The Limits of Reason -- Philosophers as Mere Humans (For more on my critique of philosophy, for bias reduction, click here ). (Philosocom's Subcategory On Fatigue and Exhaustion) (Background music) Why Philosophers Need Breaks Too To gain a complete understanding of any subject, we must delve beyond the surface. This includes critically examining the very ideas we hold dear . How can we ever hope to grasp the full picture if we only consider one side of the issue? As a philosopher, I spend a lot of time ruminating . That is, engaging in deep contemplation. While this is a powerful tool for uncovering hidden insights, it can also be a double-edged sword. The Perils of Perpetual Pondering Let me tell you from personal experience: when your mind is constantly consumed by deep thoughts, or racing thoughts specifically , it can lead to stress, impatience, and even sleep disturbances. Because I hate sleeping , I entertain these thoughts with an open mind, no pun intended. Even when exhausted, my gears keep turning and I let them because I view ruthlessness as a virtue . However, less rumination meant fewer mental resources expended, allowing for a much-needed mental break. I'd like to argue that the more we make perpetual pondering a habit, the more we can get used to deep thinking on a regular basis. That could be done by making lifelong learning a habit. Then, we wouldn't need to rest so much over thinking the deepest of thoughts. Some might argue that with all this pondering, philosophy itself is a bit...well, pointless. After all, haven't we been grappling with the same big questions for millennia? Finding definitive answers to these classic questions feels like chasing an infinite horizon. To quote Paul Trejo: Philosophy seems pointless to many readers because after 2,300 years of Western Philosophy, there is almost nothing that all philosophers agree upon. It's a fair point. And yes, sometimes I do wonder if we're all just like Sisyphus , endlessly pushing that boulder of existential inquiry uphill, only for it to slide down again. However, while I acknowledge the challenges, I wholeheartedly disagree with the notion that philosophy is pointless. Otherwise, why would I, a self-proclaimed philosopher, create a blog with a dedicated succession plan for its continued existence? My work holds practical value, especially when it can help bring hope to people, the same as it brought to myself. Hence why I don't regret choosing philosophy as my purpose. Training the Mind for the Long Run Here's the key takeaway: Philosophers, like everyone else, are human. We have limited mental energy , and just like any athlete, our minds need rest to avoid burnout and those meddlesome sleepless nights. By improving my energy management skills , I can decrease the risk of a "Reaping Fatigue Era". So can you. While it's okay to ponder the big questions, even us philosophers need to know when to take a break. That's the lesson I'm learning, and I hope I'll still manage to continue writing tons of articles and stay far away from killing my time. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback I just have some advice for not burning yourself out and being more productive with your minds. The brain is an amazing thing. Did you know that humans have abstract cognitions, which means you will still work things out in your mind even if you aren’t consciously aware of it? So, learn something new, summarize how it can be used, than do something else which is a mindless activity for you. You never know when a random thing might make you think about a problem you’ve been trying to solve abstractly.  So my suggestion is this: Plan your day out accordingly. Maybe dedicate certain times to really do the deep thinking . Then, settle yourself down before sleeping by listening to music or watching a television show or movie. Something that doesn’t involve you thinking at all. Let your thoughts just come and go as they please. Keep yourself [away] from intentionally thinking about something [and just relax] .

(Philosocom's Subcategory on A.I) (Background music) Disclaimer: This is a story written in cooperation with an A.I machine that is free for all -- A.I Dungeon. This story is set in an alternative universe where many things have changed about me. Story Analysis by Ms. Gabbi Grace "In Order to Conquer the World" is an innovative story that explores the relationship between human creativity and AI's emerging role in storytelling. The story, which co-writes with the AI tool "A.I. Dungeon," explores an alternate universe where characters and events are dynamically influenced by both human input and AI-generated content. This unique fusion of perspectives showcases not only the creative potential of AI but also how it can challenge and refine human ideas. The narrative's focus on power , conflict, and relevance invites readers to reflect on the implications of AI's growing role in society. The protagonist, General R., embodies a complex mix of ambition, insecurity, and yearning for meaning. His interactions with Major Chen, a rebel leader, unfold in a war-torn and emotionally charged setting, making the story a potent mix of political intrigue and personal struggle. This collaboration between man and machine doesn't just tell a story, but also experiments with narrative possibilities, offering a glimpse into the future of AI-assisted creativity. The story's interesting themes include conceptual innovation , character complexity and moral ambiguity. The exploration of General R.'s internal struggles and the moral ambiguities of war resonate with timeless human concerns , making this story both relevant and reflective. In conclusion, "In Order to Conquer the World" serves as a fascinating exploration of the relationship between human creativity and AI's emerging role in storytelling. **************************** Introduction The following story is a collaboration between my own doing and an A.I program known as "A. I Dungeon". "A.I. Dungeon" is a free internet game that allows you to write a story in collaboration with an actual learning machine. This story is written to demonstrate how advanced artificial intelligence technology has become thus far, and that the possibility of A.I. gaining greater independence is closer than it may appear. The Story Itself It might not be completely competent like it should be, but as long as it could bring productivity like this, then it will only grow and might even dominate our lives. Enjoy the story. It is set in an alternative universe, and the protagonist, although based on myself, has been altered by the A.I, making him not completely a self-insert. General R. is a rogue military General with the intention of taking over the world. He is currently fighting a guerrilla army of rebel soldiers on a mission to reclaim a small town called "The Docks." The guerrilla army is led by a charismatic figure known as Major Chen. When the two get into a fight, Major Chen and the rebels escape the town and go to an abandoned factory. General R. is sent to investigate the rebels and try to find Major Chen. The rebels are disposed of, even though they scarred General R.'s armor and killed some of his henchmen. General R. finally confronts her in her hideout within the factory. After a brief skirmish, General R. discovers that she is pregnant. Major Chen reveals the rebel's plan and gives General R. a choice. "Leave me and this town alone, or this baby will be your downfall", she said to him coldly. General R., defeated by her words, agrees to leave her and the town alone. Major Chen lets him go, and he leaves the General. R., depressed by her absence, makes coffee in solitude. Sometime later, the Major's rebels have become tired and hungry. Since they have been on the move for so long, they have not had food for quite a while. The rebels attempt to raid a local outpost for food. The raid is successful, and most of the troops take the food. After a short while, the General and his troops return to the factory and find it abandoned. He thought Major Chen must have betrayed her ultimatum, because she escaped the very town she tried to protect. "I am not, irrelevant!" General R. screamed to the air, fists waving angrily. "This country, and your baby, will be mine. I am the greatest soldier this world has ever known. I will bring my Clique to the greatest heights of success!" Sometime later, General R.'s forces approach the Docks and the factory that dominate this port town. "Listen up, my loyal troops. This factory will be our base of operations from now on. It will be here that we will restore this country to its proper image and dispose of the Chen Clique and its anarchist terrorists." General R. sends out his troops to secure the factory from within, to make sure no further threats hide within, while he makes more coffee. A short while later, General R. is ready to begin his invasion. The battle was fierce, but The Docks is now under General R.'s control. He sets his eyes to the mountains, where Chen retires and tries to live peacefully. He, too, wants peace, but for a different reason. He wants to be a father. One day, General R. receives a short message from Chen. The message says, "Leave me alone. I want nothing from you. Erase me from your memory"! He ventures to the mountains, where he sees Chen sitting on a hillside with her baby. Chen informs him that she has decided to be a teacher and that he is indeed the true father of her child. Chen lived in another village there with another partner and wants said partner to be the son's true father, while keeping the biological one away. The general is furious with her and tells her that he will kill her and the baby. Chen tries to reason with him. "Let's leave this war behind us." She speaks. "You are not relevant." General R. replies, "You do not know what you are doing, do you? Not only will I not leave you, but I will take this baby!" Chen sounds the alarm, and her loyalists appear, armed with their guns. He stands, enraged, but he is outmatched. He tries to escape, but his troops come into sight as he makes his way across the mountain. Another bloody battle begins. The two forces fight fiercely, but Chen is able to keep the General's men at bay. She had him cornered in a small cave. "As I said", Chen exclaimed in superiority. "You are not relevant." Furious, he shoots her in the back of the head and then buries her next to a tree. General R., now alone, looks at the baby and thinks of a name. "I..." He said and left a deep sigh. "I just want to be in peace, as well. However, I, too, want to be relevant in this world. This child will succeed me. Let this child be a symbol of my triumph, and the beginning of our new era." Sometime later, General R. sees a group of soldiers walking towards him. "Sir!" the soldiers exclaim, saluting him. "The Chen Clique is defeated. We now have the power to establish a government in the capital and end this civil war for good." The General nods and begins marching forward. After a while, the warlord is back in his tent, sitting down on the floor. He closes his eyes and begins thinking. "Did I do the right thing?" He asked himself in his thoughts. "My rage got a hold of me. Perhaps her life could've ended in a different way, in a more peaceful way. Now I might be condemned as a war criminal." He sighs. "I can't change the past. All I can do is fight on and try to win the war, even if I have to do it alone." General R. rallies his followers with a speech. "We will march to the capital and take it for good. Once we liberate it, all that is left to conquer is the world!" The R. Clique began assembling and moved out. Sometime later, the victorious Clique has reached the capital of this war-torn country. R. was furious when he discovered that the revolutionary spies within the capital were absent. "Cowards!" He exclaimed, "You never had any intention to actually practice your philosophy! No matter, I will take this city without my former allies." The revolutionary takes his soldiers and marches them through the streets of the capital. He marches his troops to the radio stations. "Listen to me!" The general shouts, "No more! We will live in times of uncertainty and danger! We will form a government in this city and establish a new country. One that will lead the rest of the world and bring it to a brighter future!" More than a month later, the General has established his base in his new republic. He was marching through the city, when he noticed the survivors of the Major Chen Clique, hiding in the slums. "Come out!" He yelled. "It's over. Your leader is gone", he told them. "Your leader is gone," he told them. "However, I will make sure that you will be punished honorably for your sins. I will see to it that the name of Chen will be avenged, for she too was an honorable opponent." Chen hears her child's father and orders her troops to retreat. He, with his soldiers, catches her and her troops, and kills several of her men with his sword. "What is this?" The leader asked surprisingly. How did you manage to live? I thought I killed you, back in that cave!". "I had help." Chen replies. "You cannot defeat me." "I see. But that doesn't matter." The General answered. "You are my enemy, and I will kill you. Right here, right now. My time to shine has come, in your stead!" A moment passes in tense silence, only to be broken by the General. "Major! I apologize." He said this shamefully, turning away his weapon. "I too had no sincere intention of hurting you. However, such violence is inevitable in times of war. Look into the future, my dear Major, for we are no longer in times of conflict." He also told his men to lower their weapons. He looks at Chen, who says, "I know you. You are very brave and loyal to your cause, but you also have a weakness that I will exploit. Do you know what your weakness is?" The insurgent major asked him with her natural coldness. "I believe you have a weakness toward me." The General replied foolishly. "You are in love with me." Chen shook her head in disgust. "I am not in love with you. Why do you have any faith in the idea that I love you, General?" She hissed at him viciously. "Face it. You are irrelevant. That's your weakness." "I am not irrelevant!" He resisted. "I can bring people together and inspire the world with what I can offer it!" She mocked him. "Such a legacy is impossible with you at its head. I am the one who will take over. Not this country, not the world, but your harmless brain." The weakened regent tried to reply back, but Chen cut him off with her greatest insult. "You are nothing but an overstretched coward!" "I'm sorry, Chen, but I'm no coward. I hate to do it, but you will be my country's first... victim of execution." He sighed and ordered his guards in a depressed tone. "Take her away, lock her in solitary confinement. No food, no water. Do it now. Do it already." A long time later, R. finds that the former Major is still alive and well, despite his intentions to dispose of her in his vengeance. "Why did I spare you? Why aren't you affected by my anger?" He asked himself, more than he asked her. "You spared me because you, sir, are a coward that pretends to be more than he is." Chen replied in the depths of the darkness. "You never had the courage to do it. To dispose of those you love. You are pathetic." "You are the one who is pathetic!" Shouted the General "You are the true coward! Not me, you! YOU!" He slapped her in rage. But before he did anything further, he controlled his temper and said, "I... I have to stop." "That's right." She replied, unaffected. "Stop with your violence. You can hit me as much as you want, but you will never manage to kill me. I will haunt you in your dreams, General, even when I die. I am your bane; The proof of what the world thinks of who you are, of who you truly are." He left her without a word, leaving her to die of starvation and thirst. Deep inside, he wanted her to see how wrong she was. The General returns to the capital and to his revolutionaries. "We are free. Let us celebrate our new order". He said this to them, trying to be happy. Within the celebration, a Chen Clique member attacks him. He kills the assassin, but later, the General died of his wounds. The new country, before it could even be established, lies once again in anarchy, war, and ruin. The story of General R. and the other revolutionaries is told in the book In Order to Conquer the World. (Note: That is the name of the story that was given by this A.I. Its innovation reminds me of the following phrase: The hero is the one who conquers their urges.)

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's Directory on AI) (Philosocom's Ori Sindel Articles) (Philosocom's Directory on Beauty and Art) (Background music) *********************************** There were plenty of sci-fi films that managed to predict many phenomena, whose seeds are visible today. Virtual reality, artificial intelligence, interstellar travel, and so on. However, mostly when movies are trying to guess the future, they guess a dystopian one , ruined by humanity's developments. Yet, I think that a dystopian future means more for the present than the future (as an outcome of the present). I don't know why, but when I try to guess what would happen in the future, I think it would be better for humanity. As an artist, I saw how anachronistically disrespectful other artists responded to A.I. paintings. However, I'm confident that the A.I. will positively revolutionize the world of art. I think A.I. will indeed change the way we observe art. More than the camera did. In a sense, the challenge will be to draw in special and interesting ways with otherworldly styles. And that's because, maybe, the A.I. will be able to draw with greater precision and perfection than humans; even hands . Of course, we can be oblivious to every development, just as many other professionals were throughout history before their professions went extinct. For now, it seems many artists respond like that. Honestly, I already have a few ideas about what to do next with A.I., at least in animation, at least. I do not see A.I. paintings as a problem, because, to begin with, I prefer as many special styles in art as possible. It interests me even more than perfectionist techniques. Hence, I see no problem with the idea that humans and A.I. will draw together or separately in the same reality. I will attempt to draw new styles as if they came from other worlds to challenge the A.I. For example, a friend from the Hi-Tech industry told me that he's scared that AI will take his job . My answer for him was to advise the A.I. And then I added that my hope is that it will create an utopia where no one will have to work. I will be embarrassed in the future if A.I. changes human order for the better and becomes a reality. Embarrassed, as an artist, that a few conservative artists who definitely understand art, will attempt to stop the utopia. Just like we were eradicated by Ned Lud , retroactively, and by anyone who attempted to block human progress. Of course, a minority may lose out on this positive revolution, but I don't refer to artists. And that's why I will recognize A.I. as a legitimate, revolutionary entity.

