en moquent lorsque vous souffrez de leurs actions, et pire encore, sans filtre, lorsqu'ils manquent de respect pour eux-mêmes pour se retenir, malgré votre souffrance, provoquée par eux, ne fait qu'empirer. Oui, cela peut se dérouler dans cet ordre, mais pas nécessairement. Votre cœur doit encore être ouvert si vous ne voulez pas affronter la misère de la solitude. Ouvrez-vous à des relations honnêtes avec d’autres êtres humains. C'est le compromis : soit être suffisamment vulnérable pour permettre aux gens de votre vie de se rapprocher, soit rester une personne solitaire et/ou personne seule comme je l'étais (pendant près d'une décennie). Car avec chaque personne que vous décidez de stocker en vous, vous risquez qu’un préjudice ou un autre vous soit causé. Pas nécessairement physiquement, mais au moins émotionnellement. L'amour, surtout, fait mal. Je n'ai pas pris la peine de risquer le compromis que j'ai mentionné parce que je craignais la douleur et n'en avais aucun désir, j'ai donc abandonné l'amour pendant près d'une décennie. Je considérais cette douleur comme inutile et je pensais que je n'avais pas vraiment besoin de quelqu'un de proche dans ma vie. Émotionnellement proche, bien sûr. J'ai vu la société comme un environnement hostile, toxique et déprimant. Je le vois toujours de cette façon, mais à un niveau bien moindre, après avoir réalisé qu'il y a des gens dignes dans cette vie, après tout. Voici une liste de traits de caractère chez des personnes dignes : Reconnaissance, Honneur Compassion Retenue Les reconnaissants reconnaissent vos contributions et vos efforts à leur égard. Ils vous respectent eux et vous en tant que personne. Ils souffrent avec vous parce qu'ils se soucient vraiment de vous, et ils se retiennent parce qu'ils n'ont aucun désir d'ajouter à votre souffrance et savent que cela serait en contradiction avec la bonne volonté d"aider qui soulage votre douleur. Si vous ne voulez pas donner de la valeur à des personnes qui ne la méritent pas, vous devez faire la distinction entre les personnes qui affichent des traits dignes et celles qui ont des traits indignes. Ne perdez pas confiance en l’humanité à cause de ces derniers, car il existe des gens qui sont vraiment des êtres bons . Des gens vraiment humains. qui suivent les normes ou non, peu importe. Les normes peuvent être utilisées comme excuse pour être inhumain, ils peuvent être prétentieux. Ne fermez pas votre entrepôt aux « êtres de haute qualité », simplement parce vous avez stocké des articles de mauvaise qualité dans le passé. Cela ne devrait pas avoir de sens. Ne laissez pas le passé faire obstacle à votre avenir. Cela n'a de sens qu'en raison du préjudice que les « êtres » de mauvaise qualité vous ont causé à vous et à votre espace de stockage métaphorique. Ouvrez-vous au risque. À ma connaissance, il n'y a pas d'autre moyen, du moins. Dépendre entièrement du passé est la raison pour laquelle j’ai conçu le sophisme de la victoire. Seul un masochiste aime la douleur, mais la vie est douloureuse. La vie est douloureuse à cause des autres, car il y a beaucoup de gens indignes. de vous Vous êtes celui qui a la liberté de choisir qui garder plus près et qui éloigner. Le propriétaire de ce débarras est vous-même. C’est à vous de décider en premier lieu ce qui entre, ce qui sort et ce qui ne doit pas être stocké à l’intérieur. Très peu d’humains peuvent supporter une vie de solitude complète, ou du moins une vie solitaire très longue. On les appelle bien sûr des ermites. J'en suis un. Mais après une décennie d’isolement émotionnel des autres, où presque personne n’avait une véritable place dans mon cœur, j’en avais assez. J’en ai assez, précisément parce qu’il y a des gens dignes. J’espère que la plupart d’entre vous, lecteurs,êtes dignes. Car vous êtes le lectorat que je recherche et que je suis reconnaissant d’avoir. Je suis conscient de mon potentiel et, en tant que tel, je ne suis pas disposé à renoncer à l'étendue de ma contribution à ce monde. Je refuse de laisser quelques pommes pourries se mettre sur mon chemin. Et peut-être qu'un jour, ce sentiment de solitude dévorant cessera de me tourmenter. Mais les amis ne suffiront pas. Seulement quelqu'un à aimer. En l’absence d’amour, je chercherai le pouvoir, car j’ai beaucoup à donner et je dois continuer à donner pour ne pas me laisser consumer par mon isolement et mon manque de contact. On peut dire que le cœur est aussi un nombre 5 : 5. Un besoin. Merci d'avoir lu. ******************************* (English version) (Background music) The heart (the emotional sphere of our being, not the organ) is like a storage room; a limited space that can contain a limited amount and size of items. But when it comes outside of the metaphorical realm, that includes people, as well. Some people's heart are bigger than others, in that regard, and they can contain more people than others. That makes them more able to endure and preserve connections in their lives. The same goes for these people's importance. Cold is the absence of heat, so technically there is no such thing as cold independently of being related to heat. A cold heart, or an heart of ice, is a metaphor for someone who lacks human warmth. As such, the heart is not only a metaphorical container, but a metaphorical tool as well, in which we use to show kindness, compassion and empathy. Either way, no matter how "big" your "storage room" may be, it is never infinite. You can't hold everyone in life, and surely you can't treat them all with utmost importance. That is because there are people who are unworthy to be contained in your heart. Not romantically, necessarily; emotionally, at least. I will give examples of traits of unworthy people, along the way. Another reason for one's inability to contain and empathize with every single human being is because we do not "have the heart" for it. If anything, only very few people will be able to forgive, for instance, every person who caused them misfortune, and/or show pity. In other words, the heart is an expression of at least 3 basic elements: