Socrates and The Problem With Philosophy (Also, Philosocom's Socrates Directory)

(All Articles on Socrates: https://www.philosocom.com/post/on-socrates-i-know-nothing

https://www.philosocom.com/post/socrates-twin-brother-by-alon-lipschitz-translated-guest-post

https://www.philosocom.com/post/society-and-the-death-of-socrates)

(Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Dilemmas and Problems)

“Socrates made people face their hypocrisy. He had to die.” -- Francis Mont

(Background music)

Socrates, the Father of Western Philosophy, was a bit of a fool, or a wise fool. He was a man so deeply entrenched in his own principles that he was willing to sacrifice his life rather than compromise them. His essential loyalty to the law of the state, while admirable in its own way, ultimately led to his demise. Breaking the law, after all, would make him a hypocrite, a contradiction of his own teachings, and so he refused to escape prison, even when offered the chance by his apprentices.

His rigid adherence to his principles was his undoing, as he philosophized to show people their hypocrisy of knowledge. He sacrificed himself on the altar of philosophy and honesty. It's a lesson that many of us can learn from. Socrates cared more about the truth and its inquiry, more than he cared about himself, so he accepted his execution wholeheartedly for doing exactly what he wanted to do: To live a life that is well-lived by examining it. Reality is ever-changing, and it's often better to adapt your beliefs than to stick to them blindly.

Socrates was a reasonable man, a thinker of great depth and insight. We might think that premature death was irrational here, but no. He lived the life he wanted, and he was the one who decided how he wanted to go. He examined his life and used his philosophy to also live that life to the very end, choosing to die in prison for his philosophical way of life, instead of discarding it in exchange for his freedom. 

Yet even the most logical minds can be flawed, and I would say that Socrates' greatness lies in the fact that he was a simple man. Philosophy, the pursuit of wisdom, often involves a constant struggle to avoid contradictions. Yet, the world is full of inconsistencies, and trying to escape them can be futile. Shouldn't we embrace our flaws like Socrates embraced the knowledge of his own ignorance?

Slavoj Žižek, known for his provocative and often controversial analyses, has faced significant backlash for his outspoken views. His unwavering defense of his beliefs, while understandable, echoes the tragic fate of Socrates. Like the ancient philosopher, Žižek risks becoming a martyr to his heavily-criticized ideas, potentially facing a form of intellectual exile, like in the case of Solomon Maimon, or societal ostracism.

The pursuit of truth often involves confronting our own flaws. I've always believed that a good philosopher must be aware of their own limitations, and attempt to reduce them.

As a flawed philosopher myself, I'm comfortable with this reality, merely because I am aware of the Nirvana Fallacy. To understand the world, we must acknowledge our own imperfections. A philosopher who is afraid to admit their mistakes is a philosopher who will never grow. Self-knowledge is imperative for growth.

Would you rather die a hypocrite or live a flawed life? I choose the latter. My life is more important than my philosophy. How can I put my philosophical research in a continuous state of growth if I'm dead?

Socrates, in his stubborn adherence to his principles, may have been a wise fool whose inquisitive lifestyle have led to his own death, yet his legacy lives on. His teachings, though flawed, have inspired countless thinkers throughout the ages. 

And perhaps, in his tragic end, we can find a valuable lesson: that even the most noble of causes can have unintended consequences. A mere stonemason is now deemed the father of Western Philosophy.