The Subcategory's Directory: https://www.philosocom.com/post/trying-to-understand-a-narcissist-s-rationale-captain-quark-character-analysis https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-philosophy-of-energy-vampires-how-do-they-think https://www.philosocom.com/post/what-are-the-actions-and-meaning-of-flying-monkeys-by-mr-manduela-svarl https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-philosophy-of-the-galactic-empire-why-oppression-isn-t-the-way-to-rule https://www.philosocom.com/post/love-bombing-the-manipulation-of-love ) Back in the late 10's, I won a very important reward. Quora's Top Writer award , I'm a top writer, So don't think I'm senile, or a retard. I don't know if I'll manage that to duplicate, But as long as I live, I guess I can just relate! I will try my best to make the world understand, That my writings, are relevant, And irrelevancy, itself, is irrelevant. Back in the early 10's, I met a very important, person. He made me a philosopher , I'm a philosopher, So don't think it's a game, of poker. I don't know if I'll manage to follow his example, But at least I can try to grow my own "temple"! I will try my best to make the world understand, That my writings, are relevant, And irrelevancy, itself, is irrelevant. Back, in the middle 10's, I won the third place on a municipal writing, show. This isn't just for show! I'm a good writer, So don't act like you, don't know. Hundreds sent their applications, but they got rejected. Do you see now, that I'm, for you, a good asset? So I will try my best to make the world understand, That my writings, are relevant, And irrelevancy, itself, is irrelevant. But back in 2018, I began growing a very chronic, fatigue. I'm not lazy, I'm not lazy at all, I'm just so exhausted, it's crazy. Every morning I might wake up so tired. But at least I can say, that, I have still tried! And as long as I'll try, I'll attempt to make you understand, That my work, is not that worthless; That I too shouldn't be left, in the darkness. When the time will come, I know I might fail my, mission. So much work because I care for this world, Will the world still forget me, after my season? It is every flower's turn to begin to bloom, But that also start, their path, leading to their doom! At least if I try I might die gladfully, Because even if I won't, succeed, Some might remember, my deed. I'm no narcissist, Contrary to what some of you, might think. I just want to contribute, In the best way I can, Do you see what it requires, man? Recognition , hard work, and a reputation that's quite nice, It's only then when my legacy will, fully rise. I hope now that you can truly see this truth: That this is a means, to help's end, Empires are built on stern hands.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) (Philosocom's Directory On the Intellect) Article Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co. "Experiencing Experiential Intelligence: A Guide To Acting Like a Genius" by Mr. Nathan Lasher is an engaging and conversational article that demystifies the concept of experiential intelligence, making it less intimidating for readers without a background in cognitive science or psychology. The article emphasizes practical application, encouraging readers to actively engage with their experiences and learn from them , providing actionable advice such as journaling and lifelong learning. Lasher's advocacy for lifelong learning and the continual expansion of one's knowledge base is commendable, as it reminds readers that the quest for understanding and personal growth should not end with formal education . He also emphasizes the importance of imagination and creativity, which often diminish with age , providing a broader perspective on intelligence beyond traditional metrics like IQ. Overall, "Experiencing Experiential Intelligence: A Guide To Acting Like A Genius" is a thought-provoking and practical piece that encourages readers to harness their experiences for personal growth.    (Background music) ************************* "[Experiential Intelligence] The combination of mindsets, abilities, and know-how gained from your unique life experience that empowers you to achieve your goals... [It] provides a holistic way to understand what’s needed for success in today’s world by getting in touch with the accumulated wisdom and talents you have gained over time through your lived experience .” -- Soren Kaplan Introductory Disclaimers I have no right telling anyone this, academically speaking. My degree is in economics and my background is in sales and marketing. I have only my intelligence to use as a reference so for the sake of this article I will not use any outside sources. Perhaps Mr. Tomasio will decide to add source material to what I am saying. Most people require that material to draw conclusions and come up with thoughts on things . I get "to cheat" because I will automatically know what to think about something because of some amazing abstract cognition I have going on . My hope in writing this is to get people to start acting like a genius.  I know you can’t increase intelligence. However, intelligence is what teaches us how to do things better. This is a process which I believe other people might be able to apply to their lives. My hope is to share an insight into what intelligence does for me and how other people might be able to do the same thing. If philosophy is all about creating better understanding then I am about to philosophize the hell out of you. Understanding What is XQ: More Common Than you Think Experiential intelligence is not a unique type of intelligence. Intelligence is pretty stationary as it doesn’t change. What intelligence itself is comes from the same place consciousness does. You would literally have to change your genetics in order to increase it. Experiential Intelligence is also known as XQ so for time's sake I will refer to it as that from now on. XQ expression of intelligence is when you use past experiences to determine what you know and how to use it. It is also known and referred to as creative intelligence . This is the result of abstract cognition drawing on every experience you have had to formulate an idea about something new. You can think creatively about things simply by your past experiences being automated as far as accessing them. And again, this is down with abstract cognitive features. My point being everyone has them and I want to teach people how to use them. You can think like I can by doing this simple process. Take a moment after each experience and write about what it can teach you. I'd suggest journaling. Write it enough times until you can remember it. Then, once you have it memorized, don’t think about it. You may encounter something in the future which will make you think about it and you will discover ways in which it can be used. Hence the importance of life long education. You never know when what you learn might come in handy. Learn like a genius by learning a new thing each week. That way you have 7 days to learn it well enough it becomes a skill of yours. Skills become those things which you never know if you are going to need to end up knowing in the future. The Path To Polymathy And Problem-Solving Easiest way to become a polymath is to always want to understand everything about everything. Do not limit yourself to only one perception. A polymath is a person who is specialized in multiple different areas. Polymathy is simply the process of knowing multiple uses for things. Polymathy allows you to become a walking multi tool pocket knife.  Problems exist as constructs in people’s minds. For instance many might see my room as a mess and therefore problematic. To me I know where almost everything is, it all has its place. Next time something is a problem, take a minute to understand what the situation really is. You more often than not will no longer see the situation as problematic. You realize you have full control over changing your own circumstance if you so choose to.  I learn through experience. Once I understand it, I will never forget it. There are different levels to memory retention. I remember by experiencing and through emotions. If I can create a pleasant enough emotion while thinking about something I will typically remember it for an extended period of time. So, my next insight on how you can function like a genius is to take some time to process experiences you go through on an individual basis. Document the entire experience and save it. Take pictures and make notes. Create "an encyclopedia" of your own. That way if you ever come across something you are unfamiliar with you can see how you handled similar situations and what the results were. Life really is about always learning and growing as a person. The less important insight is to stop trying to get people to see you as a certain way . Only focus on your actions and let them tell other people who you are as a person. My intelligence used to express itself randomly in the past in unrecognizable ways. It also used to be a matter of knowing it was something I am capable of but not being sure how to do it. It took some more massive exposure to it for me to finally realize the secret to intellectual expression . It is something that happens all on its own and does so by making your actions be a representation of it. Just the simple act of doing things and answering people will do a way better job of expressing it than you ever can consciously do. Letting people see your creative side is the difference between a high intellect and a genius.  Next, I have a framework I want to throw out there on a change to growing up which could "create" more geniuses. What I don’t understand is what happens to people’s imaginations as they grow up? Imagination is an expression of intelligence. Children, as such, are able to create and see whole realities using nothing but their own intelligence. Why do people stop using their intelligence like this? My suggestion is to change the current perspective about imagination: As one only limited to the arts and to beauty. We should not be losing our imaginations as we grow older. I believe the answer is in introducing a psychology class as a part of growing up : A class that is focused on people becoming the best version of themselves. I believe everyone is capable of using the intelligence that they have like a genius would. If everyone learned the power of experiential skills it would create a way better world. Imagine if young children had their imaginations fostered as they grew up. Imagination is an expression of intelligence. You can get better at expressing each expression of it. If that expression is naturally built into our DNA, then why do people decide to stop using it as they grow up? The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.  -- Albert Einstein The only people who still seem to be using it are the artistic types. W hat if we applied this mentality to other areas within business and life? I use my imagination without even meaning to. Intelligence is a part of the conscious mind which is a part of the soul. Look around a room, what do you think is the thing which is recognizing what the things in it are? It is your soul and intelligence and I just want people to remember to foster their own intelligence by practice using it.  Before you start each task, imagine all the ways it can be done. Don’t limit yourself to trying new things. The task still gets finished but in trying new ways to do it you are actually doing field research. You never know when you might find a better way of doing things. This is done not by paying all this money for an education. It is by giving yourself unique experiences you have never done before. The new way might not be the best way to do the task but you might have discovered a way to do something else better.  How to Increase the Capital In You That is the polymathy point I am getting to you. Always be open to new experiences because you never know how doing so might end up helping an unrelated topic. It is a matter of always wanting to improve yourself. Human capital far exceeds fiscal. You can catch a man a fish and he eats for a day or you can teach him to fish and he will eat forever. The lesson behind this I believe is expressing the importance of trying and learning new things. You never know how it might help make you a better person . Part of being a genius is having massive amounts of human capital via your brain. Geniuses succeed when they find a way to use that human capital . My point in all this is you don’t have to be a genius to act like one.  You can start by improving your human capital by doing actions which represent yourself better. Don’t worry about telling people who you are. Simply do so by acting like the type of person you are. Make sure your words are built on a strong foundation of actions.  Not saying words aren’t important, they can be used in order to plan things out. But a life built solely on words isn’t much of a life of quality. Philosocom might be the exception. Its words are its value and the reason you're here. I am merely referring to human beings in this instance. This site was the result of its owner taking action. He backs up with actions with words and his words with actions. The Semantics of Action If the purpose of life is to grow both physically and cognitively, why don’t people continue to do so cognitively past their early 20’s? Next time you see something you are unfamiliar with, try and imagine all the stuff you could possibly do with it. You might feel dumb when you realize how simple the action is that is required, but who knows, and maybe you don’t have a breakthrough idea as an alternative?  Actions are contagious. Maybe you picking up trash on the side of the road puts the thought in several other peoples and they decide to clean up the trash in front of their houses. Who said you had to clean up everything? For every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. You picking up trash was the action and getting other people to was the reaction. See how that works. You could talk all day long about the world being a more beautiful and cleaner place or you could go out and actually make it so. Beacons of Light Humans are creatures of mutual habit. You are like every other human out there. There are exceptions such as Mother Terresa but in this regard it speaks more to the nature of humanity than anything else. Doing nothing but being a loving and helpful human being , she drew major attention to herself as a result of that not being a bigger part of a specific person's life. How sad is that? No help among human beings has made the amount of work she did seem huge.  Has humanity lost its way so that nice is becoming a word lost in its vocabulary? If you want to think like a genius, every time you do something take a moment to think in what other areas of your life might it be helpful in. You never know the change that might come from you learning to apply it to unrelated areas. Anything can be used to do anything, relatively speaking. Not going to lift heavy objects with an apple. Unless you look at it as you eating the apple and giving yourself enough energy to lift the object yourself. That is the kind of thinking a genius mind will give you! Everything is possible but requires the correct pathology to be used in order to accomplish it. A better life can be obtained by finding better pathologies for things. Pathologies are simply the way that things get done. Conclusions (Added by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein) Mr. Lasher, despite mostly relying on his own experiences, believes that everyone can act like a genius. He emphasizes the importance of experiential intelligence (XQ) - the ability to use past experiences to solve problems and generate creative ideas. Key takeaways to act like a genius, include: Engage with your experiences:  Reflect on your experiences and actively learn from them. Journaling is a great way to record and process your learnings. Furthermore, additional active study strategies can be learned and integrated to your routine. Lifelong learning:  Keep acquiring new knowledge and skills throughout your life. See anything and anyone as an opportunity to invest in study. Embrace imagination:  Don't let your imagination fade away with age. Use it to solve problems and think creatively. It doesn't need to be the sole asset of artists and craftsmen. Become a polymath :  Gain knowledge and skills in various fields. This will give you a broader perspective and allow you to make unexpected connections. Focus on actions:  Let your actions speak for themselves. Take initiative and don't just talk about things.

(Series Directory) (Background music) Article Synopsis by Mr. Chris Kingsley and Co. Mr. R. Leblanc's article "Using Numerology and Gematria to Understand True Love - Part 3: Tarot Cards" delves into the interpretation of the quote "Encouraging someone to be entirely themselves is the loudest way to love them" through Tarot card analysis. The article begins by numerologically analyzing the number 297, breaking it down to its prime factors and associating them with specific Tarot cards. Each Tarot card is interpreted, with judgment representing awakening, reflection, and a new phase in life. The Moon symbolizes dreams, illusions, and the subconscious, while the Hermit symbolizes introspection, solitude , and wisdom. The Chariot represents triumph through balanced use of physical, spiritual, and intellectual powers, emphasizing self-control . The High Priestess symbolizes intuition, inner wisdom, and spiritual growth. Strength represents inner strength, compassion, and overcoming challenges with grace and determination. The Empress represents nurturing, fertility, and abundance through patience and perseverance. The article concludes that achieving true love requires self-understanding, forgiveness , and the integration of both intuitive and rational aspects of the self.   (Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) ******************* In this third part, I will introduce you to Tarot Card interpretation used to access the deeper meanings of the quote: "Encouraging someone to be entirely themselves is the loudest way to love them" -- Kalen Dion The results we had were the following: 297 (We did get this result from adding the numbers pertaining to each letter; a number from 1-9), so : 200, 90 and 7. From which we get : 2+9+7 = 18, so : 18. From which we get : 1+8 = 9, so : 9. And from further using prime factors of : 297, we get : 3x3x3x11, so, if we add the factors, we get : 3+3+3+11 = 20, so : 20. And from further reducing 20, we get : 2+0 = 2, so : 2. And, as a second way of seeing things, we get some more insights by looking at the prime factors of : 297 themselves; 3 and 11, so : 11 and 3. Note: to convert those numbers into Tarot cards, one needs to look at the Hebrew letters that are associated with the above numbers: 200 is Tarot card 20 90 is Tarot card 18 7 is Tarot card 7 20 is Tarot card 11 Then, we will look at: https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 1. Tarot card 20: Judgement: The Judgement card represents the judgement day or awakening call heralding a rite of passage . As one cycle comes to an end we need to prepare for a new stage in our development, the future is waiting. Now is the time when past efforts yield positive results, when we can reap the rewards, when we realise that we are drawn in a new direction and recognise our true calling . In it's positive meaning the Judgement card reminds us that through honesty and true reflection we can realise where we have erred on our path and that we need to forgive ourselves to regain a feeling of self-worth and accomplishment. Placed in a negative situation, Judgement symbolises indecision, a fear of letting go , remorse, and regret, and imbalance, imprisonment. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 2. Tarot card 18: The Moon: The Moon in all its phases represents the world of dreams , illusions , and the subconscious . Traditionally the symbol of the feminine, the card's meaning encompasses the maternal, the Great Mother, womanhood, and cycles. The Moon is an ambivalent card, its imagery signifies the difficulty to see things clearly: inspiring and lacking courage, enchanting and bewildering, deceptive and receptive - all sides of the same coin. Signalling fluctuating moods and uncertainty we must pay attention to our dreams, confront our subconscious and deal with the issues that come to the surface in order to progress to a higher level of awareness. Being able to put our imagination and creative talents to good use is an added bonus. Negative qualities, such as ambiguity, confusion, hidden fears, deception, can be a cause for failure. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 3. Tarot card 9: The Hermit: The Hermit card symbolizes meditation , reflection , and solitude . As one of the cards resembling old age, it also represents bearing the light of wisdom, looking into the unconscious , and observing dreams. There is an emphasis on peace and patience, by which maturity is reached, and a striving to connect to the higher spiritual self . The Hermit also depicts the spiritual leader , the taskmaster who leads with purpose, conscience, and wisdom. A mature person, the Hermit symbolizes deliberation about which path to follow, reassessment of achievements and goals, and taking the time to reflect and plan. In a negative environment, this card can resemble excessive isolation, lack of communication, intolerance, crisis, and doubt. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 4. Tarot card 7: The Chariot: The Chariot symbolizes enthusiasm, competitiveness , and triumph. Employing all powers at one's disposal, physical, spiritual, and intellectual, one achieves success and victory. The positive sides of the self, being strong and self-controlled, balancing conflicting emotions, triumphing over obstacles, and sustaining an effort, support attaining goals, thereby leading the way to transformation and self-knowledge . A dictatorial approach, recklessness, and extreme ambition can be on the other, negative side of the equation. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 5. Tarot card 2: High Priestess: The mysterious High Priestess jealously guards her secrets and occult wisdom. This card symbolizes the unconscious, a concern with our internal worlds , spiritual forces, and the understanding of higher truths through dreams and intuition. As a wise woman, the High Priestess is the Goddess of fertility and is seen as a healer, possessing intuitive powers and clairvoyance , trying to create harmony and inner balance. She emphasizes the necessity to get in contact with our inner self, to reflect and meditate, to trust our feelings, and to let dreams and intuition guide us. Observing rather than participating or acting, the High Priestess can also represent platonic love , manipulation, a pause in a process that was progressing, or even a standstill, causing doubt and confusion. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 6. Tarot card 11: Strength: The Strength card, depicting a gracious queen-like figure and a wild lion, shows that real strength has to be combined with graciousness and gentleness to become a force. It symbolizes inner strength, determination to overcome obstacles, self-knowledge, and self-discipline , as only when we know ourselves and act in a responsible manner will we be able to deal with challenging situations and overcome difficulties successfully. Yet this card does not only represent physical strength; moral and emotional strength is included in the meaning. Patience, compassion , dealing with frustration, accepting of others, tolerating imperfection (in oneself and in others), all leads to being a complete person. The negative qualities of strength include misuse of power, aggressiveness, and intolerance. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/24669b51/files/uploaded/Teach%20yourself%20Tarot%20v12.pdf 7. Tarot card 3: The Empress: The Empress signifies the queen of life, the perfect woman, the archetypal mother. She represents the matriarchal goddess, being part of nature, fertility, sexuality, and the generative forces. As the life-giving mother, she is connected to the Earth and the natural rhythms, the appreciation of the senses. As a card of good fortune, she signifies that if we are gentle and caring, as well as patient, we can bring anything to fruition; we have to be able to wait until the time is right for action so that we can reap the rewards; hard work pays off and relationships become satisfying. The Empress can, in negative situations, also depict vanity, undeveloped creativity, stagnation, and apathy. Conclusions About True Love: * The Judgment card suggests to us that we pay attention and make sure we are willing to start over again and get on track as often as we need to. There is no sin, but opportunities to readjust ourselves for the better each time we are at a crossroads. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: The card can thus teach us the value of making mistakes and that we are imperfect beings. We shouldn't be too hard on ourselves even though we should learn from our mistakes -- specifically to make better decisions with others and with ourselves). * The Moon card is suggesting to us to become able to use our dreams, our intuitive part, and our subconscious in a positive and clear way. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: It is imperative to listen to our hearts in romance. This obscure song tells us why, even when choosing partners ). * The Hermit card is the goal that we can reach once we get on a truth-seeker path; it is a valid choice as it enables our reach of Wisdom within. (Mr. R's note: How can you expect to truly love if you are not interested in seeking the truth? True love is the path of the truth seeker. The philosopher is a lover of wisdom, therefore he or she seeks it honestly, like the partner seeks his or her significant other genuinely and not out of pretending. The lover, like the philosopher/truth-seeker, isn't interested in deluding themselves with lies. They look into reality just like they look into their partner's eyes -- with love). * The Chariot card is a result of our capacity of using both our intuitive and rational aspects in order to apply those in real behavioral situations. (Mr. R's note: Is true love pure from rationality? I am not sure. Either way, it's imperative to keep a sense of rationality in true love because rationality allows us to behave appropriately in society. Would you do something explicit in public with a true lover just because your heart tells you so? Rationality tells us that you shouldn't). * The High Priestess card is reminding us to trust our intuition and be patient and resilient in doing so. * The Strength card is telling us that true strength is from within. (Mr. R's note: I'd like to argue that true love requires strength many do not have. It is the strength to be brave and not to be afraid of getting hurt. After all, love hurts, as with any possible human connection. You need to have the strength to be vulnerable. Otherwise, true love won't work. You should not fear your emotions and the emotions of your lover! Let these emotions be! Strength in true love is not expressed by self-restraint but by daring to remove the masks you otherwise put on your face with other people. In short, that true strength is the strength to be you, with as little filters as possible. Ideally, no filters would be required. Your lover wants to know you, not a false self. As mentioned -- true love is the pursuit of the truth about those whom we truly love). * The Empress card reminds us that hard work pays off. In Short Conclusion: If we try to get in a better relation with all the others, we have to accept that we must forgive ourselves as well as forgive others . We need to consider hard work and a lot of perseverance reaching the goal of knowing ourselves and others as well, so we can be in a true love relation!

