top of page

Socrates and The Problem With Philosophy (Also, Philosocom's Socrates Directory)

Updated: Sep 21

A man with a cup of drink


“Socrates made people face their hypocrisy. He had to die.” -- Francis Mont


Socrates, the Father of Western Philosophy, was a bit of a fool, or a wise fool. He was a man so deeply entrenched in his own principles that he was willing to sacrifice his life rather than compromise them. His essential loyalty to the law of the state, while admirable in its own way, ultimately led to his demise. Breaking the law, after all, would make him a hypocrite, a contradiction of his own teachings, and so he refused to escape prison, even when offered the chance by his apprentices.



His rigid adherence to his principles was his undoing, as he philosophized to show people their hypocrisy of knowledge. He sacrificed himself on the altar of philosophy and honesty. It's a lesson that many of us can learn from. Socrates cared more about the truth and its inquiry, more than he cared about himself, so he accepted his execution wholeheartedly for doing exactly what he wanted to do: To live a life that is well-lived by examining it. Reality is ever-changing, and it's often better to adapt your beliefs than to stick to them blindly.


Socrates was a reasonable man, a thinker of great depth and insight. We might think that premature death was irrational here, as it wasn't even suicide, but no. He lived the life he wanted, and he was the one who decided how he wanted to go. He examined his life and used his philosophy to also live that life to the very end, choosing to die in prison for his philosophical way of life, instead of discarding it in exchange for his freedom. 


Yet even the most logical minds can be flawed, and I would say that Socrates' greatness lies in the fact that he was a simple man. Philosophy, the pursuit of wisdom, often involves a constant struggle to avoid contradictions. Yet, the world is full of inconsistencies, and trying to escape them can be futile. Shouldn't we embrace our flaws like Socrates embraced the knowledge of his own ignorance?


Slavoj Žižek, known for his provocative and often controversial analyses, has faced significant backlash for his outspoken views. His unwavering defense of his beliefs, while understandable, echoes the tragic fate of Socrates. Like the ancient philosopher, Žižek risks becoming a martyr to his heavily-criticized ideas, potentially facing a form of intellectual exile, like in the case of Solomon Maimon, or societal ostracism.


The pursuit of truth often involves confronting our own flaws. I've always believed that a good philosopher must be aware of their own limitations, and attempt to reduce them.


As a flawed philosopher myself, I'm comfortable with this reality, merely because I am aware of the Nirvana Fallacy. To understand the world, we must acknowledge our own imperfections. A philosopher who is afraid to admit their mistakes is a philosopher who will never grow. Self-knowledge is imperative for growth.


Would you rather die a hypocrite or live a flawed life? I choose the latter. My life is more important than my philosophy. How can I put my philosophical research in a continuous state of growth if I'm dead?



Socrates, in his stubborn adherence to his principles, may have been a wise fool whose inquisitive lifestyle have led to his own death, yet his legacy lives on. His teachings, though flawed, have inspired countless thinkers throughout the ages. 


And perhaps, in his tragic end, we can find a valuable lesson: that even the most noble of causes can have unintended consequences. A mere stonemason is now deemed the father of Western Philosophy.


125 views2 comments

Related Posts

See All

2 Comments


Charles Scott
Sep 09, 2022

Hello Tomasio,


I have just "discovered" this post and the Quara page led me here.


Philosophy would not flee from flaw. rather it would remain steady and true to it's own belief. Without a constant truth then philosophy is just opinion and not logically adhering to its own constant.. therefore becoming folly and whim. Socrates took the poison and we now continue to discuss his work. If he had fled his own philosophy and avoided death by becoming a hypocrite, we would not know who he was. His theory remains yet his life ended. I would say he proved his point about remaining true to his own belief.


Like
Replying to

Welcome, Mr. Scott.


I agree that truth plays an integral part in philosophy. After all, we seek philosophy to better understand existence, and to better do so, then we must come to terms with the truth.


The truth might hurt, the truth might make people see one a cold, unemotional being, and yet, the truth, is indeed imperative if we are to regard something as philosophical.


As far as I know, Socrates never wrote a thing of his own, and was instead recorded by his follower, Plato. What do you think? Would Plato have recorded him nonetheless if his teacher fled his imprisonment?

Like

Tomasio A. Rubinshtein, Philosocom's Founder & Writer

I am a philosopher. I'm also a semi-hermit who has decided to dedicate my life to writing and sharing my articles across the globe to help others with their problems and combat shallowness. More information about me can be found here.

20240819_131418 (1) (1).jpg
bottom of page