The Search Bar

"Morality and ethics, when enforced as a Society, how are they ethical as all?" -- Mr. John duran (Subcategory Directory on Law and Order) (Background music) Police officers are, essentially, the enforcers of the law and of what their country defines as justice . As such, their use of power should be matched to the situation at hand and to what is accepted by the authority they enforce, as justice. Without this balance, the police will either become incompetent at their jobs, or state-funded thugs, defined by their disproportionate brutality. Unless the country is some sort of a peaceful paradise, police work will remain far from easy. There are so many values to preserve properly while on the job -- lower corruption, prevent avoidable deaths, detect criminals, endure harsh criticism from basically everyone, and so on. The police officers better not become corrupt themselves, or they will only enforce what they are required to oppress. In other words, being a local executor of justice will not always be rewarding beyond the pay itself. The police officer stands within a constant dilemma -- why serve a nation, or people, that constantly degrade and shame me, despite all the hard work I'm putting in the name of the law? We humans do not tend to praise those who stand in our way, whether or not our endeavors are legitimate. We will praise those who make us feel good , even if said feeling is against us, like in the state of unhealthy addictions. But many of us will condemn, degrade and belittle those who will try to stand in our way, even if their opposition is for our own good. In other words, we humans seek good, but not always the good that is within our best interests. Thus, the folk that'll try and block us, even if they're just doing their job, will be hurt by some of us -- not necessarily within the verbal area exclusively. Is the police force good? It depends on 2 questions -- whether or not the "Justice" they represent is good by widely-accepted standards, and whether or not its representatives are doing their jobs competently. And by "competently" I also refer to avoiding unnecessary brutality. Only that way one should be able to determine whether they are being punished/arrested for the sake of common good, and whether their punishment/arrestment is justified, even if it is, overall, uncomfortable. In the end, like any other government or elected officials, the police force are basically servants, even if their service is to be attacked or questioned. Without their existence, there would be little fear to commit crimes from both the potential criminals and the criminals themselves. Even if we don't like them or their methods of execution, they are there for the safety of us and for the authority of the State. Without enforcers, a society will essentially be an anarchy . As without actual power from the government, it will be ineffective. And even peaceful countries, such as Lichtenstein , have a police force. That is, of course, assuming that countries are a necessary tool for survival, and thus, existance. Giving that we need money in order to survive within civilization, I would like to argue that countries need to exist, least because they are financial institutions. The worst kind of police force is one that does not put their servitude above every other interest while on duty. If an officer receives a bribe from a criminal in addition to their existing pay, they should consider finding a job with higher pay, in case they won't come clean with their own violation. The payment is the incentive to the job, and the incentive loses its functional worth if the worker does not do the job as expected from them. Why should the State fund an officer that takes even more payment, while not doing their job as expected? Thus, corruption is to be dealt with in the name of competence. Rebellions, unless moral and just, should not happen in a state that allows the freedom of protest and provides the citizenry the potential to grow and live decently. This is why one should try and rebel in North Korea and not in any other liberal country. Because the officer is always under potential of constant examination from both civilians and the authority, morality is something that should be in a higher priority than the pay itself. Why? Because even if you are in a corrupted force, at least try and give an individual example of proper justice. That way, no one will blame you for following and imitating the wrongdoers, as did Adolf Eichman, a senior Nazi official, who, in his defence, had simply claimed that "I only did what I was told to do". Thus, those who consider becoming police officers, should consider not only the pay, the safety and so on -- but also whether or not they are prepared enough to follow their authorities' view on what "Justice" is and what "Justice" entails. Finally, should you disobey in the name of your own justice -- prepare to either defend yourself, or flee the country afterwards. If you care for morality as well as your pay, consider being a police officer only for a police force that is as least corrupt as possible. That way, you will increase the chances of being corrupt yourself.

(Philosocom's Subcategory on Shallowness) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Suikoden Content) There was once a knight Which was given the following promise: "You will evolve beyond your current strength, And overcome the obstacles in your path. As long as you beat the one true adversary of the brain, And a legacy, long after death, shall remain". His efforts has once gone in vain, When he saw his former master, fading in pain. Once again, solitary he became, Cast to the seas, he and a few followers were, Of the ruthlessness of the ocean, they had to beware. A deserted island they have found, With no one else around. To eternal exile, are they bound? "No!" the team leader has thought, And the need to endure and overcome, the rest he taught. The boat has been re-constructed, much to their luck, And the despair they felt in their hearts, was vanished in a single shock. To all of the islands they went, to recruit as many as possible, In order to combat a fate, so horrible. The fleet has been assembled, the forces are ready. The crew is prepared, the cannons are armed and steady. The great Fort El-Eal's destruction is the key for liberation, From those who want to take from us, the shallowness of information. This is not a single fleet, but one of many, even if few, That stand in the way, of the materialistic curfew. Should we wish to fight against the shallowness of content, This is but one of many websites that should be preserved. Will books stay forever when you have the internet? Will universities always be physical when you can study from home? Will philosophical articles be read when there are much less-mental-investing activities to do? The written word, you see, are weights the brain lifts. Should we discard the many legacies, of both old and new, The intellectual content of the world will be few. If we wish to preserve both the brains and the words, Intellectuals are to be spotted, recognized, and, be their deaths far, Either choose or be appointed successors to preserve their legacy -- Books, websites and whatnot. Those are the intellectuals that create their legacies, But only the successors are those who get to preserve them, Dozens of years minimum, if their lifespan is hopeful. To prevent the "Fort" from overcoming them all. Since there is no certainty of a second successor, The first heir of legacy must be chosen wisely and with caution. Choosing a backstabbing heir, Is like ruining a legion of standing domino, Without little to-no hope, Of restoration... EDIT: This The Fort of Shallow poem was heavily inspired by one of my favourite games of all time, Suikoden IV. The antagonistic base the poem metaphorizes, Fort El-Eal, is the final area of said game. In that fort is where you eventually mark the gradual demise of the empire that threatens your hero's homeland.

Article Synopsis by Ms. Gabbi Grace The article "How to Bridge the Gap of the Ideal Self" by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein is a thought-provoking exploration of self-improvement and the journey towards becoming one's ideal self. It offers an in-depth analysis of the psychological aspects of self-criticism and the emotional complexity involved in this journey, adding depth to the discussion. The text also provides a balanced perspective by addressing the need for both self-acceptance and ruthlessness, acknowledging that while pushing ourselves towards improvement, we must also accept and understand our current limitations. Practical advice is provided, such as overcoming short-term temptations and setting realistic goals, which can be applied to personal development journeys. Philosophical insights into tough love versus true love and the role of asceticism offer a broader perspective on values and mindsets that can aid self-improvement. In conclusion, Mr. Tomasio's article provides a compelling and thoughtful exploration of the gap between our current and ideal selves. The blend of philosophical insight with practical advice makes it a valuable read for those seeking to navigate the challenging journey of self-improvement. ********** Only the Best You can ever have the best life for You. The good of You is inseperable from the good of the world around you. You are the story you tell about how you fit into the world and society. -- Mr. Kaiser Basileus  On a cosmic scale, take the very large, and switch places with the very small, and I suspect the Universe would look very much the same. -- Mr. John Duran (Background music) Part I: Bridging the Gap With Unconventional Values There is usually a gap between ourselves and our ideal self, the self that we want to become. When we do things that hinder our path to this self, such as submitting to temptation instead of working towards our goals, we can often feel disappointed in ourselves, knowing that we could have been closer to our ideal self than we currently are. This is a possible reason why some of us may criticize ourselves harshly ( and others as well ). We know that we could have been somewhere else in life—somewhere better. However due to our own weakness and our refusal to be otherwise , we have failed to advance, which may also result in a decrease in our self-worth . You may often find that in order to become the people we truly want to be, as in the example of physical exercise , we need to be ruthless towards our current self, in the name of the self we want to become. Pitfalls of Self-Acceptance Accept your current self, love your current self, and you won't aim to change it for the man or woman you truly want to become. Our difficulty to forgive, as hard as it is , can be utilized for that purpose of improving ourselves. And there is no aim for improvement that isn't an aim for a change. That's because all improvement is change. Allow yourself to be pleased with yourself, you'll allow yourself to not become as stronger as you could've been. Be ruthless towards those who are dear to you, and you can help them improve as well, if that's your intention. Ruthlessness might as well be an expression of tough love . And tough love, unlike true love , even if directed at ourselves, is about change . True love is about full acceptance of who someone is. There is no tough love, as stern as it is, that isn't about one's hope for someone to change for the better. Even if that someone, is ourselves. Part II: Temptations as Obstacles to Who We Want to Become If we overcome short-term temptations in favor of long-term advancement, we may criticize ourselves less harshly. In many cases, short-term temptations are not worth it in contrast to our long-term goals. As in corruption that can stain your legacy; As in the temptation to betray the faithful; As in having power as a philosopher. Should you develop the habit of forgiving yourself over your own incompetence towards your goals, and you can normalize being fine not becoming our ideal self. The most effective way to work towards your goals is to be ruthless towards yourself. Refusing to forgive yourself, while overcoming the useless aspects of guilt associated with it , allows you to extend and further apply your potential into reality. If we find ourselves submitting to short-term temptations that hinder our progress to our ideal self, we should ask ourselves whether or not being harsh on ourselves is really worth our time and energy. I don't know, perhaps to some of you it does. Perhaps, some of you, too weak to handle criticism, may struggle with it. The solution comes when we learn to accept criticism professinally , even from ourselves, and learn to detach from anything that hinders us towards reaching our ideal selves. That may include our emotions. Despite the Difficulties of Failure Even if we ultimately do not reach our ideal selves, which is a possibility, we can still enjoy and feel good about ourselves even if we believe we can be in a better position in life. Indeed, one of the benefits of a more ascetic life and mindset is the ability to find comfort and satisfaction in the present moment and in what is presently available, rather than making us suffer over what we don't have yet or have failed to achieve thus far. Part III: The Value of Realism Another solution is to bring our ideal self into proportion. The further we put our ideal self beyond the sphere of realism, the more likely we are to suffer for not being able to reach it regardless of our efforts. Thus, when it comes to the ideal self, one should balance between two values: realism and success . Achieve the first by making your ideal self within reach, and the second by working hard towards your goals to become the best person you can possibly be. All of this takes one thing: compromise. But you need to make sure you don't delude yourself. You need to further learn about yourself , to understand what it truly can become, and what it can't become. Give up what you cannot become (or have a very low chance of becoming) in favor of working towards what you are likely to become with enough improvement. That way, your struggle towards a better self will become practical.