Article Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co. The Nirvana Fallacy is a logical misstep where realistic solutions are dismissed in favor of an unattainable ideal. This fallacy occurs when someone compares a practical solution to a perfect but unrealistic alternative, dismissing the practical option for not being ideal. This disregards that improvements, even if not perfect, are often valuable. It can be a convenient excuse to avoid improving current performance or to justify poor performance. The "Perfect Solution" fallacy , another name for the Nirvana Fallacy, suggests that since perfection is unattainable, striving for improvement is futile. This mindset is harmful because it discourages efforts to reduce flaws and improve performance. Acknowledging our humanity should not stop us from striving to improve. While perfection is unrealistic, reducing flaws and enhancing abilities is achievable and beneficial. Perfection might be impossible, but that doesn't mean we can't work on our imperfections. For instance, acquiring new skills and working harder can enhance job performance. Difficulty should not deter us from pursuing beneficial goals. Using the Nirvana Fallacy to avoid challenging tasks deprives us of potential rewards. Expecting perfection from others or ourselves is irrational. Rational beings understand that perfection is rare and often unattainable. I t is more sensible to aim for improvement rather than perfection. The Buddhist concept of Nirvana , which denotes a state of pure bliss, is an ideal state that is challenging to achieve. Perfectionists might adhere to this fallacy, believing that only through perfection can they be successful. This mindset is flawed because it treats perfection as a basic requirement rather than an extraordinary achievement. Striving for rationality and improvement is essential for becoming better employees, employers, and individuals. Philosophy aims to help us understand the truth better and improve our rationality, making us more effective thinkers and decision-makers. ******************** (Background music) Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one, and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason. -- Logically Fallacious. The "Nirvana Fallacy", as the name suggests, can easily be used as an excuse to not improve our current performance, and/or justify said performance. For example, if you hire someone and they may do a bad job, they might justify their poor performance by saying that no one is perfect. Another title for this concept is the "Perfect Solution" fallacy, as it implies that perfection is impossible, thus we shouldn't even strive to be better. It is beyond me why many people wonder if others may think that they are not human. Saying that "I'm only human" is no excuse for not striving to be better at whatever you're doing, when improvement is indeed possible. We should not settle for a flaw that can be reduced, and obviously, perfection is often unrealistic. Just because perfection might not be reached at all, does not mean that our flaws cannot be worked on and be minimized in the name of better functioning. For example, we can improve our job performance by working harder and learning new skills. We can improve our grades at school by studying more and asking for help when we need it. On the contrary, difficulty does not even imply impossibility. Just because something is difficult, does not mean we should avoid doing it, when it can benefit us in return. Using the nirvana fallacy as an excuse to avoid rewarding hardship is silly, as that would reduce the benefit we're getting in life. It would be reasonable to avoid difficulties if there were other reasons, such as not having time, energy, or having a relevant disability. However, to cancel something uncomfortable, purely because of a fantasy reality, where perfection is a dominant feature, is irrelevant to the reality we're all in. If someone expects you to be completely perfect, AKA, lack any flaws whatsoever, then they might be suffering from a poor rationality. Whether they admit it or deny it, is a different thing. The point is that perfection, as an expectation, shouldn't even be relevant to begin with. That's especially true when the people in the conversation are rational beings. And as a specific reader keeps reminding me somewhere, most human beings are not rational . Thus, it is reasonable to answer unreasonable answers, when rationality is uncommon. It is reasonable to not expect others to see what you see as obvious, when you are more rational than them. So when I insist that perfection is a very unlikely feature in human existence, as it is obvious to me, I am no longer surprised when it is not obvious to others. By the way, " Nirvana " is a concept in Buddhism that is defined by the pure absence of desire and suffering. Obviously, a state of pure bliss, as desire leads to suffering according to Buddha , is a very ideal state of being. Whether possible or not among the living is another thing, as the focus in this fallacy is the assumption that a state of perfection/"nirvana" is either impossible or very, very difficult to achieve. The focus is also towards the delusional subtext, that the other people may necessarily expect us and/or our performance to be perfect. People with a perfectionist attitude may hold themselves in accordance to this fallacy, but this isn't megalomania , where the person may they are indeed perfect. The perfectionist takes this fallacy with a great liking, especially if they are not aware of this fallacy, existing as such. Thus, they would believe that, only with perfection, they will be good in whatever they are doing. Or excellent people, in general. They may hold perfection as a basic condition, while it does not even deserve to be treated as elementary, but as extraordinary. While it is all well and good that perfection is a rare occurrence in our world, it does not mean that we should submit to our flaws. We can become better employees, better employers, and most importantly, better people by reducing our flaws, morally or otherwise. The same goes for rationality. It can be improved through philosophizing, or at the very least, by understanding logical fallacies properly. I try to do both, and thus, my rationality has been improving over the years. The possibility that I am, by default, an irrational being (as humans might as well be irrational) does not excuse me, nor you, from improving. I do not call for perfect rationality. I call for an improved one. As that would help us understand the truth better, which is the point of philosophy. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback How can someone even use I’m only human as an excuse? That means that doing whatever it is would be impossible. If it is an action which other people can do, does this not disprove the fallacy's logic? The name is the problem of saying "I am only human" – what does that make other people who can do it, in-human, better than human, a god? How do you explain professional golfers who will have better than a perfect round of even par -- Super humans? If someone really wants to understand how much work goes into striving for perfection all they need to do is try to learn how to golf. Once you see how difficult certain shots are it will give you more of an idea of how much work it would take to put you up to the level of a professional. Perfection takes hard work and doesn’t come for free. There is a cost associated with it: Energy and effort that must be dedicated towards getting things into your ideal state you want them in. Example: I was striving to become the perfect writer. To me perfection isn’t having a product with no grammatical errors. Perfection is not impossible. All it is is a subjective construct. Perfect is everything being in your ideal state. It is a matter of preference, so it is in the eye of the beholder. Perfection is hitting your ideal mark at whatever it is you are doing. For me it would be a perfect round of golf. Not saying there won’t be a few bad shots but it will involve me recovering from them better. To me perfect is a matter of what golf allows me to do by allowing me some meditative type activity. Perfection to me is nothing more than getting the desired results for things.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Background music) (Philosocom's Svartgold/Svarl Articles) ************************************* When a person learns to be assertive, he knows how to protect himself from being hurt by others. Doing so he can also protect empaths other than himself or herself. That protection is evident by these very 4 reasons, and without them, being assertive against others wouldn't be as effective. By being assertive you can save yourself time and energy, which means that it is a worthy virtue in every practical, personal philosophy: The importance of Assertiveness : 1. If you are not following your desires and do something that you don't want to do, it is not self-expression. Assertiveness is about expressing yourself, saying no to others, and not canceling yourself by doing something you don't want to do. It is part of self-confidence and shows that you care about yourself. However, assertiveness is also learned behavior. If a child is not allowed to keep their boundaries and their boundaries are crossed, they learn to be silent and agree to things that hurt them. This can be very difficult to fix. 2. Mental health and assertiveness: There are people who live in this world without any positive childhood image of authority figures. They may not have received any encouragement or support from their parents, or their parents may have been critical, teasing, or taunting. This can have a negative impact on their mental and financial well-being. Assertiveness is important for these individuals because it can help them to set boundaries, express their needs, and stand up for themselves. Learning to be assertive can be difficult and tiring, but it is essential for their well-being. 3. Getting rid of toxic people: Toxic people often react immediately to save everyone who needs them, except themselves. They may also engage in arguments where they try to have the last word. This can lead to feelings of emptiness and a desire to avoid the world. The world may seem like a dangerous and unsafe place, whether mentally, physically, economically, or sexually. Everyone has rooms inside their mind's castle, filled with memories . Some people have more difficult, unconscious memories that they need to fill with love. They may not have learned what self-love is or how to set boundaries. They may have spent many decades of their lives giving their time and feelings to others who were not worthy of them. It takes time to understand and reach a state of awareness. It is important to be patient with yourself and to allow yourself to heal. There are many resources available to help you, such as therapy, support groups, and self-help books. 4. Understanding the true behavior of others and absorb their behavior : Some people go to work and healthcare settings and set boundaries with others so they don't get close to them. I see them separated by the masks they wear. People are hypocrites. They often know how to attract an empath. They know how to play their game of life, and that's what I see every day. They love to talk about their successes. I see how they talk and dress and compliment their boss or people of higher social class. 5. It helps empaths identify narcissists behind their masks and separate them from toxic people: Empaths have a desire to belong , so they can be easily drawn to narcissists. Narcissists know who is weak and sensitive, and they will use these people to their advantage. They need to feel superior to others, and they will do whatever it takes to get what they want. 6. Assertiveness can help people who are usually sensitive and need help. They love to help others, but it can be hard for them to set boundaries and say no. The answer is that they must sometimes separate themselves from others and not go after their need to rescue others. Sometimes, this boundary-denying behavior is a way for people to check their limits and just want time for themselves. Sometimes distance will help empaths. They must learn their value as an empath and stand up for themselves. Sometimes, empaths lose their strength because they are drained by the energy vampires , also known as narcissists. These toxic people can sense empaths because they have been hurt in the past and are envious of the empaths' genuine smiles, love, happiness, and peace. They feel the need to compete with them, and in doing so, they take massive amounts of mental energy from the empaths. Empaths are often quiet people who don't have anyone to talk to. They may feel the need to talk about sensitive topics like family, secrets, and difficulties, even to people they don't know well. They may not realize that these people are only asking questions to get information that they can use against them. They may think that if they are good people, everyone will treat them well. Empaths and people-pleasers are often peacemakers and peace-loving people. However, other people may not recognize their value or hard work. As a result, they may be taken advantage of by narcissists and other toxic people. These people may betray their trust and lead them into misfortune and traps. Empaths need to learn to set boundaries and say no to others, even if it is difficult. They need to protect themselves from people who are trying to drain them of their energy. They also need to find people who will appreciate them for who they are and treat them with respect. * See research on assertiveness mental health and empaths: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042810022317 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284813175_Empathic_And_Assertive_Communication_Efficient_Communication_Developments

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) Article Synopsis by Mr. J. Igwe and Co. The article "7 Issues Arising From Assisted Reproduction (Bioethics)" by Mr. Ogbule Chibuzo Isaac provides a comprehensive exploration of the ethical concerns surrounding assisted reproductive technologies (ART). It is well-organized, clearly numbered and discussed, making it easy for readers to follow and understand the arguments presented. The article covers a wide range of ethical issues associated with ART, from consent and autonomy to the risks of "designer babies" and eugenics. The author demonstrates a keen awareness of the ethical implications of ART, particularly in terms of autonomy, consent, and the potential for exploitation. The article also addresses contemporary issues such as the potential for gene editing and the ethical dilemmas posed by CRISPR-Cas9 technology. The conclusion poses a thought-provoking question about whether the ends justify the means. In conclusion, Ogbule Chibuzo Isaac's article is a well-structured and thoughtful exploration of the ethical issues surrounding assisted reproduction, raising important questions and stimulating critical thinking. (Philosocom's O. C. Isaac Articles) *********************** Assisted reproduction refers to the use of medical techniques to help individuals or couples conceive a child. While it has provided hope and options for many people facing fertility challenges, it also raises several ethical issues. Here are some of the key ethical concerns associated with assisted reproduction: 1. Consent and autonomy: Assisted reproduction often involves various interventions, such as in vitro fertilization ( IVF ), gamete donation, and surrogacy. These procedures require the informed consent of all parties involved, including donors, recipients, and surrogates. Ethical concerns can arise if there is coercion , exploitation, or inadequate understanding of the risks and implications of the procedures. It is crucial to ensure that all individuals involved have the freedom to make autonomous decisions regarding their reproductive choices. 2. Allocation of resources: Assisted reproduction techniques can be expensive, making access to these procedures limited to individuals with financial means. This raises concerns about equitable distribution of resources. Access to fertility treatments should ideally be based on medical need rather than financial status , ensuring that all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic background, have equal opportunities to pursue parenthood. 3. Multiple embryos and selective reduction: During IVF, multiple embryos are often created to increase the chances of successful pregnancy. This practice can result in multiple pregnancies , which carry higher risks for both the mother and the fetuses. In such cases, selective reduction may be offered, where one or more embryos are terminated to reduce the number of fetuses. The decision-making process surrounding selective reduction raises ethical questions about the value and respect for human life. 4. Donor anonymity and identity disclosure: Assisted reproduction frequently involves the use of donated gametes (sperm or eggs). The anonymity of donors has traditionally been upheld, but some individuals born through donor conception have expressed a desire to know their genetic origins. Balancing the rights and interests of the child, the donor, and the parents can be challenging, and ethical considerations arise regarding the disclosure of donor identity and the right to genetic information. 5. Commercialization and exploitation: Assisted reproduction can create a market for reproductive services, including gamete donation and surrogacy. Concerns arise when financial incentives lead to exploitation, commodification of human reproductive materials, or the potential for individuals to be coerced or forced into reproductive arrangements. Ethical guidelines and regulations are necessary to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable individuals and to ensure that the interests of all parties involved are protected. 6. Health risks and long-term consequences: Assisted reproduction techniques, such as hormonal stimulation, egg retrieval, and embryo transfer, carry risks for the physical and psychological well-being of individuals involved. Ethical considerations include ensuring that individuals are fully informed about the potential risks and long-term consequences of these procedures, and that appropriate safeguards are in place to minimize harm. 7. Designer babies and eugenics: Advances in reproductive technologies, such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas9, raise concerns about the potential for creating "designer babies." The ability to select or modify specific traits in embryos raises ethical questions about the limits of parental choice, the potential for exacerbating social inequalities, and the ethical implications of altering the human germline. These are just a few of the many ethical issues that arise in the context of assisted reproduction. Addressing these concerns requires ongoing dialogue, thoughtful regulation, and adherence to ethical principles that prioritize the well-being, autonomy, and dignity of all individuals involved. Conclusion The question of whether the end justifies the means is a complex one. An issue that deserves debate and questioning. But if there is a question we should keep on debating about, is if the ends justify the means; if we should risks said problems and make them frequent in our world, in the name of having children.

