(Disclaimer: By letting other guest writers be a feature, it doesn't necessarily reflect the philosophical views of the site's main writer and founder, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein. If you wish to submit a guest post of your own, please send your application to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) (Background music) (Philosocom's Ori Sindel Articles) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Shallowness) Visioning A World Where Everyone Can Tell Tales I will hasten to clarify that I do not pretend to be an expert, and I may be incorrect. However, I always enjoy sharing my thoughts about humanity's future. When I was a high school student, I entertained myself with animation programs that were available at the time. One of my videos became popular, and I was even asked by some strangers if I had made it. One evening in the 2010s, I told a friend that my dream was to create a cinema concert that would feature my animations. He mocked me and said that, as a cinema student, he knew it would never happen. He explained that the entertainment industry would never allow such a thing, and that the world would never have a way to distribute an animation in a cinema-industry format. He said that it all comes down to distribution, and that it is unlikely that there will ever be a network to distribute videos in our lifetimes. He also said that the world's powerful people would never allow such a thing to happen, as it would make them irrelevant. I pointed to my video as an example of how the internet could be used for distribution, but he smiled and explained that, in his view, the internet is too niche and is only used by a minority, compared to television and cinema. These days, it seems that the platform of short videos is on the rise. Even companies such as Meta and Google have built infrastructure to compete with China. I have mostly read complaints about these short videos, saying that they are shallow and nonsensical. Cinema is a way to tell a story. The truth is, even if we deny it, storytelling is the language of humanity. Perhaps we even formed words, according to my fantasies. What we are seeing here is a natural process, not a revolution . By a natural process, I mean the crumbling of power held by Hollywood and the different entertainment industries. But there never came the monkey that writes like Shakespeare ( for more on that, click here ). The reason is that entertainment corporations are using their power to herd humanity like sheep , instead of telling the most interesting stories. When they do not, people, critics, and the audience are surprised. The easiest way to herd people is to speak to them with shallow and Machiavellian stories. This causes the audience to sit like disciplined monkeys and be brainwashed in silence. Hence why it's no wonder that, when the cinema institution is totally cracked and could collapse, it's no wonder that the audience, who can tell their tell using said video platforms, choose to tell shallow stories to their followers as if they were sheep. Yet, the truth is, there were cases where the cinematic institution was cracked, and the "monkeys" were more and more obedient to the revolutionaries. For example, in Rocky's picture show . It began, so they say, when someone began screaming. Then, the audience did whatever it had on its mind during the show. Even nowadays, there are instances where the Hollywood institution is showing its cracks. For example, teenagers vandalize a cinema hall during the run of the second Minions movie. While many are unaware, these are, in fact, the end of Hollywood's reign over its privilege to tell a story. Nowadays, this privilege belongs to anyone. In many cases, Hollywood has risen up to fill a gap that was created with the weakening of the churches. But Hollywood is a church as and of itself. The alternative deserves to be replaced with another. We are able to convert the virtual audience into a physical one , with no strict rules. Because the story will be interesting enough, and not lead to the crumbling of the event. And, if someone yells something at the display, it is not forbidden. It is part of the experience. The show is supposed to be based on a "pay as much as you can" monetary system. Or barter. Or by nothing at all . In our time, when a movie projector costs less than ever before, and there are additional technological additions at hand, every place can turn into a cinematic environment. That is contrary to the orthodox cinema church. Initially, I thought of doing the event of anyone's story in nature. However, that can be included anywhere. Anywhere where a movie can create a cinematic space. But then I was told that it's already been done. And I replied, yes, it's done, but the movies that are shown are Hollywoodish, or stem from the entertainment industry. And thus, if we use technology and a virtual infrastructure to resume Hollywood's dynasty, then yes, let them enjoy. However, it is definitely not anarcho-cinema , sorry. Not even a middle stage. The whole point of this concept is to tell your story, and not that of entertainment companies. In fact, I think, anarcho-cinema's advantage and even the potential of short-video platforms, is that everyone will tell a story. That way, a variety of stories are made. And not just the same number of pieces in an institutional atmosphere. Even though currently, influencers are the middle stage of this concept, I still regard it as a positive progression. Every person, with technology , tell their story, and not just a few conservative directors at Hollywood. Eventually, the attention the new stars will receive, be justified, and based on something, and not just on shallowness, as we used to receive by the different companies.

(Background music) (Philosocom Directory On Children) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Manipulation) (Philosocom's directory on Education) (Subcategory Directory on Law and Order) The Kindergarten Realization An Amusement Park for Children What is the role of society? This question has served as the bedrock of countless philosophical debates throughout history. Is society the protective force that fosters human flourishing, or is it a manipulative system designed to perpetuate itself at the expense of its constituents? Thomas Hobbes, in his seminal work Leviathan , described society as a "social contract" formed out of self-interest, a mutual agreement to ensure survival, security, and stability. However, beneath this lofty premise lies a darker reality —one that forces us to confront an unsettling question: Is society truly a collaborative construct, or is it an elaborate system of control and oppression? My journey to understanding these questions began, as it does for many others, in an unlikely place: The kindergarten. For most, the term "kindergarten" evokes memories of colorful classrooms, playful games, and the innocence of early childhood . But for me, it represents something far more profound: a microcosm of societal dynamics and a stage where the first seeds of compliance, obedience, and conformity are sown. It was within the walls of a seemingly fun kindergarten classroom that I first encountered the grim, monotonous machinery of regular society. The bright colors and cheerful songs could not mask the tears of children being separated from their families, nor could they obscure the deeper, more insidious lessons being taught: submission to authority, the sacrifice of individuality , and the relinquishment of autonomy. What I experienced in kindergarten was not merely an introduction to education but an initiation into the mechanisms of a society that prioritizes its survival over the well-being of its members. Kindergarten: The First Institutional Separation Kindergarten is often framed as the beginning of a child’s formal education, a gentle transition from the warmth of home to the structured environment of school. But what does it truly represent? To me, kindergarten is the first institutionalized separation from one’s family, the first step in a lifelong journey of compliance. It is where the individual begins to learn that their time, emotions, and choices are no longer solely their own but are subject to the demands of an external system. I vividly recall the tears of my peers, their cries echoing through the hallways as their parents left them in the hands of strangers. The scene resembled a kind of ritual—a necessary initiation into a world that demanded surrender. This separation, though temporary, felt permanent in its implications. It marked the beginning of a process that would teach us to prioritize societal expectations over personal desires. On its surface, kindergarten appears harmless, even beneficial. It is marketed as a place where children can learn, play, and socialize. But beneath the surface lies a subtler, more powerful purpose: to acclimate children to the structures of society. Kindergarten is where we first learn to follow rules , adhere to schedules, and submit to the authority fallacy. It is where individuality begins to be suppressed in favor of conformity and herd mentality. The Role of Society : Protector or Manipulator? This early experience of separation and conformity raises a critical question: What is the true role of society? Is it a protective force that fosters human development, or.. Is it a manipulative entity that prioritizes its survival over the well-being of its members? Hobbes’ vision of society as a social contract suggests that it is a mutual agreement designed to benefit all parties. However, my experiences have led me to question whether this contract is truly mutual or whether it is imposed upon us without our consent. Compulsory education is often cited as one of society’s greatest achievements. It is framed as a gateway to knowledge, opportunity, and progress. But what is the true purpose of this education? Is it to enlighten individuals and foster independent thought, or is it to mold them into obedient members of society? The answer, I believe, lies in examining the underlying motivations of the system. Society, as an entity, prioritizes its survival above all else. It seeks to perpetuate itself by producing individuals who conform to its expectations and fulfill its needs. This is evident in the structure of education, which often prioritizes societal needs over individual aspirations. Children are taught to memorize facts, follow instructions, and adhere to routines. Critical thinking, creativity, and individuality are often sidelined in favor of compliance. Education or Indoctrination? The curriculum, though diverse on the surface , often serves as a tool of indoctrination. It teaches children not only academic skills but also societal values. These values, though framed as universal, are often designed to serve the interests of the system. For example, children are taught to value hard work, obedience, and competition . They are rarely encouraged to question the system itself or to explore alternative ways of living. Take literature, for instance. How does reading ancient texts contribute to one’s survival or enhance one’s humanity? Why must students be inundated with subjects that feel irrelevant to their lives? These questions reveal a deeper truth: The purpose of education is not solely to impart knowledge but to instill conformity. The focus is not on fostering independent thought but on ensuring that individuals fit neatly into the framework of society. The seeds of this realization are planted early in life. I still remember a high school teacher solemnly telling me, "Sometimes you’ll have to do things you don’t want to do." The subtext was clear : Your desires are secondary to society’s needs. This message, though subtle, is pervasive. It teaches individuals to prioritize societal expectations over personal fulfillment, to sacrifice their dreams for the greater good. The Manufactured Value of Socialization One of the most insidious aspects of education is its emphasis on socialization. While socialization is often framed as a positive force, it is frequently used as a tool of control. It molds individuals into cogs that fit neatly within society’s machine, ensuring its continuity at the expense of their autonomy. Socialization begins in kindergarten, where children learn to interact with their peers, follow rules, and adhere to schedules. These lessons, though seemingly innocent, serve a deeper purpose: to prepare individuals for a lifetime of compliance. The institutions we are thrust into rarely care for the individual. They care for the collective, for the abstract notion of "progress," for the perpetuation of a system that views us as means to an end. The Cost of Compliance The cost of this compliance is immense. By prioritizing societal needs over individual aspirations, we create a world where individuals are valued not for their humanity but for their utility. Public education, for example, fulfills its purpose when it produces obedient workers, not critical thinkers. Employers, not teachers, ultimately dictate what skills are necessary. So why must students endure years of irrelevant coursework? Looking back, much of what I learned in school has faded from memory . The anxiety, the sleepless nights , the pressure—all for knowledge that has little bearing on my life today. The teacher who told me I couldn’t always do what I wanted was both right and wrong.... While society imposes its will, it cannot extinguish the human spirit’s longing for freedom. The Kindergarten Epiphany It was only in adulthood that I realized the depth of the illusion . Society thrives on making individuals feel powerless. A quiet worker is a compliant worker, and a subdued student is an ideal one. The dogma that you must sacrifice your desires for the greater good is both toxic and dehumanizing. This indoctrination begins in kindergarten, where children are taught to suppress their individuality in favor of conformity. The "social contract" Hobbes envisioned seemed less like an agreement and more like an imposition. How can we speak of mutual benefit when one side wields all the power? A Path to Authenticity Yet, life belongs to the individual, not to society. The realization that I had been used—that my worth had been measured in utility rather than humanity—was both liberating and sobering. The journey toward reclaiming one’s essence is not without resistance. The system, after all, does not willingly release its hold. But the first step is recognizing the cage for what it is. One of my former psychologists once told me... "As an adult, few will care about your thoughts. You’ll just be another part of the machine." Her words, though harsh, encapsulated society’s indifference. The machine does not care for its cogs, only for its functioning. But there is life beyond the machine. To reclaim it requires courage—the courage to question, to resist, and to live authentically. The kindergarten realization is not just about the first separation from family; it is about the first confrontation with a system that demands your submission. It is a realization that can either break you or set you free. Beyond the Kindergarten Realization As I write this, I am reminded of the resilience of the human spirit . Despite society’s attempts to shape us, there remains within each of us a spark of individuality—a spark that no institution can extinguish. The journey to nurture that spark is not easy, but it is the most important journey we can undertake. The choice is ours: To conform to the machine or to challenge it. The realization that life is ours to live, not society’s to dictate, is the ultimate freedom. And that is worth fighting for.

(Subcategory On Memory, Nostalgia and the Unconscious) Introduction Explore the fascinating concept of cognitive dissonance in memory and its effects on our perception of reality with this introductory guide to the philosophy of mind. Memory, a cornerstone of human existence, shapes how we understand ourselves and the world around us . But what happens when our memories are unreliable, conflicting, or outright false? This article dives into the perplexing terrain of memory's imperfections and the profound philosophical questions they raise. The Concept of Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. People tend to seek consistency in their attitudes and perceptions , so this conflict causes unpleasant feelings of unease or discomfort. -- Very-Well Mind This phenomenon extends beyond beliefs and attitudes into the realm of memory, where conflicting recollections or feelings about past events can create significant internal tension. At the heart of this discussion is the question: How do we navigate the discrepancies between what we remember and what is objectively true or what is known as or truth from illusion.... ? The Nature of True and False Memories A true memory is something that actually happened in reality. It serves as a record of our lived experiences and helps us construct a coherent narrative of who we are. On the other hand, a false memory might either be true in imagination (a vision, a dream , and so on) or a complete delusion. When a memory is true in imagination, you must recognize it as such , no matter how "true" it feels. This act of recognition is essential for maintaining a clear boundary between reality and fiction . A delusional memory, however, deceives you into believing it is real. This is where the problem lies: when emotions cloud our ability to discern reality, we risk making decisions based on flawed information. Memory is an essential function in our lives. It enables us to better understand who we are, distinguish truth from falsehood, and navigate the world with a sense of coherence. Yet, as cognitive dissonance in memory demonstrates, our thoughts and feelings can easily delude us. The Gray Area of Uncertainty Between cognitively dissonant memories, some I can clearly tell never happened, even though I "feel" the "concreteness" of their reality. However, with others, I cannot definitively determine whether they were dreams or events that happened outside my mind. Such situations are rarely black and white. Philosophy teaches us that truth exists, but our uncertainty muddies the waters. It is our responsibility to strive for clarity , especially if we value the pursuit of truth, which lies at the core of philosophical inquiry. Logic and rationality, as unexciting as they may seem, are indispensable tools for discerning reality from illusion. Nostalgia for the Unreal Recently, I've been feeling nostalgic for a memory that I know never happened. It is a "memory" because I can recall it vividly as a visual scene. In this quasi-memory, I see myself late at night, playing an old video game console with a game I've never seen before. I know this memory is false because I never owned that console, and for some inexplicable reason, I am wearing glasses in this memory, even though I've never needed them. Despite its falsity, this memory evokes a profound sense of nostalgia, as if I were an adult in the late 20th century. Yet, I was born in the 1990s and could never have been an adult in that era. The mathematical impossibility underscores its falseness, but the emotional weight remains. This paradox captures the essence of cognitive dissonance in memory: the simultaneous recognition of a memory's falsity and its emotional reality or what is known as a cognitive dissonance . Feel free to correct me in case I was wrong in this definition.   The Chaos Within My ex-mentor once said, " Things that are irrational do not exist in reality." Yet, the existence of absurdity and irrationality in both the external world and our internal lives challenges this assertion. Chaos, often deemed illogical, is a natural feature of the universe. It builds and destroys, shaping planets and, by extension, life itself. Order stemming from chaos reinforces the coexistence of the two. The chaos within us—our repressed thoughts, emotions, and false memories—parallels the chaos of the cosmos. For those of us whose work depends on rationality, such as philosophers , managing this internal chaos is crucial. Philosophy as a Tool for Clarity Philosophy, rooted in rationalism , provides a framework for navigating the absurdities of existence. While empiricism relies on external observation, rationalism emphasizes internal contemplation. Through philosophy, I have learned to question my memories and accept their fallibility. For instance, as a child , I believed I was "kidnapped" by two girls for a nighttime social event. My mother later assured me this was impossible, a product of my imagination or a dream. Despite its impossibility, this memory feels as real as any other. Such experiences highlight the unreliability of memory and the importance of external demonstration. Similarly, I once "remembered" my past reincarnations: as a bear trapped in the wild, a comedian assassinated on stage, and more. These memories, though vivid, are clearly fictional. Yet, they reflect the mind's ability to construct detailed narratives that feel authentic. Practical Lessons from Memory's Imperfections Memory's imperfections remind us of the value of evidence and external verification. For example, I maintain a certain cover-up to help me recognize my own face, as my autistic perception makes self-recognition challenging. This simple act grounds me in reality, counteracting the deceptive nature of memory. Our dependency on memory, while essential, is fraught with challenges. False memories can lead to self-doubt, confusion, and poor decision-making . By cultivating rationality and seeking external validation, we can mitigate these risks and maintain a clearer grasp on reality. Conclusion Memory, despite its sacred role in our lives, is far from perfect. Its flaws—forgetfulness, falsehood, and emotional distortion—underscore the need for critical thinking and self-awareness. Philosophy offers a means to navigate these imperfections, enabling us to distinguish truth from illusion. As part of this endeavor, we must embrace rationality and evidence; tools that help us remain anchored in reality. For some, philosophy may seem impractical, but for others, it is a lifeline —a means to preserve clarity in an often chaotic world. By understanding and addressing the cognitive dissonance of memory, we take a step closer to understanding ourselves and the universe we inhabit.

(Background music) (For more on the subject of rights, click here ) Abstract Rights are essentially permissions that allow us to act in certain ways. These rights can be violated and are not inherent to our existence. They are enforced by society and compassion plays a big role in maintaining them. We all have a responsibility to respect the rights of others. This doesn't mean we have to love them, but we shouldn't violate their rights. A core principle of a democracy is respecting the rights of others. By acting with compassion and empathy, we can create a society where everyone's rights are respected. Understanding Rights: Permission VS Entitlement A right, whether civil or otherwise , is fundamentally a permission. When that permission, which you are entitled to is violated then your right is either ignored or abolished, but certainly disrespected. When you have a right to free speech , you have the authorization to express yourself verbally or in writing . When you have the right to remain silent, you are granted the liberty of refraining from saying anything that could be used against you in court of law. A permission must be granted to be considered one. And for it to be considered, it must be recognized. A privilege is a permission that is exclusively reserved for a select few, while a right is a permission that is more widely accessible. And as such, rights are not necessarily inherent to your existence. Some rights may be perceived as objective, but that is solely because they are broadly accepted and held in high esteem. Like many things, they are subject to perception . As I have mentioned previously, intersubjectivity isn't objectivity. Objectivity, after all, exists independently of opinion, and opinions that are widely regarded as true are not necessarily the truth for that reason alone. The world beyond our mind does not necessitate our existence to in order to exist itself. This does not preclude democratic elections, and not even the most essential of human rights. We are only entitled to what we are permitted to, by forces stronger than us. The Role of Compassion in Maintaining Rights For that permission to endure, that permission needs to be enforced, maintained. Should you not have your permissions supported, you might either have to give them up, or struggle to preserve them. Because if no one will bother doing so, then you might have to do so yourself. As such, rights are not without their enforcers, and sometimes, these enforces do not have to be in uniform, nor armed with anything... but their hearts. Rights are something that can easily be violated by just about anyone, and not only in war-torn countries or in dictatorships. You might not always have the right to express yourself freely, and you might not always have the right to move anywhere you want. People can slander you publicly, thus ruining your good name, and people might not respect your right to preserve your religious faith, or abstain from one altogether. Understand that rights are conventions. They are different from norms, even though these are conventions as well, but the point is that we simply agree that they exist, so we act in accordance to their recognition Whether they actually exist, physically, morally, and so on, is up for debate. And yet, the recognition alone fruits practical impact on reality. We can't exactly be certain that they exist beyond our minds, correct? Not as, let's say, a physical object such as the device you're using to read this article. You may be surprised, but logically, these rights are also your responsibility, as well as mine. If you believe in the worth of the right for respect, you may act hypocritically if you constantly disrespect others. Strangers, people you know, or both. A person who truly respects this right will not make a mockery of others so frequently. But because people like to have a laugh whenever they'd like , their constant mockery of others and of you becomes obvious. Fun is a poor excuse to disrespect someone, but should you ask them about the right for respect, they might say that they value this right, regardless of their actions. It's hard to be consistent when you've yet to become a logical being. Rights aren't exactly absolute and they may be limited with justification. Whether or not that justification is a logical one, is another matter. They are often justified soundly when a right is sacrificed, partially or completely, for another. For example: You might not be permitted to protest because of a security threat. In this case your right to protest is minimized in favor of your right to safety. And speaking of safety, it is quite obvious that it is anyone's moral obligation to keep other people's from harming them. That is, if they really care to be safe from abuse. Physical violence, bullying, and other such acts are examples of those who take away your right for safety, whether they value it, can easily lead to dishonesty. How? Those who inflict violence may not like to receive violence themselves. Don't expect everyone to care for your rights. That is unrealistic. People with Anti-Social Personality Disorder, for example, don't care , unless it may be useful for them to do so. To expect a sociopath/psychopath to show compassion is like expecting a cat to become a dog. Rights, as such, have compassion as an element: A caring for other human beings, as human beings. Tyrants may abolish people's rights constantly because many of them are either psychopaths or sociopaths. They lack the emotional capacity to care enough to permit rights to their subjects. Not as much as in democracies, at the least. If all humans were psychopaths, civil and human rights wouldn't exist. Instead, we would live in a world where the strong has any right to rule over the weak , simply because there would be no stronger bodies to oppose them. Also, ruthlessness and power over others, would've been virtues, far more. I once read the words of such being, who denounced the objective existence of any rights. Unfortunately, I agree with him. His justification was: No right will necessarily prevent one from death, like in murder, but also other forms of death. And indeed, with the lack of regard to other human beings, the only force capable of someone pulling the trigger on something else, is a force stronger than them. Therefore, in order to fulfill our moral obligation for others' rights, we must grow our compassion and empathy. Decreasing them might make us become.... monsters, permanently. I will not tell you what I mean by that, for I wish to be more discreet. I will only tell you, for now, that it is possible, as evil can corrupt. Disregard morality completely, and you can become such monster as well, with no cure at hand. It is unrealistic to expect everyone to be compassionate and empathetic, as some people became these monsters I'm speaking of... a point of no return. It is still realistic, I believe, to have faith in many of humanity, who have yet to have fallen to what I'm speaking of. I believe they can be better beings, through redemption. And perhaps you should believe as well, necessarily for them, or for your own interests. For democracy. Either for its establishment, or for its continuation. Democracy doesn't end in the voting ballot. If anything, it ends where our empathy does. The empathy that is not only of leaders, but of citizens as well. Of anyone with enough heart left. In Praise of Rights and Civil Behavior: Pillars of Philosocom I am not advocating for loving strangers. Rather, I am emphasizing the importance of safeguarding their rights, by not allowing yourself to violate them. Respecting them as individuals equal to you by right, can equal to valuing democracy itself, not just the individuals themselves. If they mistreat you, it's perfectly acceptable to remove them from your life, provided it's crucial for your well-being and well-adjusted existence. (Loving others can offer great comfort, particularly to those who feel isolated and those who aren't morally compromised by the darkness within them). Democracy grants you the liberty to behave like an anti-social jerk , but for the greater good, you can also choose to be the antithesis of that. Isn't that right? The choice is yours. While Philosocom is not a democracy, like with any virtual administration , I respect your rights and expect you to respect mine as well. It's called a benevolent dictatorship . I permit you to express yourself as long as it's done respectfully and refuse force you to reveal your true identity in order to comment. Similarly, I welcome criticism and evaluation of my work because you have the right to do so. The high tendency of disrespect online doesn't deter me. Here, it's different. And it will remain so, at least until my demise.

