(For more on the dangers of A.I, click here)
In my case, AI is nothing more than a new competition. So in order to prepare for it, I must prove my and my writers' relevancy not only as content creators, but as humans.
I won't cooperate anymore with AI regarding content creation (AKA in writing). I can lose some of my credibility as a result. Thus, collaborating with it is unnecessary, and even counter-intuitive.
I only cooperated with it very few times, when I wrote stories with it. Two of them are on the site:
https://www.philosocom.com/post/shadow-of-veronica-an-a-i-story-of-eccentricity-and-fatigue
https://www.philosocom.com/post/in-order-to-conquer-the-world-a-story-written-by-man-and-machine
That's especially true when it can make the readership prioritize it, over me. It be unwise for me to give an advantage to a competitor.
And without writing, I have little reason to endure life.
Because writing is the only thing that makes me smile inside.
If I was an artist, I might've a similar policy. But I'm no artist.
Philosocom is for human writers. They may like AI if they wish, but it does not contradict that they themselves are human. So I don't mind their opinions on the matter.
After all, I entertain all kinds of thoughts, regardless of my own standpoint, as I constantly note in my writers' articles.
We do not have to be like-minded in order to cooperate. We only need to produce good philosophical content for the readership.
For content is king, and content is at the highest order on Philosocom.
Thanks for reading.