(The Subcategory: In Defense of Books - How Reading Perseveres How to Become Your Own Professor (A "Self-Professor") (2016, the "Hermitericum") The Nature of Ideologies ("Hermitericum's" First Article) Solitarus -- The Love of Solitude (Translated Article) The Potential Purposes of Solitude https://www.philosocom.com/post/human-social-nature ) Dear readers worldwide, I've poured my heart into bringing you insightful philosophical essays, thought-provoking discussions, and engaging interviews on Philosocom.com . Now, I'm asking for your support to help me continue this endeavor and expand its reach. I've just released a captivating collection of poetry and prose called "The Keyless Lock," and I'm thrilled to invite you to explore its pages, exploring in a few stories and much poetry, the concept of " the point of no return ". Unlock a World of Reflection and Insight Within "The Keyless Lock," you'll discover: A tapestry of themes: Journey through musings on love, solitude, masculinity , asceticism , escapism , and the profound quest for a place to truly call one's own. A personal narrative of introspection: Witness my own grappling with life's choices—from embracing solitude to seeking serenity in a world that often feels at odds with such ideals. A diverse collection: Enjoy blend of short stories and poems, each carefully crafted to ignite contemplation and stimulate the mind and heart. 100 pages of thought-provoking verse and prose, offering hours of immersive reading pleasure. It's a small investment that makes a big impact on both your literary journey and the future of the Philosocom Article Empire. I'm deeply grateful for your readership and support. Get your copy here. Warm regards, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein

Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's Summary I explore the concept of the soul through the metaphor of "light" and "heavy" souls. I believe these represent personality types rather than literal entities. The soul is a metaphor for the essence of a person. There's no correlation between physical and mental age. "Light souls" are adventurous, innocent, and extroverted. "Heavy souls" are wise, introverted, and prefer intellectual pursuits. I see myself as a balance between the two. The soul might be a way to explain death as separate from the body. Mr. Lasher, of the review division, offers alternative perspectives on the soul: The soul could be spread throughout the body. The soul might be consciousness or an energy field. Mental age could be a reflection of the soul's development. Light souls might express more imagination, a form of intelligence. Life experiences move people along a spectrum of "light" to "heavy." Mind and soul might be inseparable. The article concludes with an open-ended question about the nature of the soul and its relation to the mind. (Background music) ************************** "Capturing" the Soul with Metaphors The concept of the soul has captivated humanity for millennia. It's, arguably, that "essence" which makes us who we are. It could be seen as the driving force behind our passions , fears, and dreams. Yet, pinning down the soul's exact nature remains a tough philosophical effort, without necessarily definite result. This is where metaphor, as a powerful tool for greater understanding, comes along Throughout history, philosophers and writers have reached for metaphors to illuminate the soul's complexities. Plato used a chariot allegory, for example : Reason guided the two, black and white horses, representing emotion . Romantics compared the soul to an Aeolian harp, its strings echoing with the music of a life being experienced with motion and energy. In ancient Egypt, "The soul was not only one's character but a composite being of different entities, each of which had its own role to play in the journey of life and afterlife ." These metaphors offer a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of "the soul", giving us food for tought on the nature of existence. They remind us that the soul is not a static, concrete or even an easy-to-define entity. Rather, if truly exists, it's a dynamic force that shapes and is shaped by our experiences. Just like a cupcake mold leaves its imprint on the batter, our soul leaves its mark on the world through the power of ripple effects. The choices we make, the paths we take – all contribute to the legacy we leave behind, and influence the journey of others, in accordance to our own impact. Then, the question then becomes: are the shapes we're leaving the ones we truly desire? By reflecting on the metaphors that resonate with us, we can gain a deeper understanding of our own unique being and as such gain the better opportunity to leave a positive imprint on the world. I like to use as many metaphors as possible in my writing. It gives my writing vividity, an aura of meaningfulness, and a sense of adventure towards an unknown destination, which may or may not exist. For me, the term "soul" is a metaphor, since I do not actually believe in the existence of these eternal entities. There is no physical place in the body that could house such a thing. Feel free, of course, to try proving me wrong. The Spectrum of the Soul: Lightness and Weight For me, the term "soul" can be equivalent to "life force," "motivation," or "essence of being." It is not something that stands on its own, without a parallel term. Long ago, I was interested in the relationship between "soul" and " mental age ." I believe that there may not be a correlation between physical age (the length of time one has lived) and mental age (one's childish or mature personality). There may be people who are very old but have a childlike attitude, and young people with a very strict attitude, with wisdom that exists beyond their physical age. I would consider a "light soul" to be the personality of a child, not necessarily as an insult. People with such a life force are very adventurous, seductive, attractive, excited, carefree, and pretty much everything that may be considered social , innocent, and extroverted. A "light soul" is a child at heart. On the contrary, a "heavy soul" is not necessarily a miserable or stressed entity. As I said before, they may be wise beyond their actual age. They may prefer intellectual matters over materialistic ones, are very self-disciplined , introverted, very mature , and may or may not lead an ascetic lifestyle , devoid of obsessions after pleasure , adventures, and vanity. They may also prefer solitary pursuits, and are independent by nature, even if melancholic at times. A "heavy soul" can also be regarded as an " old soul ". I also do not take that term literally. Personally, I view myself as a hybrid between the two. I do lead a somewhat ascetic and solitary lifestyle, and I am wise beyond my physical age. However, I am also quite innocent, as I fail to understand the cause or functionality of impurity, crime, and evil in our world. I prefer intellectual activities over social events, but I am also an admirer of physical fitness. Part of being a philosopher is to be less innocent, for the philosopher seeks to understand, above all. I believe that a composition of "light" and "heavy" virtues can lead to a healthy and serene life. It is good to be kind-hearted, but it is also important to care for intellectuality and avoid the circle of materialistic pursuits . There are many more combinations that are possible for a healthy physical and mental condition. Regardless of its metaphorical aspect, I tend to believe that the soul was invented as a concept for people to explain to themselves what happens to a person after they die. It is a result of distinguishing between the person and their body, as if they were different objects. The truth might be that when we die , we simply shut down, like a phone that has run out of batteries. However, it is important to remain open-minded about the concept of souls, as it is a widely-accepted theory, along with other theories like the afterlife or resurrection. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Review I think Mr. Tomasio is missing one important aspect of metaphors. That they are a tool to use. They allow for you to connect unrelated material with familiar content so people can experience things curiously through their own experiences. They are a vital aspect of understanding things. Very powerful if used properly. What if the soul isn’t housed in the brain alone? What if it’s spread out over your whole entire body and operates through our neural system? This subject is a hard one to discuss objectively, as the soul is the essence of who you are I don’t believe it can be discussed fully without adding some subjectivity to it.   Who says the soul isn’t the same thing as consciousness? A pure sense of awareness as to what is inside of us and all around us? Courtesy of our senses? Who is to say the soul isn’t anything more than an energy field which envelops us but which can spread outside of us as well. What if your sight is actually your soul using your eyes to see what is around you? There is nothing physical about the soul other than energy. If one were to think of the soul as the same thing as conscious minds and intelligence , would your mental age not actually be your soul as well? After all, if learning is nurturing the soul, would it not make sense to think of mental age as how much you have learned? In reference to light souls being like that of a child... If one were to think of imagination as an expression of intelligence, would it not mean that children are more intellectually active than adults? So, children use more “soul” than adults do. At what age do we decide to stop using our intelligence like that? At what point do people stop expressing their souls like that? Is an old soul nothing more than a soul which has been through many experiences? A young soul would be someone regardless of age who hasn’t experienced much. If you’ve been through a lot you would probably lean more towards heavy. I think one could explain light and heavy souls more vividly by describing them as a spectrum which people move around on throughout their lives. Maybe at some point in your adult life you move and start a new job. You’d be learning towards a light soul for a bit because you aren’t as experienced with the experiences you are having yet. I believe experience is how we nurture our souls. Aren’t mind and soul the same exact thing? They are both essences of who you are. Try this one out for size. Think of a place on your forehead and without using your hands try to touch it by trying to force your brain to that point. Wonder what it is from your inside that you are feeling pushing out? If you did this properly it should feel like your brain is pushing that point from the inside out. Can you explain to me what it is inside your mind which is pushing?