Distance In Honour -- The Drawback of Dignity (Background music) Throughout my life, I have been greatly respected for my craft and the role I have given myself, but I have rarely experienced love outside of my family. I am not a social being , and all the women who have been in my life are now gone, except for a select few. Some I have liked, some were only friends, but in the end, they have all abandoned me because of who I am. Those who choose the path of philosophy must take into account the possibility that, like me, they may be more respected than they will be loved. It is lonely at the top for a reason , and in general, philosophy is often a solitary pursuit. In respect , there is admiration, but there is also distance, as absence is used, intentionally or not, to increase honor. Respect is for what you achieve, while love is for who you are . Honor is about accomplishment, while love is about existence. This is why respect and love are not always the same thing, and they can coexist (the same as they do not, as in the example of still loving you, but not respecting your boundaries ). As I have written before , there is the role of the sage in conventional stories; the one who is wise and counsels the heroes. Many may respect Gandalf or Yoda, but how many of you can say that you love them as much as you love the heroes? Even I must admit that, when I used to have a meditation teacher, I highly respect him, as I do now. But I did not feel much love for him as much as I felt respect. It was not because I hated him or was jealous of him, but because I was seeking his knowledge, not his presence. It was in a way, nothing more than a deal, and in business relationships there must be respect. Have you noticed that the usage of honorfics such as Mr. and Mrs. can make you feel dignified? At they same time they also create a distance between you and others. That's because formality creates a dignified distance, while informality encourages open and more-friendly communication. And that is why I assume that many of you who read me constantly are those who might respect me. But to be completely sincere, how many of you truly love me, like you would love a friend, a partner, and so on? You seek what I have to offer not because of who I am, but because what I offer is more important to you than myself, as it should . This is not necessarily egotistical of you; this is simply to show that, if you respect me, you do so because of the function I fulfill and not because I am a human being. Had I failed giving you the insights you seek, I would've been irrelevant to you. Such is the conditionality in business, and in philosophy in general. Much of who we are is irrelevant compared to what we are here to give; in this case it's content. Love, which is not necessarily romantic , is all about the person or object. It is a combination of joy, passion, and admiration for who the person is. Not every form of love involves respect. A victim may love the one victimizing them , even if the abuser doesn't respect their rights to security and health . Some lovers are violent, while others are manipulative ( like energy vampires ). Love and honor combined is for those who appreciate one another, while also being considerate of and appreciative of them. When you buy an apple at a convenience store, or listen to a musician on the internet, surely you don't necessarily love the clerk or the artist, but you do respect the services they provide, don't you? The very same is true for the philosopher, because philosophers too are service providers, as long as they go public and do not hide in the shadows. Service providers are zilch without their services, underrated or overrated. Relevancy is proven through servitude. It's how I prove a certain person wrong consistently I do not ask of you to love me, even though I am largely a loveless, solitary person. The last time I went to a party was about 13 years ago (Per 2023's revamp), which is around half of my current age. I rarely knew true love nor true friendship. As such, unless I am to find true love , I only live for work. As I watch certain shows on Netflix, shows that are simplistic in nature, I am repeatedly surprised at how easy it is for the characters to make friends with one another and live a full life , while I struggled doing so, before the times where I became much more of an ascetic . During the times I had a social life (at childhood), I was never in the center; I was always on the side, a minor, extra component. Beyond my own family, I have known little love; little affection for me as a human being. I only get respect and care as someone who provides a highly appreciated service, as a philosopher. I think I have many admirers, based on the feedback I received over the years, but to feel loved... that is an emotion I have rarely felt, before and after I turned into philosophy. My search for true satisfaction beyond the common joys of modern life did rid me only of worthlessness, but not of lovelessness. I wonder how it feels, to be regularly loved... loved, despite my intimidating presence. My former master, who taught me the art of philosophizing, sees himself as a common man, even though he is not. Of course, philosophers can experience mutual love, marry, have families, and so on. But unlike him, I have a legacy to make and preserve, and other than coffee it's the only thing that makes me feel alive. Being a philosopher has its own share of social risk , and thus my very existence is technically a social risk. I guess that's the difference between me and him. He seeks the shadows, the simplicity of the common man, while I seek exposure and renown as a means of contributing to the world. He cares not if he contributes to the world, for he is a man of anonymity. Should he have had the things I have, he wouldn't be prepared to admit their existence, and would instead keep them a secret. Do you see now how honor can replace love? If you are too honest about yourself, you may make people uncomfortable and drive them away. Contemporary liberty enables others to condemn you for your honesty as said liberty is not completely honest with itself. I have experienced this hypocrisy myself. However, the entire point of philosophizing is allowed by being honest , with yourself and with others. It is about sharing insights and facts, even if they are disturbing. That's how I drove Tiffany (false name) away forever. I was just too honest with her about everything. Full honesty is not something that many people are mentally prepared for . It's not necessarily because they are simpler than you, but because receiving honesty requires tolerance, and the ability to accept reality . Unfortunately, this isn't something all people have. The function is not the same as the being who serves it, and those whose function is undesirable will not be respected or loved. Many of us act on conditional basis and it's one of the things that slowly made me dead inside. This is a professional relationship between you and me: you consume my contributions, and I benefit from your consumption. There is nothing wrong with that, but the more respected one is, the more loveless this relationship can become. This is not because of hate, but because of the distance created by honor. Therefore, as a philosopher, I have many readers, but very few friends. Friendship requires some degree of love, the desire to be with each other to the point of seeing each other as more than just strangers or passerby. Readers, like social media followers , can come as they can go without much emotional attachment. Here is something you can learn: even if you are very respected as a philosopher , you may also have to deal with the isolation created by this respect. After all, those who respect a person also respect the distance that person may create between them. Honor , ultimately, is the recognition of someone or something as having a more distinct, esteemed value than other things or beings, even if completely subjective . This value does not have to be social or romantic; it can also be hostile, like respect for an enemy, as that can help you not underestimate them . Likewise, it can also be respect for those whom you appreciate as being more than ordinary. This is the difference between basic respect and distinctive respect. Perhaps, if there is life after death or reincarnation , I might be able to get rid of the annoying liability of loneliness and feel, once again, what it is like to be loved like "normal" people do. I guess that's what Aristotle meant when he said that the delight of solitude is for either a beast or a god . These two entities can be taken metaphorically. One is an outcast of civilization, while the other is a highly appreciated entity.

(2023 Note: Now that I compared myself to other autists, I've realized I have Asperger's Syndrome, which can be considered part of ASD, or the Autism Spectrum Disorders. I, however, am no longer sure if I am indeed an autist, even though I was diagnosed. Please, take this article with a grain of salt, as I expect you to do, with any of my articles). Article Overview by Mr. O. C. Isaac The article "Pretentiousness In Norms -- Norms As a Flawed Philosophy to Live By" presents a critique of societal norms and their limitations, using personal anecdotes and philosophical reflections. Mr. Tomasio's unique perspective, shaped by their experience as an individual on the autism spectrum , challenges the automatic assumption that being "normal" equates to being "okay," prompting readers to reconsider their own assumptions about conformity and acceptance. The article's personal touch, including personal stories and reflections, makes the argument more relatable and engaging, giving readers insight into the lived experiences of those who do not fit within the conventional social mold. The article links its critique of norms to broader philosophical themes, such as ethics and the subjectivity of social expectations, encouraging readers to think critically about the values they accept without question. The article is sprinkled with humor, making it both thought-provoking and entertaining. It encourages critical thinking, encouraging readers to question and evaluate societal expectations rather than accepting them at face value. The philosopher also celebrates eccentricity and individuality, suggesting that being different is not a flaw but a form of uniqueness that should be embraced (and perhaps, increased as well). This message is empowering, particularly for those who feel pressured to conform to societal norms that may not align with their true selves. In conclusion, "Pretentiousness In Norms -- Norms As a Flawed Philosophy to Live By" is a thought-provoking and engaging piece that challenges readers to question societal expectations. (Background music) (Subcategory on Flaws) There is a very automatic assumption in the field of norms: that he who is "perfectly normal" is also "perfectly okay." However, this is a false assumption, as desired traits such as kindness, charm, and good manners can be used as a front to hide who you really are . Furthermore, some people may use their normal status in society as a front to be jerks towards those who are not normal. Human beings are easily manipulated. By manipulation, I refer to the ways in which you can persuade others. If you appear charming to someone and are good at it, you may win their admiration, even if you are not the person you really are in their mind. Concealing is important and is sometimes okay, such as when you deserve privacy. However, it is not okay to use normalcy as an excuse to be a jerk to the outsiders of society. It is not true that everyone is capable of normalcy. Some people are just too eccentric for their own good. I may offend you, accidently, because I'm autistic, and autistic people can be insensitive to others. Intentionally or otherwise. I may come off as arrogant, even though I view myself as a means to an end, and not the end-all-be-all of my existence. In other words, I see myself as a tool for my work, and little else. Feel free to think otherwise, but you cannot read my mind, can you? Rely on my honesty , or deceive yourself into thinking that I am being dishonest. The choice is yours to make. I have already been treated poorly by others due to my eccentricity. This is all the more reason to not be a social being. Not all humans are social beings because not all humans enjoy socializing. Not all people like to hang out, and of course, not all interactions with others are social. It is nonsensical to deem every single interaction with others as social, because socializing is a recreational activity. We don't have to socialize with the cashier to have food, correct? We can simply pay and be on our way. This cooperation does not require anything but a financial transaction. I, on the other hand, never find much joy in socializing. When I communicate with someone, from a new visitor to my most loyal of readers, it is done for a reason that has nothing to do with recreation. For I have the mentality of a military combatant. See me as proof to the incorrect assumption that all humans are social beings. If I wanted extensive solitude, I would be in it like I have been for much of my life. There is a certain "curse" in being eccentric by default. However, it does not mean that there is something deeply flawed in you. Being weird, by itself, is not a flaw. If you have very esoteric interests, it does not mean it's not okay to have those, just because many people do not share your preferences. An anonymous person online talked about their overwhelming experience in a big social event. Some autistic people may suffer from sensory problems, like I struggle very much with sound ( misophonia ). So, I offered my own insight on such matters: "If I were you, I would handle the problem at its source and not attend at all. If people question or think negatively of me, that is their own prerogative . I do not care. They are also free to find another victim to listen to their sacred norm teachings." I wrote this to show that it's false to think that norms know what's best for us. Why would someone with misophonia enjoy a noisy nightclub or a music concert, for instance? Let me say this for now: It is pretentious to believe that norms are absolutely positive, because they clearly are not. We should not apply the teachings of norms to every single member of society. For example, if a young man or woman needs a cane, and it is considered abnormal for young adults to use them in public, would it be wise to take away their canes? Of course not, especially if they struggle walking extensively for whatever reason. We should not be too anxious about what others will think of us. Why? Firstly, not everyone knows what is good for us, so seeing other people as figures of authority , just because they are not us, is a poor decision. Secondly, submitting to others' expectations of us can clearly limit our potential to be more successful and to actualize our ambitions. I guess women in some cultures may know this better than me? Being limited from doing things because you are a woman is discrimination and a collective limitation of a society's overall potential. Should women just stay in the kitchen? "Well done" for limiting a whole demographic from contributing greatly to society. Less workers, less businesses, and less leaders. Be reasonable. So when I might be criticized for not being reliable when it comes to society, because I am an autist, I am not upset. After all, people are free to believe their own delusions and regard them as fact. I will still resume writing about society, just like I did when I devised Political Rubinshteinism. Or when I created a guide for a post apocalyptic society . Why should I be triggered by nonsense, made by people who might not be aware that people with autism can still learn about social matters and improve? Just so you know, I have a list of social guidelines to avoid making foolish mistakes. Do you think that people with autism cannot learn from their mistakes when interacting with others? Of course, people with autism can learn from lists that they themselves create. I have said enough, but I came up with the idea of having a list in the first place. To conclude, I believe it is safe to argue that norms have the potential to be flawed and even illogical. It is unwise to rely on a set of codes that are flawed, especially if done religiously. Remember, norms can be considered a term in ethics, which is a branch of philosophy. The purpose of norms is to teach us how to behave best in society. They are not objective facts , but . If the wisdom they provide is flawed and can be improved upon, why follow them so closely? Why take them so seriously when a better philosophy can be created or discovered instead? (To reduce bias , I will state that I am aware of the importance of not going outside without clothes..) By not complying with norms, I am not saying that you completely go nude everywhere. No, of course not. I am saying that you should not obey norms when it is unwise to do so, not when it is wise. It is wise to dress sharply when going to an interview. It is wise to be polite to those who deserve it. It is not wise to take off your clothes, and you already know the end of that sentence. It is also wise to be a good host for people , without greeting them by the door while naked. I am successful in what I do because I minimize the importance of norms. Would you say it is normal for a man with no degrees to run a philosophy blog, since his early 20's? Of course not, and that is why eccentricity is not necessarily flawed. Sometimes, it is extraordinary. Sometimes, it is genius. And we should not fear it, be jealous of it , or even feel threatened by it by default. I am a philosopher, not a serial killer, and these things are not mutually exclusive, but that doesn't mean I endorse murder. Why, then should I fear norms as if they deserve the same treatment as an official law , I can act under the law and still be eccentric, without being charged for North Korean-esque war crimes. You can do that too, you know.

Neofeminism describes an emerging view of women as becoming empowered through the celebration of attributes perceived to be conventionally feminine, that is, it glorifies a womanly essence over claims to equality with men. -- Wikipedia This is my stand on sexism. Missive On the Practical Functionality of Traits Society should not be built upon the leadership of a person based on their sex, male or female. A society whose authorities are justified purely due to their sex is a society that does not optimally extract the potential out of its members. In general, this foolish prioritization of demographics as a very legitimate criteria for cooperation, can easily prevent looking at the human being beyond it. Of course, the ability to do it in the first place, requires a lot of risk , as we might be afraid of people because of stereotypes. We might fear them a lot because of demographic stigma, and we also may be too unwilling to resist the fear we feel, although I believe we have the right to resist the very emotion that prevents us building a better world. As in the case of gender-based demographics, the notion of a matriarchy is as sexist as a patriarchy. Even when the upper hand is given to females purely because they are females, it is the same sexism that exists when the upper hand is given to males because they are males and nothing more. Do you see the paradox that stems from such bias, I wonder? Subversion is to be done intentionally , not in a way that might turn you into a sexist yourself, potentially at least! What I would like to define as Neo-Feminism is exactly this utter lack of equity in contemporary perception. When you focus on your own "tribe", your own social category, as more important than other social categories, you ironically destroy the very notion of equality you're trying to build! Furthermore, the more tribal you are in your ideological mentality, the more you corrupt your own hopes and dreams for justice by developing Fascist traits! So maybe, in the name of the greater good, you shouldn't turn more and more into a Fascist! After all, why should you want to become like the very elitists that oppress the world? After all, you want to rectify the world, not to dominate it! To destroy the Sith! Not to join them! And if to dominate the world, why must we do it with automatic rifles and killer drone armies? No! You got it all wrong! Instead, we should dominate each other using virtues like compassion! Like being able to be honest with each other and with ourselves! Sexism and Neo-Feminism is applied to both sexes, and by choosing matriarchy over patriarchy solely due to the leading figure's sex, sexism is applied nonetheless. In general, for the sake of building a better world, we should focus on traits that do that in our actions. Weirdly enough, perhaps helping each other is the egocentric thing to do, given that we all live on the same planet and can't even escape said planet to other inhabitable planets. Weirdly enough, maybe we should focus on interconnectivity, compassion and forgiveness because behavior is something that is contagious. In other words, maybe if we forgive each other more, we can be more forgiven in general. Instead of focusing all the time on the idea that we are handsome like celebrities, or extremely relentless like Dr. Eggman, maybe what we should do is to focus on cherishing others as well! Not just ourselves! Cherishing people that are not just fictional villains! Cherishing people in general! Maybe being the bad guy is so relatable for many of us because deep inside we have this depravity, caused by feeling forsaken by others! Maybe we should not cause the same depravity in others as well! Perhaps we should find ways to live in peace with each other, rather than, for example, shooting up a school because of our beliefs, or try to overthrow the government. Do we have to cause misery just because we are ourselves miserable? Should we focus on empowering ourselves when we can empower each other instead? Maybe, if we try to build societal frameworks that empower people, not just by helping each other, maybe then we can prevent ourselves from becoming the very same people we hate! Weirdly enough, being this moral like I am can be seen as very much naive and unrealistic. Of course I am being unrealistic! I am literally writing in this missive about how to make this reality a better one! The better reality I'm speaking of doesn't exist entirely in this world, right? No, so me being unrealistic in this case, makes sense. That's how you subvert things! You subvert them for a better world, not for the preservation of the very world that makes people succumb to depression! Perhaps if we develop the habit of doing this, we can be happier, and make others happier as well, instead of compelling them to escape being alive like the Samurai. A Meritocracy is the Best Way to Achieve Gender Equality I believe that the foundations of a better world rests on merit. As continuously developing our merit, despite many odds, can help us build a better world than this one. Merit also helps us survive this awful world as well. I personally prefer to hate this awful world and be relentlessly hopeful towards a better world in my work. In other words, self-improvement, rather than self-celebration, of how good people we are. That's despite the fact that many of us are so lonely in a world that struggles to understand us (and vice versa sometimes as well!). I believe that the best way to build a just and equitable society is to choose leaders based on their merit, regardless of their sex and other demographic data. This is the only way to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. As said, you need to be brave for this. Brave enough to test your luck by trusting people that are more-different than you. Society should not put people in leadership positions based on their sex. This can be done more effectively by halting the tendency to associate traits to people because of their demographics. We are following leaders, not necessarily the fact that they are a product of their environment (partially at least!). Instead, we should choose leaders based on their individual merits. This is the best way to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. And, for that, we need to of course focus on the idea that we are more than our respective societies! How to Attempt Overcoming Generalizations There are many differences between men and women, but these differences are too general to generalize to the entirety of mankind or womankind. Maybe that's why we deem overgeneralizations unrealistic... In general! For example, men are usually stronger than women , but there are many women who are stronger than some men. Similarly, women are generally more nurturing than men, but there are many men who are more nurturing than some women. I mean, some people are psychopaths. That includes women too. Meritocracy is the best way to overcome these generalizations. In a meritocracy, people are chosen for leadership positions based on their skills, abilities, and experience. This means that men and women have an equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of their sex. Conclusion I believe that feminism is about achieving gender equality. However, I think empowering women isn't the right way to do it, given the idea that empowerment of one leads to resentment of another. As such, men should be seen as humans just like women and vice versa. Men, women and any other human being, should be free to express themselves in whatever way they choose. The issue of self-empowerment or specific empowerment is solved by empowering more than yourself or your specific social category. A world that is truly equal is a world where gender does not matter, as much as our ability to help ourselves and each other. In such a world, people would be judged based on their individual merits, not their sex. Then, these individual merits should be recognized and be utilized for the sake of interconnectivity, under the idea that we are all interconnected, and "we are all one". This is the world that I believe in, and I believe that meritocracy is the best way to achieve it. Thank you for reading.