(Articles on friendship: https://www.philosocom.com/post/why-men-and-women-can-be-friends-the-fallacies https://www.philosocom.com/post/defining-friends-followers-and-fans https://www.philosocom.com/post/how-to-distinguish-your-allies-the-parasocial-fallacy https://www.philosocom.com/post/on-the-value-of-friendship https://www.philosocom.com/post/porky-and-chen-how-i-came-to-be-a-servant-of-philosophy https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-rubinshteinic-guide-to-being-friends-with-philosophers Away From The Hermitic Philosopher -- A Very Mysterious Storytime Through A Former Friend's Perspective ) https://www.philosocom.com/post/alienation-as-natural ****************************** Followers and friends, Show others that you're relevant, Even if you live on your own, Your ultimate absence will make them moan! Followers and friends, For some reason are biased towards you, Might like you more than yourself, Might think of you while sleeping beneath the shelf! When you might think you're worthless, After a shower of insults given by some ***holes, That's when they are best shined, That's how you might, for life, be better inclined! You might think of the emptiness, That surround your life, And ponder to yourself, Is life truly meaningless? Who will then sound the alarm, And, thus, save you from harm? Followers, and friends, Appear whenever the week starts or ends, Even if you live on your own, alone, They are still ready for you, on the phone. Followers and friends, Odd favours they might take, Whether or not your life's at stake, A greater potential, they can make! Whenever you need to send a letter, Or hear someone else's thoughts, And save yourself a good cost, That's when they are best shined, That's how you might, for life, be better inclined! The world is filled by people who might want you dead, Because of legitimate things you said, And because you're ethnically, Jew, how so sad! These folk can have a counter-force of sorts, --Loyal people without a financial cost! Who else, will prove that… she was wrong, That you too, deserve to live, And not be an irrelevant man, left unsung…? Followers and friends! Are a necessary evil! They are not a means to an end, They are there so both of you will feel less sad! They will support your struggle, No matter the cause at hand, you juggle. They will empathize, Your name they'll emphasize, No matter your influence's true size! You're going to have followers! As you're going to get haters! You're going to get faithful friends, As you will create toxic enemies! Through the clicking of the keyboard… The world will develop!

(Background music) (The Directory: Planet Lok -- An Indication To What I Have Become Escaping Inevitable Doom - The Space Nomad Theory - How To Extend the Human Race Indefinitely Do you have five minutes to talk about UAP? A Guessing Attempt Written by Ori Sindel The Rubinshteinic Frame Condition Theory -- Why Innovation Has a Universal Function Is the Universe a Conciousness? https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-rarity-of-life-among-infinite-stars-a-philosophical-and-scientific-inquiry-by-mr-chris-kingsl A Tale of Golden Fire The Peace of the Warrior (A Sci-Fi Fable) -- How Peacefulness is Stained https://www.philosocom.com/post/alienation-as-natural ) A common question that many people ask themselves at least once in their lives is whether there is any extraterrestrial life beyond planet Earth. And if there is, will they ever be able to develop sentience like us humans, to the point where we will be able to communicate with them like we do with ourselves? With so many Earth-like planets out there , that is, planets with oceans and other habitable biomes, it is safe to assume that even if there are no sentient species within our technological detection range, there are sure to be some life forms on those planets that we have yet to realize their existence. Theoretically, it is also possible that there are interplanetary or galactic empires , even if they contain only one or two colonies other than their original planets, that both us and they have yet to interact with each other, or with any other sentient species ( Like the Ur-Quan Heirarchy in Star Control ). Our interplanetary loneliness might be a common state of being without us or them knowing it. The existence of Philosophy on Aliens, once proved beyond the realm of theory and speculation, could have a negative influence over our position in the universe as a race. Perhaps we are not as special as we think we are, let alone created in the image of a supreme being. Or superior, compared to animals, who are not. If we find races that are superior to us in any way, then we are also not as talented and sapient as we think we are. Imagine a species where every average being is as intelligent as a human genius ; this is how harsh the discovery of sentient aliens could be. And still, due to the immense size of space, extraterrestrial communication can be very difficult. Perhaps a hidden species has received the messages we sent to space, and has already sent a reply of their own, but it could take a few human generations for that reply to finally be received. This is how problematic communication can be in space, leaving us hanging, perhaps, for centuries, for evidence to be revealed. Another issue on the topic of aliens is about alien invasion. Perhaps there is a grand empire out there, looking to conquer and enslave entire species. However, I think such a scenario is highly unlikely, both because of the size of space and because of our increasing military might. If we were ever united against a common enemy, we might be the most powerful species in this side of the universe, even if we are not yet capable of interstellar travel. Additionally, there is no threat that would stop our militarization aside from ourselves. Taking the resources to invade a distant, heavily fortified, and small planet sounds very impractical and costly, even for a strong alien nation. (Assuming, of course, their technology is less to match ours, upon our collective unification for global defense purposes). Nonetheless, what we can be assured of is that it is reasonable to believe in extraterrestrial existence, even if it is far more primitive than ours. And even if it isn't sentient , necessarily. Let alone, sapient . Because of that, we should consider the possibility that we as a species are not as special, let alone divine, as some of us think we are . There might even be species that look and function similarly to us, aside from a few visual and cultural differences. And at the same time, in the moment you are reading this, an alien might be looking up at the night sky and wondering if they are alone in the universe.... just like we do. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback Not saying [aliens] exist, but why else would we have been given a universe? An area so big someone could spend their lives traveling it and never see everything. If [aliens] do exist that means they are probably just like us. Having no way to travel that far into space and therefore are of no threat to us. If life exists it isn’t within our reach so it’s pointless to contemplate what isn’t possible. Then again, it might take belief in another living thing out there which allows us to think of ways in which to get there.

(Philosocom's Directory on Culture) Public Conversation, public domain, Is like a gathering of warriors, Willing with ease, To try and inflict verbal pain On one another, Should they find the slightest reason, To do so, happily. Why should the pain of another, Bother me by a bit, When I get to do what I can, what I want, To a fellow human being? Why should the sensitive, the anxious, or at best The easily irritated, the stressed, Be of any concern, of any consideration, When I get to shoot them, Like when the protagonist shoot the masked henchmen, And see them collapse, one by one, Like a series of dominos, All with the trigger of my gun? Why should I care of the weakness of the foes, When the foes can be turned Into my own preference, -- From annoyed, to extremely furious, Most especially when I cannot see their faces, Their reactions, the consequences of my actions, As it is all conveniently covered, By the helmet of the web, far from physical contact? They have thoughts, emotions, families, secrets, weaknesses and more, But it can all be ignored, With the trigger of my overpowered gun, Powered by confidence, and the desire to have a good time, At the expanse of another. One by one they go, into the slaughtering machine Of the burning bullet, the burning word, One by one they fulfil the never-ending passion For entertainment, for a good laugh, for condenscending, And it's all good, Because they're just "Stormtroopers", Henchmen of the dark, behind the dark, And their cries can't be heard by the noise of the flamethrower, So it is all good and well, To install in their brain, A penetrating bullet of hell. They come in many forms: Scouts, Snows, Ranges, Shadows and Darks, But why should I care, When their anguish entertains all the same? Waging war is not what one should do, But if it makes one happy, makes one feel like they expressed themselves, Then who are we to judge the death toll of many, Especially of those.. above the chair? Hermits, loners? To hell with them, For they are weak, "pussies", "snowflakes", sensitives, Who refuse to deal with reality -- The reality led by the peace-slaughtering machines, The reality we all create, And laugh with satisfaction, Of a day that's been "well done", By the power of pressing certain buttons, Those that pull the trigger, And aim exactly, aim purposefully, As we rise with apathy, And they fall, In the inflicted mental wounds, of their misery. The only shield from all of this? Combine disconnection with connection, Or disconnect completely, If you don't have anything else to say to anyone You don't know, Because they sure do, And always will, In the name of hedonism. (Stormtrooper Culture)

"Whom we will obey is not as relevant as WHY we would choose to obey them all, being sentient beings thereby gifted with free will" -- John Duran Mr. Chris Kingsley's Synopsis The article explores the concept of free will, contrasting it with the ability to act independently. It highlights the interplay of internal and external forces shaping our decision-making autonomy . The article compares exercising free will to mental strength training, where overcoming internal struggles strengthens resolve. Nathan Lasher's feedback discusses the practical aspects of free will, such as marketing and financial limitations. He argues that while external factors can influence decisions, we ultimately control our responses and actions. Understanding and harnessing free will ambitions allows individuals to create their desired life despite external influences. (Background music) Free Will vs. Weakness in the Face of Choices When the topic of free will arises, we often face a crucial distinction: what influences our decisions versus the inherent ability to make them independently . This distinction separates the mere act of choosing from the true essence of free will, which lies in the ability to act independently of any external or internal force that dictates our choices. The harsh reality is that our free will is not as absolute as we might imagine. It hinges on our capacity to act upon our own volition, unyielding to internal weaknesses and external temptations, from addictive games to hatred , that can overthrow our decision-making process. With countless temptations that life throws our way, it's tempting to conclude that many of us are simply too susceptible to succumb to them, rendering our free will casually compromised. Every internal struggle, every urge that pulls us towards actions we know we shouldn't take, reveals the potential fragility of our free will. And having free will also means that we have the freedom to resist temptations and addictions, and not only to do whatever our desires tell us to do . Acting on reason is also a choice we have the freedom to make, which further expresses our free will. Acting on the sole tyranny of desire does not make us free. What makes us free is the ability to act without it as well, with enough tenacity and discipline. However, it would be ignorant to overlook the significant influence of external factors on our ability to make truly free-will decisions. Unlike internal demons like temptation, these external forces don't actively make the choices for us, necessarily. They exist and interact with us, shaping our landscape of options. For example, while a teacher praising the virtues of military service may influence our decision to join, the final choice remains ours. The teacher merely expressed their perspective, leaving the actual decision-making power in our hands. The concept of free will is not a binary, black-and-white assertion. It exists within a spectrum, where the interplay of internal and external forces determines the degree of our autonomy in choosing. Recognizing this spectrum, acknowledging the limitations of our free will, and striving to cultivate our internal strength to navigate these limitations, is perhaps the most genuine expression of our free will itself. Free Will as Strength Training for the Mind External influence differs vastly from internal conflict in its impact on our choice-making. To illustrate, imagine a wrestling match. The cheering crowd represents external influence, influencing your mood or motivation as a fighter, but not directly dictating your moves. In contrast, your opponent embodies the internal struggle, actively grappling with you to prevent your victory. While the crowd can sway your emotions, and therefore you, they don't decide the outcome. Similarly, external factors may shape our context but don't directly control our choices. Empowering free will, then, demands fortifying our mental endurance against internal adversaries. Ideally, we should cultivate such immense willpower that temptations lose their tempting grip. This journey, however, is paved with a unique form of suffering: the internal struggle between our higher selves and our undesired urges. This necessary suffering is the container in which our free will is forged, a struggle against the tyranny of undesired urges that might as well be endless . But this suffering needn't be endured passively. Just as physical fitness necessitates challenges, free will flourishes through controlled confrontation. Consider a mental "boot camp"... A set of attainable yet tempting challenges, like placing cookies on the table and resisting them for a designated period. By facing these inner adversaries head-on, we strengthen our resolve and expand our free will's dominion. Ultimately, the key to harnessing free will lies in embracing and deciding depite the external influence and external struggle. Embrace the temporary discomfort as a catalyst for growth like a businessman would embrace a good opportunity . That's a sign that you're actively flexing your mental muscles, making them more capable to assist you making the decisions you really want to make, and not the decisions you're pressured nor tempted to make. Remember, suffering, when channeled rightly, can become the fuel that propels you towards a free and empowered existence. In a way, that is how "the world can be yours". Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback Free will is an interesting topic. Business via marketing might influence what you do but not entirely. They do their best to have them as the first thing you think of when you need a certain action, or service, done. Where free will exists is in you choosing to want a certain thing done. Free will does have its limitations though. People must keep their expectations of what they are able to do in line with their ability, financial or otherwise. You have every right to do what you want to, legality aside, as long as you are willing to live with the consequences of doing something. Those consequences can be good if the right intent exists. Why they only ever refer to consequences in reference to negative things is beyond me. Do good work and the consequence is your value as a human increases.  Let’s talk about good consequences for a minute. To younger individuals still in school the consequence of hard work is a good grade. Not all consequences are negative. They are simply the result of completing any action. I would say that money is the determining factor in our free will. Can’t quite go out and buy nice things without it. So, possessions are the consequence of hard work [and] finding better actions to earn you money is what work life is all about. Understanding yourself fully also aids in this. You might discover your gifted and are capable of more than you originally imagined.  There exists a reality of free will. You have no control over other people’s free wills. All you can do is decide how to let their free wills impact you. I personally understand free will as I discover everything I am capable of. When the world has no limits for you I have the free will to decide how I want the world to look. I get to build my dream life, that is the basis for what free will is. You have the innate ability to control your entire life. Don’t like something, figure out a way to deal with it. Either by increasing your knowledge so it is no longer a problem or figuring out a way to remove it from your life . Those are really the only two options people have when another’s free will impacts your life. Or the third less advisable option would be to simply ignore it.  You have a ton of free will compared to your limitations. Nobody is preventing you from going out and doing something. Just your own preventive constructs you build up in your own mind. Don’t want to do something, simply decide not to do it. Good things should be encouraged as people work on being the change they want to see in the world . The ultimate lesson in free will: You can literally create any world you want to. Damned be anyone who tells you differently.