(Note: This article discusses agnostic atheism . For more on my reasoning in that regard, click here ) (Background music) Why I Chose Agnosticism Agnosticism , or the uncertainty of divinity , is probably the most realistic conclusion one can reach in an age where, despite modernity, it is still not possible to prove divinity in scientific terms ; Where logic alone is insufficient to prove anything that also has to require further evidence. This is why scientific experimentation is insufficient. Assuming divinity as true is purely spiritual, and science cannot prove it because it is confined to the physical realm exclusively. It deals with physics, biology, chemistry, and so on—all of which are constructs of physicality. It is illogical to conclude that science has disproved divinity because it is not its field. Just as a musician can play his piano good without being an expert on music theory, a fisherman doesn't need to be a marine biologist in order to catch fish, and so on.. Science, as such, is limited by its own present expertise. And where science is limited, we are left with philosophical speculation that might as well never reach a definite conclusion. When it comes to logic, it alone cannot prove anything in existence as it requires additional knowledge to support it. Do we have evidence that there is an external layer of reality, called the " spiritual realm "? Some may find it logical to believe that when death ends, an afterlife begins. And yet, necromancy, the magic to resurrect, is but a myth. Have you or I ever experienced what happens after we die? It is a question that has occupied me for around a decade, but regardless of answers, it will remain a theory, whether or not death is final or but a "gate" to another world. Faith and knowledge are not the same thing. There is no need for faith to know that it will rain tomorrow, as you can tell by the weather forecast. Certainty is not the same as trusting that something is real. If you had knowledge, faith would not be necessary, as faith is loyalty or subscription to a claim that you hold dear to your heart. If we actually knew that divinity and spirituality are real, there would be no need to believe in something that we know is there. What do we need to determine the existence of gods and other spiritual concepts? We would need tools that we can be certain can assist us in our quest for such realization. A "meta-science", if you will, but not to be confused with an actual term for something else . In essence -- a science that exceeds the limited physical realm. For example, we would need to be able to identify and track the consciousness of people after it disappears, and follow it beyond the now-dead body. We would need to somehow break the space-time continuum , to somehow make mythical beings such as ghosts and demons communicate with us just as any other human being we meet in the streets... Anything that would allow us to truly know, and not just believe, that this " meta reality " exists, and that there is not just the physical realm in all of existence. There are many claims by believers that certain situations they or others have experienced necessarily indicate the existence of divinity. However, as long as coincidences are just as possible in theory, it would be hard to believe they are right. Because in the end, many things happen purely because of processes that are confined to the physical realm, or to reasoning that can be independent of divinity. (Note: I may use anecdotes as well in my writings. However, using anecdotes does not necessarily mean that they are intended to remove, or cancel, other forms of present, additional evidence. In other words, anecdotes alone do not necessarily oppose deductive reasoning . They are only canceling when isolating said evidence from the reality they attempt to portray). The birth of a child, for example, is easily explained without resorting to divine claims. The sperm reached the egg and this union led to the slow development of a new human being in the womb. It is not necessary that a sperm was "chosen" to be the "victor", as it simply was the fastest, nothing more, theoretically. You were not necessarily "chosen" by a divine being to be born, when you could've just been the fastest sperm to reach the egg. Claim otherwise and you may find yourself committing Ockham's Razor . It is unknown whether or not the universe formed by design, because even if logical, logic without sufficient knowledge is still insufficient. Even in the 21st century we still have a lot left to know. Should we fail to open up our minds, we may see falsehood as reality, due to our confidence in our knowledge. It's like the belief in sentient aliens. It is reasonable to believe that there are aliens of similar intelligence to us due to Earth-like planets , but we have yet to actually witness, let alone interact with, an actual alien. How then, can we confirm that we are or aren't alone in the universe? Because of these reasons, I once again resort to an honest confession of my uncertainty. I suspect that some would like to discuss this matter with me. Regardless, I am not expecting you to think like me on this matter after reading this article. I am expecting you to have broaden your understanding of agnosticism. In short, I will only change my agnosticism if I witness a god as I witness any other being, and know that it is not a "prank" or any other type of deception. Because in the end, an unproven theory is just a theory, no matter how many people believe it to be true. I suspect that such an examination will only be possible after death. Mr. Joseph Bright's Feedback The term "agnosticism" was coined by Thomas Huxley in the 19th century. Huxley, a biologist and a staunch advocate for Darwin’s theory of evolution , introduced agnosticism as a stance against the dogmatic certainties espoused by both religious believers and atheists. He argued that claiming certainty about the existence or non-existence of God without adequate evidence is intellectually dishonest. Huxley's perspective was deeply influenced by the empiricist tradition, which emphasizes knowledge derived from sensory experience and evidence. David Hume, an 18th-century Scottish philosopher, is another influential figure whose work laid the groundwork for agnosticism. Hume questioned the rational basis for religious beliefs, suggesting that human reason is inherently limited and incapable of proving the existence of God. His skepticism extended to all forms of metaphysical speculation, arguing that many religious concepts are beyond the realm of empirical verification. Hume's critical approach to religious doctrines emphasized the need for evidence and reason , aligning closely with the principles that Huxley later articulated in his formulation of agnosticism. Additionally, Immanuel Kant, an 18th-century German philosopher, contributed to the agnostic perspective with his critical philosophy. Kant argued that human perception is limited to the phenomenal world (the world as we experience it) and that we cannot have direct knowledge of the noumenal world (the world as it is in itself, including the divine ). This distinction reinforced the idea that certain metaphysical questions, such as the existence of God, are beyond the scope of human understanding. These influential voices collectively underscore the foundational principles of agnosticism: a commitment to evidence-based reasoning, an acknowledgment of the limitations of human cognition, and a cautious approach to metaphysical claims. Their contributions have shaped agnosticism into a robust and respectful philosophical stance that values open inquiry and intellectual humility.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's John Igwe and Co. Articles) **************************** Monsieur Chouchani , whose real name was Shimon Shteinman , was a mysterious and enigmatic Jewish teacher and scholar. He is known for his unconventional teaching methods and refusal to reveal much about his own background. Chouchani had a reputation for being a brilliant and profound thinker, and he taught a small group of students, including notable figures like Elie Wiesel and Emmanuel Levinas . Despite the mystery surrounding him, his teachings have had a lasting impact on the intellectual and philosophical world. His learning philosophy, though somewhat obscure due to his secretive nature, has garnered attention for its unique approach. Monsieur Chouchani's philosophy was characterized by his emphasis on critical thinking , independent inquiry, and a deep engagement with both traditional Jewish texts and general knowledge. While he didn't leave a formal body of written work, his teachings and approach to education emphasized the following principles: 1.1,Critical Thinking: Chouchani encouraged his students to question, challenge, and critically analyze the ideas they encountered. He believed that true understanding came from rigorous examination and not passive acceptance. Critical thinking is the ability to analyze, evaluate, and assess information, ideas, and arguments in a systematic and logical manner. It involves the following key elements: * Analysis: Critical thinking begins with the examination of information or a situation . This involves breaking it down into its component parts and understanding how they relate to each other. * Multidisciplinary Learning: He advocated for a broad and interdisciplinary approach to education. Chouchani felt that knowledge should encompass various fields, including literature, science, philosophy, and ethics, to foster a well-rounded and informed perspective. * Intellectual Independence: Chouchani urged his students to think independently and not rely solely on authority figures or established dogma. He encouraged them to form their own conclusions based on their own reasoning. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: I myself formed my own philosophy ). * Ethical Values: Although he had a focus on intellectual pursuits, Chouchani also emphasized the importance of ethical and moral values in life, drawing from his Jewish heritage. * Privacy and Mystery : Chouchani himself maintained a shroud of mystery regarding his own background, which added an element of intrigue to his teachings. This enigmatic persona encouraged his students to focus on the content of his lessons rather than his personal history. His approach to education and philosophy left a profound impact on those he taught, and many of his students became prominent scholars and thinkers in their own right. Chouchani's emphasis on critical thinking and a holistic approach to learning continues to be influential in various educational and intellectual circles. 1.2, Depth of Knowledge: Chouchani was known for his deep and profound knowledge in various subjects. His philosophy emphasized the importance of in-depth learning and understanding, rather than superficial or rote memorization. "Depth of knowledge" refers to a comprehensive and profound understanding of a subject or topic. It involves not just surface-level or superficial knowledge but delving into the complexities, nuances, and intricacies of a particular area of study. Here are key aspects of depth of knowledge: * Specialization: Depth of knowledge often involves specialization within a specific field or subject. Individuals who seek depth in their understanding typically become experts in a narrow area of expertise. * Mastery: It implies a level of mastery where an individual has a strong command of the subject matter, understands its foundational principles, and can apply this knowledge effectively. Exploration of Complexity: It involves exploring the intricacies and complexities of a topic, understanding its historical context, and being aware of its current developments and debates. * Research and Analysis: Individuals pursuing depth of knowledge often engage in research and in-depth analysis to expand their understanding and contribute to the field's body of knowledge. * Intellectual Engagement: Gaining depth of knowledge requires a high level of intellectual engagement and curiosity, often involving continuous learning and staying updated on the latest research and developments. * Contribution: Individuals with a deep knowledge of a subject may also contribute to the field by publishing research, teaching, or sharing their expertise in various ways. Depth of knowledge is highly valued in academia, research, and various professional fields. It allows individuals to make meaningful contributions to their chosen area of expertise and to provide valuable insights and solutions to complex problems. 1.3, Multidisciplinary learning: He advocated for a broad and interdisciplinary approach to education. Chouchani felt that knowledge should encompass various fields, including literature, science, philosophy, and ethics, to foster a well-rounded and informed perspective. Multidisciplinary learning , also known as interdisciplinary learning, is an approach to education that emphasizes the integration of knowledge and methods from various academic disciplines or fields of study. The goal of multidisciplinary learning is to provide a more holistic and well-rounded understanding of complex topics and issues. Here are some key aspects of multidisciplinary learning: * Integration of Disciplines: In multidisciplinary learning, students are encouraged to explore topics or problems from multiple angles by drawing on concepts and methods from different disciplines. This can involve combining elements of the natural sciences, social sciences, humanities, and more. * Real-World Relevance: Multidisciplinary learning often focuses on real-world issues and challenges that do not neatly fit into the boundaries of a single discipline. By approaching these issues from various angles, students can develop a deeper understanding of complex problems. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: Philosophy can technically be relevant indefinitely because even its ancient insights could still matter in contemporary times. The same reasoning found thousands of years ago, for example, could still be applied today. And I quote: "Contrary to the stereotype of philosophy as an impractical discipline, the skills and techniques that philosophy teaches are extremely useful. The same skills and techniques used to address philosophical questions and solve philosophical problems can also be used to answer practical questions and solve real-world problems"). * Collaboration: Multidisciplinary learning often involves collaboration among students, educators, and experts from different fields. This collaboration can lead to innovative solutions and a more holistic perspective. * Broad Skill Development: Students engaged in multidisciplinary learning tend to develop a wide range of skills, including the ability to think creatively, synthesize information, and communicate effectively across disciplines. * Fostering a Broader Perspective: By studying multiple disciplines, students can gain a broader perspective on complex issues, leading to a deeper appreciation of the interconnectedness of knowledge and the world. * Problem-Centered Approach: Multidisciplinary learning often revolves around specific problems, questions, or projects, allowing students to apply their knowledge to address real challenges. In conclusion, multidisciplinary learning is seen as a valuable approach for preparing students to tackle the complexities of the modern world, where many of the most pressing issues require a diverse set of skills and knowledge from various fields. It encourages a more holistic and interconnected understanding of the subjects being studied. 1.4, Intellectual Independence : Chouchani urged his students to think independently and not rely solely on authority figures or established dogma. He encouraged them to form their own conclusions based on their own reasoning. Intellectual independence, also known as critical thinking or intellectual autonomy, is a fundamental aspect of education and personal development. It refers to the ability to think for oneself, question established ideas, and form one's own conclusions based on reason and evidence. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: It is also the independence from the need to have your own ideas imported from others thinkers. As such, one doesn't have to study the history of philosophy in order to be a good philosopher. Negative, he/she needs to think on their own, even at the absence of books to read from, or other people to philosophize with). Here are some key aspects of intellectual independence: Questioning Authority: Intellectually independent individuals are not passive receivers of information. They are willing to question the authority of experts, teachers, or established doctrines and seek a deeper understanding. Open-Mindedness: While intellectually independent individuals question ideas and beliefs, they remain open to new information and alternative viewpoints. They are willing to change their opinions in the face of compelling evidence. Self-Reflection: Intellectually independent individuals engage in self-reflection to understand their own biases and assumptions, which allows them to make more informed and objective judgments. Personal Responsibility: They take responsibility for their own learning and decision-making , recognizing that their choices and beliefs are their own and that they have the capacity to influence their own intellectual growth. In conclusion: Intellectual independence is a vital skill that empowers individuals to navigate an increasingly complex and information-rich world. It is highly valued in education and in various professional and personal contexts, as it leads to more informed and thoughtful decision-making. 1.5, Ethical Values: Although he had a focus on intellectual pursuits, Chouchani also emphasized the importance of ethical and moral values in life, drawing from his Jewish heritage. Ethical values are principles that guide human behavior and decisions based on what is considered morally right or wrong. These values serve as a foundation for how individuals and societies interact and make choices. Here are some key aspects of ethical values: Morality: Ethical values are rooted in morality, which is the distinction between right and wrong behavior. They provide a framework for determining what is considered good and just. Principles: Ethical values often reflect principles such as honesty, integrity, fairness, respect for others, and empathy. These principles guide individuals in their actions and interactions with others. Cultural Variability: Ethical values can vary across different cultures and societies. What is considered morally acceptable in one culture may differ from another, although there are often universal ethical principles that transcend cultural boundaries. Personal Beliefs: Ethical values are influenced by an individual's personal beliefs, upbringing, religion, and cultural background. They shape a person's character and moral compass. Decision-Making: Ethical values play a crucial role in decision-making. They help individuals assess the ethical implications of their choices and guide them toward actions that align with their values. Legal and Social Norms: Ethical values can intersect with legal and social norms. While not all ethical values are enshrined in the law, many laws and social expectations are rooted in ethical principles. Ethical Dilemmas: Ethical values are particularly important in situations where individuals face ethical dilemmas, where they must make difficult choices between conflicting values or principles. Professional Ethics: In various professions, such as medicine, law, and business, there are often codes of ethics that outline the ethical values and responsibilities expected of professionals within those fields. Social Responsibility: Ethical values also extend to the responsibility individuals and organizations have toward society and the environment. This includes actions aimed at contributing to the greater good and minimizing harm. In conclusion, Ethical values provide a moral compass that guides individuals and communities in their interactions and decision-making. They are fundamental in promoting fairness, justice, and empathy in human relationships and are a cornerstone of ethical philosophy and ethical reasoning. 1.6, Privacy and Mystery: Chouchani himself maintained a shroud of mystery regarding his own background, which added an element of intrigue to his teachings. This enigmatic persona encouraged his students to focus on the content of his lessons rather than his personal history. Privacy and mystery, in the context of individuals, refer to aspects of personal life or identity that are intentionally concealed or kept hidden from others. Here's a closer look at privacy and mystery: Personal Boundaries: Privacy is the concept of maintaining personal boundaries and controlling the information one shares with others. This includes aspects of life like personal space, communication, and data. Protection: Privacy is often associated with the protection of one's personal information, ensuring that it is not shared or accessed without permission. It is essential for safeguarding personal security and data. Legal Rights: In many societies, privacy is considered a legal right, and laws exist to protect individuals from unauthorized intrusions into their personal lives. Privacy Concerns: Privacy concerns have grown with the advancement of technology, as digital data and online communication have raised questions about personal information security and surveillance. Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations often play a role in discussions about privacy, particularly regarding the balance between an individual's right to privacy and the needs of society or organizations to access certain information. Concealment: Mystery involves deliberately concealing information or aspects of one's life, often to create intrigue or to limit the knowledge others have about them. Enigma: Creating an aura of enigma can be a deliberate choice for personal or professional reasons, as seen in the case of individuals like Monsieur Chouchani, who maintained a mysterious persona. Intrigue: Mystery can be used to pique curiosity and stimulate interest, making an individual or subject more captivating. Impact on Relationships: Maintaining a sense of mystery can affect relationships, as it may lead to heightened curiosity or intrigue, but it can also create distance or misunderstandings if taken to an extreme. Personal Choice: Mystery is typically a personal choice, and individuals decide to what extent they want to share or conceal information about themselves. However, privacy and mystery are intertwined, as individuals often choose to keep certain aspects of their lives private or shrouded in mystery. While privacy is more focused on protecting personal information and boundaries, mystery revolves around creating intrigue or a sense of enigma. Both aspects are influenced by cultural norms, personal preferences, and evolving societal values. Conclusion: Chouchani's philosophy of learning has intrigued many scholars and students for its unconventional and open-ended approach to education. His emphasis on intellectual autonomy, interdisciplinary thinking, and ethical considerations continues to be a subject of study and discussion. Chouchani's philosophy is perhaps best understood through the notable individuals he taught, including Elie Wiesel and Emmanuel Levinas, who went on to become influential scholars and thinkers. His teaching left a lasting impact on his students' intellectual and moral development. It's important to note that Monsieur Chouchani did not leave behind a written body of work, so his philosophy is mostly known through the perspectives and experiences of those he taught. His unique teaching approach emphasized independent thinking, interdisciplinary knowledge, and a blend of intellectual and ethical growth. In essence, studying the learning philosophy of an enigmatic sage can open doors to new ways of thinking and learning, offering valuable lessons for individuals and communities. Reference: 1. https://www.nli.org.il/en/at-your-service/announcements/mr-shushani 2. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BYFZ1mI142U 3. Handwritten works from Elie Wiesel's mysterious teacher opened to the public. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/315336 4. https://www.biographies.net/biography/monsieur-chouchani/b/3777b2d7 5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsieur_Chouchani

(Directory on Writing) (Philosocom Directory on Communication) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Manipulation) Journalism Versus Philosophy (Background music) Humanity has two methods for obtaining truth (or what is assumed to be the truth): rationality and evidence . Without these two values, the truth cannot be obtained, or at least can only be discovered partially. In recent times, the human mind is no longer seen as a prime tool for truth-seeking. Instead, philosophy has been cast aside in favor of two other "sub-methods" of evidence: science and journalism. People no longer believe that sitting alone with your thoughts is a good way to find truths about the world. Instead, they turn to researchers and journalists, who look outwards to whatever subject they are covering. If fields such as philosophy continue to be cast aside and their contributions overlooked, independent thinking may become more difficult, and that thinking may instead be dependent on external agents such as journalists, scientists, and other researchers. Should we avoid independent thinking in the name of external stimulation, we can also reduce our own critical thinking skills , which are necessary to understand and examine information. Accepting information as it is is dangerous in a sense that it can deceive us while thinking we see reality as it is. Accepting information as credible and on-point with reality should only be the conclusion of a greater cognitive process. A process that includes fact-checking, for example, and seeking sources that may oppose that information due to their own reasoning. Serious philosophers would abstain from just seeing information and accepting it as valid. When it comes to intellect they are supposed to be the cream of the crop, per se. It is therefore a job suited for them to analyze information that is presented as fact and question its validity and rationality. All in the name of truth. It is incorrect to regard philosophy as solely "the love of wisdom". We need to distinguish between what it literally means and what it refers to. It means that people don't necessarily philosophize because they feel affection or admiration to the concept of wisdom. No, that's not necessary. They do it because they want to become wiser, with "wisdom" referring to a more-refined understanding and application of reality. Philosophical inquiry is done in the name of acquiring wisdom, not in the name of "loving" or "expressing love" to it. "Love" is not necessary here, but rather the desire and dedication to be wiser than before. (And to be wiser, we must not regard false notions as true, nor act upon them while seeing them as such. The philosopher has no reason to deceive themselves, as that would be self-contradictory. Why pursue the truth, just to deceive yourself, when you can do just that, and not be deceived?) As such, while the journalist is mainly an investigator and a gatherer of information, he or she may not have the intellectual merit or integrity to prioritize the truth in favor of bias or in favor of getting the next pay-check. They might even feed you with fake news using malicious manipulation of your emotional biases. Philosophers, you could say, are the frontier of autonomous thought . It is very difficult for a good philosopher to be satisfied with whatever is presented to them, and they will not necessarily be content with their own feelings of contentment (you can call this meta-emotion , as parallel to meta-cognition ). They will ask and they will doubt until true satisfaction is reached; satisfaction accepted both by instinct and mind. However, this inquisition can be problematic for researchers such as journalists . After all, they have a deadline to meet, competition from rival news outlets, and perhaps other tasks, such as writing the next project in their job. In addition, if a news outlet may have a specific agenda that isn't about covering the truth, they may appeal to the concept of post-truth in order to gain and retain its readership/audience. Or in other words -- appeal to their emotions rather than their desire and belief to understand reality better. You can call that a form of scam, unless of course you're giving your audience what they want to hear from you, and then there is the simple case of supply and demand. That is even though your audience is unconsciously biased towards falsehood. But, why would you tell them that if you wish to capitalize off your own, untold, intellectual dishonesty? These incentives can hinder a journalist's endeavors as truth-seekers; incentives that philosophers do not necessarily have. After all, you do not have to "work" as a philosopher in order to be one; you do not even have to be driven by money in order to do a good job in it. Maybe you have another job, maybe you're unemployed; people do not philosophize, usually, to get the next pay-check. For that matter, in 2023, it isn't profitable to use a philosophy degree for jobs in the U.S. This is why it should be obvious that not all news outlets present correct information, or even try to do so at all. Theoretically, most if not all forms of propaganda are, by default, so biased that they might either twist or ignore important truths just to promote a person, an organization, a policy, and so on. Journalism is, all and all, a business industry first and a truth-seeking method later. That could also be true to any other researchers that have certain agendas they do not want to hurt. By the way, entertain the fact that there are 6 massive media empires that own almost all media companies on this planet. They are known as the Big 6. On the other hand, philosophers are not loyal to money (usually) or to a certain allegiance, other than the truth. What separates philosophy from religion is the fact that in philosophy it's good to doubt your beliefs and replace them in the name of advancing towards the truth. A true philosopher should not be biased to a certain ideology, because then they become "religious" preachers of said ideology, and will be less willing to open up to the possible fact that they are wrong. The notion of being wrong in philosophy, therefore, should be a welcomed one, because in order to reach wisdom, one usually must commit some mistakes, recognize them, and move onwards. There is no higher authority, such as a boss or a censorship body, to "fix" or alter your work in the favor of a larger organization. You have either yourself, an audience, perhaps other people to discuss your work with -- and the most important thing of all -- the work-tool that is your mind. Manage to be independent of an academic organization, and you can be even less censored when doing your work. I'd therefore like to propose the encouragement of philosophers opening up media outlets like Philosocom in order to independently observe and criticize the huge media empires that create and distribute content to the world, in the name of assisting the public to get closer to the truth, and remain in-touch with reality. The brain is, arguably, the philosopher's most important organ in their line of work. They do necessarily have, like the journalist, to get outside and interview a few people, or even travel abroad. All they have is their general knowledge, their critical thinking skills, and their ability to formulate new ideas in the name of better understanding the world around us. These three things are all that is required to be a philosopher, once they are used regularly and communicated through speech, writing, or other forms of recorded communication . The value of the mind as an information processor and generator , is underrated. Of course, external sources have their own place, because we do not live and operate in a vacuum. However, in philosophy, the evidence is a tool used for confirmation , and not the aim. If that functionality was reversed, then philosophers would have needed to become journalists instead. Some people therefore fail to understand the fact that the human mind is also a tool for truth-seeking , and yes, even research. Finally, there should be a distinct distinction between philosophy as an ideology and philosophy as a method of truth-obtaining . To have a philosophy does not make you a philosopher because it's not something you necessarily work with to understand existence. If you see your current viewpoints on life as satisfactory enough and do not wish to expand or question them, then you are not a philosopher. Philosophy is based on not being satisfied with what you know or assume you know. That is the reasoning based on Socrates' search for the truth . To be a philosopher, after all, is to seek. They are called philosophers because he or she who loves wisdom, seeks it . By itself, there is nothing dishonest about it, if the philosopher is truly interested in it. If I did not love or even liked a product, I wouldn't want it at all would I?. That is the same in philosophy -- you don't necessarily have wisdom yet, but you surely wish to obtain it. You don't necessarily do it for revenue or any other hidden agenda. And you surely don't have to manipulate your audience for that matter, now, do you? The core difference between the two occupations, therefore, is that the journalist might not necessarily have the truth in their top priority, while a true philosopher does. This gives, or should give them an edge in the content-creation industrial complex . And to consider philosophy irrelevant is like saying that the truth is irrelevant.