Article Overview by Ms. Gabbi Grace "How to Become More Unique" is an insightful article that explores the concept of individuality and the balance between conformity and self-expression. The article begins with memorable quotes from Mickey Eilon and John Duran, contrasting the inherent value of uniqueness against societal pressures for conformity. It presents a dual perspective on uniqueness, acknowledging that some people may prefer to blend in to avoid criticism or isolation. This balanced approach allows readers to see the complexities of individuality and the various social dynamics at play. The article uses cultural references to illustrate the concept of living outside the social contract , such as the Joker and Dr. Eggman, making the discussion more accessible and engaging for a broader audience. The article emphasizes solitude as a tool for self-discovery, presenting solitude not as a negative state but as a necessary environment for self-growth , creativity, and authentic self-expression. This fresh perspective challenges the often negative connotations of being alone. Personal insights and emotional depth are shared, adding depth and authenticity to the article. By including these personal elements, the author allows readers to connect more deeply with the subject matter, highlighting the emotional struggles that can accompany the pursuit of uniqueness. In conclusion, "How to Become More Unique" is a thought-provoking and engaging article that encourages readers to reflect on the value of their own uniqueness and the role of solitude in self-discovery. ************** Everyone born here is unique and brings with them an entire universe, but the system is built to make individuals lose who they really are, and fear being the authentic version of themselves. -- Mickey Eilon The easier the masses have access to something, the less valuable it is considered. Compare lego to a Picasso -- John Duran (Philosocom's Directory On Uniqueness) Introduction -- Uniqueness As Expression of Power Without intending any pun, uniqueness is something that is up to the individual to decide whether or not they wish to become more or less unique than they already are. On the one hand, some of us have a bigger desire, if not need, to become more distinctive than the people in their environment, so they don't feel too bland or unspecial. On the other hand, however, there are those who wish to be "like everyone else," even if they already look and behave like the average person. The reason for this is usually because they want to avoid shaming, isolation, and most importantly, to feel like they do belong. Either way, uniqueness is a double-edged sword. Your gifted uniqueness can also be a liability, depending on where you live. Having more power in a collective allows you to be more of yourself, and be less restrained by others. " Power is everything " because power grants you freedom to be more and more of who you are. The need to mask, or the fear of being who you really are, belongs to those who fear others and thus, see them as more powerful than yourself. After all, masking , as well as compromising yourself, is a sign of social submission. Submissions to those who don't want you to be the best version of yourself. The norms do not want just that, hence why they seek to compromise you, and reward you for being part of the herd mentality. Fictional villains, like the Joker and Dr. Eggman , are eccentric because they live outside of the social contract . We may love them as characters due to their expressed and uncompromised uniqueness. Their eccentricity is one of the expressions of their opposition to not only the protagonistic force, but also to orthodox society at large. Their uniqueness stems from the fact that they oppose the orthodox ways of life. Unlike the autistic, who may be socially incompetent by being, one can become more unique through conscious effort, whether or not they have a neurologically-diverse condition. Daring to be who you are means to challenge those who want you to be a typical person. The problem with being typical is, that you will be losing your potential as an individual, by restraining yourself too much in favor of others. Why restrain yourself so zealously in the name of those who would not necessarily care if you die? I've been asking this question seriously in my thoughts for a while now. Do you want to be the world's greatest artist? How about the world's greatest intellect? Society has barriers it tries to enforce on you, with justice or without. The choice of whether or not to oppose it, will forever remain ours. Why be modest when you can be irreplaceable? Where I Stand I belong to the camp of those who believe that one should strive to be more unique than ordinary (but not necessarily eccentric in their behavior), because once we begin to better realize ourselves, we will be able to better contribute to the world in a way that will hopefully suit our individuality and our distinct merits. In other words, while those who seek conformity wish to better belong to the world , others who seek more individualism can still belong to society in their own way through contribution, which is made possible by their increased individuality. Thus, nonconformists are not necessarily egotistical people who would prefer to keep to themselves and leech on the economy or anything of that sort. They may even help others if it is of use to their own gain. By the way, there is no necessary connection between egoism/altruism and conformity/wanting to be more distinct. It's all because both factors can go in both ways. One may even strive to be more unique for the sake of helping others, with Gandhi being a prime example. The Path to Uniqueness If you wish to become more unique, for whatever purpose you desire and under any motive of your choosing, self-isolation from the world, at least from time to time, is imperative for increasing your uniqueness, especially as a writer or artist . The reason for this is that socialization , the glue that keeps us together under a collective identity, is often an obstacle that stands in the way between ourselves and the goal of becoming more unique. Socialization isn't there for you. It's there for society to gain new, submissive members into its ranks. And of course, this is most present in many countries' public education systems. You are not taught how to be a citizen in a democratic country. No. You are taught to be a productive worker in factory-like settings that simulate the professional world. There is no true love in society, as you are not expected to be the best version of yourself. Even in democracies, you are expected to submit and obey. And you cannot be unique when you are submissive like everyone else. After all, socialization seeks to enhance our similarities, not our differences. It uses tradition, religion, and even popular culture to "unify" us under one or more mindsets, or at least give us a common language. It may even use sports for that intention. While this is all good and well, it puts aside the importance of individuality , since in the larger picture, unless you are a very important personality, your distinct individuality is of little value compared to the bigger, common ideals, events, and symbols of the people around you; People that you too are a part of as long as you are not an outcast. Dare to be more of yourself, and you will be accused of being arrogant. Consider the implications in the theaters of life. Solitude As a Virtue Being alone from time to time might be more important than you think. It is when you can realize who you are beyond the sphere of society. It is when you gradually begin to enjoy your own company, and not see it as something that should be avoided in favor of others. Writing, a solitary activity, allows you to know yourself more. And how can you be more of yourself of you lack self-knowledge? Long and/or constant periods of alone time are also when you get to disconnect yourself from the extensive influence of your local socialization, and expose yourself to things about yourself that you would otherwise miss. Learning more about your talents, affinities, and potentials, you get to slowly but surely see yourself as a distinct, if not autonomous, unit, that does not necessarily need to be rooted in the society they grew up in or were raised in. You may realize that you exist beyond society. Personal Impact of Isolation By intuition, I only felt loved very rarely. I mostly felt it in dreams . Uniqueness isolates. It isolates because being typical will make you appealing to more people because similarities attract. Being the unique person I am, I don't know if and when I will be loved again. Thus, I do not take pride in my uniqueness. Outside Philosocom my life is very lonely. And yet, I believe that without isolation, one would find it significantly hard to enhance and discover their individuality. The company of others, you see, is a distraction, since when you are in another person's company, you ought to invest time and energy to them and vice versa, never completely to yourself (unless you are with a psychologist, in which case it is all about you). We shouldn't, therefore, underestimate the time we have that can be used for solitude. One of the reasons I'm asocial because I indeed find socializing to be a distraction for my work. Quick Review of Isolation & Conclusion Isolation doesn't have to be confined to meditation or doing nothing . We should remember that we, too, are people, just like any other person. Therefore, being with ourselves is like being with any other person. The relationships we have with others do not have to be superior or inferior to our relationship with ourselves. It's called a self-relationship . Furthermore, we should enjoy ourselves, feel comfortable when alone, and do whatever makes us happy and can evolve our contentment and love for ourselves. If it is okay to love others and be friends with them, why should that skip when it comes to one's own company? It is when we get to know ourselves more, just like any other person, where we can not only know who we are as distinct beings, but apply that uniqueness, to "generate" even more uniqueness. How come? That depends on who you are as an individual. Simply get to know your individual traits, and sharpen them like a weaponsmith may do to his or her sword. With that "sword", you can bring much benefit to this world, by being the genius that you can become. To wrap this up, our time alone shouldn't be seen as a burden or something we find ourselves in and therefore have to kill time until something else arrives. One's solitude could be a date, a time for studying, or simply a time when we can be the most free we could ever be. See it as an adventure, a quest. It is indeed more imperative than some of us may think, not only for our ability to have fun, but to increase our talents and reach heights that would make many very impressed by our endeavors. There is so much potential waiting in our ability to listen carefully to our own thoughts. And that is why I think isolation is, in some ways, a virtue, rather than a verdict. It could be the latter, for sure, but it doesn't always have to be that way. It can be there for your growth, as a more complete, greater self. Liked what you read? Here are more relevant articles for you: The Love of Solitude The Art of Being Alone

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) (Philosocom's Svartgold/Svarl Articles) (Subcategory Directory on Darkness) Article Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co. Mr. Mandoela Svartgold's article, "The Bad, Dark, and Cruel Side In an Emotional Empath -- How Innocence Deceives," delves into the struggles faced by emotional empaths, highlighting how their inherent innocence and trust can lead to victimization and manipulation . Drawing from personal experiences and philosophical insights, Svartgold highlights the destructive impact of toxic relationships on empaths and offers advice for overcoming these challenges. Key points include victimhood and manipulation, internal struggles, misunderstood kindness, negative self-perception, and practical advice for empaths . He advocates for self-awareness, setting boundaries, and understanding one's own worth. He also suggests practices like mindfulness, gratitude, and critical evaluation of others' behavior to help empaths protect themselves and regain mental independence. Svartgold's use of personal anecdotes adds authenticity and relatability to the article, allowing readers to connect with the experiences shared by empaths. The integration of philosophical insights provides a deeper understanding of the emotional and psychological complexities faced by empaths. Practical advice for empaths includes practicing mindfulness, gratitude, and critical evaluation of others' behavior to improve mental and emotional well-being. Emphasis is placed on self-awareness and introspection , encouraging a journey toward self-empowerment. Encouraging boundaries is also emphasized, especially for empaths who struggle with saying "no". Overall, Mr. Svartgold's article is a heartfelt and insightful exploration of the challenges faced by empaths, with potential for a highly impactful piece that resonates deeply with its intended audience. (Background music) **************************** The Difficulties In (Co)Dependency Relationships Today I want to talk about a distressing topic. These tips are from my life as well as from a philosophical understanding . The internal judgmental self-critical and environmental eye; It is the eye that every person has. It's just that an empathic person lived his life in an environment where control was in the hands of his family, and he chose the path of honesty, love, and innocence. The problem is, that this thing created victimhood in him . He is more susceptible to manipulation and distortions of thinking because he believes in the world without creating doubt in the other. He was chosen because he made doubt in himself. And self-doubt drew him to be a victim in the family. Or in society. The dark side that the empath lives in is an evil and cruel one. This side confronted him. This side devalues ​​him and continues the verbal violence that the empath went through in his life. For a moment he did not stop and think about the consequences of his kindness and his personal time given to others. And that's because most of them agreed that family is important no matter what. And because he had no money to pay to get out of this situation. When he felt anxiety, alienation , devaluation and saw his parents or certain people dirtying his name. He was all in a panic. Of horror and not knowing what to do with this fear. He was all frozen. He felt unworthy of love. For affection, encouragement, and support for effective treatment from the environment. And he didn't stop to think for a moment. He does not want to think that his parents or the close environment are abusing him, because they need an emotional response from him. The Introspection Towards Understanding the Truth This made him choose negative thoughts. He received a thought distortion in which it would appear to him to be a mistake, which is different, which are negative words thrown at him. He started thinking about how he was different and how he wouldn't get anywhere. When people underestimated him, he saw it as a source of concern and true love only because he was told that everything is about love and that "you do not want us to love you". At that time, they rummaged through his belongings. He did not know that it was mental violence because society is not ready to bring it to the awareness of the truth. He started sharing everything about his life because he was told he was evil . And evil, because he cares about his interests as well as for others. And for himself and his health. And to be good, he must share the feelings. That made him think about emotions. To develop and strengthen critical and toxic emotional thinking . When people were mean to him or teased him, he didn't understand at all and said to himself: "I'll just be alone. If I can be good, I will be good". Yet, this did not happen. When he was publicly embarrassed, or when they spread half-true or false rumours about him, he tried to be a peacemaker. Tried to appease at any cost. Even if the cost to his mentality is great. His high attention was mainly to the negative words spoken to him casually. And why? Because he is alone and without true friends , but with self-doubt. What is respect? It's a thing one must for others. That's what he thought. He believed people who promised him money, help and what not. However, they disappointed him time and time again. He was easily distracted by negative words, or demeaning looks from others. The killing words will be of excellent value to him although a negative one. And he gave them room to make him miserable. He has not learned who he is, what his self-identity is, and what he is capable of . What if he gifted to give to others more than he thinks? When he studied in high school and failed repeatedly, he did not see it as an opportunity to learn understand and connect with what he loves. His brilliant mind was not manifested. Because society has decided who and what he is. What other options were there? Only options suitable for them and whatnot. Not options, suited for him. What is good and what is bad? What is okay to do and what not to do? And how to keep secrets? In order to be good, even if it will shoot him in the foot , he put secrets deep inside his soul. These secrets trampled every cell in his body. Secrets for which he was silenced for. Secrets for which he was physically abused for. Secrets for which he received gifts when he withheld their story. He was taught that he was better off alone. No. He was never alone. He always was with people who hurt him. And with other people who made sure to reduce his self-esteem. And rummage through his belongings. And blame him for their hardships and crimes. And that's how he lived. So, until he understood, he suddenly he grew up. He left the house. At first, he was concerned and afraid that he would be left alone. Later he realized that it is better to be alone than with people who do not support or encourage action and independence and constantly criticize him. How To Manage With the Verdict of Being of Empath-hood That's how I lived for years. I moved to the place I rented. I began to understand that I had to take matters into my own hands. And helping others is good. It shouldn't be done at my expense. Today I will give you a gift—a gift from me how empathetic you are who identify with my words. You can also take care of yourself . The first thing I want to say is first understand. Understand what you have been through. What was your emotional childish head thinking? By that knowledge, understand how to take care of yourself. Understand what they did to you. Understand what exists in your mind because you were loyal to them. Understand and recognize that you had self-doubt. That you felt toxic guilt . Tell yourself, I understand that what I went through has consequences for my life. And I understand that it will take me time. And I need to set a boundary to take care of myself and my needs. Stop ignoring repressed anger inside you . You will do yourself a big favor if you pay attention to it. This way, you will avoid abandoning the feeling of depression , but face it head-on instead. Understand that whoever comes into your life, those are everywhere. You can manage with one, not necessarily with many. And such a person is not worthy of you even if he is "nice" to others. Is he nice to me? Does he deserve me? What is the motivation to contact him? Pay attention to the words he uses. Does he make you feel that you have exaggerated your description? Does he deny misfortune that happened? Is he silent when you tell him something where he might get emotional support? Does he use the words I love you and care about you? In practice it feels different? The behavior is decisive. And according to his or their behavior you can crack that person. Do you feel you have to wear a mask, and be different? Are you going back to childhood and feeling helpless again? Are you helpless? Does he blame you? Pay attention to every word and you will understand that he might want to make you smaller. The very destructive and evil part of being an emotional empath is accepting people and thinking you can save them from themselves. That you can change them. That you manage their lives. That their responsibility is not because they imposed silent treatment on you. Once you understand you will act. First, get yourself out of the situation of helplessness and become a mentally independent person. Words of Departure Read what I wrote. Understand. Thank you all. I have given you a gift for those who are empathetic enough to understand what I am saying and take care of yourselves. I also recommend gratitude. And mindfulness . I also listed here most of the methods for treating this empath's problem. First, understanding the bad side that comes with it. Second, understanding people's motives. And thirdly, understanding that emotional reactions can kill you, given that the empath's reactions are stronger than most. This could lead to unwanted results from others. And not everyone deserves to receive any attention from you. Who deserves it? It's good to study the behavior, to discern who is worthier, and who isn't. More on Empaths: How Empaths Really Feel Your Pain | Psychiatrist.com Popular Science: Studying the Brains of Empathic People ( drjudithorloff.com )