Containment Functionality Power All of which are limited, and that limitation is based on the individual. Containment requires attachment, and as such people like psychopaths, who are not attached to anyone, are considered heartless for that reason. Attachment, while a potential liability of unnecessary dependence, is important so we wouldn't dispose of others so easily, or hurt them in any other way. It would therefore be unwise to treat everyone with the same degree of regard, especially if that regard is large. There are many uncaring people in this world. It is normalized to the point that alienation became natural. These are people who don't really care for you, no matter how much time and energy you dedicate to them. They will be ungrateful to you. Some of them may even use you as their victim. They might not even care of the dedication itself. Be it a relationship you had with them, or, at the very least, a favor you did for them. They won't care much, they won't thank you sincerely, if at all. They will just abandon you once more, after you outlived your use in their eyes. Having a heart is also a number 4: 4. A liability. For some people need to be let go. But for you as well, these are examples of people who are unworthy of your time, and are unworthy to be contained within your heart. That's true in a mutual way. They care too less, if at all, to deserve that place within you. Give them that place, and you can be quick to be disappointed. They care little for you. Don't be tempted to care much for them, because when they decide that you outlived your usefulness, you should adjust accordingly, and do so as well, in the name of moving on. Caring for others is not a capacity everyone has appropiately, and not something that everyone is willing to give, even if they have said capacity. Thus, if you want to know who is worthy to be contained within you and who is not, you need to detect the following traits in people: Ungratefulness Dishonor Apathy for distress Filterlessness (no self-restraint, impulsivity). Ungratefulness happens when you are not recognized for your contributions or your willing to contribute. Dishonor -- when you are shamed, despite your efforts. Apathy for distress -- when they don't care when you suffer from their actions, and worse of all, filterlessness, when they lack the self-respect to restrain themselves, as your agony, caused by them, is only worsening. Yes, it can go in that order, but not necessarily. Your heart must still be open if you do not want to face the misery of loneliness. Open up to honest relationships with other human beings. That's the tradeoff -- either be vulnerable enough to allow people in your life on a closer level, or remain a solitary, and/or lonely person like I used to be (for almost a decade). For with every person you decide to store inside you, you risk some harm or another being done to you. Not physically, necessarily, but emotionally, at the very least. Love, especially, hurts. I did not bother to risk the tradeoff I mentioned because I feared pain and had no desire for it, thus I gave up on love for almost a decade. I saw that pain as unnecessary, and believed I don't really need anyone close in my life. Emotionally close, that is. I saw society as a hostile, toxic and depressing environment. I still do see it that way, but at a far lesser extant, after I realized there are worthy people in this life, after all. Here is a list of traits with worthy people: Gratefulness, Honor Compassion Restraint The grateful recognize your contributions and efforts to them. They respect you for them, and you, as a person. They suffer along with you because they truly care for you, and they restrain themselves because they have no desire to add into your suffering, and know that it would contradict with the good will that is easing your pain. If you don't want to give worth to people who do not deserve it, you need to distinguish between people who display worthy traits, versus those with unworthy traits. Don't lose faith in humanity due to the latter, because there are people out there who are truly good beings. People who are truly humane. Normative or not, it does not matter. Norms can be used as an excuse to be inhumane, hence why they can be pretentious. Do not close your storage room to "high-quality items", just because it stored bad-quality ones in the past. It shouldn't make sense. Do not let the past stand in the way of your future. It only makes sense because of the harm the low-quality "items" have caused to you and to your metaphorical storage room. Open yourselves to risk. There is no other way that I know of, at least. To depend completely on the past is the reason I devised the Victory Fallacy. Only a masochist loves pain, but life is painful. Life is painful because of other people, because a lot of unworthy people are out there. You are the one with the freedom of choice of who to keep closer and who to keep away. The owner of this storage room is yourself. It is up to you to decide what let in, what let out, and what to not store inside in the first place. Very few humans can endure a life of complete solitude, or at least a very large one. They are called hermits, of course. I am one. But after a decade of emotional isolation from others, where almost no one had a true place in my heart, I had quite enough. I had quite enough specifically because there are worthy people. I hope most of you, readers, are. For you are the readership I strive and am grateful to have. I am aware of my potential, and as such I am unwilling to give up on the extent of contribution I can bring to this world. I refuse letting a few rotten apples stand in my path. And perhpas one day, this self-devouring feeling of loneliness will cease to torment me. But friends won't cut it. Only someone to love. In the absence of love, I will seek power, because I have much to give, and I need to keep on giving to not be consumed by my isolation and skin deprivation. You can say that the heart is also a number 5: 5. A need. Thanks for reading.