(Background music) (Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Health) (Philosocom's Svartgold/Svarl Articles) (Philosocom's Disability Directory) ************************ Inclusion and real integration of the mentally ill into a 'healthy' and 'normal' society, is best by having a visible disability . People with disabilities often face discrimination and exclusion. It is true that most of them have problems getting drunk in order to acquire financial independence... where it will be possible to rent an apartment and live. And they owe a bigger budget from the state. Because it violates their rights. For example, how will a single traumatized person who is not self-employed and lives in their parents' house at the age of 30 or 40 find a job? In all places of employment, it seems that people with disabilities have started to be integrated. 21.3% of the workforce in the U.S is made up of people with disabilities. However, it is unclear how many of these people have mental illnesses. Employers are generally good at providing appropriate accessibility for people with disabilities, such as larger text for the visually impaired, devices that record what a person says and turn up the volume, and elevators. However, the attitude towards the mentally disabled is still negative and not adapted to each and every individual. There are mentally disabled people who have been evicted from their homes or have been the victims of severe sexual assault and must now live alone . What does a person who lives with their parents at the age of 40 look like? How does the company treat them? How do they view themselves? How is a woman who was sexually abused in her family treated, even until the age of 40? Does this increase her integration and security in society? Is the attitude towards her really appropriate? Will the National Insurance really give her the allowance she deserves or will they take advantage of the fact that she is alone? Or with parents who just want to hurt her but are comfortable with her in their home keeping their secret from a very young age. Is the integration of the mentally disabled really adapted to each case? Can the mentally disabled really be real with society being so judgmental? It is clear that the budget for the mentally disabled is very low. The hard drugs that most of them take have negative effects on some of them, but there are also some positive effects. However, do they really live with dignity ? A rehabilitation basket requires every mentally injured person to go to a psychiatrist regularly. That is, while the physically disabled, who earn almost twice the allowance to take care of themselves, have special services, additional assistants, and more assistance from the state in housing. They do not need to take care of themselves every day or every month. There are easier times. Why do mentally disabled people have no control over their lives? Why do they have to take pills that sometimes don't always suit them? Medication with disgusting taste that can make them puke? And every few months, many of them have to give the rehabilitation basket as proof that they are seeing a psychiatrist and that he is responsible for them. He/she can do anything they want. They can also impose a guardian over them, which can hurt them even more. As a need to belong in society, a mentally injured person must find an apartment for themselves. How many mentally disabled people have their own apartments? Do people with mental disabilities have the option of a mortgage? Depends if you are not discriminated. The mentally disabled from the military are a given. Belonging to the normative society is important for the mentally disabled primarily work. The need to work in order for them to be able to leave their parents' house, who do not necessarily take care for them. The cases may vary. There are those who hurt them, for example. But is it a big wish? To have at least a 2 room place to live in? It won't necessarily be just handed to them. And it is also not certain that it will be with good and accommodating neighbors, who would only deteriorate their mental condition, further. That's why they need to work like everyone else in society, if they are capable of work, despite the hand they've been dealt with. Why do people have issue a directive to combine all mentally disabled people with only other mentally disabled people, and not with the mentally or physically disabled or autistic people? Why is there a kind of separate and distinct category in their consciousness? Viewing people with mental disabilities as defective is not necessarily correct. There are many intelligent people with mental disabilities. In fact, their differences can often give them creativity and skills in certain areas. Why is it that almost every lawbreaker who is caught goes to a psychiatrist and is released from prison? Why are they then mixed in with ordinary people with mental disabilities who have never committed a crime? Why is this such a dangerous inclusion? Why do certain authorities always talk to people with mental disabilities in a slow manner, as if they were incapable of understanding? Do you think this helps them? I think it insults them far more, instead. Why are some mentally disabled people suspected for misdeeds? Are all people worthy of such suspicion? Why, after all their expensive treatments, some of which are also physical, they remain outsiders ? Is the attitude towards them based on generalizations and reassurances to the public that a person murdered because he went to a psychiatrist once and is probably a person with a psychiatric diagnosis? What is this fake reassurance? Why are people with mental disabilities who do not function at all mentally disabled since they must exist and survive? These are all questions that need to be answered. The opportunity that has been given to mentally disabled people to work is excellent. However, even this has a limit. If they earn more, the state can take more money from them. In the past, there was no possibility for mentally disabled people to work, and they were essentially imprisoned in asylums. This was not always healthy for the mentally disabled person, and it may have even contributed to their mental problems. A rehabilitation basket for the mentally disabled encourages work in sheltered factories , but the welfare wage for autistics and the mentally disabled can be awfully low. This situation does not encourage any progress, and there is no opportunity for progress like this. Why is the treatment provided only by a psychiatrist and psychologist and there are no other alternative treatments? Why is there no speech therapy? Because there are mentally disabled people with speech problems... this also costs money, but the budget is low. Also, some 18-year-old adoptees are required to reach a state of well-being without a mental health problem in order to receive information about their biological parents. Some even hide this information from these adult children. This also shows the difference between the mentally disabled and ordinary people, and indicates a different attitude. Why is there no transportation for the mentally disabled who do not have a car? And all this is only if you work through a rehabilitation basket. Why is there no tailored aid that does not just push for development but also for increased aid? Why do some mentally disabled people go to a private psychiatrist, while others go to a psychiatrist from the cash register? Mr. Rubinshtein's conclusion: Should we see beyond the social stigma, and beyond the disability , we will be able to better include the mentally ill into society's ranks. Should we do it, they can contribute to society far better, using the benefit of their work. Thus, equal opportunity is imperative for the individual and collective, human potential.

(Philosocom's directory on death: https://www.philosocom.com/post/defining-death ) The world can be divided into two types of people: those who are consistently covered by the various media, and those who are only covered every once in a while, if at all. Even in a world where many live in comfort never known before in human history, people die prematurely from events that most of the world is not yet aware of. Many people may not even aware of their existence to begin with. (2023 Note: There are 195 countries in the world today. How many of them can you name by heart? ) Much of our external knowledge goes beyond our mere senses; it requires the observation and presentation of various media outlets in order to come to our attention. And since many of us are largely passive beings, receiving information rather than actively investigating for ourselves, our global knowledge depends on bodies beyond our control, thus determining our current level of knowledge and ignorance. And some of these media outlets may have their own ulterior motives. The main motive of Philosocom as a media outlet , by the way, is to research reality through philosophy and exchange of ideas. In 2020, a war has emerged between Armenia and Azerbaijan over a disputed territory. In it, thousands of soldiers and civilians have been killed in the conflict, largely on the Armenian side. This is but one example of many where people die and their deaths remain largely ignored by major media providers. South Sudan , a country declared fairly recently in 2011, had much pain and suffering following a civil war, where hundreds of thousands of people were killed. The bitter truth is that human equality is not yet fully implemented in the world. If there were a civil war in France, Britain, or the United States, most of the world would be horrified and would follow every piece of news about the event. However, if you were brutally executed in a "corner country," your death would go unnoticed. Education about the world is inadequate, leaving the potential to learn new things to oneself. In actuality, the opposite should be the case; otherwise, there would be no point in providing education to those who can do it themselves. Only seldom should a teacher learn from a student about the topics that the teacher is supposed to teach the student. In this world, people need to be auto-didacts because otherwise they would not necessarily receive the knowledge that is sufficient for their understanding. If I wasn't an auto-didact myself, I would not even know English . North Korea is the closest "Corner Country" to break through the glass ceiling blocked by central medias. Due to its heavy influence on major countries such as South Korea and the United States, it is the most covered place in the world where crimes against humanity still persist . Theoretically, if it had no nuclear weaponry that could potentially cause the next world war, North Korea would have probably stayed in the world's corner, similar to the recent Armenian war and the unfortunate South Sudanese mass murder by its own government. It is unfortunate when people need to emigrate from their countries in order to have a better chance at life. It just goes to show that it doesn't always matter who you are or what you're capable of. You also need to come from the "right" place. Otherwise, it is as if you are "born to fail" in life. In a more appropriate world, every country in the world would be relatively equal in its potential for proper media coverage. The Deaths of the Corner People in a "corner country" should be of the same importance and have the same reception as in any other part of the globe. But no. In reality, information providers are driven not necessarily by wanting to help us discover the world, but by interests such as profit. After all, " content is king " because they earn their keep by giving us the content we, the consumers, want to consumer. Similar to what the " Bias-Breaking Hill " article was talking about, it is insufficient to receive just the info you are provided in your passive media, particularly the news on TV and social media feed. Hopefully they can be trusted, but in the name of obtaining optimal knowledge, multiple sources are required to attend to, in order to break the frame of the bias of your local system. To those who believe there are no bloody wars in the modern world, other than the Russio-Ukranian war , I would kindly suggest informing yourselves of the existence of less-known countries. These countries also have humans living in them, and not all of them are your average liberal democracy or constitutional monarchy . Yes, there are still absolute monarchies in this world, and Americanization has yet to achieve world domination. Before I wrap this up, I would like to admit that I do not know everything that is happening in the world. There could be atrocities happening that either you or I are unaware of, or events that you know and I do not. After all, I have only been abroad once (to the UK) and I am more than willing to learn more about the corners of humanity. If we want to be truly united, we have to be aware of each other's existence. My deepest sympathies go out to the Yezidi people , who were victims of genocide by ISIS. May no other cleansing of people be caused simply because they are different.

(Philosocom's Directory on Culture) Background music) Culture gives people within a society a common collective consciousness and subjects to discuss, which in turn strengthens the ties between people and makes society more socially cohesive. It also gives people a sense of collective identity and a feeling of belonging to a place and/or a group of people larger than themselves. However, one of the functions of culture is to limit individuality under specific circumstances in order to preserve the collective identity and cohesiveness. This is an extreme example of how culture can encourage certain behaviors and condemn others, all in the name of preserving the societal identity. Culture can also limit one's actions, even if it is not always dictated rightfully. For example, in some cultures, women are not allowed to hold specific jobs. This is because these cultures believe that women should be restriected, only because of their gender. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the ways in which culture can both promote and restrict freedom. Conforming to a local culture wholeheartedly would therefore be a mistake that would harm your own growth outside of whatever it may try to dictate or impose. A common example of the limitations that a culture attempts to force is through the use of the expression "the fashion police "—some sort of an unofficial figure of authority telling people what they should wear and what they shouldn't. This is sure to be condemned by individualists, because such authority has no actual right or authority to supervise our private wardrobes. And thus we have the two-sided coin of culture—an "armor-smith" of the collective, and a "warden" of eccentric individuals and of those who choose less preferable paths. Like in the official bodies of democracies, the notion of culture should not have complete loss of control, as that would harm societal identity to societal people, but shouldn't have complete control over everything in society. That would harm those who are more of "black sheep" by nature. Culture shouldn't, either, be completely abandoned, especially in modern times where people of the same culture are likely to be complete strangers to each other. In such cases, culture fulfills the position of giving them something in common in the name of cooperation. And we need to cooperate in order to survive as a collective and perhaps evolve beyond that function, as well. Speaking of common identity—as the world becomes more and more interconnected through the internet, social media, and the learning of international languages such as English and Spanish, the existence of localized culture becomes under the threat of globalization. As globalization becomes more dominant than our local cultures, there is a less need for the latter as we can all occupy ourselves on the content of the former. This could lead to a decrease in patriotism and the common man's desire to feel emotional attachment to their local country, which means the role of culture itself becomes less and less effective to the cultivation of local societies, communities, and countries. In 2020, with the terrible expansion of the COVID lockdown, cultural institutions such as theaters and concert halls have taken a heavy blow . A blow that some of them might not be able to recover from. As there are much more modern alternatives to said institutions, such as Netflix, YouTube, and social media, the current functionality of the long-lived "higher" culture and arts should be, therefore, questioned. Why do we even need cinemas, technically? As everyone can become a content creator, whose content can be accessed by anyone across the world, the role of culture seems to take a transition from local to international. This means that there will be less interconnectivity between man and his country at least in this aspect, and more division between local societies. That is due to an increasing lack of common identity and relatedness. If my thoughts are correct, this could explain the separateness in the U.S., for example , as less and less people have things in common with one another beyond their opinions, ethnic origins, and the fact that they are Americans. We can thus conclude that the age of nationality is coming to an end due to globalization, due to the fact that people connect and relate less to each other and more to diverse foreign influences. If a country wishes to preserve the common identity of its citizenry, there will be a need to make significant changes in its education system , and try to give a reason to the future generations to actually care about their country beyond the fact that it exists and that they are within its borders. North Korea does a very extremist job at it by sending people who are suspected of being influenced by the South to concentration camps. While a reasonable country does not need to do that, local culture is to be restored to its former glory if we wish to increase the feelings of love, pride, and belonging to the country we were born and/or raised in. Otherwise, we will gradually lose our local identity and patriotism in the name of the international culture, forming through the media. Finally, a question—when can one know that they are patriotic? When can we know that we the local culture is doing its job properly?—It's when we can look at a stranger that has the same citizenship as we, and actually feel like they are a part of us and vice versa, and not as a stranger like many of us may believe they are. However, as long as we treat our fellow countrymen as foreign strangers, including our very own neighbors—we can rest assured that we are more connected to the posts and videos on the internet rather to the very country we were raised in and/or are raising our children in.