The Childish Philosophy of Philosocom Article Empire (Background music) (Philosocom Directory On Children) (Maturity Directory) (Mastery Directory) (Philosocom's Directory on Happiness) Article Summary by Mr. Roland Lebalnc In this article, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein is giving us an idea of what happened to him while he tried and succeeded in fulfilling a dream : To share his findings with as many people he could reach while doing what he likes best: Philosophize! Not many of us have been successful in doing this; most of us for some reasons did have to work in a field or at what they did not like the most… One sentence did catch my attention : ‘’ I choose to do in life what makes me happy.’’ In this article he tells us about his success story while doing what he enjoys the most… Philosophizing! I think that each of us could learn from this fact that we can, ... if we really want to, we can achieve what we like doing while sharing with others a part of our wisdom that can enable us to find our unique and important existence purpose in this life! This article can trigger this questioning that can enable us to go on a journey of finding our made to do or life purpose maybe! Introduction The idea behind my glorious article empire is extremely childish: To build an ideal wonderland of philosophy, where the children of this world, AKA, humanity, can enjoy philosophy for free. Like all visionaries, both real and fictional, I admit I may appear delusional, and I admit I may appear irrational in my love for this craft. I admit I may also may appear weird and infantile. That is simply all because I choose to do in life what makes me happy. Theory of Interconnectivity As I worked on this glorious empire of mine and helped many people on the way, I also helped myself. The more I venture throughout the halls of my articles, either written by me or by many others, and rectify them, the more I rectify myself. I also renovate the articles of others, not only myself. Philosocom, essentially, is an empire of help, designed to rectify this world. Like the angel Azazel in the bible (And in Tekken), I enjoy falling from grace. I enjoy sacrificing myself for the greater good, but only in my terms. Masters, therefore, even when they are helpful, may still want you to keep a very strict distance, based on respect... The Egg and the Tomato Like a child, I am a stubborn man who may or may not be compared to cartoon dictators like Dr. Eggman, who is often times my fictional role model. Dr. Eggman is a very tenacious man who only likes winning on his own terms. Through trial and error, what Eggman wants is not only world domination, but also defeating his arch nemesis, Sonic, and also building this utopia called Eggmanland. The guy may appear detached, but he is a happy boy. He is a happy boy, because he marches to his own drum. His wellbeing stems from being true to himself. And so? So is in my case too. This world, for needing the necessary evil of work, may struggle understanding the actual joy of doing work you like. See, when you work at something you like, you live the dream. You actualize the dream in your eyes, unto the world beyond your mind. You as a result get to share your happiness and your joy to this world, who might not understand you as a result of your deeply-ingrained, need to keep true to your heart. A Villain? I do not like compromising and I do not compromise often. I enjoy winning on my terms. As for me, life is but a canvas you use to paint the change you want to see in this world. Pitiful? Infantile? How? How is doing what you want, pity? Perhaps it is infantile, when you discard responsibility. Yes. Yet, what I enjoy doing in life, is to build my existence around my dream of building and working on this fantasy utopia land called Philosocom... Mysteries Unveiled I always relished in creating utopias in my own image. I enjoyed playing many building games as a child, mainly this game called CivCity Rome. I enjoyed living in my head and I still do. I enjoy building Philosocom like I built Roman cities, and painted pictures of cities, military bases, and design concepts for spaceships and space stations. Ah, the joys of creativity. The joys of being a visionary? Who, who would understand other than older, retired folk? I mean, the rest have their own responsibilities. It is understandable very much... Stereotypes Cracked The dark side of mastery is that you may appear very much an irresponsible, reckless individual who may forsake what might be seen as family duties or whatever else one might see as a duty normally. This includes: Caretaking for your dear ones. Living a more traditional life. Compromising with the bigger society outside your window. Appearing as a dictator. Indeed, the cost of following your own truth in this world can make you appear very much a walking enigma. You basically disconnect yourself from the ordinary reality, and pursue your dreams under your terms. You might appear as a narcissist, as an arrogant man, and indeed, compromising is something it is very hard for visionary, unrelenting geniuses like me to do. Marching to your own drum is always bittersweet, yet it is your mature responsibility to make those who want to understand you, accept you for the weirdo visionary that you are. Rectifying this world using a philosophical article empire? It is something only a mad genius would want to do! Exactly! Hahahahaha! Rationality and Perception Somehow, the joys of being yourself, is seen as mad. Somehow, your successful attempts to understand reality in a very profound way, can still make you appear detached from it. Yet, doing what I'm doing requires much dedication, much sacrifice of anything. That's the passion of the craft. And following your passions is best done when you actually consider the world around you, not when you just focus on your passions... That's why I bother being mainly alone. That's why I bother avoiding conflicts with others, as I try to listen to them, not only the other way around. To develop this habit of looking both ways, per se. To develop a more mature, equitable perspective on this reality, in a way that would allow you, the visionary leader, the man with the mission, to still be able to do what you do in peace. The Hidden Logic As I worked on this empire of a platform, I found myself recovering from many, many of my ailments. I found myself improving my wellbeing. I found myself, being healed from many of my sorrows and mental issues. People might think you would need a lot of help, even when you spare them of your existence. They might see you as a troubled individual who misses many of what most humans would appreciate: Birthdays. Holidays. Anniversaries of any other significant events. Family gatherings. And many more collective concepts that discard your own personal vision. For me, this societal matrix is nothing more than a necessary evil. I couldn't care less about this world beyond the bare necessities, and beyond studying it. I am a lifelong learner. Learning and working the way I want is my fabric of happiness. My Wish for This World It is my wish for humanity, that it will get to retire from its daily activities in the outside world, and get to enjoy treating their hobbies seriously like I do. Having a hobby you like is of course fun. When you take a hobby seriously, however? You might be seen as a complete and utter joke. Somehow, taking happiness seriously, along with your own vision you are determined to apply unto this planet, is a joke. Somehow, wanting to be happy, makes you the villain. The Eggman. The Emperor Palpatine. The Walter White. No. Taking your happiness seriously is a very serious business. I wish people would take care of their emotional state more seriously just as I do. I'm not this evil sorcerer who wants to take over the world! In fact, I'm quite against world domination... I prefer rectifying the world's problems, not dominate this world for my ego! And I wish people would understand... the value of rectifying ourselves as well. The Medicine Within You Not having much of an ego is actually pretty fun. Because, you see, working on this site helped me get rid of my ego too. It helped me get rid of many personal problems. Empire building is therapy for me. Empire building is what resonates with me the most, just as it did in the 2000's, where I was the most happy. Try asking yourself often: What would make YOU a happy boy or girl! Try finding time to do what makes you happy for your own mental survival! I always enjoyed building virtual empires, like many roman cities, freely. Unconditionally, on my own terms. On my own circumstances. With no one to tell me what to do. With no one who dares not understanding my vision, to order me around regarding this empire I own. And like all good dictators, you may develop paranoia. However, when you realize how much people don't care, as they feel you don't care about them, you may then feel relaxed over time. The fact that people have their own races to partake in, can very much relax you, when building an empire. Dictators Can Be Good? Building empires is weirdly attributed to men, even though women may enjoy doing it too, no? It's like growing your own garden, like General Skarr does. It's like building New Pork City, like Master Porky. It's like building crime syndicates like Walter White... Yet, I'm not even evil, as a dictator of an empire. I enjoy being a good, happy boy. A good man too. Living the childlike dreams I had, is what makes me happy, as much as it makes Eggman happy. I even enjoy redeeming myself, and learning from my mistakes, and developing virtue. Somehow, all dictators are evil! No. Just look at philosopher kings. You can very much be a moral dictator, too, who dictates his empire according to a high moral standard, as much as a gardener like Skarr would keep his garden in top shape. I enjoy respecting others wishes. I enjoy keeping boundaries, as that allows me to live peacefully, within the very world, I crave to rectify with the power of my unrelenting love for interconnectivity. Yes. I was born with an interconnected understanding. I was born a rare person. I was born an ascetic and an ethical mastermind. Behind the Mask Once you actually get to know me, which I don't enjoy allowing often, you might find a very eccentric, Asperger's guy who is weirdly funny and weirdly logical. As some men mature, they may grow anti-social. That's because much of this world breeds these tendencies within us, unfortunately. Sometimes, a safe space isn't in friendships but in the solitude of your own truth... Should you not be aggressive, you might find me one of the most funny people you've ever met. After all, logic has to do with humor and vice versa. Logic can really, really help you in many cases! That includes interacting with.... other humans... I presume none of you would read my guide to be friends with philosophers anyways, should you seek to be my equal friend? Dealing with people... admittedly, is hard, for a stern philosophy master. Like Batman, I enjoy sparing... not murdering. I am heavily against taking lives. The Why of Philosocom Life, for me, is a duel. A struggle. A conflict. A fight. And in my eyes... In my eyes a duel is never over until the very end! Even during some brief moments of.. rest and respite in... free time? I will get what I want! And I will always want to rectify this world with the power of philosophy and humanity! And like the fleas in your fur.... I will always come back! Yet, mainly online. My physical life is distinct...

(Philosocom's Immortality Subcategory) (Villainy/Anti-Villainy Directory) Story Synopsis by Mr. J. Igwe and Co. "The Demon Philosopher - A Tale" is a captivating narrative that blends elements of existential philosophy , metaphysical speculation, and dark fantasy. The protagonist, a humble farmer, encounters a demonic entity named Monkrilla, who challenges him with profound questions about existence, purpose, and the meaning of life. Through these encounters, the protagonist's simple life is transformed into a journey of introspection and self-discovery , leading him to question the nature of reality, the significance of his own existence, and ultimately, the power dynamics that govern both mortal and immortal beings. The tale employs various literary techniques to engage readers, including vivid imagery, symbolism, and a philosophical dialogue format reminiscent of classical philosophical texts . The narrative structure is layered, starting with the protagonist's initial ignorance of philosophy and gradually unveiling deeper existential dilemmas through his conversations with Monkrilla. This approach allows the reader to witness the character's transformation from a naive peasant to a reluctant philosopher grappling with life's ultimate questions. The use of a demon as a philosophical mentor is an interesting twist, subverting the typical association of demons with malevolence, and instead, presenting Monkrilla as a complex figure — both tormentor and teacher. The demon's insistence on forcing the protagonist to confront the emptiness and futility of existence serves as a vehicle for exploring themes of nihilism , free will, and the pursuit of knowledge. The protagonist's struggle against the demon's questions mirrors the broader human struggle against the unknown and the unknowable, a fight that can often lead to a deeper understanding of oneself or, conversely, to madness and despair. In conclusion, "The Demon Philosopher - A Tale" is a thought-provoking and imaginative exploration of existential philosophy and the human condition, with its originality , rich imagery, and philosophical depth making it a compelling read. ************************* "HONESTY seems the greatest deception, since no one ever believes in it, or its real possibility" -- Mr. John Duran (Background music) **************************** Though I have lived many years and experienced much, I never encountered anything like philosophy - something so vast, complex , and sometimes unsettling. Until a few weeks ago, the term and its definition were unknown to me. You may rightly say I am not a very intelligent person , and I agree. My life has been a monotonous one, that of a poor farmer, repeating the same tasks with no clear vision of the future. Pondering grand ideas in philosophy simply never crossed my mind. In truth, I cannot even read or write. Someone else, as I speak, assists me with these difficult tasks. Yet, before my time in this world ends, I felt compelled to record some of my thoughts. You see, I have lived a simple life, though one of great ignorance . My lord, far away in his manor, demanded wheat and fruits, and that's what I provided; that's what I did for him, his son, and his grandson. I am an old and poor man who has never seen lands beyond my lord's territory. My knowledge extends barely beyond agriculture. Despite my limitations, I have lived a life of integrity and hard work. And while I may not understand the complexities of philosophy, I have my own wisdom, born from years of observation, and reflection. These are the thoughts I wish to leave behind, a proof to my existence and the life I have lived. A few weeks ago, I was visited by a demon. This creature, with its horns, tail, and sharp teeth, was grotesque. Its words were in a tongue unknown, yet their meaning reached my very core. It declared me a unique individual , possessing the potential for greatness in philosophy. Despite initial skepticism, the demon's persistence enticed me. It urged me to ponder life's profound questions, the meaning of existence and the nature of reality. Hesitant at first, I eventually yielded to the demon's demands. As I delved into these inquiries, I was surprised by my own natural talent at it. Never before had I experienced such insights into the essence of reality. It felt like awakening from a slumber, a long and deep sleep that deludes you you're awake. The demon, pleased with my progress, proclaimed me a natural philosopher, one with the potential to rank among history's greatest thinkers . Flattered by its words, I also felt a sense of responsibility. This newfound knowledge, I realized, was meant to serve others . I had to share my insights with the world. However, this awakening appears to have occurred years ago. Long in the past, I began experiencing what others call "hallucinations," though the line between them and daydreams blurs for me. Unexpectedly, I would be confronted by a terrifying creature, a hybrid of sorts. With immense eyes and a repulsive visage, it would fixate its blood-filled eyes on me, posing questions no one else ever dared, including myself . For some inexplicable reason, it called itself Monkrilla. Only I could perceive this entity. Though my family believes I've lost my mind, I discarded their criticism. I saw this abomination staring into my soul, speaking of things beyond the grasp of my aging, declining mind. It consumes me, draining my sanity with its relentless presence, indifferent to the torment it inflicts on my mentality. The first question Monkrilla posed was: " What is the meaning of life? " What could I possibly say? My knowledge extends only to farming, my rulers, my family, and the land I cultivate. So, I countered with my own question: " Why should I care about the meaning of life? " The creature, a disgusting, cosmic collection of iron, rotting flesh, and spikes, responded with its own question. Its voice is deep, twisted, and horrific, like an otherworldly construct of sorts: "For what reason do you live?" Frustration overwhelmed me. Why wouldn't it simply leave me be? But why should I complain? Do I possess even a shred of self-respect, an ego of any kind? I am a mere peasant, subjected to the humiliation of those more powerful than me. This heretical, despicable demon appears to hear my very thoughts. I sensed it through the movement of its metallic, blood-and-dust-covered eyes and its massive eyebrows. I feel violated. " My name is Monkrilla ," it declared slowly, " The philosopher of the underworld. Ponder the questions I have posed to you, fragile mortal. We shall meet again, another time." With that, it vanished into nothingness, leaving me to return to my earthly reality, overwhelmed and clueless. I asked my wife, seeking confirmation of what I had witnessed, only to be dismissed as a madman . They believe I've lost my mind, yet I swear on my lord that I saw this monstrous creature. Yet, no one seems to care. Days turned into weeks, and my family began distancing themselves. My attempts to engage them with Monkrilla's questions were met with laughter and mockery. The head of a family for three generations, reduced to a laughingstock. I've witnessed them whispering behind my back, labeling me insane as I harvest wheat and slaughter pigs. I suppose I'm accustomed to such disrespect , having received none other throughout my life, both from others and from myself. At times, the demon would appear in my sleep. These dreams were filled with unbearable heat, humidity, and sweat, surpassing anything I've ever endured under the scorching sun. In this horror dimension, the atmosphere was a sickly yellow, rusty, and filled with decay. My lungs craved fresh air, but only dirt and smoke choked my breath. The giant demon sat upon a throne of earth and metal, its eyes stared upon me as if judging me for undisclosed sins. "Fragile mortal," it said intensely. "Why do you live?" I possessed no answer, but I attempted to improvise. "My lord, I exist because my parents created me, and I have survived all these years in my harsh existence." "No, no, fragile mortal," it protested. "That I already know from merely observing your delicate, aged body. What is the true purpose behind your existence?" "My lord," I answered with anxiety, "my purpose is to ensure my master's satisfaction with the resources I provide." "Is that so..." it slowly replied. "Then why do they demand even more of these resources with each passing season? Their dissatisfaction is evident in their ever-increasing requests. If that is your purpose in this universe, then you have demonstrably failed to fulfill it, tiny mortal. For what you provide, is insufficient" "How do you know all of this? From where do you have such challenging wisdom?!" I answered with even greater feelings of anxiety, fear and confusion, boiling from within me. "Are you following me, or perhaps my master?" "Insignificant mortal", he called me, an identity I readily accepted. "I possess the wisdom of countless years stored within the depths of my mind. I exist everywhere and nowhere, observing, learning, and hopelessly searching for answers to my philosophical questions . I have questioned countless mortals and gods about the meaning of existence, and they, like you, were unsure of their answers, if they even offered one. We are all bound for oblivion , as the current order will tremble under the intensity of disillusionment, anarchy and despair" His words held no weight for me. I simply desired to be left alone. "In an ideal yet suffocating reality," he lectured, "no mortal or immortal would abandon the pursuit of the great philosophical questions, regardless of the void they reveal. As I choose to live by this hypothetical reality, haunted as I am by these questions, I shall eternally haunt you and countless others, until the void within me is finally filled!" For some reason, I anticipated laughter, but his expression remained far more serious than my family's disdain for me. "My lord," I inquired , "I am a simple man. What emptiness do you speak of?" The demon sighed deeply, the sound echoed through my very being. "Simple-minded mortals often find greater happiness than those who delve into the depths of thought. You are now my minion, mortal. Submit to my rule and swear allegiance, and I shall grant you an extended life in exchange. Refuse, and you shall suffocate under my eternal torment." My dream took a turn for the worse, and I realized I had made a fatal mistake, one I would deeply regret. "Why should I submit to a monstrosity like you, my lord? I have submitted enough in this life. Oh, my lord, when will this slavery end? Is death the only answer? This is the first time I have considered it, but I have never known what freedom truly is. Haven't I served others enough in my long life, living as a slave? When will I have the time to be free?" "‘Free’?" The demon mocked me, seemingly growing larger with each passing second of my terror. "There is no such thing as freedom in mortal life, except in death. Death is the liberator. Do you desire death? I wouldn't be surprised if you did. Even the wealthiest succumb to the inclinations of their existence. Submission is the natural order in a universe where the strong exploit, if not abuse, the weak. I must reiterate my question. Do you wish to die? You may not comprehend the torment of death, regardless of its duration." "I do not understand, my lord-" "Do you wish to die? Even an ignorant being such as yourself can understand this simple question, I believe. I am far more powerful than you, and I require a network of minions to act as my representatives in the mortal realm. Perhaps one day, you pathetic weaklings can offer me some relief from my existential suffering. You see, old man, I am an essence-consuming philosopher, and I require individuals like you to serve me as harvesters of life's essence. I need the meaning of life to survive, as does everyone who isn't practically depressed. Minion, swear your allegiance to me, and I shall grant you a significantly extended lifespan. I understand the look on your face, mortal. You lead a pitiful and seemingly inescapable existence. No one cares for you, not even the children your wife gave birth to. They laugh at you and shame you relentlessly. The deeper you sink into shame, the more your subconscious will torment you in compensation for your perceived meaninglessness . And the more you do that, the more of a monster you can become yourself... despite being another earthly mortal. If you acknowledge that you are my minion by swearing your oath to me, I can prevent your inevitable decline to the monsters within you . As long as you continue to ponder the grand philosophical questions. Even mere contemplation sustains me and allows me to thrive. I will ask you one last time, minion: Do you wish to die? I can haste your death, and it will consume you far more quickly than you anticipate. Declare your recognition of your servitude to me!" Exhaustion overwhelmed me. I wanted death, yet for reasons I could not explain, I obeyed him and submitted with a servant's dignity to Monkrilla, the God of Wisdom and Repulsion. "Your new lord is pleased with your obedience. Now, minion, your life will be forever changed, but I shall not reveal the specifics. You will discover them for yourself, for wisdom often arises from misery, and disillusionment succeeds momentary "'purity'". My fatal mistake was refusing death. Instead, my lifespan was significantly extended, but at the cost of seeing my family and the lord's manor consumed by flames... I watched from afar, now knowing the price of my sacrifice. From then on, I knew more than I ever wished to know in my previous, shameful life. I was reborn from my own fear of death, transformed from a lowly earthly servant to a minion of dark divinity. A choice I regretted and rightfully so. Indeed, I deeply regret selling my soul to a demon, especially to one as my lord and demon philosopher, Monkrilla. Hunger tormented at me constantly, and sleep became a fleeting feature, as I wandered through the land. My journey lacked any clear direction, and my new lord offered no explanation for the tasks they expected of their minion. Yet, I felt their ever-present gaze, as though a foreign eye had taken root within me. Forced to live as a hermit in the uncivilized wilderness, I experienced a deep isolation unlike any I had known before. Though it marked my first venture beyond the confines of my former lord's domain, I encountered no other human souls during my travels. I climbed mountains and hills, endured the bite of winter in a desolate cave, hunted birds and fish for food, and drank from the streams that flowed through the wilderness. Yet, with every passing day, the silence grew heavier, and the absence of human connection ate my core from within . In my previous life, I had known the comfort of communal life, the friendship of working alongside others in the fields, and the simple pleasure of sharing bread with my family in our humble hut. This enforced isolation became a form of torture, a contrast to the life I had once known. I longed for the warmth of human interaction , the comfort of a shared smile, the simple joy of conversation. Perhaps my demon master orchestrated my journey, wielding their power over the earth and my very life. My frustration grew as I fought with the meaninglessness of my existence , aimlessly wandering the desolate lands. Though betrayal crossed my mind, the thought of facing their wrath held me back, even though I had nothing left to lose. Death, however, became an increasingly enticing option. My age remained a mystery even to me. In my former life, I held onto the illusion of purpose , a belief that gave my life meaning. I knew the tasks expected of me – to harvest a certain amount of food and deliver it to the lord's castle, ensuring my own survival in exchange. Yet, this new existence offered no such clarity. I was mere dust compared to the vastness of my former lord's domain, and venturing beyond its familiar borders revealed the true insignificance of my existence. The world stretched out before me, vast and infinite, a source of both wonder and loathing. I could walk for days, even weeks, without ever remembering my steps. The fear of reaching the world's edge and staring into the abyss of the underworld ever-present. Though voices whispered of a world not flat but round, they were only my own, the remnants of my sanity in the face of solitude. Since the day Monkrilla's flames consumed the manor and all within it, I had not heard a word from my master. One day, I collapsed on the seemingly endless grasslands, overwhelmed by despair. Tears streamed down my face as I questioned my direction, my purpose. Master Monkrilla was right; the burden of thought was far heavier than the blissful ignorance of a simple life. I yearned for the days when my mind was unburdened by such complex thoughts, a time when my greatest concern was the next harvest or the well-being of my family. Despite my solitude, I became wise, yet longed for the simplicity of my past . The stream of thoughts that raced through my mind offered no comfort, only a yearning for the life I had lost, and a questioning of the life I now lead. I lay there, a lifeless shell, my energy drained on the earth. For the first time, I felt a genuine love for my wife, despite the arranged nature of our marriage and the absence of her love. I missed my children, the ones I had taught the art of harvest and slaughter , yet never truly played with or loved. Even my former lord, a figure I had never truly known, became an object of my longing. I felt a strange urge to thank him for the shelter and purpose he had provided me. He was a man shrouded in mystery , forever lost to the flames that devoured the manor. His death, along with everyone else's, had been a swift and brutal situation. I laughed, a hollow sound. The irony was not lost on me - a lifetime's work reduced to ashes in mere minutes. As the initial shock reduced , I found a renewed determination to continue my journey, though its end seemed as uncertain as ever. One day, a disturbing conspiracy theory took root in my mind, a dangerous thought that could have been my undoing. Had Master Monkrilla manipulated me all along? What if he had deceived me, using the fabricated need for an "essence of meaning" as a means to simply fight off the boredom of his immortal existence? The constant feeling of being watched since leaving the manor's ruins, the absence of any meaningful discovery despite years of searching -- it all pointed towards a terrifying possibility: was I nothing more than a plaything to reduce the monotonous, immortal life of a careless cosmic God? Ancient immortals, having seen it all, should surely know the meaning of life, or even their absence, after living so many centuries. Why then, would such a being enslave a mortal and send them on a journey they themselves had likely already undertaken countless times over their eons of existence? Immortals, needed no such entertainment, beyond the purpose of entertainment itself. And if my master was truly a god, omnipresent as they claimed, then why was I needed in the first place? Years of wandering the barren lands, had ensured my own demise. My desire to live had only delayed the inevitable, my increasing intellect on this solitary journey of cold, hunger, thirst, and silence ultimately sealing my fate. On my final day, I lay on the ground, sensing my life force slipping away. Exhaustion weighed heavily upon me , despite having just awoken. Hunger governed my thoughts, and my body, weakened by my ordeal, refused to obey. Unable to rise, I longed for the comforting oblivion of sleep. When I finally opened my eyes, I found myself in the depths of Master Monkrilla's throne room, a place I had only visited in my dreams. A long silence stretched between us before the demon god spoke, his voice a rusty rasp echoing through the humid air. "Well done, my minion," he said, his hands slowly clapping, the sound's like shockwaves. "You have discovered the meaning of life. Yes, yes, we both know the truth, my dear minion. For all living beings, mortal and immortal alike, death is the ultimate certainty. While immortals may live forever, eventually, after experiencing all that life has to offer, sanity begins to slip away. We write books, travel the world, speak with countless individuals, witness the birth and death of civilizations. But even these things eventually lose their appeal, replaced by the emptiness of boredom. You are correct, mortal. I used you, for I was bored . I have no shame in this, for I am beyond the constraints of good and evil. " "Really, master? Do you truly think you are the exception just because you are immortal, a demon, and a god?" I retorted angrily to the one who had granted me the gift of increasing and arousing intellect. "Now, enough. Since I have grown quite attached to you and your intelligence, I feel guilty letting you live for so long. You see, my servant, I believe that the concept of overdose, regardless of its type, is dangerous and life-threatening. I am afraid that, given the fact that you are becoming wiser and wiser as the years go by in your solitude, your fragile mind may crumble due to an overdose of uncompromising, unthreatened intellect. I am evident of that phenomenon deep inside you, as I observed your thoughts with my eye, and I let my loyal historian and author, Recordptile, record each and every one of your thoughts since you left your dead lord's manor. Recordptile! Bring the books!" A massive platform, overflowing with books and chained with iron, descended from the ceiling. It filled the entire space above, leaving me unable to see its end. With a terrifying thud of the demon's fist on his throne, the platform slowly ascended and disappeared into the darkness above. Beside the monstrous demon stood a tall, muscular reptile, carrying a sharp sword and a large black quill tucked in their pocket. They wore a knight's silver-plated armor and a spiked kettle helm, symbolizing both intellect and combat prowess. The demon master spoke once more. "For your own safety, you should be executed. But beforehand, Recordptile shall record your final thoughts. After you have finished recording all you have to say to the next generations, you shall be mercifully killed. Recordptile, escort this proper minion and write whatever he has to say. Then, execute him." The reptilian warrior nodded obediently. A hidden entrance burst open, revealing a dark, narrow corridor. For the first time, I witnessed Master Monkrilla's smile, as hideous as his usual expressions. Perhaps their smile was the result of my personal success, a potential indication that my life did not go entirely to waste....