(For more on the subject of time, click here ) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Time) ************************** The notion of time travel is one that has been covered and presented for many years, to the point of being a cliché in various media, and will probably be talked about for many years to come as well. Whether or not we will actually be able to invent a time-traveling machine is unknown, and indeed, there are those who claim time travel is in fact impossible due to the fact that "time" is not an object or material that can be experimented with using science or technology. Should we, however, ever be able to manipulate time to the point of being able to move between different periods of this reality's history and future, there are a few horrors that this concept entails that can ruin your whole-time traveling experience and even mark your very own doom permanently. Here are 3 consequences of time travel that can put you in distress for as long as you live: 1. Pillar-men : What is a pillar man? What if you use your time travel machine to go to either the past or the future, using a location that, in an exact period of time, is already inhibited by an object, like a wall, a hill, or a pillar? It would entail the fact that your body could be merged with another object in a different period of time -- for eternity. Should you be stuck with that object, not only will you not be able to get out of it, but you might as well also suffocate from not being able to move. And if you are able to move, whoever finds you will probably be afraid and try to harm you, or call other people, such as guards or police, that will view you as a threat because of your obscure, half-human shape, thus condemning you to death just because you did not estimate where exactly you would "spawn". The solution to this problem is obvious, but often hard to implement -- when time traveling you should make sure that you will enter a fairly open field, so no local object will merge with your arrival to whatever time period you chose. Thus, research about that specific time is necessary to avoid grave results. 2. Mutation: Similar with the concept of a pillar-man, but only with other people, most specifically locals who just happen to be in the exact spot you will land in. Should such accident happen, you might find yourself becoming a part of someone else and vice versa, giving you both a lifetime of being in one body just because of a very unlucky coincidence. Should you spawn in another period within a mob, the mutation can become even more severe, and you can become a multi-consciousness monster who just happened to be created from "thin air", so to speak. If you spawn between both a person an object, like when a local person just lies on a wall, both of you could become a hybrid between a mutant and an inanimate object (AKA wall, in this case). Therefore, time travel is scarier than we might think, because under many circumstances, an unlucky time traveller might spawn where we are and literary merge with either yourself or with something that belongs to you, with no hope of ever separating one another. This fear, however, can be compared to that of the road -- every ride you take could be a demise, but that doesn't mean you should avoid the road. 3. Not Being Able to Return: The greatest, easy-to-be-frequent horror is not being able to ever return to your own time period, as nothing actually guarantees your time traveling machine will always work when you'll need it. It could be broken, run out of power and even be destroyed by the locals. Anyone who dares to ever consider time traveling that is also wise enough, should consider the possibility that every attempt at traveling would be their last one, even if they just started this whole business. Additionally, if you time-travel from a skyscraper into the past, you could spawn in the air and fall to your doom, along, of course, with your machine. 4. Unexpected Results: Finally, we need to consider the possibility that even the slightest change of the past caused by our meddling could have grave consequences on the present and/or future. Do you expect to kill Hitler as a baby and thus end WWII? His death will not necessarily stop the Nazis from ruling Germany, and thus, WWII might happen anyway, even if it would end differently, and not necessarily for the better. This is not to say that Hitler need not to be killed, but obviously the events of the world will clearly end differently, for the good or the bad of sides. Not only one should consider where they will spawn, they also need to find a place to cover their machine, assuming it is as big as a wardrobe one can get inside. Even, however, if their machine is but a watch on their wrist, the potential horrors are still present in their possibility. Anyways, these are few of the reasons why I am against the practical implementation of time-travel. I will finish by this statement: If anyone at any given time would be able to travel, we would have no security, no privacy and no peace, as anyone with a weapon could easily spawn in our bedroom as they can within a bustling city square. This is the same reason why I am also against practically using teleportation, humanity should ever invent it. Time travel, after all, is simply teleportation, and even though it's in the same place, it's at a different time. Should this hypothetical technology ever be implemented, I think it should be limited to a select few who are professional and wise enough to use it -- and only use it when there's a necessity. Traveling to the past or future shouldn't be as common like driving to the supermarket.

(Background music) Judging Individuals On a Single-Shot Basis Perhaps one of the easiest fallacies when interacting with others comes from judging the nature of a person. It's a fallacy when the estimation is based on insufficient evidence to make such a judgment. Imagine the Death Star from Star Wars, a supreme battlestation that can largely be defeated by a single shot into an exposed tunnel to the core . So is what I'd like to present as the Whole Person Fallacy, a variable to the generalization fallacy, which can be defined as "A hasty generalization." It's a  fallacy "in which a conclusion that is reached is not logically justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence ." ( https://www.thoughtco.com/hasty-generalization-fallacy-1690919) . Like with the Death Star, your image and progress in life, no matter how noble or accomplished, can be completely overshadowed by a single or a few more mistakes or even a minor inconvenience, thus rendering all your features unimportant, even as if they never existed, by external reception. A more-contemporary example is a Youtube content creator by the nickname of JoCat, who received much harrassment online due to a short song he made that many disliked. Due to the "cringe" nature of that song, people made lots of ad-hominem assumptions on him, and so on. The backlash, caused by that one video, caused him to leave the internet indefinitely. You can run a very successful, very customer-friendly air travel business, but have its entire reputation stained for life by an unexpected, embarrassing incident between a furious customer and one of your attendants. This is also particularly true when it comes to the "MeToo" movement , regardless of whether the case for "canceling" someone is justified or not. Has someone reported you, a public servant, for sexual harassment? It does not matter how much you contribute to your country and community. The door awaits you to exit through it without considering your service to society. Although it isn't exactly clear how many sexual accusations are false, a certain source estimates them to be around 2 to 8 percent. This could mean that certain people would be wrongly charged for crimes they didn't commit, which could stain their whole reputation and life legacy. A World of Instant Judgment In the age of instant opinions and online echo chambers , it's tragically easy to shatter someone's image based on a single misstep. Wrote an article was too boring ( which is its own fallacy )? Congrats, you're now a "terrible writer" in the eyes of those who aren't necessarily frequent readers of yours. Authored a whole library of books? Doesn't matter, because one Facebook comment can paint you as an idiot in the eyes of those unwilling to look beyond the surface. Every action we take online is a dice roll, a gamble with our reputation. Public philosophers should know this as well. Content we release, regardless of intent, can leave permanent marks, thanks to our collective knack for clinging to insufficient evidence. Consider the possibility of not being too close to the spotlight, if you don't want you or your family to be harrassed nor threathened. Why? It boils down to our brain's love for shortcuts. Generalizations, stereotypes, and snap judgments are mental hacks, saving precious energy by prioritizing short term efficiency over profound understanding. Doubting our first impressions, seeking counter-evidence, takes mental effort most of us prefer to avoid. And yet we are confident in making claims that we didn't research enough. Confidence in a quick conclusion feels better than the messy process of critical thinking. It is far easier resorting to mere rhetoric over the careful study of logic and evidence. Does someone criticize your work? Jealousy is the easy answer, even if it's that answer is speculation. Someone dresses religiously? They must be a one-dimensional fanatic, right? Wrong. Our quick conclusions, often based solely on fleeting online/offline interactions, are rarely accurate. The antidote to this fallacy is to cultivate a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism. Challenge your own confidence in hasty, whole-person-generalizing judgments. Ask yourself: "Do I truly know enough about this person to draw a conclusion? Is the available information sufficient? Could more research or reflection change my perspective?" It's easy to feel like we know someone based on their online persona, even if we've never met them in real life. We fill in the blanks with assumptions, often inaccurate ones. I, myself, have been labeled a " pseudo-intellectua l" judged by a stranger who couldn't be bothered to engage with my broader body of work which I work to renovate to this day. The sad truth is that for many, truth itself is less important than the perceived general agreement. Challenge a widely accepted "fact," even with evidence, and you risk facing the wrath of those who confuse popularity with the truth ( AKA the "ad-populum" fallacy ). It's like Plato's Cave Allegory : some prefer the comfortable shadows of their online echo chambers to the harsh light of critical thinking. Gathering information, even online, takes effort. But dismissing someone without even a general scan of their work, and without estimating their potential? That's not just lazy, but also a possible reason, although flawed, of spreading misinformation. So, before you label someone a "terrible writer" based on one article, consider this: you might be making a fallacy and denying yourself the chance to engage with a potentially valuable perspective, and deny yourself from being exposed to new centers where ideas are exchanged. You know... like Philosocom. Remember, the sun of truth shines just beyond the bonfire of instant judgment. Take a step outside your comfort zone, do your research, and let critical thinking guide your interactions. It's the only way to escape the cave of misinformation and build a more informed online world, where people would be able to act better, based on greater exposure to the truth (rather than their impressions of it, thinking that these are the truth).