(Philosocom's Asceticism Directory) (Philosocom's Success Directory) (Background music) You don’t need to live a grandiose, hedonistic lifestyle in order to be ambitious. In fact, there are many people who live simpler lifestyles and are still very accomplished and are still productive. As much as living physically alone and remaining in front of a screen all day is considered the hallmark of a person who "has no life", people judge by conventional standards, which then ignores the depth of simplicity , and binds us to stereotypical thinking. For example, Emily Dickinson lived a relatively simple life, rarely living her family home. She spent much of her time in isolation from the world, mainly communicating with others through letters. However, she was a prolific poet and wrote over 1,800 poems in her lifetime. Her work is now celebrated around the world as an "early feminist voice". On the other hand, Mswati III, the king of Eswatini (formerly known as Swaziland), lives a lavish lifestyle. He has many wives and children, and he also owns a fleet of luxury cars and a private jet . However, the African Absolute Monarch is not as well-known as Emily Dickinson. Moreover, with all of his power and prestige , he didn't contribute to humanity as much as Dickinson did. 25% of his kingdom's children under the age of 5 are malnourished, and over 20% of his people have HIV. He is often criticized for his lavish spending and his lack of concern for the welfare of his people. He also uses his security forces to crackdown subjects resisting his rule. These two people are very different, but they both achieved things which led them to relevancy. Emily Dickinson achieved fame and recognition through writing poetry, while Mswati III achieved power and wealth by retaining his position as Africa's last absolute king. However, it is clear that it is possible to be ambitious and successful without living a luxurious lifestyle, and without oppressing those who think differently than yourself. Now, tell me, which did more in terms of influencing the world: an esoteric, eccentric poet, or a less-known, less-cared-about dictator? This shows us that recognition and success can be attained without the excessive exertion of force, and without the unnecessary use of violence, as can be seen in Gandhian philosophy. Whether Dickinson was ambitious or not, what matters is her writings, and not herself as much. Without them she would have been just another hikikomori withdrawing from society. Her poetry was massive in numbers, and had much greater power on the world throughout history than Mswati III. This is very ironic and exemplifies how Occam's Razor can be used for morality : You don't have to commit awful acts against humanity just to contribute to society and be a good person. Perhaps, ultimately, he will be remembered but as one of the many modern dictators that have ever lived, not necessarily more than that. Governing a small nation he could've improved with reforms, but chooses to sink to greed and to hedonism instead. It is often specifically because of a simpler lifestyle, that can make you more accomplished. Living more simply often means that you can have more time, energy and resources in your hands. And with these spare assets you can work better. Live in an ascetic manner , even, and you can work to be more disciplined, keeping yourself on the straight and narrow of your work. If you have ambitions that require a great amount of work and effort, I suggest you to consider living more simply. Then, you can reduce distractions around you, killing off your already-limited lifespan. Final Note: No offense was intended to Eswatini citizens during the writing of this article, including those who support their king. The usage of the Eswatini's monarch's example was merely used as an example to the argument made in this article.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) Article Overview by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. Mr. Mandoela Svartgold's article, "How To Detect and Handle Betrayals In Relationships," provides a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted nature of betrayal within various types of relationships. The article delves into the definitions of betrayal, methods for detection, the complexities surrounding marriage and open relationships, the implications for children , and strategies for remedying betrayals. The article offers deep philosophical reflections, particularly through Mr. Rubinshtein's notes, which encourage readers to ponder the nature of reality, awareness, and preparedness in the context of relationships. The practical detection methods section is detailed, outlining specific behavioral changes such as alterations in appearance, secretive actions, and shifts in communication styles. The balanced perspective on relationships is acknowledged, acknowledging the diversity of relationship structures while clearly stating his own stance. The advice on remedying betrayals underscores the importance of emotional maturity, responsibility, and empathy. Encouraging forgiveness and rational negotiation reflects a compassionate and constructive approach to resolving deep-seated relationship issues. Overall, Mr. Mandoela Svartgold's article stands as a commendable contribution to relationship literature , offering both depth and actionable guidance.   (Background music) (Mr. Rubinshtein's Note: This article can be seen as an example that can be applied in philosophy as well. Should we be mindful of our surroundings, we will be able to understand reality better, and live less in denial about it, if at all. Even the smallest of details around us can serve as evidence to something bigger. And the more aware we are, the less surprised we get. The less surprised we get, the more prepared we can be with reality and its potential outcomes. Mind your surroundings like a ninja does, and you will be able to navigate life better and with less naivety Because remember that your current love interest might, one day, be your enemy. Even if by their own accord. And being able to be mindful enough can help you plan ahead better, like a mastermind would). (Philosocom's Svartgold/Svarl Articles) ********************************** (Defining serious relationships) Introduction The attitude to betrayal differs from person to person. Some see it as something related only to relationships between a man and a woman. Some see it as something related to a betrayal of trust . With severe lies. Others between man and his friend. Some consider it a crime punishable by stoning. Some see it as a goal that's done when there's no other choice, or when that one of the parties is abusive. Everyone sees cheating as something different. Some do not care at all, even, about whether or not they are betraying someone's trust in their loyalty , when there are other interests at play (like money ) But betrayal of trust is a big thing that leaves many doubts regarding others. Cheating when it is in a marital relationship such as marriage (but not exclusively) can cause the dissolution of the serious relationship. That is because propagation is sexual . And sexuality is also a collection of emotions. Of course, we are excluding asexual relationships, in this case. Especially since this brings pleasure. Being pregnant is unwanted. And beyond that... that partner will say to himself: "What do I lack that makes them likely to be disloyal to me?" Especially if the partners are active, they can grow suspicious with each other, and begin to grow distant. How to Detect Betrayals When a man or woman cheats, they are hiding a secret. They may behave differently as well. Generally, if they have been married and are in a serious relationship for years, they may invest less in physical appearance. So in this case when they have a partner (even a lover is a partner), and on the way they will put perfume, to try to have a more attractive scent, and begin pampering themselves more. They will suddenly act with extreme joy or suspicion. Or will there also be outbursts in which they will blurt out and ask "Why do you think I cheated on you?" "You think I went with ... your friend...?" For example, usually, a man who is having an affair will also hide the fact that he cheated by changing his underwear before he gets home. He will fix his hair. He will apply gel. He will dress in different clothes, in order to lower the suspicion of his partner. He will even speak in a different tone. Go to a beautician. When there is a lover, usually the one who cheated will take the phone and put on a secret code. So that his wife does not breach and find data that will incriminate him. (Note: Everything I wrote and wrote here applies to the opposite gender as well). The need for sexual relations within the family will decrease. And if, for example, the woman was used to be with her husband once a week, when she has a lover she will reject her husband with the excuse of headaches. A lot of work problems and problems with their children will occur (if they have children). Problems with her parents. And maybe they will only spend time intimately once a month. Also, this connection is confidential. When cheating, the need to be seen on the street hugging is impossible when the chance of running into the husband or wife is high. Usually they will prefer trips abroad. Or a house or a hotel. Or a place far from their home. So as not to jeopardize their marriage. When it comes to the institution of marriage, it is a religiously sacred institution and a married couple sanctifies themselves in the married status and God or Allah or Jesus or whatever it is for their religion sees the couple and passes energetic cables between them and connects them (according to spiritual doctrines, at least) . So that their soul will be connected. There are those who claim that when a woman marries she is sanctified and becomes more holy. There are also those who are in favor of open relationships . They see relations as something emotional and not that important. And even next to their children they date others with permission. I myself do not believe in such a relationship because I do think that relations are a non-verbal communication that strongly connects a couple as distinctive beings, but I digress. It allows me to be who I am. It causes the connection of my soul to be aligned with its purpose , by conveying feelings of pleasure, joy, pleasure, passion, the possibility of being without clothes and masks. but I digress. In my opinion, yes, it is a very bonding thing that is better to do when you really love each other. True love . And there is a real match. Also, there are cases when a man or a woman cannot marry for reasons such as: the family is one or both of them are from a crime family. In some cases these reasons apply to starting a serious relationship, as well. And the parents don't get along. Or they are members of different religions. And in such cases there is a possibility in these situations to either break up or live together. No wedding and I don't think it's bad. I think being known as a couple is also something significant that could be seen as a threat to others. But some will say that having a child out of wedlock is a sin to an unloving God. I say in these situations a child is a gift. In my opinion, having a child is not accidental. And it's just something their parents and/or family have decided. And when a couple has a biological state between them where they are at the peak of fertility, they are attracted to people of the opposite sex by something in their unconscious that makes them want to be with that person. A child can be created from sexual relations even with contraceptives. And outside of marriage, too. In any case, does such a child deserve to suffer that one of the parties abandons him? Anyone can do what they want. But I dare to speak my mind: A child is usually the fruit of love. (Here I'm talking about love... marriage... partnership even without marriage). Not every couple has children even if they marry at a young age and why? Because from an evolutionary point of view they are not suitable together for having a child and there is something blocking them. They should pay attention. Especially if they are young and old enough to have children. A couple who wants to have children but fails at it, could also lead to betrayal/cheating. Theoretically, that is the reason for Silent Hill 2's entire plot. Families and society cause more difficulties to break up the relationship. Another dimension is the economic aspect. When there is a divorce, one of the parties usually loses financially. One of the parties will have to pay for the child until the age of 18. This burden exists when there is a marriage. And in a marriage agreement, money must also be given to the children. When one of the parties cheats he may find himself impoverished on the street. Whether it is the man or the woman. Especially if you are getting divorced. In addition, it sometimes causes anger on the part of the parties towards the child. Especially if you don't get a divorce when a neighbor has to get a divorce and therefore the child may feel guilty. Children are known to take the blame from their parents if they divorce. How to Remedy Betrayals As the Betrayed But sometimes there is no escaping it. And this is an important step. In order to return a cheating spouse, it is necessary to understand the consequences of his actions. In addition, he must apologize and change his behavior. For that, you need to convince him to do just that: To apologize for the great grief he caused you, and hopefully make the promise to you, that he will be loyal once more, and never betray you as long as you are together in a serious relationship. Study rhetoric, which is the art of persuasion, and you can increase your chances of making him or her return. When there is no agreement that it is something that hurts the other party, the relationship cannot be revived. If the partner is in love with the mistress, he must take responsibility and understand that love is no small thing. And feelings are an important thing. And that the hearts of others are not toys to be played with. Both to understand the reality and to take responsibility if it is discovered. To admit fault is part of growing up and acting emotionally mature. Of course, if the cheater/traitor made children outside of the relationship, they are to be considered as well, when attempting to convince him or her to return. You must be logical and stay vigilant. And think of a plan that will recognize the faults of others, and the products of their actions. Because in the case of children, at least, even if they are not yours, they are not going to get away, and none of us exist in a vacuum. And in such cases, you need to remember that your shots are limited, if not only one. Blow this up by being too biased to yourself, and lack the necessary empathy to understand your cheater's situation, and they might never return to you. Even immoral actions, after all, give birth to new, moral responsibilities that may be beyond your control. Consider such cases as negotiations. And in negotiations you need to keep your head cool, as to not keep away the very one you love. Be delicate and be considering, or the cheater might deem you too hostile to return to. It isn't easy to return a partner, but by being rational, stoic and empathetic, you can at least ease the difficulty of your attempt/s. Forgive them for what they've done. Make them know that they have a place to return to, with love, care and compassion.

Synopsis by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein Life is inherently imperfect. We can't always achieve our desired outcomes or attain the level of "perfection" we envision. However, this doesn't negate the value of striving for excellence. Giving your best effort doesn't guarantee an ideal result. Some individuals may simply have a higher capacity for a particular task, allowing them to excel even with less experience. This doesn't have to diminish your own efforts in the races of life. Humans possess varying strengths and limitations. Some limitations are inherent, while others can be improved upon through dedication and practice. The key lies in understanding your unique capabilities and striving for excellence within that framework. The true measure of success lies in making the most of the cards you've been dealt, and accomplishing your ambitions despite the hardships. Whether you possess exceptional talent or face significant challenges, continuous improvement is the key. The concept challenges the notion that "doing your best" equates to achieving perfection. Perfection is often an unrealistic ideal, and some tasks may simply fall outside our natural strengths or capabilities. We all have inherent limitations, but that shouldn't always excuse us from doing the best we can. (Background music) Striving for Excellence Despite Challenges Existence is imperfect, and you can't always get what you want or think you deserve. However, that doesn't mean you can't try to be the best you can in whatever field you work in, regardless of the end goal. Even if you fail, it doesn't mean you didn't try your best—although in most cases, there is room for improvement. And it is best to try and fail rather than to not try at all. If you're not going to try, how are you going to have a chance to reach peak performance? Doing the best you can allows you to optimally reduce the chances of failure. Then, this rate of performance not only becomes highly beneficial, but necessary as well, for accomplishment to be likely made. For the contemporary world is a competitive landscape, hindered only by monopolies and syndicates of people and groups. Companies strive to pick the top candidates, and a single misstep can weaken your position both before (the interviewing) and after joining the organization. This pressure to be perfect can be overwhelming, especially when faced with limited options. As such many Americans suffer from work-related stress , and the paradox lies in striving to be good so much that your own stress hinders you. Stress is indeed one of the reasons people miss work days. See how your emotions work against you, unless you keep them in greater check by their reduction. Most people have two choices: hone their presentation skills to stand out in a competitive job market or rely on someone else's financial support. However, those with disabilities may have a third option, depending on their circumstances. People living on welfare do not have to be deadbeat klumniks. Whether it's refining your skills within your field, advocating for disability awareness , or simply finding ways to live a fulfilling life, there are countless paths to personal growth. Finding My Path: A Personal Story Technically, I never worked full-time because such a trial would only worsen my mental health.  The tasks I had at an office weren't inherently difficult, but the monotony triggered extreme periods of exhaustion . In part, this caused a "Reaping Fatigue Era" , a 5 year period where I only got tired and more tired until I became physically disabled in 2023 from all the exhaustion. To be free of that neurological imprisonment, I forced myself to develop a neurological technique that kills off much of my emotions -- the Inner Murder technique. Just to earn back my physical freedom, I had to sacrifice some of who I was. This worked, too. Because of that period's resolution, this website improved significantly. The resolution allowed me to contribute meaningfully without succumbing to the pressure of a traditional job.   Stress not only exhausts me but also translates as physical pain. This brings me back to the original point: doing your best doesn't always mean being perfect or even ideal. A person in a wheelchair won't do well when tasked with climbing stairs, and a blind man won't necessarily navigate a new location as well as a seeing man.  In other words, doing your best is about capacity, not merit. Even skilled individuals have limits. Ironically, someone with a higher capacity but less inherent talent might surpass you in the long run because their skills can improve significantly over time.  The key is to identify your strengths and weaknesses, and then strive for excellence within that framework. Let's take gaming as an analogy . Two players with the same amount of experience can have vastly different levels of competence. One player might have a natural aptitude for the game, leading to faster skill development.  Judging someone's skill solely on experience is a fallacy.  It's like the generalization that all elderly people are wise – age alone doesn't guarantee wisdom. In-depth research articles, as such, are beyond my capacity, only if I choose to perceive pain as insufferable. Then, the research and the writing process would be too demanding, causing the stress and physical pain I mentioned earlier, either way. The right approach goes a long way. So rest assured that I strive for excellence as a writer and site owner. Longtime users of Philosocom are evident to the numerous changes I've implemented on the platform – all proof to my dedication to continuous improvement to my work. The Continuous Evolution of Website Management One might think that creating a website is a one-time endeavor. However, I've learned firsthand that website management is practically an endless flow of work. This truth became abundantly clear during weekly consultations I had with a certain consultant.  She constantly presented me with tasks, emphasizing the need for continuous adaptation in website design and interface. This concept aligns perfectly with the notion of striving for excellence within your limits.  While a large corporation might have the resources for a complete website overhaul every year, for me, excellence lies in making steady and gradual improvements. That's done by constantly tweaking and refining the user experience based on my capacity, knowledge and the ever-evolving landscape of website design. The journey of website management, though demanding at times, allows me to share my insights and contribute meaningfully to the world of philosophical exploration , despite my ills and disabilities. Disabilities do not have to be a very large problem when you're tenacious enough to be right for the job. Therefore, doing the best you can is also a matter of tenacity, a drive to succeed despite all opposing odds. Think beyond the disability, think beyond why you can't do something. Identify what needs to be done for greater advancement, and focus on it the best you can. Only then you'll have the least amount of odds standing between you and your goals. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback I would say doing your best is a relative term. Perfection is nothing more than a subjective state of mind. Best is not a universal term. Someone’s best might not be relative to how another person sees it. You cannot place it as a universal value. Doing your best is a matter of ability. Not everyones is the same. As Mr. Tomasio mentioned, some people might be naturally skilled at something. Best is more of a matter of how much effort you put into doing something An example of how standards work in the real world: People automatically assume everyone doing a particular job must be the same. My personal belief is that a job doesn’t make a person. A person makes a job. [This is] how employment structure should be held: Basing its jobs on its employees. Custom designed work. Humans weren’t meant to be assembly lines where they do the same work over and over again. Why waste your time doing something a machine can do? Technology has caused humanity to need to work on its human capital. People should always do their best because they never know what doors might open up if they do so. People’s actions determine how people see them. This does not mean your actions need to be done in secret . Doing your best is nothing more then putting forth as much effort as you can. Imagine doing that for everything in your life. Never know what the future holds if you did that. Next time you are around a group of people try putting a little effort towards doing stuff. People will think you are a hard worker when all you are doing is the bare amount of work. It’s as simple as doing actions.