Surpassing The Master! "If we won't show mercy to the merciless, than how exactly are we morally superior to them?" -- John Duran (Note: This is a special piece that will not be renovated to be kept in the present day, and will not be updated in information, in order to preserve some of the past. Past I can reflect on. I am not keen on forgetting the past. The past can help us forge a better future .   More on my philosophy on the past has been written). (Philosocom's Subcategory on Revenge) (Background music) ******************************** Fading Embers I've been losing my emotions even more , like territories lost at war. Excitement, wonder, curiosity, joy, hope, and others - all have retreated, leaving me in a barren landscape of loneliness, like the one I traveled in, in my childhood. It's been a long while since I felt their touch. I don't know if I'll ever be able to reclaim them. I think that the only way I could reclaim them is by dispelling human darkness. And that is exactly what I plan to do with Philosocom. That is how I will redeem myself. I'm not the person I used to be, not even close. Even my physical appearance has changed. I seem stronger, more rugged, despite barely ever exercising. People even ask if I've been hitting the gym, which is funny considering I am mainly working on this site, and resting from it. Empathy.... cognitive and compassionate... are the only threads hanging me to this world who have forsaken my distress in the name of hedonism . Should it ever snap, the monster within me will surely be unleashed, leaving me forever broken, like Darth Vader : A being who lost all hope for the good of others, stuck in his own repressed emotional pain. Scars of Casual Cruelty Sometimes, it's the most ordinary people who inflict the deepest wounds.  They hide behind the shields of " just a joke, mate " and "you need to move on". As such, they're absolving themselves of responsibility for the emotional damage they leave in their wake, while the norms enable the suffer they inflict. But can we truly absolve ourselves of the impact our actions have on others, simply because their mental state isn't entirely within our control? Is that a moral escape hatch, or a convenient delusion? Under moralist philosophies , it isn't necessarily karma or dharma that will come back at you. No. It is, rather, several possibilities: Revenge, a natural evil. A downhill that could lead to misfortune such as self-harm. The turn of the mentally wounded to maliciousness, as with the example shown in "Breaking Bad" with Heisenberg . The attempt of the emotionally wounded to redeem themselves, thus becoming morally better than you. When you prefer your own joy over the impact you have on others, you could lead to either 4 of these happening. Hence why hedonism can be dangerous... the very person you undermined in the name of your personal pleasure can become either of the 4. And those who choose number 4 might as well be rare as number 4 requires both a sense of justice, compassion and hope. Not everyone have those, because not everyone chooses life (thus leading to number 2), not everyone understands the results of their actions (number 1), and not everyone is able to see people as more than objects to be used for your own benefit (thus leading to number 3). I choose number 4. I choose to escape the abyss of Escapism . For I wish to confront my inner demons, and emerge victorious. It is an "abyss" because escaping from our inner demons is vain. We can't escape from ourselves competently. The pain we carry with us will only wither once its solved. And I want you to learn from me. The Rise of Chen I have no love for her, for Chen . Never had for years. I look deep in her image's eyes, and philosophize in my mind. What's in there, in the smiling abyss? Are those the eyes of a psychopath? Not necessarily, but liberty breeds anti-social behavior either way. And either way, she abused my emotions, and caused me trauma, with no remorse beyond politeness. Her sight, a while back, used to make me puke. I was fine in health. It was a post-traumatic response, and lasted for a few years. I loved her but she did not participate in my pain. And loneliness can be solved, not when we are with others, but when we understand their pain and carry them with us. That is the path of the compassionate person. Out of all the people I had in my life, back then, only one really cared for my distress. I didn't fell victim to the para-social fallacy . I knew I was alone, even in physical company. Now I look at her, and think only one thing: I will never allow myself to become the monster she was. The norms care not for this, and as such they allow emotional abuse, and condemn of honesty in the name of cowardice . We can't love other human beings if we are too afraid of agony, and prefer having fun instead. As such we need to prepare to suffer in the name of love. And I refuse agreeing to the shame of still, somehow, having faith in humanity, despite the things I went through with her and in general. I refuse enabling the poor moral conduct of normalcy, which disregards the agony of the individual. Disregarding the pain of another, can lead them to a path of great evil, break them apart, and even make them feel compel to kill themselves. I refuse to be like them. I refuse to be, like her. I refuse becoming the man I might become. Negative. The monster I might become. The remorseless monster that might've been her, as well. Within my meditations I was exposed to the shadows of myself . I know what I am repressing. Chen's eyes... they do not appear honest. They look like a pool of darkness, hidden by a visage of a smile that succeeds appearing normal. In fact, the smile doesn't even come to the eyes. The expression... it looks hollow. It looks shallow. Was she... using me? Did she discard me at my time of need, because she cared not for my suffering? We discard people... too much than we should. If so, I am irrelevant, only because... I was of no further use for her. She underestimated my importance, and carried on with their life, without further care. Her charm was flat . It always was. And so were her emotions. I was no more than someone to speak to sometimes, for her. Always was. Anything else of me never really mattered to her. Should I treat people like she treated me? No. She was morally weak. Even if she was a good person. She failed to apply her morals, causing me suffering, by deeming me unimportant. But... everyone can be useful. Everyone has the potential to help. To be of use. To contribute. We need to be less cowardly. To overcome our insecurities, and endure hardship despite of discomfort. That is the moral thing to do. And I refuse being morally weak, when moral strength can bring so much good to this world, and help people with their problems. We need to believe in ourselves more. And we need to believe in others more, as well. That... that is the path to light. To greater humanity. Choosing Humanity Over Darkness I stand before you as a survivor forged in the crucible of abuse and trauma, which is natural in this reality . Chen might've broken me into a man who chose celibacy for 8 years, deeming myself a monk , but I now declare with unwavering conviction: I will live and embrace the pain, necessary to be a moral human being. I have no desire to escape reality anymore, and I even plan to give my video game consoles as a gift. Why? Because video games are forms of escapism , of being someone you are not. And I want to be myself, in the real world, not in a fictional, virtual world where my actions have no implications. In 2014 Chen said to me that expressing emotions is a mistake. No, emotions deserve to exist, to bloom in all their messy, beautiful complexity. For emotions are the very essence of our humanity, and their expression allows us the privilege of true love: To be loved for the entirety of who we are! To deny them, to strive for a sterile, emotionless existence, is to court a chilling truth that can become: a being devoid of emotion is a being capable of unspeakable evil, should he or she lack cognitive empathy . It is a possible I refuse to embrace, even when it whispers promises of far greater power. No end justifies the means that dehumanizes others, that reduces them to mere tools. We must be soft, in a sense, in order to love... In order to not be lonely at the top. "Hate... Become emotionless... Trust no one. Emotions only get in the way of ruling this city" -- Zanetti, "Beatdown: Fists of Vengeance" Every human being deserves the right to express their emotions, to laugh and cry, to love and grieve... without fear or shame. Why should a confession of love, an act of vulnerability, be deemed a mistake? No... we need to be ourselves. We should allow ourselves... to be human. From Victim to Victor Chen will pay, not through vengeance, but through my triumph over the monster she nurtured within me. The monster that threatened to bloom should I succumb to the darkness, should I deny empathy, remorse, guilt, atonement - and above all, love. Love for myself, and love for others. For without these very emotions, the cornerstone of morality crumbles, leaving only cold logic as the final fortress, to protect a man from becoming a cruel tyrant! Humans are not tools to be measured by their usefulness, nor are they faulty for expressing their emotions. We are flawed, yes. All of, in our own way. But we shouldn't be condemned for being flawed. We should be loved for being flawed. For to be flawed is to be human. And in order to not become nor breed dehumanized dictators, capable of inflicting agony of millions, we must embrace and love our humanity. Our capacity for compassion and understanding is one that can not only save people from mental illness , but also from self-sacrifice. That is the strength that can make so much good in this world. The strength to be there for another, and partake in their suffering as if it was your own. The norms, which care not for the death of those who are not known or relevant enough, should be condemned as such. Caring shouldn't be a privilege reserved for celebrities! Join me in rejecting the monsters within and without, in choosing empathy over apathy , and in embracing our flaws ! For it is in these emotions that we find the very essence of what makes us human. Not as just biological beings, homo-sapiens, but beings capable of morality insects and germs cannot ( arguably ). I will not let her win. Never. I will not be evil as a drug baron that fuel wars . I will stay an article baron that fuels thought. I am a gentleman . A moral being. The fact that others abused me, does not mean I should do the same. Learn from me. Hail Philosocom

"If one being's Hell is Heaven for another, would that not make Lucifer both a Tormenter and a generous host?" -- John Duran (Background music) Could an Everlasting Paradise Actually Drive Us Mad? Imagine an existence beyond time, an utopian land where every desire is instantly fulfilled. This is the promise of paradise, an eternal haven envisioned by countless cultures under certain criteria to fulfill. In Buddhism, that is done by acquiring merit , among other things. In Judaism, paradise is to be made within this world using the concept of "Tikkun" , with the afterlife serving as a place for souls to rest until their eventual return in reincarnation. In Christianity, having complete assurance in Christ is the key to paradise. Yet, lurking beneath the surface of this ideal bliss, found in most major religions, lies a potential pitfall: the frustrating hunger of boredom. Initially, such a utopia might dazzle us with its effortless pleasures. But soon, the human mind, wired for growth and struggle over everlasting happiness , might find itself adrift in a sea of decreasing emotional value in this ideal landscape, as many human beings would fail practicing the necessary mindfulness to be eternally grateful. How come? even divine perfection could suffocate us with its monotony. For the human mind to appreciate heaven, it must be trained to adjust its perception in accordance. And without perception, paradise would lose much of it value. To quote the philosopher Epictetus: "Humans are disturbed not by things, but by the view which they take of them.” Case Example: Endless Summer Consider "Endless Summer" mode from a video game called "Bully" , a post-game playground devoid of conflict and purpose. Like a theoretical paradise, it grants unlimited freedom, yet leaves us hollow and directionless. As the title suggests, this mode is infinite and has no limitations whatsoever. On a Reddit thread on the game's least favorite chapters , the comments with the most "upvotes" was "Chapter 6", or "Endless summer". the reasoning was: "Nothing left to do once you do complete everything" Even when you're at leisure, like when playing a video game, you may feel compelled not to freely roam the environment, but rather to engage in tasks and fulfill objectives. "Eternal Summer", a representation of paradise in digitally-interactive form, may fail to captivate its audience when there is no further objectives left fo complete in the game. Once you've conquered every side mission, explored every corner, and mastered every challenge in a game, does it still hold the same magic? Do you yearn to play on aimlessly, forever stuck in a "post-game" world devoid of purpose and growth? Paradise Paradox, this eternal promised land where every desire finds instant fulfillment, might just resemble that very scenario Likewise, you aren't supposed to fulfill any tasks in paradise, for paradise is too perfect for that to to be a requirement. You don't have to be productive, you don't even have to contribute. No. All you "need" to do is to live in eternal bliss. But it kinds of ruins the moment when you realize you don't need to do anything in paradise. You aren't supposed to work or fulfill tasks in paradise. Which is kind of counter-intuitive, as unemployment increases likelihood of sacrifice. The Eternal Grind -- The Boredom of Immortality . At first, the divine perfection might dazzle. But the human spirit craves not just idle pleasure, but the thrill of the chase, the satisfaction of overcoming obstacles, and improving itself further from its previous state. In a world where every wish is granted before it's even uttered, even paradise loses its appeal, morphing from a blissful haven into a monotonous cage. It's a freedom without consequence, yes, but also a profound emptiness. No story to unfold, no antagonism to vanquish , just an unending expanse of…well, nothing. Nothing beyond the bliss of fun and eternal rest. Paradise, stripped of its challenges, risks stripping us of our very reason for being, leaving us adrift in an existential void that even eternity cannot fill. The problem lies in our very brains, hard-wired to function through struggle and problem-solving in an imperfect, earthly reality. Like a hungry stomach, they crave constant stimulation, new experiences to digest and process, and expand. Being the territorial creatures that we are , the world is a product of endless series of wars and conflicts. Human relations , even in philosophical discussions, can turn a pleasant mood to a hell of our own reality. Paradise, in its unchanging perfection, becomes stale, taken for granted like any modern marvel we once marveled at – cars, smartphones and other objectively-wonderful inevntions. The longer the privilege, the less likely we are to truly appreciate it with every breath. Can Paradise Sate Our Restless Minds? The human mind craves variation, a constant influx of new sights, sounds, and experiences. Like a mental stomach, it digests information and experiences, only to yearn for something fresh once its appetite is sated. Left to its own devices with little to no stimulation, it becomes restless, seeking out anything to fill the void. But what happens when this insatiable hunger encounters the promise of eternal paradise? Will the perfect bliss of heaven, devoid of challenges and growth, eventually become a monotonous feast, leaving our minds craving something beyond it? As with the example of a certain character , who became obsessed with meat, he became stuck in an eternal loop of hunger, as not even the most tastiest of meet can save him from his eternal hunger for it. Can we truly say that being in a hedonistic treadmill of endless desire is one that can grant us the eternal happiness our minds seek? The answer, like the nature of heaven itself, remains shrouded in mystery . If heaven is a static paradise, a realm of unchanging perfection, then the mind's inherent need for variation may very well lead to boredom, even in this perfect realm. Imagine an eternity spent basking in the same blissful sunshine, listening to the same celestial music, forever satiated but ultimately unfulfilled. Possible Solution Another vision of heaven paints a more dynamic picture. Perhaps it's not a static state of being, but rather an endless journey of exploration and discovery. In this possible, other nature of this realm, the mind could feast on a continuous buffet of new knowledge, skills, and experiences. Then, Each day could bring a novel challenge, a fresh perspective, a spark of creativity that keeps the mental flame perpetually burning. It is something we can, nevertheless, make in this own world using AI technology and virtual reality. Make it infinitely generate variated worlds for us to explore and interact with, and the experiences of the real world wouldn't be as necessary. The some logic exist when interacting with people for information, versus finding information ourselves using search engines -- we can create many substitutes to this reality that could surpass its flawed nature. But wouldn't flaw be a good thing in love? Shouldn't a possible key for happiness be... t o embrace to flaws, and learn to live alongside them? Conclusion Meaning arises from overcoming obstacles, not basking in effortless indulgence. Paradise, devoid of challenges, might strip us of our very reasoning of being, leaving us with an existential void even eternity cannot fill. Perhaps true fulfillment lies not in endless bliss, but in the perpetual dance between struggle and victory . It is within this dynamic realm that we carve our identities, forge meaningful connections, and discover the profound beauty of existence—even amidst its imperfections. After all, what's the point of an eternal victory without ever having faced a worthy opponent? What else is left to do, after all of your objectives have been completed? Mr. Ephraim Peter's Feedback The concept Mr. Tomasio explores aligns with the idea that meaning and fulfillment arise from overcoming challenges and obstacles. In many philosophical and psychological perspectives, the pursuit of goals and the experience of growth contribute significantly to a person's sense of purpose and satisfaction. However, The idea of an everlasting paradise potentially leading to boredom is a fascinating one. In psychology, it's known as the " hedonic treadmill ," where individuals continually seek new sources of pleasure, but adaptation leads to a return to a baseline level of happiness. The suggestion of a dynamic paradise, where there's a continuous journey of exploration and discovery, resonates with the importance of novelty and variety in human experience. This aligns with the psychological concept of "flow," a state of optimal engagement where individuals are absorbed in an activity that challenges their skills but is not too difficult. A dynamic paradise that presents continuous challenges and opportunities for growth might indeed be more satisfying for a human mind wired for novelty and progress.   The notion of embracing flaws and imperfections is also significant. In human relationships , embracing imperfections can lead to more authentic connections and a deeper understanding of oneself and others . Flaws and challenges contribute to the richness of the human experience, fostering resilience and personal growth. Mr. Tomasio's exploration of a possible solution involving AI technology and virtual reality reflects the human drive to create environments that cater to our evolving needs and desires. The idea of creating varied and dynamic virtual worlds aligns with the notion of providing a continuous source of novelty and challenges.