For more on this subject, click here . Think of intelligence as the cost of understanding stuff . The more you can understand the greater return on investment that you will get. Intelligence actually gets you to use the economy to your advantage. Intelligence mostly is the cost of doing stuff in this life. More intelligence means that you can do more things. Actions are the currency of life.... nothing happens unless you first do something.  -- Mr. Nathan Lasher (Background music) Rebalancing Wisdom: A Call for a Harmonious Society In today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world, there appears to be a profound imbalance between two essential forms of wisdom : technical wisdom and philosophical wisdom . This division is not merely an academic concern but a reflection of our collective priorities, values, and understanding of what it means to live a fulfilling life. The Duality of Wisdom At its core, technical wisdom is about the how. It encompasses the tools and methods we use to navigate the intricacies of modern society—mathematics, science, engineering, and technology. These fields are instrumental in building the physical and digital infrastructures that shape our daily lives. They teach us efficiency, precision, and innovation, offering us the power to manipulate the world around us to achieve desired outcomes. In contrast, philosophical wisdom is concerned with the why. It delves into the deeper dimensions of existence , prompting us to question the nature of reality , the meaning of life, and the values that guide our actions. While technical wisdom equips us with the means to build and transform, philosophical wisdom seeks to understand the purpose behind such endeavors. It asks whether our pursuits lead to meaningful and ethical outcomes or if we are merely engaging in an endless cycle of progress devoid of deeper significance. The Modern Imbalance Modern society’s emphasis on technical wisdom is evident in numerous ways, from the structure of our educational systems to the allocation of resources and funding. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects are often placed on a pedestal, viewed as the pathways to success, stability, and societal advancement. On the other hand, the humanities—especially philosophy—are frequently sidelined, treated as less valuable or even obsolete in a world obsessed with quantifiable results. This prioritization of technical wisdom has led to remarkable achievements: technological advancements, medical breakthroughs, and a hyper-connected global society . Yet, it has also created a society that excels in answering how but struggles to address why. The pursuit of material wealth and technological mastery without a corresponding quest for meaning can lead to a culture that feels empty, disoriented, and increasingly exploitative. As we focus on creating more efficient systems, enhancing productivity, and achieving economic growth, we often neglect the ethical and existential dimensions of our progress. We, therefore, risk becoming experts in functionality while remaining amateurs in understanding the deeper implications of our actions. This imbalance is not just problematic. but a symptom of a larger cultural liability—the preservation of a society that values doing over being. The Search for Balance To address this imbalance, we must consciously integrate both forms of wisdom into our lives and communities. It is not enough to simply teach our children the skills needed for the workforce; we must also encourage them to engage with the fundamental questions of existence. Philosophy should not be relegated to the background as an obscure or outdated field. Instead, it should be viewed as a vital companion to the sciences— a discipline that guides and provides context for our technical endeavors. Imagine a society where technical and philosophical wisdom are given equal weight. In such a society, we would not only innovate and build , but also reflect on the ethical implications of our creations. We would ask ourselves whether the systems we develop truly enhance the human experience or merely serve to entrap us in cycles of consumerism, competition, and superficial success. A balanced society would value the engineer and the philosopher alike, recognizing that both are essential for a harmonious and sustainable existence. The Wisdom of Purpose Philosophical wisdom brings with it the potential for purpose . It offers us a lens through which to view existence as more than just a mechanical process—a mere sequence of tasks and achievements. With philosophical insight, life becomes a landscape of opportunities, each with the potential for meaning and fulfillment. Purpose becomes the compass that guides us through the complexities of existence , reminding us that beyond the practical, there is a reason to strive, create, and endure. However, if we reduce our lives to mere mechanical efficiency— where the ultimate goal is financial gain, career advancement, and material success reside —we risk a deeper sense of dissatisfaction. On the other hand, achieving professional success without a corresponding sense of purpose leaves a void that no amount of wealth or prestige can fill. Our achievements become hollow victories, milestones that signify progress, but not satisfaction. Escaping the Machine: Beyond the Mechanical Life Society often pushes us into a predetermined mold: Pursue education, attain a degree in a lucrative field , secure a stable job, start a family, and work until retirement. This narrative, while practical and effective for material stability, lacks the depth needed for true existential satisfaction. We are programmed to believe that fulfilling these societal norms is the key to a successful life , yet many of us find ourselves longing for something more—something beyond the repetition of daily routines and the accumulation of wealth. This societal script, which encourages us to follow a well-preserved path , may earn us respect and admiration, but it often fails to fulfill our deeper needs. When we look at our lives through the lens of this script, we may realize that we have become cogs in a machine—participants in a process that demands efficiency and productivity, but offers little in terms of personal growth or self-understanding. The true tragedy of this mechanistic lifestyle is that it leaves little room for existential inquiry. It traps us in a cycle where our worth is measured by external achievements, leaving our inner lives impoverished. The wisdom of purpose—an understanding of why we engage in these activities—becomes a distant and neglected pursuit. Without it, we risk becoming strangers to ourselves, going through the motions of life without ever asking what it all means. Philosophy as a Lifeline The value of philosophy cannot be overstated. It provides a platform for questioning the very foundations of our existence. It challenges the narratives that society imposes and allows us to carve out a path that resonates with our true selves. Philosophy is not merely an academic exercise ; it is a lifeline—a means by which we can reclaim our autonomy, and rediscover a sense of meaning in a world that often feels fragmented and chaotic. By engaging with philosophical wisdom , we are invited to explore beyond the confines of the metaphorical machine. This is what I call the Second Head of Wisdom. It encompasses the humanities, where disciplines like literature, history, and philosophy come together to illuminate the deeper dimensions of life. Philosophy, in particular, offers the tools to navigate not just the external world but the internal landscapes of our minds and souls. When we invest time in philosophical reflection, we gain the ability to see life’s challenges not as obstacles to overcome mechanically, but as opportunities for growth, transformation, and understanding. We begin to see that there is more to life than following societal norms; there is the potential to live authentically and purposefully, guided by our own sense of meaning. Towards a Harmonious Wisdom To create a truly balanced society, we must recognize the value of both technical and philosophical wisdom . We need the sciences to build the future, but we also need philosophy to ensure that the future we create is one worth living in. This means integrating philosophical reflection into every aspect of life—from education to work, from governance to personal development. By fostering a culture that values introspection and the search for meaning as much as it values innovation and efficiency, we can create a world that is not only functional but also fulfilling. This harmonious wisdom will lead to a society where technological advancement is aligned with ethical consideration, where material success is accompanied by a sense of purpose, and where individuals are empowered to live not just as efficient beings but as meaningful beings. The journey to achieve such balance is ongoing, and it requires a collective shift in how we perceive and prioritize knowledge. But if we are willing to make this shift, we can transcend the mechanical, materialistic existence that threatens to define us. We can create a society where purpose and progress go hand in hand, leading to a richer, deeper, and more meaningful way of living.

(French translation by Mr. Roland Leblanc. English Below ) L'oiseau dans une cage - L'histoire de deux tigresses (Une histoire de notre écrivaine invitée Mme Yael Hilesoom sur la solitude) (Avertissement : les messages des écrivains invités ne correspondent pas nécessairement aux convictions, aux pensées ou aux idées du directeur de Philosocom, M. Tomasio Rubinshtein. Le but des messages d'écrivains invités est de permettre un large éventail de récits émanant d'un large éventail de personnes. Pour postuler pour un article d'écrivain invité de votre choix, veuillez envoyer votre demande à mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) Interprétation de M. Rubinshtein: Il s'agit d'une histoire bien méritée de solitude positive, racontée par une femme, regardant une autre femme assise sur son balcon. Il y a, techniquement, de nombreuses métaphores dans ce conte qui peuvent vous donner beaucoup de temps pour réfléchir. L'oiseau, par exemple, peut être considéré à la fois comme une tristesse et comme le véritable moi du protagoniste, réprimé par elle, alors qu'elle vit sa vie. Cela peut aussi représenter ses désirs les plus profonds. La comparaison avec les tigres et les prédateurs peut nous apprendre que nous devons être forts pour survivre seuls, que nous luttions pour survivre ou que nous résidions victorieusement dans la solitude avec un cigare. Enfin et surtout, l'interaction avec l'autre personnage peut nous indiquer la nature parasociale du monde d'aujourd'hui, où les connexions sont non seulement fausses mais lointaines. Sur l’oxymore du lointain et du proche, existant ensemble en même temps. ************************** Aujourd'hui, j'ai rencontré un prédatrice, comme moi. Cela s'est produit tard dans la nuit, alors que j'étais assise dans la cour, fumant ma dernière cigarette et me sentant encore malheureuse. Une étrange tristesse m’avait envahie et je ne savais pas comment y faire face. Je tolérais sa présence depuis le matin, mais elle restait là, comme un oiseau en cage, à picorer les barreaux. Je voulais vraiment lui tendre la main et la libérer. J'ai regardé dans l'air sombre. Aucune voix de la rue Agripas ne pouvait être entendue au-dessus des bâtiments de la rue Hayabuk. Même le magasin de houmous était silencieux, ne jouant pas un seul air de musique. Un million de personnes passaient chaque jour dans cette rue. Une personne a même commencé une bagarre avec une autre pour une place dans la file d'attente d'un restaurant. Mais tout le bruit était disparu alors que j'étais assise dans la cour sombre et sans goût, en colère contre rien. Puis, une bête en colère comme moi a allumé les lumières du balcon devant moi. Elle fumait un cigare parfumé à la fraise, libérant la fumée dans toutes les directions. La douce odeur s'est mêlée à la fumée noire de ma cigarette solitaire. Et elle restait là solitaire, sans rien faire. Au bout d'un moment, elle s'approcha de la clôture et regarda par en bas. Puis elle s'est assise à nouveau, et comme personne n'est venu l'appeler, elle s'est levée et est partie. Et puis je me suis retrouvé seule avec la pile de matelas sur lesquels j'avais posé un joli drap. J'ai regardé, impuissante, et l'oiseau en cage n'était plus en colère. Elle ne pleurait plus non plus. Je lui ai ouvert la porte pour qu'elle puisse s'envoler dans l'obscurité, dans le silence aux yeux des autres. Lorsqu'un tigre perd son appartenance à son groupe, il ne dort pas la nuit. Il n'y a personne pour assurer sa sécurité. Personne pour le garder au chaud. Personne pour lui montrer le chemin. Il éclaire donc son chemin de vie avec ses yeux verts, brillants et cruels. ********************* (English Translation by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein) (Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) Mr. Rubinshtein's interpretation: This is a much-deserved story of positive solitude, told from the side of a woman, looking at another woman who sits on her balcony. There are, technically, many metaphors in this tale that can give you much time for reflection. The bird, for example, can be regarded as both sadness and as the protagonist's true self, repressed by her, as she lives her life. It can also represent her deepest desires. The comparison to tigers and predators can teach us that we need to be strong in order to survive alone, whether we fight to survive, or victoriously reside in solitude with a cigar. Last but not least, the interaction with the other character can indicate to us the para-social nature of today's world, where connections are not only fake but distant. On the oxymoron of the far and close, existing together at the same time. ************************** Today I met a predator, like me. It happened late at night, when I was sitting in the yard, smoking my last cigarette and still feeling unhappy. A strange sadness had come over me, and I didn't know how to deal with it. I had been tolerating her presence since morning, but she just sat there like a bird in a cage, pecking at the bars . I really wanted to reach out and throw her out. I stared out into the dark air. No voices from Agripas Street could be heard over the buildings of Hayabuk Street. Even the hummus shop was silent, not playing a single tune. A million people pass through that street every day. One person even started a fight with another over a place in line at a restaurant. But all the noise was gone as I sat in the dark, tasteless yard, angry at nothing. Then, an angry beast like me turned on the lights on the balcony in front of me. She smoked a strawberry-scented cigar, releasing the smoke in all directions. The sweet smell mixed with the black tail of my lonely cigarette. And loneliness sat there, doing nothing. After a while, she came to the fence and looked down. Then she sat back down, and when no one came to call her, she stood up and left. And then I was left alone with the pile of mattresses that I had laid a nice sheet on. I stared helplessly, and the caged bird was no longer angry. She didn't cry anymore either. I opened the door for her, so she could fly into the darkness, to the silence of other people's eyes. When a tiger loses his streak, he doesn't sleep at night. There is no one to keep him safe. No one to keep him warm. No one to show him the way. So he lights up his path in life with his green, glowing, and cruel eyes .