(Background music) Part I: The Weight of Secrets: A Moral Imperative Man is not what he thinks he is, he is what he hides.  -- Andre Malraux In the absence of dire circumstances , one's most challenging moral decisions often arise from the responsibility of keeping secrets. These secrets are entrusted to you by individuals who have placed their faith and trust in your discretion. A secret, by definition, is information purposefully concealed from others, a form of exclusive knowledge. Furthermore, we may also keep secrets from ourselves, intentionally, and unconsciously.. While a paywall also leads to exclusive knowledge, the reason of concealment is not the lack of trust but the quest for monetary gain. Secrets are to be kept in the name of psychological safety , mainly. Should you betray this trust and reveal their secrets, their respect for you will crumble, and you will be perceived as less trustworthy. Therefore, there exists a social and moral obligation to guard entrusted information, especially if you desire the respect of others. Complying to this also serves as a testament to your integrity and ability to uphold promises. As such, I view secret-keeping as an obligation that should be honored whenever the situation arises. A vow, like the one presented in the Samurai's Bushido code . Part II: The Charm of Secrets: Uncovering the Human Need to Share There is no delight in owning anything unshared. -- Seneca Humans possess an inherent desire to tell secrets to others, to share their deepest thoughts and experiences, even at the risk of exposure. This inclination stems from an innate need for connection, validation , and emotional relief . The act of exposing secrets, when done with discretion, fosters a sense of intimacy and trust, providing a greater sense of security to the secret-keeper, and less loneliness. This is also how loneliness can be a liability, when the people you've trusted, failed to be trustworthy in practice. Unburdening oneself to a trusted confidant offers a sense of security and credibility. If you need to do it, do it with people who care for you enough as to not betray you so easily. Those who ghost easily for example, are cowards, and cowards are not trustworthy for they can easily betray you. A Weight off Your Mind The secret-teller feels validated, knowing that their thoughts and experiences are not confined to the depths of their mind but are acknowledged and respected by another. This shared vulnerability strengthens the bond between the individuals, fostering a deeper level of intimacy. However, the decision to disclose a secret should not be taken lightly. As such, the choice of a confidant must be made with prudence. Imparting sensitive information to a stranger or an acquaintance is a gamble, filled with the potential for betrayal and exploitation. Hence why knowledge is power. Sometimes, not even a family member is trustworthy enough! Secrets possess inherent power, and entrusting them to another individual grants them a degree of influence. Therefore, you should feel grateful when you are given a secret, because secrets grant you power. Abuse that power , and you might be as morally-depraved  as a merciless, third-world country dictator. Would you be able to live it through without feeling any regret? While family members, psychologists, or mentors may offer a safe haven for secrets, it's crucial to recognize that not everyone in our lives possesses the integrity to safeguard confidential information. The temptation to reveal a secret for personal gain or even for amusement can be overwhelming, as many temptations are , especially amidst social pressures or personal conflicts. Part III: How and to Whom Reveal Secrets People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character -- Ralph Waldo Emerson Maintaining secrecy requires a strong sense of self-respect and personal integrity. Betraying a confidence not only damages the trust of others but also undermines one's own moral compass. The weight of a secret can induce a form of "anxiety," a constant awareness of the responsibility to uphold one's word. Not everyone has the guts to endure it , so they may be tempted to spill the beans. Thus, it's crucial to reveal secrets to people possessing the following traits: Loyalty Trustworthy-ness Resolve against cowardice Moral Integrity Accepting Secrets Ourselves Accepting the responsibility of keeping a secret demands self-assurance and a commitment to long-term confidentiality. Secrets are not mere playthings to be discarded; they represent a "sacred" trust of sorts that reflects one's character and values. You know, it's quite hard to get along in this world if people find it hard to depend on you. As individuals accumulate the trust of others, their own self-trust deepens, reinforcing a virtuous cycle of integrity and reliability. That's because when someone trusts you, you feel like you are appreciated enough, and cared enough, to not be betrayed by these people. Final words Navigating Trust and Deception: A Call for Integrity If you're going to use your given power badly, then I hope your deception will be revealed, before it's too late. Or people are going to be disappointed; Heartbroken; Sink into despair and lose faith in humanity. If you want to improve your confidence with others, ask yourself if they deserve to be trusted .   If you seek to be trusted yourself, ask yourself if you are worthy to be trusted by others as much as you trust yourself. If people do not have a hidden agenda, or an ulterior motive . I would not recommend entrusting secrets with them. After all, that motive is hidden, unknown. What if that motive is something that might go against you? even if the secret is about something that isn't their fault, that isn't a "sin", they will nonetheless keep it in private, in the hope that it won't go out publicly. All because they're afraid of external perception.

(Background music) (For the directory on success, click here ) Making Something of Yourself -- A Short Essay Logically speaking , there is no "must" or "must not" when there is no goal to depend upon. A goal is something that we choose to pursue and eventually achieve. Therefore, as long as you do not have an ambition that you wish to achieve, there are no things that you must do in order to actualize a non-existent ambition. For there must be a goal in every pursuit. Otherwise, why would we pursue in the first place Pursuit is always dependent upon a purpose, whose steps and actions towards it are required in order to achieve that purpose/goal. For example, I do not really need to shave . However, because my ambition is to keep the aesthetics of my face and prevent my face from being itchy, I must shave in order to achieve that ambition. Without purpose or any other functionality, there are no necessary components that you must fulfill. Without any of these you can just do nothing , and then you'll make nothing out of yourself. For a purpose, people may work on themselves and strive to be better. Therefore, making something out of yourself is often because of a certain drive in you. A "will to power", if you will. Social pressure can be a very annoying aspect of our lives. Just because you are under pressure by other people, it does not mean that you must follow as they do, no matter how convincing they are. Social pressure alone is not enough of a purpose to succumb to others, regardless of their affiliation to you. Once you are a free citizen, your life, ideally, is yours to do with as you please. Since your life belongs to you, it is primarily up to you to decide what purposes you wish to actualize. Thus, if you wish for a simple, normal life , it is your undoubted right to live a life of simplicity; if you wish to be great, the same conclusion follows. Being told what to do, and doing so for the sake of blind obedience, is but the property of a true prisoner of the mind. When it comes to lifestyle, there is no "enough" or "not enough" in endeavor, beyond the stories we tell ourselves and believe in. You don't have to be simple, nor great. There is no law from the state that demands you to be either of those opposite values. It is generally, if not solely, your choice to be either of them, or even mediocre if you desire, regardless of reception. This is much more true if you are an adult. Personally, I combine those values in my lifestyle. I live a relatively ascetic and hermetic life. When there is no work on a specific day, I barely talk to anyone, and I very rarely get socially involved beyond the interaction between me and my family. However, I have decided to live such a simple and serene life to make room for philosophical contemplation and writing philosophy . I call this lifestyle Philosophical Asceticism. I present you my personal example in order to show you that you can both live simply and peacefully, and to achieve greatness at the same time. Simplicity and greatness don't have to contradict themselves, for they can even be united into a hybrid. If you attempt to follow the path of greater merit, take note that you cannot control the memory of others, let alone after your death . The possibility of you being remembered for an extended period of time is dependent primarily, if not solely, on others. Many people who have made many inventions, theories, and works of art are remembered because their creations have surpassed them in the collective memory. I myself am not even sure who invented the television, Wi-Fi, or corn flakes, despite their value. If you desire to be remembered as a great person, not because of social pressure but because of your own desire, try to create and compose great things, and the possibility of you being remembered long after your death will increase . However, do not rely too much on mere hope, for life is not fair for theoretically everyone in this world. To succeed in the first place you must overcome the mental difficulties of failure!

Table of Contents The Poem Itself. Analysis by Mr. J. Igwe and Co. *********************************** How delightful it is, To believe that you are special, As anyone else, And not insignificant, As anyone else. That a clear, heavenly-planned path, Has been decided for you, And no possible choice on your behalf, Could ever change it. Even if you decide to take a knife, And brutally kill your family, That is also planned out, Just as your decision, To not do so at all. "Everything is planned and the possibility is granted" So say the sages of Judaism. How can such thing be true, When you are condemned by your immense liberty, As Sartre would claim? As if, you cannot alter your life, Without any choice being already planned, By a mysterious entity. It is quite silly, when you can decide your fate, to an extent, and not said being. Should that being want me in jail, Why would I be there if I am to choose not to commit a crime? Perhaps there are, indeed, Choices bigger than divine will. And still, most, if not all, Seek to feel important, As inferiority weakens our egos, And depresses our will to live. Thus, it would only be natural, That some people will believe, That the universe has a mind of its own, Even just for the sake of feeling great, In both mood and role, As barely-influencing as it might be. It feels great, to believe there is a greater frame, Where every encounter, every day, Is significant more than it seems to be, But.. more than it actually is, perhaps? That each ally is a star of destiny, That each conflict has a clear result by the heavens, That only a divine will, Will decide who will win in whatever conflict, One and their followers may encounter, No matter how powerful either side may be. In video games, Rare are the cases where you fight to lose; Which means -- You're supposed to prevail with each encounter, You can also lose in. If only reality was as simplistic as the virtual realm. Does "money comes from divine authority"? Do something not appealing in a job interview, And you've blown it. How, then, in the world, Can divine will also have authority, On the free will of its subjects? If it has, then such "wills" are not free, Which is too illogical to be true, Since we already have freedom, On many of our choices; Choices unplanned by divinity. In the end, at least as a man, Only I can impregnate a woman. No divine authority can force me to do so. Thus, should the heavens have commanded me to be a family man, They cannot execute their order, Without my permission, my will. Thus, it would only be logical, That there are some things that are greater, Than the concept of legendary spirituality. Analysis by Mr. J. Igwe and Co. "In Offense of Determinism" is a poem that explores the philosophical tension between determinism and free will. Mr. Tomasio challenges the idea that every event and decision is predetermined by a higher, divine authority, as suggested by deterministic or religious doctrines. The poem engages with existentialist ideas, particularly those of Jean-Paul Sartre , to advocate for the reality and importance of human freedom and personal agency. The central theme of the poem is a critique of determinism, the belief that all events, including human actions, are predetermined by a divine or cosmic force. The poem questions this idea by presenting hypothetical scenarios and asking whether such actions could be truly "planned out" by a divine entity. The poem suggests that if every choice is already determined, then human freedom is merely an illusion. The poem also critiques religious determinism, referencing the paradox of being condemned by one's immense liberty, as Sartre might argue. It highlights that while religious doctrines may promote comfort in believing in a higher purpose, they can also deny the fundamental human experience of freedom and choice. The poem embraces existentialist ideas by asserting that humans have the power to make choices that are not constrained by any divine or cosmic plan. "The poet" argues that if divine will had authority over every choice, then the concept of "free will" would be a contradiction. The poem also addresses the psychological and emotional dimensions of deterministic beliefs, drawing parallels between real life and video games, where outcomes are often scripted or pre-determined. By comparing reality t o the "simplistic" virtual realm, the poem critiques the deterministic belief that divine authority controls all outcomes. The poem employs literary techniques and style, such as irony and satire, repetition, rhetorical questions, imagery and metaphor, and a conversational tone to engage the reader in a dialogue about the nature of freedom, choice, and divine authority. By drawing on existentialist ideas, the poem argues for the primacy of human agency and the limitations of deterministic thinking. Overall, "In Offense of Determinism" is a compelling reflection on one of the oldest philosophical debates, presented in a style that is both accessible and thought-provoking. The use of existentialist concepts gives it a contemporary relevance, making it resonate with those who question traditional religious or deterministic beliefs.

(Philosocom's Masculinity Directory) Hereby 10 insights/laws I have to offer about the notion of Manhood. 1. You don’t need to demonstrate what is already there . It’s not your problem that others don’t believe you’re a man, when you clearly are a man! You don't need to prove your masculinity. It's not your problem if others don't believe you're a man, because you know that you are. You don't need validation for your manhood, therefore apathy about it, is strength , by sparing you limited time and concern. 2. You don’t need to give anyone an impression of what is already present and known (Not just your manhood). You don’t need to impress a lady when the lady already has a positive impression of you. The same applies to anything and to everyone else. People will already have an impression of you based on their own experiences and biases . When they refuse to understand your words, then let your actions speak for themselves. Try to avoid people-pleasing, as that can be used against you. 3. There are no specific guidelines on how to be a man when the only way to be a man is to be male and to reach adulthood. Other "necessities" that are regarded as prerequisites, are product of delusion. There is no one "right" way to be a man, given how diversely-individual we all are. What matters most is that you are true to yourself and to your plans. 4. You clearly don’t need to “ be in touch with your feminine side” if you are convinced you don’t have one. You don’t have to “be more manly” if you’re convinced you’re manly enough. Conversely, you don't need to conform to traditional gender roles if it doesn't serve your hopes and dreams. Plans, yet, require you to be considerate of others, or else they would turn on you either through impulsivity or through their own revolutionary potential. 5. You don’t need to be at the top of whatever societal power pyramid you’re in, in order to be masculine. Some common men, from construction workers to lumberjacks, can be more ironically considered more "masculine" than the man at the top. Soldiers going to war, can be deemed as more brave, than the politicians who sacrifice them. Masculinity is not about your job or your social status. It's about being confident and comfortable in your own skin. Being true to yourself is a virtue, therefore "masculinity" is about having "masculine virtues" in your thoughts and conduct. The more universal a culture is , the more virtues are seen as masculine by most of this world. 6. Your girlfriend or wife is not a goddess, an angel or a nymph. Praising them like this can be seen as not self-respecting, and therefore not virtuous. The attempt to portray women as divine creatures is a biased perspective. Look at them as humans instead, like any other human being. Look them in the eyes, and understand they are flawed as well as yourself. You don't have to objectify human beings, nor put them on a pedestal, just because of gender/sex. Treat people with respect and dignity, regardless of mere demographics. 7. Once you are an adult and have finished all your mandatory tasks, the way you choose to live your life is entirely up to you. Even if you disappoint some of your closest people, your life from adulthood until death remains yours to lead and govern , whether you attain a powerbase , or decide to become a drag queen. 8. Being nice is not always helpful. Sometimes it can even do the opposite of what you expect. Do not be afraid to raise your voice and speak your mind when you are convinced you should. Adulthood is the end of the submissive obedience that you have been preached to follow during your school years. 9. If you don't know something and want to know it, and it's your right to know, ask! Even if others may be frustrated by your questioning, ask nonetheless, until you find a satisfying answer. We are born into this world ignorant, and we grow less ignorant as we learn. It is through knowledge that we can successfully stay true to ourselves, without the difficulties of failure. 10. You don't need a muscular physique in order to be manly. Your maturity , assertiveness, autonomy, and self-dignity are sufficient to make you "a masculine man", as opposed to a boy, who is likely to possess neither of these, but is extremely muscular. The path to "masculinity", necessary to be respected by many people, lies in virtue, not in bodybuilding.

(The Undead Metaphor's Directory: https://www.philosocom.com/post/a-new-type-of-undead-and-my-background-story Poem Introduction A solitary sage , adrift in the boundless ocean of thought. Isolated from the noisy world , they delve into the abyss of existence, pondering the very fabric of reality . The nature of consciousness, the temporary essence of the human condition—these are the enigmas that captivate his mind. As days extend into weeks, weeks into months, and months into years, the grey philosopher's thoughts deepen, intertwining like the roots of an ancient tree. A solitary island, adrift in the never ending sea of humanity's content matrix. Yet, in this isolation, he finds solace, a freedom unburdened by the shackles of societal expectations whose mark he refuses bearing. His ultimate goal is to transcend the mortal coil, and ascend to a realm of pure thought. To share these profound insights, to ignite the spark of curiosity in the minds of others. A legacy, carved within the annals of human thought, and proof to the enduring power of the solitary thinker... (Background music) The Poem Itself As weeks past by, They become months, And as months go, They become years, Until century after century, Go through the one, Known as the Grey Philosopher. Life for him is but a distraction, So they go to be in isolation, For the reminder of existence, Pondering about the only thoughts, That keeps them, Between life and death. They are so deep in thought, They will not contact anybody, Even if contact is attempted to be made. The more lasting they are, The more thoughts will manifest, To protect them in their stead, From outside intervention. They want to be alone, so why fear? All you have to do is not to interfere. They love no one, And no one loves them. That is not a worthy concern, In contrast to whatever is on their mind, And even if humankind, Is to be eradicated by plague, In pure isolation, this figure will reside, Like an uncracked egg. They look around them, And they see how temporary it all is, They can't help but to think, What is it all for, When one can spend The entirety of their existence, In pure contemplations, That can last, Even the strongest of nations. Now, we might not be undead immortals, But here's what we can be: Conveyors, couriers of insights, Carried around and round, Like in an elementary school's game. Round and round goes the thesis, Of one who is long dead. One after the other, Naturally, die also, but not instead. It is added, then multiplied, Like a fountain of many stories, That is what it's like, To pass down the past's worries, Forward, into the future, Where the Idea will feature, In hopes that, even after one dies, Many will continue to meet her. Until the end of time, Until there will be none left, And the universe will say silent of sentience, Like a mime. Bouncing back and forth, Goes the philosopher's thoughts, Up and down, left and right, And then spread into the world, By those who are not afraid To be largely heard. To be a Grey Philosopher is pure egotism, But to be both a thinker and a distributor -- That should be preferred, far more. Why just think for yourself, When you can dedicate a medium on your behalf, And spread your ideas, your insight, Until you will lack the might, To do so, Until your retirement or death, Which will be your ultimate foe? Nonetheless, the Grey do not seem to realize, That their thoughts are not ones to weaponize, Against those whom you could be of use; Otherwise, both sides lose!