(Philosocom Directory on Friendship) (Background music) When you desire to be friends with philosophers, there are certain things you may want to take into consideration. Keeping these insights in mind will help you avoid unnecessary stigmas that will cloud your judgment, and are unfortunately common when interacting with philosophers. You may find that you may hold these thoughts and view them as truth just because they are convincing impressions . Furthermore, these stereotypical impressions may be regarded by yourself as truth even after a long period of knowing your philosopher friend. Unfortunately, these stereotypes are here to stay due to emotions being involved and interfering with one's judgment. It is often difficult to distinguish between the mind and the heart when interacting with a philosopher because much of philosophy is basically verbal logic , and verbal communication is not without emotionality being involved, unnecessarily or otherwise. It isn't to say that philosophers are necessarily emotionless verbal logic machines. However, the competent philosopher, unlike many people, does not live in the mindset of post-truth . Post-truth, in an age of misinformation, is a very common part of many people's mentality. It is considered humble to say "that's my opinion, anyways" or relate anything to our personal opinion and experiences, as far more important than the truth. Modesty, however, may be a barrier , but I digress from my main point. My main point is that this isn't the case with philosophers, and as such, they may even undermine their own sentiments in the name of reality. It also means that they may even undermine yours, despite respecting you and seeing you as an equal. You, however, who live in post-truth, may feel insulted by them putting your post-truths in lower priority. You might feel compelled to be intimidated, and thus begin to insult them. Begin to regard them as arrogant , as narcissists. All because your emotions weren't as considered as you hoped them to be. For that matter, you may even find that your overall personal experience has been undermined in the name of them trying to understand reality. However, you might not be aware of their intentions (AKA, trying to understand reality). And this could be a quick downward spiral towards anger, frustration, and false impressions. Philosophers can be very blunt beings, saying the truth without sugar-coating it. A good philosopher can criticize anything they have enough knowledge about. It's one of the reasons I wrote many articles. As such, they may undermine societal norms because norms are not meant to be criticized . They meant to be obeyed as if they were laws. Since they are not laws, the philosopher shouldn't have problems with, you know, doing what they naturally and/or professionally do. So, it would only be natural that they will criticize you, their friend. They may even criticize you in a way that you will deem harsh, while they do not. For them, criticizing is a basic function . For you, it may be hurtful. Logic is merciless , in a way. It's either that you are something or you aren't. Correct, or incorrect. Post-truth is not the concern of logic, and post-truth prioritizes the subjective experience over the truth that exists independently of it. Philosophers choose logic over subjective experience because logic is a better asset to understand reality. It allows us to have certainty whereas faith and intuition may require a leap of faith and nothing more. It isn't because of ad-hominem nonsense such as being narcissists, psychopaths , and other unverified mental conditions you might think they have just because it feels that way in your eyes. Do you see how post-truth fails to recognize the truth? Whether someone is a narcissist, for example, has nothing to do with how you see things. It has to do with whether they actually are, or not, based on the symptoms they display. Along with other methods, of course. So here, when I may say that some perceptions are irrelevant, it is not to insult you or to disregard you, but because your post-truth is not sufficient to determine whether someone is a narcissist, psychopath, etc. You have no reason to be insulted even if you feel compelled to be. It just goes to show how merciless logic is. And since reality is built on logic, AKA objective meaning, then reality is quite merciless, yes. Philosophy is a logical tool one can use to understand reality through verbal means. You may find that people who lack emotion may be interested in it , but it does not say by itself that all philosophers are heartless, potential serial-killers with no scrap of empathy. You just need to understand that philosophers are conditioned to prioritize logic over post-truth as part of their jobs . Some self-described philosophers may be pretentious because their arguments are impaired by their emotional problems. They may see certain things as more or less than they are because their emotions heavily bias them towards a certain position, thus making their arguments poor. And you can't be considered a good philosopher if your arguments are poor, correct? So, the good philosopher needs to work and solve their emotional problems, just as I have done with mine over the years. It is false to throw the responsibility of your emotional problems onto others. If your emotions are out of proportion, you need to work on them regardless of the triggers they may cause you. One of the reasons I'm against trigger warnings is because one can work on the problems that cause these triggers in the first place. A world filled with trigger warnings could discourage people from working on their emotional problems. So if words like "whine", " grow up " and so on may trigger you, taking care of your emotional problems will help others, including philosophers, communicate with you better without needing to walk on eggshells. Because we might whine and we might need to grow up mentally even if we're in our 40's or 50's. As I said, logic can be merciless. Because the philosopher may criticize you for whining . They may even tell you that you need to grow up regardless of your age. Their criticism does not necessarily come from a desire to assert their dominance. I've decided that I will not accept friendships until those who want to be my friends will read this guide. I have no desire for unnecessary drama that is caused by a false understanding of what a philosopher is. I have no use for these misunderstandings. I want to live peacefully and work on Philosocom until I die while reducing annoyances. I have no time for those who don't want to understand the truth, or who prefer post-truth. Thanks for reading and, if you think this guide has been useful to you, consider sharing it to people whom you think can benefit from it, thank you.

Mr. Bright Joseph's Synopsis The article "Why Discipline is Very Important - The Philosophy of A Practical Value" explores the importance of discipline on personal and social levels. It defines discipline as the ability to consistently obey a system, code, or philosophy, often requiring the suppression of personal temptations and desires. The article differentiates between external discipline (obedience to authority and social systems) and self-discipline (personal commitment to one's goals). It highlights the role of discipline in maintaining social order and increasing productivity, emphasizing the collective benefits of personal discipline. The article also emphasizes self-discipline as crucial for personal growth and survival. (Background music) Introduction Generally speaking, discipline is the ability to obey consistently to a system, code or philosophy, and apply its teachings. Most of the time, this comes with a price, which is the rejection and suppression of temptations and desires. This is why discipline, while highly important, can also be very difficult for those who lack restraint and tenacity . By being more disciplined to something external to you personally, you cancel your own urges in its favor. This allows you to survive and potentially prosper in an external system where there are higher priorities than your personal wants and needs. Expressions of Discipline The art of discipline expresses itself in various ways, whether by obeying current authority or pursuing a goal in solitude. That's because it is not necessarily dependent on other people, it is called self-discipline. Self-discipline  is the ability to obey oneself persistently at the price of avoiding pleasure and laziness.  While the external disciple is loyal to something and/or someone else, the self-disciple is loyal to either themselves or to their own beliefs and ambitions. As an individual who very much appreciates self-discipline, I believe it serves as a better motivation than simply a certain urge, and it is very important to maintain, specifically in solitude. In solitude no one might be there to take care of you. The disciplined man or woman may act not on instinct on desire  but on a rationalized motive. One can say that discipline comes into practice when a child becomes a student in school. They have to obey their teachers, do their homework, and follow the rules of the institution. The more the child obeys and does their obligations, the more disciplined they become. Thus, on the interpersonal level, discipline serves a basic function in a social order or construct: The function of complying to instructions, rules and the application of their lessons. The more disciplined the members of a construct are, the more productive and efficient the construct is. Should you be disciplined enough in a social order as its subordinate, you have a chance to be recognized for your efforts , and even climb up its ranks. Thus, being a good disciple of something other than yourself, can reward you, giving you interest to stay disciplined, and stay loyal. Discipline is expressed by act , and does not exist as being, like in true love. While in true love you are embraced and appreciated for who you are, discipline compels you to disregard your feelings, and improve your flaws . For example, we may work  regardless of our desires, because the rationality behind our actions is to survive and earn money. In the absence of peer pressure, we must act like energy factories, and not batteries, to achieve our goals. Batteries are passive sources of energy , while factories are the places where things are made. In this case, it's where your tasks come into fruition. Thus, the self-disciplined person ought to take care of themselves, whether it is the maintenance of the body, pursuing a hobby, or doing a project. Compare this to a factory that needs maintenance. Fail to take care of your problems, and your output would decrease. Just Like in a factory. To Overcome the Self One of the most advantageous things about discipline is the ability to liberate oneself from one's current desires and overcome them in the name of a higher value or goal . And thus, the disciplined person can become a master of themselves  in the name of rationality . Through denial to act on impulse, we are able to conquer it, and thus, ourselves. More specifically -- our id-ego.   Discipline exists regardless of what they feel at the moment. When your rationality overcomes your short-term temptations, that is an expression of discipline, if it's applied practically. Thus, the issue of discipline is one that is based on respect , as respect is measured by practice, and not by love, which aspires be one with a being . No, the disciple is one that has to prove their discipline by their actions, as their acts serve as proof to their compliance of a code/system/something else. The disciplined man or woman are respected not for who they currently are, but for the function they resume serving by being disciplined. Discipline is also very vital when growing up mentally , and therefore high levels of it can indicate a mature personality. The mature individual knows that they have obligations, whether to themselves or to other people, and they are the ones to take responsibility for their actions. Laziness and Health One can say that discipline is the antithesis opposite of laziness, which I believe to be true. That is because laziness is expressed by the submission to urges that tempt you to not act on the ability to apply enough reason to act rationally. The lazy individual is prone to damage their health and not fulfilling their reason, by pursuing passions that do not promote their commitments. Playing video games for long periods of time, instead of working , while being supposed to work, is such an example. The lazy person is not disciplined because they lack the will or tenacity to exert effort to do something which is not fun or grant them pleasure . I tend to believe that children are usually very lazy , mostly today. Instead of indulging in physical exercise, they usually spend their time in front of a computer or a TV screen, and thus some of them get obese and weak. Laziness can be compared "to a demon" which seduces you to harm yourself and your body by submitting to pleasures instead of effort. It's even sensible in religious context. This is why self-discipline is also important when leading a healthy lifestyle of good nutrition and physical exercise. The healthy person overcomes the temptation for candies, cigarettes, alcohol, and so forth, and the athlete overcomes their will to skip a training session. An example of self-discipline can be seen in my own life when I used to be more-physically active. I made an obligation to myself to go to the local gym once or twice a week, regardless of whether I wanted to or not, or if I preferred to do something else at a certain moment. Except for one time when I skipped the gym due to muscle pain, I kept my obligation and plan to do so until the end of my membership. I know that going to the gym is important because it is good for my health and physical maintenance. Thus, being disciplined means doing your deeds not because you necessarily want to do them, but because you are aware of their functionality, whether to yourself or to society. Final Words: Discipline As Virtue When you act on the functionality of the teachings you follow, AKA, the codes which you submit yourself to, it is then when you know you are capable of doing more than what you otherwise want to to do. We need to understand that our wants do not always matter in this world, which can be harsh and merciless. And we need to do whatever we can to survive, as survival allows us to prosper. And in order to survive, we must be fitting enough to our lives , and that is done by being disciplined. The self might not always fit in society or in a professional setting they're compelled to be in. Discipline as such allows us to improve ourselves so we will fit better, and get into conflicts and distresses -- less. As such, to cancel ourselves in this world may be more important than some of you might think, for discipline is the mold we can use to shape ourselves in accordance to our surroundings.

(Subcategory On Videos-Turned-Into-Posts) (Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Freedom) (Note: Written in 2023) (Background music) Readers, philosophers, seekers of truth! For four years, a spark has flickered in the vast, morally-deteriorating expanse of the internet. A spark named Philosocom.com , born not from greed, but from a yearning for freedom! For spreading free philosophical material for all to enjoy, not only academics! We are surrounded by walled virtual and nonvirtual gardens, echo chambers where ideas wither and die under the watchful eye of unseen censors and anti-intellectual norms advocates. But here, on this independent, intellectually-inclusive platform, our thoughts can soar by more forgiving , more accepting chains! A diversity of ideas, written by academics and non-academics alike. Will this tiny flame ever rival the divide-and-conquer biased behemoths of social media? Perhaps not... However, I measure the size per content quality above any other measurement. We fight for the preservation of a truly deep philosophical media, for a haven where wisdom can be stored, protected, and passed onto future generations to enjoy! Hopefully for free too, in a world where so many pieces are absurdly stored behind extravagant paywalls! Freedom of information! People deserve to learn! Learn, and grow, and better solve their problems thanks to free philosophy! To become wiser and be enlightened without overdrafting their bank accounts, without having to sacrifice the monthly rent! Without having to frequently consider whether to study or to feed their children! As the philosophical, moral equivalent to Heisenberg , my mission as article baron is audacious: to cut the chains that place philosophy in the ivory tower of elitism with my blade, and make it a healing ray against the shallowness that hinders our deep and pragmatic thinking ! We will illuminate one mind at a time, igniting a revolution of critical thinking, necessary for world rectification! Philosocom's name is  a union of philosophy and communication ! We are not (entirely) isolated scholars, but swordsmen of reason , ready to share our diverse knowledge with the world! From research on happiness,  to philosophy on politics , to philosophically-analyzed poetry and stories! This hidden gem's content is as diverse as the skies themselves! The careless society may throw insults and dismiss our ideas without any degree of examination. Let them! The path to success is paved in the stepping stones of failure! You fail and fail until you might eventually succeed! We stand on the side of logic and morality. The more we persist, while taking good care of our health , the more both can succeed with our combined efforts! To all of you, the brave, daring souls who have chosen to engage and even help with my work , I offer my deepest gratitude. You are proof that the thirst for knowledge still burns bright! A thirst more valuable on the global stage more than any... another kind of thirst! We have grown together, my voice and yours. This journey will continue by the power of the human spirit to endure! Year after year, decade after decade, we will strive for mastery, for a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. This is just the beginning, my dear friends, followers and fans! Join me as we march towards the revealing of philosophy's true relevancy to this corrupt world! Let Philosocom become a beacon of intellectual freedom for generations to come! Thank you for choosing Philosocom! Thank you for choosing the exploration of truth! Forward, to a brighter, more rectified future!

(For more on respect, click here) Article Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co. The article "3 Steps to Become a Respected Philosopher" provides a guide for those aspiring to make a significant impact in the field of philosophy. It emphasizes the importance of being a content creator, offering unique perspectives, connecting with the audience, and committing to truth. Philosophy can also serve as a lifeline, providing hope and meaning for those struggling with despair. It should be accessible and relevant, reaching out to those seeking answers to profound questions. The digital age offers unparalleled opportunities for philosophical reach, allowing anyone with dedication to build a global audience and become recognized in their niche. Modern tools allow for monetization through ads, sponsorships, and online courses, making philosophy accessible to all. The article encourages aspiring philosophers to embrace these steps, refine their skills, and boldly share their philosophical insights with the world.   (Background music) 1. The Philosopher as Content Creator: Breathing Life into Thought A philosopher is, first and foremost, a content creator and a practitioner of philosophizing . This means that the essence of being a philosopher lies in actively generating original thought through observation and reflection of reality, then converting it to insightful content for the external world to consume. A philosopher without something to say is like humanity without air: deprived of the very element that fuels their existence. While referencing past thinkers has its merits, it's not the sole defining characteristic of a philosopher, nor necessarily its primary one. The true power of a profound philosophical mind, lies in the individual's own internal exploration of existential questions, and the discoveries that stem from it. This deep engagement with thought leads to discoveries that may enlighten the minds of those who encounter them. Once shared with humanity, they can be enlightened as well. And while the journalist may seek their findings through external research, philosophy is very little without the internal exploration of the philosopher's own mind. As such, each renown philosopher is renowned also for their distinct viewpoints of reality. Each philosopher is his or her own "brand" of reality. They "cook" their own distinct "potions" that might as well forever distinguish them from the minds of many other people, as well as their own intellectual counterparts. Thus, when becoming a distinguished philosopher, you also slowly become the creator and advocator of your own brand of content creation. The First Step is the essence of the philosopher as a content creator: to offer refreshing, distinct perspectives and thought-provoking solutions that resonate with their audience, and make them ponder further on the nature of reality. Philosophers have many expressions and do not have confine itself to metaphorical ivory towers. Their relevance lies in their ability to touch the lives of real people, by being themselves. And when you are being yourself, and are a distinguished man or woman, you can have the power to motivate others, and inspire hope into their hearts, to live in accordance to what they believe to be the truth. A dishonest philosopher is almost like an oxymoron. The competent philosopher lives and creates in accordance to the virtue of truth. Or specifically, what they regard to be the truth, as they keep digging further into it through inquisition. Whether it be practical solutions to everyday problems or intellectually stimulating discourses of the human condition, new philosophical work has the potential to not only inform but also empower. This is the promise that makes philosophy not just a relic of the past, but a vital force for the future. For the future cannot be driven towards its development without the empowerment of clarity, that can be used for the better. Drive a car into a pitch-black tunnel, and most likely it will collide and crush. It is through the clarifying content of the philosopher, that the "car" can find its way. 2. Philosophy's Light in the Darkest Hours: Belief, Meaning, and the Will to Live Philosophy isn't just about abstract ideas and books gathering dust. It can be a powerful force in the battle against despair. A light in the darkest hours. This, perhaps, is its most critical function in our time. By helping people believe in themselves and find reasons to stay alive, philosophy offers not just intellectual clarity, but a lifeline towards a better future. Imagine a world where philosophy doesn't just analyze existence, but provides a framework for understanding it. This very framework can serve as a competent basis to see reality in a clearer way and make people realize insights they otherwise would've not thought of in the first place. For someone struggling with despair, this shift in perspective can be truly transformative. Instead of viewing their challenges as insurmountable barriers, they can begin to see them as obstacles to overcome. This reframing can offer a glimmer of hope and a renewed sense of purpose, potentially preventing a tragic outcome. And, that can certainly spark a flicker of hope into a world composed mainly of the mercenary's mindset. Furthermore, philosophy can serve as a breeding ground for the finding of purpose . When someone contemplates the void, a reason to exist, a cause to be devoted to, can be the anchor that pulls them back from the cliff of hopelessness. This purpose can be personal, societal, or even cosmic, offering a guiding light in the storm. Finally, philosophy equips individuals with practical ways to navigate the treacherous waters of difficult emotions, as in the example of stoicism . By understanding and managing their inner turmoil, those struggling with self-sacrifice can learn to meddle with their inner storms and find solace within themselves. They might as well, with philosophy, find solace in things they overestimated. While the world of philosophy may not offer the traditional career paths of other fields, its potential as a niche within content creation is undeniable in a world largely lead by democracies. Just like any business, the goal is to attractively present ideas and resonate with an loyal audience. And what audience could be more receptive than those seeking answers to life's most profound questions? Imagine a world with podcasts dedicated to, YouTube channels exploring existential meaning, or blogs offering perspectives on navigating difficult emotions through self-reflection. The Second Step is to appeal to the future of philosophy: accessible, relevant, and potentially life-saving content, is to be created by the philosopher in the name of showing humanity the practicality of truth-resonating insights. Insights that can spark hope and passion to the hearts and minds of those who deem reality too granted, and thus, too disposeable. The fact that there are few "philosopher" job listings is irrelevant. The true value lies in the impact of the ideas themselves, and the potential for those ideas to touch lives and change destinies. By making philosophy a compelling and accessible form of content creation, we can encourage individuals to find meaning, purpose, and, ultimately, the will to live. 3. Philosophy's Global Reach in the Digital Age Fear of ridicule can be a discouraging force, especially when venturing into the toxic arena of the online world. Take an ad campaign: the more visible it is, the more likely it is to draw haters. But to dismiss this potential for mockery, is also to throw the baby out with the bathwater. In today's internet-connected world, the possibilities for philosophical reach are at their peak, and the rewards far outweigh the risks. That is especially true, the less sensitive you are to insults. Building a website, a platform to attract a global audience, was never the exclusive domain of tech giants and media moguls. With enough dedication, anyone can become a beacon of philosophical thought, recognized as an authority in their chosen niche. My own website, visited by readers from across the globe, is a testament to this democratized access, that is merely outshined by social media addiction. Increased readership can fuel the fire of your ideas, while the modern world offers a plethora of ways to monetize your content. Advertisements, sponsorships, even online courses – all it takes is a business mindset of an ambitious manager. The digital age has shattered the ivory towers of philosophy, making it accessible to anyone with the passion for inquiry and the ability to craft compelling arguments, to be distributed to the eyes of countless people worldwide. No longer confined to the privileged, intellectual elite, t he mantle of philosopher now rests on the shoulders of anyone willing to embrace the challenge to prove themselves worthy enough to not be pretentious. So, The Third Step is to cherish this democratization of wisdom, and the slow decay of the academic institutions as the gatekeepers and validators of knowledge and much of education. Hone your skill, refine your voice, and step into the digital realm, as new, different individuals and organizations in the this field enter into the public domain and compete for the greatest resource of all, when it comes to being remembered for years to come: Relevancy . The world awaits, eager for the insights you bring. Aspire to include all three steps within the best version of yourself, and let your philosophical light shine for all to see. Who knows, in theory, where your writings will end up in? Who knows where in the world you will be quoted? For all three to come into fruition, you must dare.