(Philosocom Directory on Numbers) It is arguable, and even reasonable, to claim that individuality has been on the decline in recent times. This is due to a number of factors, including: The rise of the herd mentality , where there is more peer pressure than ever before. The negative association of eccentricity with mental illness , perversion, and other negative things. Indeed, due to the authority of the norms, individuality has appeared to be significantly declined in favor of being accepted, desired, and liked by the world . True individuality is pretty much within your eccentricity. And yet, there is this claim that every single individual is unique, different from any other person on the planet. This claim appears obscure, given how uniform the modern world appears to be. A sad truth can be that there are millions like you and me, with similar personality traits, beliefs, occupations, and so forth. The reason for that is because the term "million" is not that big of a number compared to the world's population, which is around a few billions , with hundreds of thousands being born every day. With overpopulation , it is a bit scary to think that you and I are not that unique like we think we are, in a world where much of our jobs' positions could be replaced by countless candidates. Perhaps you think it's not that scary, that you are, at least professionally, replaceable . But for me it is scary, to realize that I am not that unique like I think I am. My 7 books, my personal philosophy , -- all are my potentially-feeble attempts at refusing to be "like everyone else." The reason is that I don't want to be expendable like your average henchman in an action movie . The henchman is never remembered, but the main villain is, even if their presence is shorter in time. The main villain is still more valuable than the countless henchmen who appear over and over again. But I digress. In order to try and better distinguish our individualities, I've come up with a theory, or form of measurement, in the form of a personalized series of numbers. The idea is that the more variety of numbers you have in accordance with your individual attributes, and the more of them you have, the more unique you are. I chose numbers specifically because it is easier to distinguish series of numbers than it is of words. For example, many people can be shy, introverted, and like cats, but how many people can be 9-2-4 at the same time? The determination of numbers is done by the following: Ask yourselves as many questions you like, and think of a maximum of 9 questions, with 0 being none of them or no preference. The thing is, the more questions you ask yourself, and the more answers you have - when you know which of them to choose - the better you can be at discovering your Theory For Individuality. Come to think of it, there doesn't need to be a maximum of 9 answers, since most often there are more than 9. If you happen to know all the names of the world's countries you can even go to around 100 or 200 in your number, should you ask yourself a question regarding countries and nationalities. With so much potential questions and answers, it seems that one can be more distinct than initially believed, with 0 also being a legitimate answer, since we can also be defined by our lack of deed, belief, and so forth; a lacking that can be changed in the future. Regardless, this theory is far from perfect. There is no universal set of questions, so someone who has 9-2-0 can be awfully similar to someone else who has 0-9-2 in some region of their algorithm. Furthermore, there are no universal sets of answers to each question, so someone who has 9-0-2 can be similar to a different set of numbers that represent the same answers. The solution to these problems is within the creation of a global database, such as a website, with a universal representation of numbers and the same questions in the same order, which is updated on a regular basis. That way, our personal way of introspection will not get in the way of better understanding ourselves as distinct individuals. Such construction of an algorithm is difficult, and at best can be done by an A.I. system, but it just goes to show how complex we actually are, even the more simple-minded within us. The complexity of the human brain is enough to serve as an example to that. Regardless of my theory's flaws, I believe it can be compared to Winston Churchill's view of democracy: It is the worst form of government we've devised, except all the other worse governments . In other words, my theory may be bad, but can you think of other maticulous alternatives? Mathematical psychology failed to survive the 20's century. It is no longer relevant. Instead it has been replaced with psychometrics, a field that attempts to measure psychological concepts. I believe it is the best way to measure individuality. It is like the DNA of the mind - complex, unique, and always prone to change. All we need to do is to build specific models that are based on this article's rationale to at least try and label people in accordance to different criteria. It can theoratically replace the Myers-Briggs type indicator without having to alitgn people in different categories. I'd like to suggest that the indicator in question is faulty as people can change throughout life and thus not necessarily belong to specific categories ( INFJ , ENTJ , and so on). (By the way, I used to constantly jump from INFJ to INTJ . From the very start I doubted the credibility of this indicator. For the 2023 September revamp of this article, I remain an INTJ). For this algorithm theory of individuality to succeed one must devise questions whose answers resonates with them the most. That will make one avoid jumping from one algorithm to another like with the MB indicator. The point of this theory is for one's unique individuality to be translated into number form, and last as long as possible. That will be one's number. The number that transcends external measurements such as birth date, the total sum of names and so on. You know, details which have nothing to do with one's more-innate individuality. If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it to spread the word of this theory!

(Directory on Fear: https://www.philosocom.com/post/on-fear-and-the-right-to-resist-it ) Intelligence itself is not scary when you understand what it is. -- Mr. Nathan Lasher (Background music) I am disappointed. My attempt to understand what monsters are by looking through definitions and examining a variety of media failed to satisfy. It did not satisfy, because I now realize that there might not be a universal definition for monsters. That could indicate that anything and anyone is capable of being a monster, as long as it can terrify, disturb, or be regarded as inhumane. It is a large mistake to see monsters as abominations or even as adversaries, even though these can be regarded as specific examples of monsters. Wouldn't you regard Hitler as a monster? Most of you may agree, as is evident by the horror he posed to millions. Nonetheless, as a person, Hitler was a vegetarian who liked animals, children, and family. In addition, if only in person, he behaved nicely. No, I do not praise him in any way. Do try and make the difference, too, between personal attitude and committing crimes against humanity. I am merely saying that monsters are subjective to their demographics. The Nazis were anti-human, but pro animal rights , for that matter... Monsters come in many shapes and forms and express different traits, powers, and behaviours. I too regard him as a monster, despite being a human and a mortal... instead of something like a cosmic planet eater. Monsters can exist in fiction just as they can in reality. A bear can be regarded as a monster if we find him in the wilderness and not in the safety of the zoo. Some of us have turned bears into these cute beings, like Winnie the Pooh and the classic Teddy Bear doll. However, the cuteness we attributed to the bear does not mean it cannot eat you alive, should it be hungry enough. I have heard horror stories regarding chimpanzees too, but let's try making this article more... bearable. Yes, pun intended. People may be introduced to monsters at a very young age. The myth of the monster that lays under your bed or that hides in your closet is such an example. Even if it isn't there, the mere concept of such an entity is something that has terrified many children, correct? Whenever I was in my apartment as a child, I used to be afraid of shadowy figures that might wait for me and try to assassinate me. It had no rational reasoning, but the concept that existed in my mind used to make me afraid of the dark. Some of you may have had your own childish fears. Tales of adventures, both real and unreal, may help us cope with such fears. The archetype of the hero , the brave and strong warrior who is capable of defeating any adversity in his path, is such an example. The superhero genre might be nothing more than a mere imitation of old tales, modernized. Many of us may see this genre as very, very overused and unoriginal, but let us not forget that the concept itself was never original to begin with. Many mythologies of many cultures, perhaps your own as well, precede Superman, both in history and in their tales of courage over monsters. It's a mistake to regard any monster as threatening or as capable of hurting you. Cockroaches are the fear of many, maybe even some of you, but beyond their presence, they don't really do anything and are generally harmless. Harmless monsters do not even have to be small. In a game called " Silent Hill 4 ," there is a creature that just exists, called the Greedy Worm . It has no known reason to exist and is a giant worm that gets inside walls and hangs from ceilings. You can hit it if you want, but you'll waste your time since it's also invincible and will resume doing whatever it's doing despite being hurt. You can read about the monster if you want, but even the information on it lacks any certainty, when it comes to its purpose. Don't get me wrong. The Greedy Worms are intimidating, large creatures that can definitely be seen as monsters. Nonetheless, their mere presence may be enough to frighten you. In addition, monsters are not necessarily feral, wild, or beings whose appearance is disturbing. Vampires are also monsters, but they are usually elegant, beautiful beings that led to subcultures, such as the Emo and Gothic subcultures from the 2000s. They dress beautifully, behave in a cultured manner, and if it weren't for their thirst for blood, they wouldn't necessarily be scary. They may be particularly scary to some people due to their own fear of seeing blood. What is even the purpose of monsters? Monsters represent many things that we are terrified of, things that disturb us, or simply feel very eerie to us. Essentially, anything that is unpleasant can be regarded as monstrous, to whatever degree. In a sense, even ideologies such as Nazism can be seen as monstrous, with their representations, their monsters, being Nazis. The myth of the brave hero is nothing more than a fallacious fantasy, because in the real world and even in some fiction, it's impossible to defeat every monster or everything that terrifies us. We do not have that power — the power to overcome every problem that may stand in our way. Being a hero in real life is its own thing. Even if they may appear in our eyes and disturb us with their presence, it would be wise to acknowledge the ability to get used to reality. That's what makes reality not ideal at times, and maybe that's okay? Maybe we can endure life and be happy in it, despite the flaws and the fears? As with the Greedy Worm, maybe the most realistic and wise choice is to learn to live with the things and beings we might never be able to defeat. Alternatively, we can become strong enough by ourselves, to overcome these opponents.