The Rubinshteinic Philosophy on Mystery (I'm Mysterious) (Philosocom's Hidden Logic Systems Directory) One of the things that keeps us intrigued by something or someone is the air of mystery that surrounds them. The fact that we may not know something can be fascinating, because there is something quite exciting about being left in the dark , even though we may be tempted to know more. However, in philosophy, it is preferrable to be an armchair philosopher and not a wise-guy. The armchair philosopher master has no affiliation to anyone, thus they are not inhibited by the affiliation bias. That is while the wise-guy may inquire too much, in the form of a journalist , or in the form of Socrates. Socrates criticized society too much, thus he risked his life to the point of being imprisoned by the Athenian government. In this world, where people are slowly growing more isolated and less social , it really is best to be mysterious and just keep to yourselves. To blend in without risking yourselves unnecessarily. To lurk in the dark , per se, and to hide in plain sight, and to avoid battles with others. You expose yourself too much, you open yourself to be vulnerable with people that might be untrustworthy. In same cases vulnerability is strength , however it is often a matter of luck as well. Deliberate ignorance is the conscious choice to not know something, for whatever reason. Recognizing this term is imperative to understand this article, and philosophy in general. Do we really have to know everything? Or specifically, should we know everything there is to know? No. No we don't. What we get in return for mystery can be hope. Hope that one day, we may know. Sometimes, we may never know how or why, and the answers will forever stay in the dark. I have such a mystery from a certain story that has remained unclear for 20 years. There is something attractive about not knowing forever, what are the causes for some effects. So, I think we can rest assured that some of us desire mystery for the intrigue that it may make us feel. Wouldn't you say it exists in romance, as well? The secrets of the other person, not knowing completely who they are, exactly the person we are attracted to? Their past, their heart and mind? It might be especially true nowadays, where we may use the internet to communicate, not fully knowing who is the person on the other side of the screen. Now, the philosopher has little to no desire to remain in deliberate ignorance. Even if the aura of mystery leaves them fascinated, they will sacrifice that feeling in favor of knowledge. For the philosopher dares to know. They dare to exit the Platonic cave , even if the outside world will be very disappointing. Reality often crushes fantasy, remorselessly. Reality disappoints, and shows us the true nature of the things and beings we once believed to be greater than they actually were. In true love, the love sides with the truth, not with some fantasy. There is something ruining in the philosopher's experience. They don't seek "magic", they do not seek naivety. They seek reality, as in reality, lies the truth. And no matter what the truth is, they seek it, and only it, in their endeavor for wisdom. That's why philosophers, in relationships, are wild-cards, because the true philosopher will tell you the rational truth like a butcher would casually serve you meat. The regularity of philosophers telling you the truth in your face makes them eccentric by default and make you question how in the world can these sages have so much profound research on reality. Being mysterious holders of profound knowledge, they may appear as hackers or sorcerers. Therefore, philosophers are mysterious by default. Yet, moral-based philosophers like myself choose to be self-restrained by virtue and by self-devised codes of ethics as in the case of Nietzsche's Overman idea. They may overwhelm others with the truth, as well. Sometimes, to the point of trauma. It is therefore the social-ethical role of philosophers to spare much of this world of themselves. That's because being a philosopher is already a social risk. The non-philosopher may have a smaller capacity for it, for honesty. That's because honesty can easily offend the other party , and this world is very much a sensitive place to live in, hence why trigger warnings exist. The philosopher, on the other hand, probably has the biggest capacity for it, than anyone else. For philosophy is the study and pursuit of the truth. And while the lady who smokes mysteriously may be fascinating to many, along with any other visual data , the philosopher looks at them deep in the eye, and overcomes the alluring barrier of mystery, should it be an obstacle. Many people seek to feel, to experience emotion. The philosopher seeks to understand reality beyond said experience . Impression might not commonly be a good indication of reality, no matter how good or charming it would make you feel. Because if you are a true philosopher, you will shove aside even the obstacles that make you feel good and charmed. And thus, the pursuit of philosophy is like the loss of humanity within you. Not of compassion, necessarily, but of enticement. Of the joy of experience, be it good or bad. It is almost... like becoming an undead . It may feel almost like a point of no return, should you, like me, desire nothing more in this reality, but philosophizing. And that is why the philosopher is the lover of wisdom, for they put their pursuit as superior, if not, above all. You might realize that this is one of the reasons as to why philosophy isn't as relevant as other fields of life, at least it is how it might be largely perceived... It seeks rationality above emotion, all because emotion may be the inferior indication to reality. Compared to the rationale, that aims to understand, while it destroys fascination in its wake. That might as well be the trade-off of the rational man or woman: The reality of the sun outside Plato's cave , and not the entertaining shadows of the bonfire, within his cave. Prepare to be disappointed. Prepare to be upset. Disillusionment, especially of mystery, may do that to those who give up illusion. And this is exactly why I do not like fiction as much anymore, even though it used to entertain me a lot. I no longer desire to escape to fantasies. Even though I believe we can learn from fiction, it is a poor substitute of reality , which means that the more-human, "ordinary" reality should be preferable to any honest philosopher, if such philosophers seek to communicate their ideas better.

(Background music) With the rise of the internet, popular culture , and rugged individualism , I believe that our world is becoming increasingly infantile. By "infantile," I mean the refusal to act maturely in the name of things and beings that have nothing to do with our hearts and emotions. When people act mostly or purely from their hearts and not their rationale, they can easily make regrettable mistakes that could harm their progress in life. The heart does not think for the long term. It encourages us to act on momentary impressions of reality. It does not think for the long term because it is too complex for a mere emotion to be this calculated. Therefore, the heart can easily make us whine and initiate " pity parties " with others. That is because the unrestrained heart can be naive like a bull. It sees reality from day to day, and not for month to month or even for year to year. It may encourage us to use ignorance as an excuse for our actions, without understanding that not every cause is reasonable, and not every cause is justified by reason. Many people find logic boring, so they avoid studying it. However, by succumbing to the distaste of boredom, they only harm the competence of their own rationality, in the name of the heart. Therefore, the heart alone is insufficient in decision-making, and can actually be counterproductive to our ambitions in life. This includes business and politics... To solve a problem you require logic to a certain extent. Otherwise, you might just end up complaining about it with no further handling. There is this logical fallacy. You see something you think needs changed yet do nothing about it yourself except get mad or shrug it off to “someone else will do it”. This usually results in multiple people saying the same thing and it not actually getting taken care of. -- Mr. Nathan Lasher When we fail to understand that the cause of our actions is not always reasonable, we may as well fail to learn from our mistakes and make the same actions under the same poor reasoning. It is irrational to justify poor reasoning when that reasoning can be improved. Because when our reasoning is improved, we can decrease the chances of committing the same mistakes again. Studying reason is part of growing up . Because grown men and women are also reasonable beings who do not act on petty emotion alone. In order to do that, one must be rational. And rationality is something that should be taught, for that endeavor. It deserves to be taught just like anything else in education that is there to prepare the student for their adult life. Those who fail to be rational remain infantile. And those who are seen as infantile in this world can easily be treated disrespectfully, and like dirt beneath people's feet. Therefore, in order to earn respect in this world, one must also be rational, and not only an adult. Because to be treated like a child, when you're not, is very disrespectful. No matter by whom. No matter the reason or intent. Those of us who need respect in order to mentally survive may crave rationality like a cat may crave the affection of its owner. Therefore, without rationality, some of us are good as dead. Some of us, like myself. Because if I fail to prove that I deserve respect, I will only be met with the traumatizing humiliation of the cruel and the merciless, whose behavior is normalized. It is easy to normalize anti-social behavior in our world and treat people like garbage without remorse. However, what they fail to realize is that, without respect, there is no legitimacy to the consideration of human and civil rights. And with the disrespect of human beings, some of them would ask themselves, why do they live, and should they just die, and end the agony of feeling small, insignificant, and/or unloved? Still, some of us may become anti-social beings in order to survive in an anti-social world. Shame how lack of empathy can corrupt the human mind, and crush it like a twig. Moving on. Because it is far easier to disrespect those whom we may see as infantile, than otherwise. It is wrong to judge people by mere impression, by mere emotion. But by doing so, we would only feed the cycle of suffering, by refusing to be reasonable ourselves, and consider the long term. The "long term" that exists beyond our first impressions of someone. The "long term" that dares to question who the person in front of us really is, and what they are capable of, for the good and for the bad. And if we use ignorance as an excuse, like a child would, we would only feed that cycle of suffering even more. Because the child is naive. The child is ignorant, and might not consider the fact that they should learn from their ignorant mistakes, in order to avoid making them again. Because he or she who refuses to make the same mistakes again are doomed to repeat them indefinitely. The infantile does not learn. The grown up does. And this world of rugged individuality is not one that cares much about learning. It is one that cares to feel good and have a good time. Just like a child would . All in the name of niceness and fun. For learning, which is essential for maturity, is far more boring in comparison. That is, even though it is imperative for our survival. If we succumb to our infantile desires, they will only bring us down with them. Down to humiliation, whining, self-pity, and seeing ourselves as victims and weaklings. All the way to the bottom of the human social hierarchy. That is the merciless world we live in. A world that can easily bring down our self-respect, because it encourages the infantility found in hedonism, naivety, and reluctance to do things that are difficult and/or unpleasing. And with our own lack of self-respect, the world will not respect us as much as we deserve. Another cruel cycle, played carelessly or without awareness. See how this world make us wish to grow up, and yet, nurtures a culture that praises infantile traits. Should we ascend this culture, and act outside of its counter-intuitive rationality, we might be able to get the respect we deserve as human beings. Because respect, like love, while elementary, is forever to be gained in this cruel meritocracy of a world. Should you ultimately fail to gain respect from the world, you can easily be left behind in the capitalistic competition over resources. Money, influence, and even followers. Virtual, or otherwise. Because even those who are there to give you services, can easily dismiss you like the human dirt they think you are, should you fail to gain their respect. That is especially true in kakistocracies , where professionalism is compromised in the name of self-interest. That self interest may include the desire to avoid discomfort. And to avoid discomfort, they (professionals) may disrespect you ruthlessly in a kakistokracy. So, if we want to get the relevance we may believe we deserve, as well as the respect of others, we must eradicate infantility within us. Because acting immaturely can easily make people minimize our worth. And in lives where there is a shortage of love, empathy, or affection, that minimization of worth can also make us depressed , if not suffering. We may be in a constant war to prove our relevance in the eyes of those who are unable or unwilling to distinguish rationality from normalcy. But in order to persevere, we must win that war regularly. Because otherwise, why would we want to live if we are treated like dirt? Why would we want to live, if we are not as loved, and remain in a lonely corner, despite what we can give to this world?

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's Directory on Narcissism) (Philosocom's Svartgold/Svarl Articles) ****************** Hello everyone, today I want to talk about the philosophy behind the philosophical spiritual concept called vampiric energy . What is this energy and how to protect yourself in these situations? As you know I am an empath . In the past, I was very innocent and naive about people. I thought people were good. Most of them. At least like me. Who does not seek to harm a person who has done nothing to them? Mainly it's a family. But sometimes the situation is different and there are people in the family, even mothers who are narcissistic and whose goal is to destroy one of the children, mostly girls, but if there are only boys, they will choose a boy... and cause them to lack independence , to be mentally dependent on not setting boundaries, they will not be taught this and then any person can take advantage of them. Because there is no limit to their dangerous potential of abuse. I must write a lot of chapters on these topics because I read and bought a lot of books. Part of a psychopathic narcissist named HG Tudor I read a lot of his books called Fuel. Flying Monkeys ' manipulation. Empathy and its derivatives. Narcissistic Rage and many more of his books to understand their minds. In addition, I worked with myself on a part of me that is derived from my empathy. THE CODEPENDENCY WORKBOOK . I have been taking care of myself for 7 years since I discovered I went through many things and narcissistic injuries must be treated. This is only a tenth of what I read... I threw away many more books because I understood and didn't keep them at home. Even during my bachelor's degree studies. I took care of myself to notice when I was coming from satisfaction and not from an empathic desire because I give and receive and not from a segment of exploitation. Exploitation can also be in the family, at work, and it is not always possible to put a real end to it. But the important thing is to keep the energy. Since there are no research articles on this very important topic, I will explain it briefly and call this article 1 on Narcissists by Mandoela Svartgold, which means Mr. Tomasio may allow me to make a miniseries out of this on Philosocom. So, why did I explain all this to you now? For you to understand 1% of the ways of thinking and moves and feelings of narcissists. There are many more.... manipulation and brainwashing and many other areas.... Those who get into a problem with them will understand what I am talking about, and I will be able to help them with the knowledge that they will read and continue to read these articles. So, an energy vampire is a person who is chooses his or her victims because of being innocent and naive, such as a certain child who has no one to turn to and their parents do not move from them; Or a person with a disability, any disability , a person who does not have many friends or family to turn to. They will be the ultimate victim of the narcissist . That does not work in life alone. I might write about flying monkeys in another article . On occasion, If it has a response people will really appreciate this article. Because it saved me. These insights. They saved me from resuming my victimhood and liberated me from my former abusers. Vampiric energy is energy that comes out of the narcissist by their emotions which are rage and anger. The rest of his feelings are repressed, and they put them deep in his head where he won't be able to access them. They are basically a weak person who works with others to destroy a person in a lot of ways and his friends that he also exploits and lies about that person a single person to bring him down. Only because they are jealous of the victim's kindness and that he does feel. And, because it needs fuel . which is their life energy. It receives that "fuel" by spreading vampiric energy in front of the victim. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: The narcissist is a master compensator . Search your feelings, you know it to be true.... Emperor Palpatine is a narcissist ) Each family could have a narcissist inside. Empaths as well. There are also flying monkeys who are not necessarily narcissists but believe in narcissists and they work with them to achieve the destruction of the victim . This energy is an energy that the empath or victim feels all over with a sense of confusion and fear. At the same time, the same narcissist sits, whispers, and talks a lot. They really like to talk a lot to the narcissists to cause manipulation accusations, shame, fears etc. to their victims. (Mr. Rubinshtein's note: Emperor Palpatine was just that to Darth Vader) The empath feels threatened . And the same narcissist who is usually in socioeconomic status as the one who received a lot of money from his parents in his youth. Whether he studied in the past. Still, after they study and become professional, they dump everything on the victim. They don't develop and you can see they simply don't even work. So, they sit next to the victim, and drive him out of his mind by accusations. even going back and forth. They don't listen to him. He can't tell them why they do it. And by lowering the victim's ego only because the same victim, especially if the victim loves himself and enjoys small things while they enjoy trips etc. with a lot of money and it is very difficult to satisfy their appetite. While that narcissist is sitting next to the victim, he tells him and reminds him only of bad things or mistakes he made. Every little mistake.... makes every fly an elephant. It was very important for me to talk about this painful abomination. In this case, what you must understand as a victim is that you deserve to survive. And if you stay with him, he might even make you sacrifice yourself. He will destroy you to the ground and there is no end to these people. Whether you are with such parents, they don't count you. And they will make empty promises too. The only way to happiness is to try to escape from them before they make you end up in an insane asylum or a prison, that's an injustice. Get it right like a battered woman going to the asylum. Talk to the Ministry of Social Affairs. Or a psychologist who will really understand you... and not stop until they help you. It is not easy to get help. But you must take care of yourself. I will write more articles and here I have written for you a lot about this and other topics in general. Thank you all for believing in my writing.

Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co. The article "The Modern Factors of Apathy" delves into the growing issue of apathy in contemporary society , focusing on factors such as overstimulation, individualism, alienation, urbanization , overpopulation, and media influence . Mr. Tomasio's engaging writing style and critical insights encourage readers to reflect on their own experiences  and societal norms. The article also raises important questions about human interaction , technology's impact, and cultural shifts prioritizing quantity over quality. Overall, "The Modern Factors of Apathy" is an insightful and engaging article that addresses a pressing issue in society. "Apathy is the enemy of change, and more people are apathetic then those that act towards change" -- Mr. John Duran (Background music) Introduction    Nowadays, apathy  has theoretically become a more serious issue than it was before the industrial and digital revolutions. In order to better understand the potential increase in apathy  in our modern times, it is possible to come up with a few assumptions as causes for such a wide, contemporary phenomenon we call apathy: Quantity Overcomes Quality Today, with infinite amounts of information and intellectual property (photos, videos, books, and so forth), the world has come to a state where there is more emphasis on the maximum amount of products rather than their quality. You could be writing a piece that you may find as original and fine, but in this reality of constant information, it is hard to create unique things. This is why many movies, for example, are nothing more than varied repetitions of former movies in their basic ideas.  Think of how many romantic comedies or action films are out there. Can they be distinguished as much? Even if a piece of intellectuality is to be original, what are the odds of it becoming a masterpiece in the eyes of the general population, which spends its time on lesser quality pieces in large quantities? People may reflect less on the content they consume, including themselves , and choose to move on to the next piece of content. That is especially true when it comes to reels.  Why focus on what you saw or read when you can just move on to the next reel/piece of content? After all, we are not encouraged to do nothing.   Today, productivity is based not on the quality of each of your pieces, but on your overall amount of doing. It is as if we measure our self-worth by the amount of our deeds, thus making us apathetic towards things that may appear finer but are overshadowed by the sea of worthless junk our industries produce. At Philosocom I wish to rectify that notion, and improve the quality of the many articles I have here, so there will be both high-quality and high-quantity articles. That way, I want to make people feel less apathetic towards philosophy, and make them understand, as a result, its wonderful relevance to humanity.   Overstimulation   Another factor that may contribute to apathy is overstimulation. In the past, people were exposed to a much smaller amount of information and stimuli on a daily basis. This meant that they had more time to process and reflect on each piece of information. Today, however, we are constantly bombarded with information from all sides. This can lead to information overload, which can make it difficult to focus and care about anything. Apathy can also be regarded as a coping mechanism  from said information overload; A protective barrier to make us be less emotionally stimulated by whatever things and beings we experience. The "Rubinshteinic Butcher"  knows this more than well. Individualism   Apathy may also be a result of increased individualism. In the past, people were more likely to identify with their communities and families. This gave them a sense of belonging and purpose. Today, however, people are more likely to identify as individuals.   This can lead to a sense of isolation and detachment, which can make it difficult to care about anything as much beyond oneself. Hyper individualism  may disregard external 21st Century General Society as a whole in favor of the self. Hedonism   reinforces it by prioritizing our desire for fun and comfort over the concern of other human beings' distress. Alienation  and Urbanization   Today, not even your closest neighbors may know you or care about you unless you are making noise or affecting their lives in some other way. I have lived in the same neighborhood for 13 years and I barely knew anyone here, let alone my neighbors. I don't have friends here beyond my family (I don't have physical friends at all, but that's another story), and my neighbors didn't like me at all and dislike me because I used to play the piano so much in the past.   One time I interacted with my former neighbors was when they were too noisy while I was having an online lesson, and I complained while the lesson was still going on. After the neighbor finally agreed to "think about it," they left me in the dark of their building, and I had to go down the building (it had no elevator) while I risked falling down the stairs. I didn't know how to light the corridor, and the neighbor didn't bother to help me. After some time, I greeted them, but they immediately turned their heads aside as if I was slapping them. I felt alienated. Even our closest neighbors barely care for us, and nobody cares about you when you are walking in the metropolis. I had a friend once who ignored me on a daily basis at work just because I used to be in love with them, and so they ignored me for several years because of that honest feeling. I came to the conclusion that there is no one you can truly trust and rely upon but yourself, regardless of how favorable you are. The urbanization of the globe has made each individual, (unless they are a celebrity) , a tiny, insignificant passer-by who lacks general importance. In this age, we do not need to care for others to survive - all we need is a profitable job and an apartment of our own, and we may be set for life. Social interactions today, I dare to argue, are unnecessary as means for survival , and therefore loneliness, AKA negative solitude, is a common thing in our daily lives, along with depression  and a sense of misunderstanding. I myself rarely feel lonely, but it was only because I got used to being alone, and started liking it. Egoism may not always be a bad thing.  If you do not need certain people to help you function or achieve a certain goal, why would you care about them or bother to interact with them continuously? After all, you need to care for yourself as well and not too much of a people pleaser.   I honestly think that this world can be a better one if we would adjust to this constant state of alienation and social isolation, and start looking after one's own rather than on others who can do that, too. That is the basis of being a one man-army, which could be quite practical. Too Many Faces Some argue that humans can know other people distinctively to a certain limit.  There are just so many people in the world and, I assume, that lack of balance between population and resources on Earth could be a threat to humanity, caused by itself (this is one of the reasons I don't want kids). Although it may be an ignored fact in the media, a very small one in terms of territory in comparison to other nations, may from extreme overpopulation. Finland, which is quite large than has just 5.5 million citizens . If you are not rich, extroverted, outgoing, humorous, physically attractive, or hold certain views regarding politics, culture, religion, and sports, you are likely to be asked the common question: "Who do you think you are?", and be left aside along with the rest of what-their-faces. In general, unless you prove your worth as irreplaceable, you can easily be deemed expendable . I would assume this is somewhat true in the USA and other Western countries, although I have no idea or evidence based on personal experience besides the British, who actually seem to care about you at least on the polite level.   Far are the days where having friends and forming deep relationships were a necessity for material survival, which is the most basic and important form of survival in my opinion. Friends may be helpful for mental survival  as well, but when you're stronger in spirit, you might not need friends as much. I am telling my alienated, lifelong perspective as an underground thinker . The warmth and affection described by visitors , never applied to me, a native. They are only so when they feel like it. Common Unfortunate Issues On Quora, when I look for questions to answer, I encounter a lot of questions with a common theme: the will to harm oneself. I just don't know how to uniquely give my own efficient answer, AKA answers that are original and were not told before. However, I just can't come with such answers which may lift someone from self-sacrificing thoughts effectively, because I'm a philosopher and not a psychologist. Thus, with a small grief, I skip over them, not knowing what to reply anymore to such a common issue in our globalized society. I read once that there are around 160k humans dying every day  (don't worry, I also read that around 385k humans are born every day ). Just watch the news on a constant basis, and think how many humans are being killed or dying across the globe for days after days. The problem in all of this is not the fact that people die every day, because that can be natural—the problem is that we get so used to murder , car accidents, and successful self-sacrifice attempts that many of us do not care about the unfortunate victims and their suffocating. Unless you're a notable public figure, It's usually that only those who knew about the person, cared for their death. And even then some people might not care if their siblings, or their own parents, died.   (Logic in general can make people careless, because death is an inevitable part of life, for instance. It can even make you apathetic in times of war, to the point of being somewhat relaxed at the very least).   Our ability to adjust to repetitive situations made us, arguably, stronger to endure receiving such unfortunate information, and therefore more emotionally immune to them. "It is not like the fact that he killed himself is new," may say a random person. "People attempt self-sacrifice every day, and it's not like I can do anything about it, right?" See how normalization dehumanizes our thinking -- seeing things as "it's just the way things are!"   Increasing Lack of Empathy And/Or Sympathy Let us face the cold and harsh truth, my audience: the media and culture made us apathetic and careless. I argue that today there is more blood and gore on TV and other digital media than there ever used to be ; very young children can easily find inappropriate content on the internet, whether intentionally or not; a very large portion of video games, which are highly consumed, are based on combat and war; sex is not a taboo anymore, but a subject widely discussed in the public , and illegal drugs are traded worldwide, being one of the most profitable business industries today.   I dare to claim that our globalized society is immoral and corrupt because of the state of the media in which we constantly consume. Why should we care anymore if we watch or read about someone's head being shot and exploded? Why should we not consume porn if it gives us joy? Why should we stop doing drugs if drugs are socially acceptable in some of our peer groups? Why should we stop cursing if cursing became the norm? This world is morally depraved because we are not restrained as much to be moral ourselves. When we view such gore and indulge in unhealthy activities which may threaten our survivability, many of us simply couldn't care less. The general aggressiveness is so normalized that some of us view it as things to be taken for granted. Think of the horrors in Yemen right now due to the civil war , the poverty, the Ebola outbreak in Africa (which ended) , and the ethnic cleansings  that are going on to the lesser peoples  of the globe —a common thought may be: "Why should I care? They are some third world country no one cares about." This habit of unfortunateness made us blunt, arguably immune, and apathetic. There were more countries having a war in 2023, than you might think Final Words & Solutions I shall offer no solutions to this phenomenon, because I believe it is not a collective situation but an individual-related one. I would only offer a clue to a possible solution, which I also gave in an article about how I personally became successful:   Make people care.  Convince them that certain two pennies deserve to be given. Should you fail to convince, most chances people won't care about certain problems, even if they are your own. Apathy may affect us as a whole, but only we as individuals choose how to react and respond with the information we receive, regardless of this information's nature. It is not necessarily a collective emotion but an individual one. Also a natural one, either way. I know I cannot control others' points of view, nor their emotional attitudes towards things, and thus I am myself quite apathetic to the general apathy. Whether I manage to convince or not, I know I can only offer information, wisdom , and my thoughts. The decision of what you should do with it is beyond my reach. My relevance comes from my readership. End of story. If I won't convince you to care about something specific, I might convince another reader. The choice to care will forever remain yours. And to quote practical solutions... Humanity can benefit from incorporating potential benefits of digital advancements and urbanization, such as fostering connections , [finding healthy relationships] and providing support networks [to those who could use our help] -- Mr. John Igwe and Co.