(Philosocom Writing Directory) (Background music) Introduction: In the Beginning... My initial experience with Philosocom was uneasy at first. While I made websites as a kid, they were not enough to prepare me for managing and designing a website such as this, especially in a non-native language. It can definitely be said that I had, and am learning, from my own experience, with only minor advices here and there from my family. Eventually, however, I managed doing this more independently, gaining much-needed experience whose Insights From Philosocom I'd like to share with you. Here are a few insights from an experienced online writer for those wishing to become successful bloggers, in a world of immense competition from millions of content-creating websites : What to know before starting: Make sure you have a niche or subject you're either good at or are willing to have enough time and motivation to improve your knowledge about it. That will have a better chance at attracting a crowd of readers/followers. Anyone can start a blog at any time, but not everyone has the required knowledge. Blogging for most will not yield quick and desired results. It requires more than just writing articles, but writing them in a way that will leave a good impression on your audience, so they will be more likely to return for more content. Additionally, you won't always get the same amount of views every day, just like in any other private business. Prepare yourself for disappointment as well as for unexpected, fortunate news. Where to start a blog: I recommend starting a blog in a website of your own because that would mean you would have more control on the layout of your content and on how it would be monetized. Regardless, secondary, smaller blogs should be made on free websites such as Medium, Quora and so forth, to attract more people to your blog through backlinks . A strong social media presence can save you much money otherwise spent on advertising ( the "necessary evil" of this world ). Having a lot of followers is not necessarily something shallow to be proud of. They are, in fact, an asset, capable of being measured financially. As an online writer it can often give you the exposure you need to make money from your content. Tips on writing a blog: Make sure you are a good writer! one who can be understood, convey their message, have a wide array of vocabulary to use, and be able to keep your readers interested on the subject you write about. People today usually have a short attention span , so it is your duty to give a reason for your readers to sit and consume your content for at least 2 or 5 minutes on average. And if your content pieces are often long, have them summarized. A list of what to avoid as an online writer: Annoying, exaggerated clickbaits -- They can reflect poorly on your reputation as a content creator. Fake news -- They can hurt your credibility. Racism , incitement and sexism -- It can make your blog rejected by some advertisers, including those from Google AdSense. Articles or posts with only a few sentences. Condemn/shame ex-followers for unfollowing you -- this is a juvenile and insecure reaction towards of a legitimate action. Just carry on without worrying too much. For specific examples I recommend Rotten Websites Wiki Here are some ways to monetize your blog, by the way: Sell advertising space on your blog. Write sponsored posts. Create and sell digital products. Offer consulting services. Start a premium membership site. Thank you all for reading, and I hope I managed to successfully help other ambitious writers in their plans and endeavours.

(The following article can be seen as a prequel to this article , that expands on this character of mine) (Not for the faint of heart, I guess) (Villainy/Anti-Villainy Directory) (Philosocom's Directory On the Virtual Realm) (Villainy/Anti-Villainy Directory) Article Conclusion by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. "Recognition of 'Force' -- The Philosophy of Razor Reapkvar" is a thought-provoking exploration of character creation and deep philosophical musings. Mr. Tomasio delves into the psyche of Razor Reapkvar, a complex half-orc protagonist, using his narrative as a lens to examine broader themes such as the nature of villainy , the impact of virtual realities, and the human struggle for autonomy and understanding. The article excels in intertwining character development with philosophical inquiry, challenging conventional narratives and encouraging deeper reflection. Razor Reapkvar is portrayed with layers of complexity, driven by internal torment and external expectations. The engaging narrative structure blends storytelling with philosophical discourse, creating a cohesive and engaging read. The critique of virtual gaming mechanics , particularly the obsession with Experience Points (XP) and leveling up, is timely and relevant, drawing parallels between the virtual and real worlds. The use of vivid imagery and emotive language effectively conveys the bleakness of Razor's existence and the torment of his hallucinations. In conclusion, "Recognition of 'Force' -- The Philosophy of Razor Reapkvar" is a commendable piece that successfully melds narrative storytelling with profound philosophical exploration. Overall, it stands as a thought-provoking and richly layered work that invites readers to reflect on the nature of reality , autonomy, and the human condition.   *********************************** Throughout almost every tale in human history, the villains were often right. I suspect it's far easier to label those whom see too-clearly as demons , instead of accepting things as they truly are.  Hence, those who see with perfect clarity are demonized, and become 'bad guys' only by knowing far more than others are comfortable in knowing -- Mr. John Dura n (Background music) *********************************** Character Introduction In this fine evening, I'd like to tell you the story of a fictional character I created in a Dungeons and Dragons-esque game, whose story we can all learn from, and apply our understanding of to each of us. The story itself was made intuitively, and nothing of it was made for this article. It was only when I realized how it affected me, its creator, that I decided to share it with you as well. Razor Reapkvar is a lowly, unlikeable half-orc who earns his living from his "clients", by fighting for the sake of killing said "clients", be these individuals or entire businesses or even towns. He is a very violent, solitary character , not because he is bloodthirsty, but because he suffers from hallucinations that no one, including himself, understands completely. He has an uncanny intuition that tells him there is a world beyond the one he is in, but he knows nothing of it beyond his unique intuition , which tells him to kill people for his own survival and prosperity. He will forever remain a mystery, and yet their power is recognized by both Razor and his victims. Razor's a psychopath , while his victims, who already know who he is for his reputation, either flee or fight fruitlessly. No one actually knows how these hallucinations look to Razor, but what is certain is, that they tell him of a certain acronym whose meaning is clear only to him, just like the illusions' existence in his mind. Without understanding himself completely, his path is a consistent descent into darkness . There is no redemption, no escape, only the relentless pursuit of EXP, told by his metaphysical intuition.... EXPloited By Our Desires Experience Points. A strange concept, isn't it? The more you do a certain activity, the more you earn in many virtual worlds.  Like a phantom currency that's only tangible in numbers , a reward for actions that feel so... unreal.  Often, they are actions that treat virtual beings like crops to be farmed, more than their own personhood. It's part of what is intended to make a game fun, although it feels like a chore. A twisted game where the stakes are life and death, with one's own return only dependent by the player's choice. This creature is greedy for this abstract currency, necessary to make him even more of a relentless, competent killer, in an ad-infinitum manner. For some reason it is normalized in gaming to enjoy such an activity, compelling players to grind virtual lives for corporate profit. Razor, trapped in this infernal cycle, is a pawn. A pawn driven by hunger that knows no satiety. His hunger is the sole responsibility of the player, whether he keeps himself eternally hungry for virtual lives, or whether he finds himself proving his worth as a killer yet again.  His hallucinations, like the fog that creeps into the mind, are a constant torment. He seeks relief, an escape from the madness,  but finds it only in the act of taking lives . Choosing not to use Razor, AKA the choice of nothing , then appears far more significant when we look at him from an ethical lens. It's a perverse logic,  a twisted morality , to enjoy virtually-simulated murder for the sake of personal fun. The end, he believes, justifies the means, like many players might believe when farming virtual lives, unique or bland as they are. I guess it is better than killing people in real life, showing us how the concrete is far worthier than the virtual world in front of our eyes all the time. In these desolate lands where happy virtual communities once lived, the echoes of a higher law tells him inside of a different truth, that they should be killed for fun, more than they should just enjoy their small, peaceful lives.  For fun and for greater merit. The darkness within Razor grows with each kill, a monstrous shadow that consumes his humanity, and becomes more and more of an Orc, and a Dark Paladin. He is a prisoner, trapped in a labyrinth of his own making, where the player is the warden. The world around him is a mere canvas for his insanity, and a very small understanding of the world beyond the virtual screen. Love,  redemption , will never be possible, as for that, one must first understand enough what has been going on in one's mind . Otherwise, it is an infinite loop that keeps him away from such virtues, reserved to those with more moral alignments , with each murder. There is no escape, only the endless pursuit of Experience Points. A power that comes at a terrible cost. Towns, cities, lives... all sacrificed on the altar of his tormented mind. Like a gambler chasing a losing streak , he clings to the hope that the next kill will bring relief. But the house always wins. And in this game, the house is his own madness. Madness, caused by a flicker of truth. The residents do not know they are imprisoned in a virtual matrix. Only he understands it, and cannot do anything further to elevate his intuitive understanding. No extra knowledge, no teachers. Just him and a flicker of truth that drove him mad. XP... XP... The only thing he feels intuitively is his desire for more such experience. Yet as strong as he will be, he will never be able-bodied to overcome the virtual matrix he is in. An infinite loop where a flicker of hope is the only thing that prevents him from complete loss of mind. A Quiet Rebellion Against Orthodox Expectation The world is a master , demanding obedience. Landlords, bosses, teachers, they are the overlords, and their approval a currency of survival. I learned this lesson early, a bitter pill swallowed in the classrooms of my youth. I strove to get away from such masters, like Razor seeks to get away from the mastery of his own madness on him. The fear of failure , of falling short, was a constant companion throughout most of my life. It drove me bitter, drove me even vengeful.  The pressure to perform, to meet the expectations of those who would one day discard me as well , was suffocating, and felt utterly futile, for discarding would've commenced either way.  Knowledge and wisdom were the fleeting pleasures amidst the relentless pursuit of grades, validations and relevancy. Now, as an adult, the echoes of that servitude linger, yet in my own eccentric way. The desire for independence, for a life free from obligations, is something I don't know if I would ever desire nor manage. I know how much good I am capable of keep doing. How could I not bind myself for its sake, and for the sake of feeling useful, thus mentally stable? The world, a monstrous, absurd entity , demands tribute. Bills, responsibilities, task demands. The only entity I seek to control me is myself, under my true master's philosophy.  I longed to break free, like Razor did. From all the frustrating lack of unrepressed knowledge, that corrupted my mind like the lack of knowledge about his intuitive role, corrupted the half-orc man. The world outside turned a distant, indifferent observer I wish little to do with directly.  All I seek is a quiet corner, a place where I can exist, physically unnoticed , therefore mentally unburdened. To live, to write,  and to be left alone.  Is that too much to ask? Humanity at large was a distraction that made my granny feel she was abandoned. Instead of ruthlessly killing people like Razor, I prefer avoiding them, for I have no reason to be with most of them. The Philosopher's Contract: Obeying the Call, Accepting the End Should the world demand something from me, and I would have no other choice but to do it, then I'll do that duty without question. Should someone want my insights on something, I will be biased to give it to them, for that is my altruistic duty as a philosopher. I am a servant, bound by duty and obligation of my own voluntary heart. Like a prisoner in a cell of my own making, I await the next command. The next task, the next burden, to ensure my granny's wishes are lastly fulfilled. Socialization has shaped me, molded me into this obedient vessel, who obeys her from her grave, not out of misery, but out of love.  I am voluntarily a cog in a machine devised after her, a pawn in the grand game, she originally was to commandeer. In the absence of such a player, unlike Razor, I, the "character", take the player's role unto my sole hands, continuing where she has left off, as the sole sovereign. I will serve, I will endure. However, I will also remember that true freedom lies within,  not in the approval of the world , and not in a worth I already managed to prove by building the Philosocom Article Empire. Conclusions Razor Reapkvar, a haunted soul trapped in a cycle of violence and slight realization of virtuality... His story is a warning, a reflection of the darkness that can consume us all, once we begin becoming more aware of the higher, more metaphysical truths. He chases a phantom reward, a meaningless prize that prevents him from understanding nor containing a greater clue of his virtuality, his matrix. His hallucinations,  whispers in his eccentric mind,  tempt him with power to overcome these virtual chains with XP, at the cost of countless lives in his own electronic prison of a reality. The desire for approval, for validation of what his intuition already tells him, is something that can turn us into monsters.  Razor's tale is a mirror, reflecting the depths of our own potential for evil. Whether we find ourselves trapped in self-doubt, driven by our own expectations, or to validate in the real world what we feel inside... Does it have to involve the excessive harm of others? In our pains, and despite them , we still have the choice to resist, the mentally stronger we become . To break free from the chains of obsession is always there, yet hindered by our lack of critical thinking.  It is a choice that Razor failed to make, a mistake that cost him his humanity, as he became more and more of an unrelenting monster. In the end, Razor's story is a reminder of the fragility of the human mind,  the power of choice , and the desire to know the truth beyond just our intuition. Not necessarily in the form of social validation, but in the form of seeing, our actualizing of that intuition, in the world beyond our eyes, as we attempt breaking free from the isolating matrix of solipsism.