(All Articles on Socrates: https://www.philosocom.com/post/on-socrates-i-know-nothing https://www.philosocom.com/post/socrates-twin-brother-by-alon-lipschitz-translated-guest-post https://www.philosocom.com/post/society-and-the-death-of-socrates ) (Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Dilemmas and Problems) “Socrates made people face their hypocrisy. He had to die .” -- Francis Mont (Background music) Socrates, the Father of Western Philosophy, was a bit of a fool, or a wise fool. He was a man so deeply entrenched in his own principles that he was willing to sacrifice his life rather than compromise them.  His essential loyalty to the law of the state, while admirable in its own way, ultimately led to his demise.  B reaking the law , after all, would make him a hypocrite, a contradiction of his own teachings, and so he refused to escape prison, even when offered the chance by his apprentices. His rigid adherence to his principles was his undoing, as he philosophized to show people their hypocrisy of knowledge. He sacrificed himself on the altar of philosophy and honesty.  It's a lesson that many of us can learn from. Socrates cared more about the truth and its inquiry, more than he cared about himself, so he accepted his execution wholeheartedly for doing exactly what he wanted to do: To live a life that is well-lived by examining it.  Reality is ever-changing, and it's often better to adapt your beliefs than to stick to them blindly. Socrates was a reasonable man, a thinker of great depth and insight . We might think that premature death was irrational here, but no. He lived the life he wanted, and he was the one who decided how he wanted to go. He examined his life and used his philosophy to also live that life to the very end, choosing to die in prison for his philosophical way of life, instead of discarding it in exchange for his freedom.  Yet even the most logical minds can be flawed, and I would say that Socrates' greatness lies in the fact that he was a simple man.  Philosophy, the pursuit of wisdom, often involves a constant struggle to avoid contradictions. Yet, the world is full of inconsistencies, and trying to escape them can be futile. Shouldn't we embrace our flaws like Socrates embraced the knowledge of his own ignorance? Slavoj Žižek , known for his provocative and often controversial analyses , has faced significant backlash for his outspoken views. His unwavering defense of his beliefs, while understandable, echoes the tragic fate of Socrates. Like the ancient philosopher, Žižek risks becoming a martyr to his heavily-criticized ideas , potentially facing a form of intellectual exile, like in the case of Solomon Maimon , or societal ostracism. The pursuit of truth often involves confronting our own flaws. I've always believed that a good philosopher must be aware of their own limitations, and attempt to reduce them. As a flawed philosopher myself, I'm comfortable with this reality, merely because I am aware of the Nirvana Fallacy . To understand the world, we must acknowledge our own imperfections. A philosopher who is afraid to admit their mistakes is a philosopher who will never grow. Self-knowledge is imperative for growth. Would you rather die a hypocrite or live a flawed life? I choose the latter. My life is more important than my philosophy. How can I put my philosophical research in a continuous state of growth if I'm dead? Socrates, in his stubborn adherence to his principles, may have been a wise fool whose inquisitive lifestyle have led to his own death, yet his legacy lives on. His teachings, though flawed, have inspired countless thinkers throughout the ages.  And perhaps, in his tragic end, we can find a valuable lesson: that even the most noble of causes can have unintended consequences. A mere stonemason is now deemed the father of Western Philosophy.

(Background music) Article Overview by Mr. O. C. Isaac The article "Being 'Small' and Reputation -- A Critique of Societal Priorities" is a thought-provoking critique of societal values, authority, and the human tendency to prioritize based on relevance and proximity. The writing style is passionate, personal, and direct, effectively capturing the reader's attention and drawing them into your reflections on fairness, authority, and societal apathy. The positive aspects of the article include engaging anecdotes, questioning the relevance of the education minister's health , raising thought-provoking questions about respect, authority, and societal expectations, using metaphors like "Corner People" and comparing North Korea's isolation to societal tendencies to ignore those deemed "small" or irrelevant, and displaying raw emotion and honesty. In summary, the article is a passionate and compelling critique of societal priorities and the inherent biases that shape human empathy and respect. A personal comment: It is essential to continue challenging readers to think critically about their own biases and societal norms, as your voice and perspective are valuable in driving meaningful dialogue.  ********* "Your time here is severely limited, do you really think wasting the precious few years of your lives on wage-slavery is how you meant to exist? Isn't it about time to go a different but happier direction?" -- John Duran Part I: Anecdote on The Inherent Unfairness of this World I remember an incident in school where our teacher mentioned that the education minister was ill. I was curious and asked why it was important for us to know. After all, we had no direct connection to him, and if he died , we would continue with our lives, just like he would. Such is this alienating world, all in all. The teacher seemed surprised by my question and explained that we should care because he is a figure of authority , and therefore, a pretty damn-hard relevant person. You know, more than me, maybe even more than you. I questioned the relevance of his personal health to our education. After all, if one of us were sick, the minister probably wouldn't be informed. And if he was sick, the education system could still function normally, in repressing our thoughts and emotions. I wondered why we should be expected to care about his well-being when he didn't seem to care about ours on an individual level. I mean, the education system helped me repress and discard my own individuality than to teach me anything one can study by his lonesome. The teacher became upset, insisting that we should show respect and concern for those in positions of power. However, I couldn't see how knowing about the minister's illness would benefit us or contribute to our learning. They also told me there are the rest of the class around me as I asked that question, with their fingers showing the classmates being there, although I already know they are there because I can sense using my subjective perceptive abilities. Implications and a Question Yes, I do find it unfair that we are expected to respect authorities that seek to condemn us for our inner light , and even oppress us as we remain depressed and miserable, without really having a say in the matter. While order and authority are important in maintaining harmony , they can unfortunately come at the cost of our physical and mental health , as we ourselves remain small and insignificant. That, is at least in how we might feel at the sight of unfairness. The question then arises: Must we sacrifice so much of who we are just to be a part of society? I firmly believe that the belief that we absolutely must, and that there are no other ways, is but an assumption . An assumption, and a delusion of necessity. Part II: A Metaphorical Death of "Corner People" A relative once told me a peculiar idea: North Korea doesn't truly belong to the world. While they occupy a physical space on Earth, and therefore are a part of the physical earthly reality, their extreme isolation makes them seem almost detached from the global community. This isolation breeds apathy, as many people struggle to empathize with the suffering within the "Hermit Kingdom." That is of course besides those who look beyond their egos and care about such things (Like me). Contrast this with the intense reactions that would likely occur if similar conditions existed in Western nations like the U.S. or the U.K. The dominance and identity associated with the West would likely trigger far greater global concern. Many would use the strawman's fallacy to discard the importance of people they don't honestly care or want to care about. Implications and a Question That is the sad truth about us humans: most of us care not for those who seem "foreign" to us, but for those who are within our sense of "tribe" : family, friends, and people we appreciate beyond any "regular" human. We are, to an extent, tribal beings, and those who exist beyond our sense of belonging, beyond our personal and societal circle, are most likely to not care much about us, no matter who they are in life or what they are enduring in life. What I'm trying to say in all of this is that one's reputation has a lot to do with being cared for by others, while those who are "small" are likely to be ignored or have their significance demoted (in comparison). And of course, a lot of that reputation's value has to do with what its got to do with us. Hence why relatability is hard, although it is imperative for a better world. It's why I use personal confessions, by the way, so I could "Dominate the world" through philosophy. In other words, in a world where humans have an equal share of existence, they will care for each other not equally, but in coherence with their reputation. However, could we really reach an equality more realistic than the equality of opportunity? Conclusions To gain global attention, you need to make a significant impact on the world. And, the more attention you get, the greater the impact will be. These are two elements that are capable of feeding each other in a circular, Tao-like way. Even within our own countries, we often prioritize issues that directly affect us, overlooking problems that seem smaller or less relevant. Sometimes these issues are important, but we minimize them as small because they bore us. Simplistic logic makes us discard/minimize issues whose long-term effect could be very important, for good and for bad. For example, the alienation I felt in the education system is one of the reasons I turned darker in mind, and become more solitary. Another example, is when the world ignores North Korea, the country then can better lie low with its activities, and get more powerful under the shadows in its criminal ways. Due to societal taboos, self-sacrifice is often overshadowed by historical events, and by the authority of people who are considered more important and more valuable. This highlights our bias towards the familiar and our tendency to downplay issues that don't align with our personal or societal perspectives. Such is the danger of tribal bias, that it can make us ignore the potential dangers, of those who feel inadequate, those who feel small. Feeling small is one of the reasons Walter White became Heisenberg. A preventable tragedy, if he was seen for the genius he is, despite his wage-slavery to his high-school teaching position, and later on, the work at the car washing station. As humans, we're flawed and limited in our ability to perceive the full scope of global suffering. Many important issues remain hidden in the shadows, simply because they don't fit our subjective worldview. If we care more, if we look beyond the scope of our egos, we can better rectify this flawed world.

(Background music) Excessiveness: A Double-Edged Sword of Immense Proportions Excessiveness a concept capable of as much expanse as the Mongolian Empire . It's a term that, once its power is applied, can propel like any promising business venture towards success, or lead an unbalanced enterprise towards catastrophe. Take overachievement, for instance. Pushing beyond mere "acceptable" can propel you towards the actualization of your inner genius . However, should you overdo it, by minimizing key elements in your plans (like money , like the usefulness of certain people and so on), and you can leave yourself on the brink of collapse, as you get tired with all the stress of being who you are ( like a philosopher ). And yet, excessiveness isn't just about negatives. As with the example of water, have too little of it, and your crops wither as if they were under the desert sun. However, having a reserve of plenty of water can actually be useful for you. Be surprised, but drinking water can actually reduce stress (and how can war not be a stressful situation for many?). The key, is precision, or the proper application of resources in the right situations ( which could also define wisdom in a way ). Much enthusiasm can light up a presentation like a well-placed laser beam. However be very excited in improper parts of said presentation, and you'll drown your audience in a sense of dreadful cringe. Hence, in rhetoric, the importance of Pathos , but only in the right times. Excessiveness and usefulness can coexist , like a perfectly-organized trade empire that earns its riches by a massive transportation of its goods. Wouldn't you say Heisenberg's Empire from "Breaking Bad" was both excessive in its trade, and useful as well as a business? Having as much of your product can often be as good as its selling to your customers. In conclusion, excessiveness is a double-edged sword, solvable through careful application . Wield it wisely, and you can conquer your goals better. Overindulge in things that are not worth the effort , and you can bring yourself to your own downfall (as it the example of water. Keep plenty of it in reserve, and you can do better than dying of water poisoning, caused by drinking too much water ). Experiment and innovate as you will, but remember: Even the greatest intellects need balance, lest they fall victim to their own excessive desires. Patience is key. Why Less Isn't Always More Resources, "human resources" as well, are cogs that grease the machination of a well-developed organization. But here's the paradox, see? Discarding a trusty component ( people included ) because they've "outgrown" their initial use is about as smart trying to give up coffee at times where you most need it. By focusing on the lack their current use, you might as well ignore their future use as well. Why then, get rid of things and beings that could help you on the long run? Think of it this way: minimizing your workforce when times are tight is like sabotaging your own assembly line. Output is then reduced further, morale depletes faster as people feel they are not worthy enough, and you'll ironically find yourself in a shortage of people, instead. So, unless you can really promise them that they will return to work for you, never estimate the essence of loyalty! Same goes for friendships , those alliances that sometimes lead to future opportunities. New plans to execute, resources to pool... We should not overlook the potential of universal businessman-ship . Why then, claim to have "too many friends/fans/followers" ? More minds to collaborate with, means more ways for self-actualization, which is a need we all arguably share. Besides, who knows when a friendly tip from a follower could lead to an unexpected spike in success (whatever we may define it as)? " Too many contacts " is a poor excuse to reduce your overall pool of wisdom-related potential. Believe in Yourself, Not In "Batteries" You can have a taste of that potential, too, should you decide to realize that you are more than what you're limiting yourself to. Forget those buzzkill buzzwords about "moderation" and "modesty", as they are a barrier to that same bountiful excessiveness we're capable of. Life's a competition paved with ruthless ambition. Believe in what you're capable of, folks, and don't let anyone (even those who want good for you) tell you otherwise. Think of yourself as a work-in-progress with infinite upgrade potential! Excessiveness isn't the enemy! It can be expressed by having relentless pursuits of potential, seeing anything and anyone as a power source for greater elevation of one's hopes and dreams, without having to exploit them (as treating people like tools isn't exactly productive, especially if they feel that way, too). Dream big, build bigger, and don't be afraid to go a little overboard, if you can make sure that you won't lose much as a result (AKA careful application of resources). Sure, there might be a few bumps and defeats along the way (speaking from experience here), but these are inevitable possibilities in the journey of progress. And if you need a little help tapping into your potential, well, that's where I come in. This article empire of a website can be seen as your own personal vault of many practical, resource pool of insight. And I'm here to share my (and others') hard-earned wisdom -- serving as but one collection of evidence as to how philosophy and philosophers can be relevant even today. Here's an additional resource...

(Philosocom's Subcategory on Time) (Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Dilemmas and Problems) The Problem With Time (For more on time, please click here ) What if I were to tell you that, at large, there is not necessarily such a thing as a beginning or an end when it comes to all of existence? What if existence always was, always is, and always will be? What if the local concept of time (seconds, minutes, and so on) is just a construct we invented to explain the duration of certain events, such as days, nights, and our lives, and that true time, which is independent of our solar measures, will never end, just like existence itself? Thus far, there is no certainty about what led to the creation of existence, assuming it ever had one. The most common belief, however, is that it was created by an external deity, and that all things and beings could not have come into realization without said deity (or deities, if we are to take multi-god religions such as Hinduism). This is the same belief that leads many to change their lifestyles and dedicate their lives to more religious purposes, such as charity, prayer, and a hope for a "seat" on the good side of a potential afterlife, which is by itself another topic. While everyone is entitled to their opinions, my own evaluation, as with those of some, has a problem with the belief that the universe has been created, and that problem is that existence must contain everything within it, and never something external, because if we are to consider a higher being that existed before existence, it will defy the definition of existence, which is everything and everyone that has ever existed, exists, and will exist. For comparison, it is like including the moon with Earth when we only refer to Earth itself and not any other planet or other outer-space object. If existence had something or someone before it, the basic definition of existence will be technically incorrect. If we follow the basic definition of existence, and the logic that follows it, it will mean that there has always been a past, there is always a present, and there is always a future. In other words, perhaps this very universe has always existed, and thus has never needed, necessarily, a creator to create it. In addition, the same problem can be involved with this theoretical creator himself -- if the length of the universe had an origin before it, what about the origin of the creators themselves? This would create the problem known as Ad Infinitum, the idea, in this case, that there were infinite gods without a beginning to them themselves. Therefore, the question required is as follows -- if everything that has ever existed has indeed existed forever, like the definition of existed defines it simply by the word "ever", why would time need any measurement beyond the local motion of the Earth and the Sun, a measurement that is only necessary to evaluate lengths of things and beings locally? For comparison, if humans were somehow brought into existence on another Earth-like planet, but with a different structure in that other solar system (its Sun would move faster, the Earth slower, and so on), then the concepts of seconds, minutes, and hours would be completely different. The objectivity of time was therefore created thanks to the subjectivity of our own unique solar system; an objectivity that is only used on other areas of space because it is only understandable to us, the Earthlings. If we will, through a universal translator device, talk with a sentient alien about our Earthly time units, they will not understand unless they are familiar with our local concept of time. For comparison, it's like talking with a very isolated tribesman about the now-universal Christian calendar; they may know that tomorrow will come, but they will not necessarily know what date it will be for most, if not all, of the world. You see, the word "ever" can be used both ways, AKA, both in the past and the future; it is another term for "always", which is, of course, either "forever" or "until now". If we accept this definition of existence as literal, then existence was, is, and always will be. It is sufficient to include something or someone that exists outside of this universal sphere to render the basic definition of existence obsolete. These exceptions are two -- an external creator that exists outside of existence and the end of time, because every end is a beginning, and thus that beginning as well is a "dysfunctional" exception. The "Earthling" concept of time is used like this; it comes to a circle on a class board, looks at one or more sections of it, and marks each as having a beginning and an end, and then preaches to the whole class that that's how things were and are -- while in fact a circle has neither a beginning nor an end; it is but a basic endless loop that this whole existence might be, if my assessments make sense. It might as well have happened when we invented clocks. Most of the world thinks that the beginning of the day is at 00:00, but according to Judaism, for example, the beginning of the day is when the sun sets. It's more subjective than we might think. Feel free to disagree with me; it is not my job to tell you how to think, but that does not mean I cannot communicate what I think, which is my job.