(Subcategory Directory on Law and Order) Synopsis by Mr. Ogbule Chibuzo Isaac "9 Ways Social Harmony is Preserved" is a philosophical analysis of the mechanisms that maintain social harmony within constructs. It explores the dichotomy between law and freedom , enforcement mechanisms, shared beliefs, incentives and disincentives, conformity and stress , fear as a tool, deception and critical thinking, shame as teaching and control, and collective claims and individual achievements. The article highlights the importance of balancing individual desires and societal needs, arguing that social constructs should not be viewed solely as limitations but as frameworks that offer belonging, purpose, and protection . A well-functioning society should balance these competing forces, allowing for individual flourishing within a system of shared values. The article calls for a balanced approach to social harmony, prioritizing moral methods and individual health while fostering a cohesive society. This ongoing dialogue between individual and collective needs is essential for the evolution of just and effective social systems. (Background Music) Introduction: Maintaining Harmony in Social Constructs There are many ways a social construct maintains its harmony. However, not all of these ways are entirely positive or entirely negative. Some methods are neither good nor bad, but simply inherent, and their impact depends on the specific social construct. Either way, for an idea to be powerful , it needs not only for people to have faith in. It also needs to be enforced. Otherwise, it will grow ineffective. Therefore, enforcement holds both a philosophical and functional value. The Double-Edged Sword of Social Constructs Social constructs, in the form of written and unwritten rules and ideas that shape societies, play a complex and multifaceted role in maintaining harmony. Here's a breakdown of their methods, highlighting the positive and negative aspects: 1. The Law: Freedom and Order Social constructs create legal systems, and not only norms and traditions . These systems provide a framework for freedom by defining acceptable behavior. However, they also require submission to those rules. The law can reward citizens who follow it and punish those who break it, creating a sense of order. Freedom in society therefore cannot be absolute. 2. Enforcement Mechanisms: Maintaining Functionality Social constructs establish organizations like police and courts to enforce laws. This ensures the population functions smoothly and obeys the established rules. There are, however, less legitimate forms of "enforcement" such as the " fashion police ", which "enforces" through compliance and through herd mentality. It's faulty for the same reason following trends can be faulty. Therefore, not all functionality is logical, productive or even moral in some cases, like with North Korea . 3. Shared Beliefs: Cohesion and Control Social constructs develop shared ideas like religion , culture, norms, and ceremonies. These beliefs create a sense of social coherence but can also be used to control behavior and limit individual thought. Culture is not only to be enjoyed from, but to limit us for greater order. As such, people may obey a flawed ethical system merely to conform. While it is considered moral, for example, to obey the law, it sometimes better, ethically, to break it. 4. Incentives and Disincentives: The Carrot and the Stick Social constructs incentivize desired behaviors through rewards like social status or material possessions . Conversely, they discourage unwanted behaviors through punishments like social exclusion or legal sanctions. This applies even in democracies, though to a lesser extent. Some people, by their verdict of being , will likely to be excluded more in comparison to people who are less unique. Therefore, uniqueness is a double-edged sword , in many societies that prefer mediocrity over the experssion of more-distintinct individuals. Ironically, they hinder their own meritocratic potential. 5. The Pressure to Conform: Stress and Isolation Social constructs can create pressure to conform, leading to stress for individuals who don't fully align with the expectations. Conversely, opting out of social life can also lead to stress and isolation. It is unrealistic to expect from general society the long term effects of stress on our mental and physical health. That is even though we may sacrifice much of our personal health to conform and to please people Therefore, stress reduction is a personal responsibility. 6. Fear as a Tool: Maintaining Order and Shaping Behavior Fear of legal repercussions, social disapproval, or even exclusion can be used to encourage obedience and maintain harmony. However, this fear can extend to unhealthy levels, creating phobias or social anxieties. Whether we're aware of it or not, we have the right to resist our fears.   Either way, we can see a trend here, of the conflict between social cohesion and individual health. For its use of fear and coercion , partial abstinance from general society, unfortunately could be the moral thing to do for the long-term health of our bodies and minds. After all, society does not work effectively on the reduction of the natural possibility of trauma between human beings. Additionally, using fear as a tool could be traumatic by itself, as fear plays a role on the development of post trauma. 7. Deception and Partial Truths: Limiting Critical Thinking Social constructs can present information selectively or even create false narratives to maintain control under ulterior motives . This can discourage critical thinking and independent thought, even in democracies. A less crictically-thinking populace is one that is more-easily manipulated, thus leading to an opportunity to increase one's powerbase. This in turn leads to greater corruption , justified, and even backed by a docile population. Therefore, while the philosopher encourages critical thinking , the politican encourages herd mentality. Behind their supporters' backs of course. Deception allows you to give you the delusion that you are freerer than you actually are, as you submit to your confirmation bias and affiliation bias , to agree with it. 8. Shame: A Tool for Teaching and Control Shame can be used to discourage undesirable behaviors and set examples for others. However, it can also be used excessively, leading to social ostracization and psychological damage. Shame can also be used to scapegoat individuals for the sake of maintaining power structures, by uniting against a common enemy , whether real or imaginary. Due to its contribution to the development and reinforcement of the victim's mentality , shaming should be an immoral tool to use, however effective it may be. For a healthier society, we should work for better harmony. One that improves psychological safety, not takes it away. We can cooperate better without the need to take away each other's health so often. 9. Collective Claims: Sharing Credit Social constructs may take credit for individual achievements, promoting a sense of shared success. While this can strengthen the group, it can also downplay individual contributions. This is mainly true in sports and international competitions such as the olympics. Conclusion: The Negotiation Between Individual and Society By understanding these diverse methods, we can better appreciate the complex interplay between social constructs and individual freedom, as well as be wary of it. Social constructs create a framework for order and cooperation, but this framework can sometimes come at the expense of individual expression, autonomy and health. However, to view social constructs solely as limitations is a simplification.  They also offer a sense of belonging, shared purpose, and protection . A well-functioning social construct finds a balance between these competing forces, allowing individuals to flourish within a system of shared values. Additionally, it would work using the Occam's Razor: Choose morally-good methods to achieve its aims while also sparing itself the reduntant investment of resources. Health is also a resource, a limited one. The important takeaway is that social harmony is not a static state, but rather a constant negotiation between individual desires and societal needs. This ongoing dialogue is what shapes the evolution of social constructs and could pave the way for a more just and future, the same as it could lead to straight-out oppression. If you enjoyed reading this article, consider visiting my online book shop , and thanks for reading thus far.

(Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Potential and Hope) (Philosocom's Hidden Logic Systems Directory) Article Summary by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. The article "Of Beast, Men and Philosophizing -- A Potentially 'Hidden Logic'" explores the differences between human and animal cognition, particularly in relation to existential thought and meaning. It challenges the assumption that human logic and existential doubt are universal to all living beings , offering an engaging concept of animals possessing a different kind of logic. The article uses scientific references, such as the default mode network (DMN) and comparative cognition, to ground its philosophical musings in real-world research. The balanced tone of the article is important for a piece like this, as it explores possibilities rather than asserting. Overall, the article is thought-provoking and brings fresh philosophical questions to light.   (Background music) The justification for divinity in many minds is simple: the universe "must" have been created by design , and if it was not created but "popped" into existence, then it would have no reason to exist, making it absurd. This argument aligns with the Teleological Argument in philosophy, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe imply a purposeful designer. Thus, in the minds of many, divinity exists because they are certain that existence can't simply "pop" into existence without previous design. However, the fallacy in that logic could be the fact that we are bound to human-scale logic (anthropocentrism). Have you ever wondered if (or why not) animals or insects think the same as us? This leads us into an exploration of anthropocentrism and how it shapes human assumptions about intelligence and reason. When you put an animal like a cat in relative isolation from the world ( as they are largely solitary creatures ), they might not be bothered with philosophizing like we humans do. As long as a cat has what they need to survive and some affection , they may not question their existence like many humans have, do, and will do. I've observed the cats I've had throughout my life. When they are awake, they may simply lay somewhere for the majority of their waking time, staring blankly at things or even at a wall. For humans, such behavior might trigger discomfort or even anxiety. It speaks to our need for meaning —a topic extensively explored in existential psychology . Have you ever thought about what goes on in an animal's mind? While studies in animal cognition have shown that animals think, dream , and form social bonds, it is uncertain whether they ponder deep questions about life, as humans do. Research on the default mode network (DMN) in the brain—a network associated with self-reflective thought—has only just begun to be explored in animals, leading to fascinating debates about the inner lives of non-human beings. Philosophy is mainly driven by words, something that animals often do behind our backs. They may understand words but are not capable of reading books or, I believe, forming complex thoughts involving language. The comparison of human symbolic thinking to animal cognition sheds light on why we philosophize, while animals focus on survival. However, the reasoning behind one's existence does not necessarily require words. In theory, it only requires the ability to inquire and have the concept of self and existence. Even beings such as cats could, in theory, question their existence as we humans do, though it may not take the form of complex, structured reflection. Still, when you, like my mother's cat, are confined to a small space and do nothing most of the time, a human would go nuts in such confinement. This highlights the distinctiveness of human cognition : our relentless search for meaning, even in a life of comfort. Why, then, is the need to justify one's existence, along with the existence of the universe, seemingly exclusive to human logic and not the logic of other biological beings? Why is it important for humans to doubt their existence, even if they lead an overall good life, while an animal, like a cat, does not seem troubled by such existential concerns? This could be a reflection of how evolutionary psychology shapes the human need for meaning and purpose. This is my theory: I think animals have a different kind of logic than humans. They do not need philosophy or religion because they are not troubled by existence as long as they can survive another day. Research in comparative cognition suggests that animals operate with forms of logic that serve their survival needs, and this might explain why existential doubt seems absent in them. As to "why" they must survive, they might have a different logic, a logic that they cannot communicate to us, or simply don't. It is not necessarily exclusive to instincts that make a lifeform avoid death. After all, humans are technically animals, even if we are more advanced or "superior" to other organisms. However, our humanity does not necessarily mean that our sense of logic is the most superior or "correct" one . Some humans may need philosophy or religion to give their lives meaning, but this does not seem to apply to lifeforms many consider "beneath" us. This touches upon the philosophical discourse on speciesism which questions the hierarchical value humans assign to different forms of life. Can animals philosophize? I don't know. But if they possess mentality, I assume they can philosophize by recognizing concepts such as life, self, and reality , even if it differs from human reflection. This could mean they approach survival with a philosophy we are unable to grasp, much like the theory of mind in animals continues to challenge long-held human assumptions. Lastly, remember that some animals surpass us in certain areas. In speed, strength, and sensory abilities like smell, sight, and hearing, they outperform humans. Recent studies in animal sensory perception show that some animals can see colors that the human eye cannot. It is plausible that animals have ways of perceiving and understanding reality that are beyond human comprehension, adding a whole new layer to the mystery of their "hidden logic."

(Background music) Article Overview by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. "Rubinshtein's Philosophy on Physical Training and Agony" is a well-organized and thought-provoking article that explores the intrinsic link between physical development and personal empowerment. It delves into the concept that cultivating physical strength enhances one's ability to perform tasks independently, fosters inner resilience and character, and offers a holistic perspective on self-improvement and the management of agony as a catalyst for growth. The article is well-organized, transitioning from the fundamental philosophy of development to practical applications and broader implications on personal and societal levels. The discussion on "vital agony" versus "harmful agony" provides a nuanced understanding of discomfort as a necessary component of growth , encouraging readers to reframe their perception of pain and challenges as opportunities for development rather than mere obstacles. The article integrates practical examples, such as comparing physical training to maintaining a household or the analogy of military strength, effectively illustrate abstract philosophical concepts, making the ideas more accessible and impactful. It emphasizes holistic development, connecting physical training with mental and emotional strength, emphasizing the importance of a balanced approach to self-improvement. The engaging writing style of the article resonates with individuals seeking purpose and direction in their self-improvement journeys. Overall, "Rubinshtein's Philosophy on Physical Training and Agony" is a valuable contribution to discussions on self-improvement, resilience, and the holistic development of individuals.    A primary Philosophy on Physical Training is development. Development is the notion that one is getting better at something, and therefore, is becoming more powerful than before. The more you work on developing yourself, either physically or otherwise, the more powerful you can become. The more power you have, the more potential you can gain and then apply. In the realm of physicality, being strong physically means that you can do more things independently of external, hired help. This, in turn, can save you money. Thus, physical power is one that can save you other forms of power, such as finances . In exchange, you keep that finance and get to spend it elsewhere. If it weren't for your physical prowess, you would depend on one or more hired hands that you could use without. Hence, why the development of physical power is the development of your inner resources . The growth of one resource can allow the growth of another resource, plural or merely singular. The human body is a center of much promising potential. Physical exercise is an exercise in unleashing that potential within you. Neglecting your body means neglecting that potential, making it underdeveloped, and making you dependent on external sources of power unnecessarily. The body is a tool that you own. In a sense, it is your most basic asset, more than any technology. Developing it further extends its promising potential beyond its current practical territory. Physical exercise is a skill like revamping a philosophy article. The more you do it, the better you get at it. The better you get at it, the less painful it can be for you. Therefore, it is a reasonable interest to develop your body to reduce or even eliminate pain that may be included in physical tasks. Not developing your body means exposing it to weakness , and the weaker you are, the more likely you are to suffer critically and unnecessarily. Strength, physical or otherwise, is also a source of defense from such agony . To protect yourself from such agony, you must endure the agony that is required for development . Be afraid of that vital agony , and you will fail to invest in protection from harmful agony . Vital agony is one that contributes to your development, while harmful agony is one that hinders it. There is no life that is devoid of discomfort, and thus, from the potential of agony. Live a life that is devoid of vital agony, and you will expose yourself unnecessarily to future, harmful agony. This includes any other area that is not physical . That's because vital agony nurtures strength, and strength builds character . In order to have good character, both in strength and virtue, you must entertain vital agony . Physical exercise is the exercise of tolerating vital agony on the physical level, and that tolerance can be applied to other departments of our lives. The carefree hedonist who avoids agony may find themselves suffering from harmful agony as they failed to build strength against it. Strength is not only used for offense but for defense as well . As such, the emotionally strong person would be one that can use their emotions practically, like the physically-capable man or woman. Being emotionally strong does not mean, necessarily, that you are an impractical drama-inducer. No. Strength is also expressed in the wise allocation and application of resources. This is why wisdom is an expression of strength. For example, the stronger military force is not the one that is larger in quantity. After all, such forces have been defeated throughout history by smaller armies . Thus, strength is not measured in intensity or quantity alone. It is measured by its ability to exert its power in order to either control or influence. What is the practical point of a man or woman on steroids who does not have the power to clean their homes because they are on overdose ? What is the point of a large military force that is also hungry and tired in the middle of battle, against a smaller force that has been well fed and rested? Fun fact: Asceticism is derived from the Greek word "askeō," which means "to exercise" or "to train". The ascetic trains the power that exists beyond their own willpower . As such, a good ascetic is one that can operate independently of willpower. They develop a specific power that can be exerted despite many situations. This is what makes them very disciplined. Combine reason with asceticism, and you can operate in this world as long as your actions are reasonable, with little else required for that intention. With little inside of you (desires, temptations) standing in your path. Training is more than just developing our bodies— it's the maintenance done in the name of health and iron will. Training is needed even regardless of one's unwillingness. Do you take the garbage out of the house? This is a prime meaning of training—to clean ourselves also from negative traits such as clumsiness, childishness , and slothfulness which threaten our physical well-being. Do so regularly, and the "house" that is your body will be clean from these traits, like a literal house. In the absence of training, the body will unnecessarily deteriorate and can become a liability in our paths in life. Maintaining it through training would mean that it will get less in our way, and be more than an asset. Like a pet, it requires regular attention and caretaking. But unlike a pet, we're necessarily dependent on it as well When we neglect our body, our positive values may become hurt as well; values that can be used for departments outside of pure physicality. We can become fatter and more tired, and at times even less disciplined as well. It can affect interpersonal departments, like when socializing . Like when looking for a partner, and so on. It has little to do with our own body image , and more of using our bodies to advance in life regardless of our perception of it. Rubinshteinic philosophy holds practicality as one of its supreme values. The ultimate point of practicality is to survive and thus to thrive. Thus, treating our bodies like practical tools can further our survival in life , and allow us to better thrive. All our actions begin with our bodies and we cannot do anything without using the body first. Even our minds are part of it, so we can't even think without using our bodies. Developing the body means developing the very center, the very foundation of all our actions . A good foundation should be able to support more successful and promising actions . This is why a healthy mind can definitely exist, at least more than otherwise, as a result of a healthy body. And of course, we need our minds intact in order to allow good cognitive actions. How can a philosopher be a good thinker if their minds are distracted by constant ills and harmful agony? These can damage the clarity and rationality of their thinking. This is because there are constant interactions between body and mind, whether or not the mind is purely physical. The metaphysical essence of the mind does not matter as much, because practically, it only matters that the mind is a product of the body. Even if it exists independently of the body, it cannot operate independently of a body, rendering it ineffective when bodiless. (By "mind" I may also refer to "soul"). As we train, our muscles grow and become stronger by resisting gravity and the objects we hold. This is because our body is here to be adapted to the environment it interacts with. The more interaction, meaning, the more it resists its physical surroundings, the stronger it will become in the name of surviving in the environment it is put against. Human beings have become the conquerors of Earth mainly because of their ability to adapt to their environment. This is why developing the body is excellent for the purpose of adapting. The muscles build themselves accordingly. They are our extensions and they are there to assist our living. If you wish to become stronger by training, you have, first of all, to resist your urges that are used as obstacles and excuses. Second, you need to accept the importance of vital agony in the name of its untapped benefits to your interests. I believe many people give up on training because of the inconvenience of pain and sweat. However, pain and sweat are a direct indication of development! Development is based on overcoming former states, AKA, growing out of them. A tower is built by stories overcoming their lower levels. The self is therefore built on overcoming its former versions. It cannot develop without successfully overcoming what it used to be. For muscles to develop, they must overcome their former, weaker states. When you race and beat your previous time scores, you know that you have overcome your former records, and thus, the former versions of your body. With the hedonistic values that our Western society possesses, we become weaker and more fragile, almost to the point of self-injury by unhealthy substances. All in the name of feeling good. Ironically, such good feelings can lead to harmful agony in the long run, in the form of poorer health, and its consequences Fun does not have to be the primary source of motivation. A good source of motivation should be justified by its practicality. Good feelings are not as practical as survival and maintaining our health. What would happen if training stopped being enjoyable? Would you neglect your body because your counterproductive feelings told you so? Unfortunately, many people would do so. Treat your training as if it were a habit and a duty, and you can survive better by being in better health. In return, you can also operate better in life. All in all, training is a means to an end. It is a " necessary evil " used to maintain and/or improve our physical power. And physical power is a "necessary evil" in itself, because in this world, the strong rule over the weak , and the mighty dictate what is deemed right, what is deemed normal and desired. As such, being physically big and strong can help you overcome certain types of adversity , even if by display or behavior alone. Since I'm a big and strong man, people very rarely interfere with me in real life. They know, even by intuition, that it is unwise to meddle with me. The sad truth is that people of smaller sizes may have it harder in life . So, at least by being more muscular, you can make certain people keep their distance from you, like a scarecrow may do to pests.

Fate is the intended, destiny is the outcome. The ending is set, but Not the means to get there -- Mr. John Duran (Background music) Part I: Some Quotes On the Gamification of Life Life is a game, whose conditions are either met, denied or reprioritized. The world is a playground. Roles of players are either given, chosen or rejected. Whatever goal can only be achieved by surviving enough to gather the required power for its fulfillment. Rules are only dependent on agreement and enforcement. It isn't a rule but a choice to seize any opportunity. The journey is the reward that gives you growth and experience, which can be seen as forms of power. Don't be afraid to think outside the box. Doing so might help you get into the next stages of your goal. Freedom of expression is essential to achieve the goals we deem proper to gain for ourselves and/or others. Live your life on your own terms. Depend on the terms of another as a benefit for your own terms. Part II: The Article Itself For me, life's like a twisted, puzzle maze game that is either regenerated or already set. Our choices are only made within our respective mazes. Such mazes appear to be like an endless role play game where you're trapped in a fog-shrouded world, exploring its depths and gaining experience points from every encounter, even the ones with yourself. It's very likely that you have only one life to go through, meaning that our connection to the "game" of life is not only more precious but quite the privilege. If we die, where else might we find ourselves? Like the monsters we encounter, our "characters" are constantly evolving, regardless of their actions. Both we and our antagonistic forces are always in some kind of a growth process simply given by the earthly, linear progression of time. You might find yourself growing up mentally even through sleep. I really think what is deemed as "experience points" are simply the human ability to naturally learn by the fact the human endures life. Thus, the more we endure, the more we know. Knowledge is also a power, or a resource, and we can't win our respective victories without having the required type of resources, at the required amount. For instance, building a city in a game requires one to gather wood, stones and marbles, what humans basically need is a place to be, a place to breathe, and a place to sleep in. Yet, having this balanced lifestyle of training and rest is something that can be deemed as a self-engineered learning effort. For example, the more you practice a skill, the stronger you become, unlocking new abilities, opportunities, and human connections.  Every experience, every choice, shapes your journey. If you train a skill and then take a break, to the point that it becomes a regular way of life, you can really see that skill grow with time. Even if it takes a very long time to actually master it. Therefore, growth can be divided in two: Growth that is natural, and growth that is more of an artificial substitute to the first, default type. Asceticism is literally translated from greek, and originally means training. It's how I personally develop my mind. Of course, people, especially the autistic, should find the right way to understand the world. The right way for themselves, individually. Like the fog of Silent Hill , life's path is uncertain. There's no clear goal, no definitive ending but death itself . Some seek meaning in achievement, others in relationships, and some wander aimlessly and others idly stagnate . However, unlike Silent Hill, we don't have a specific handbook to guide us, unless we decide to form our own philosophy, of course.  Every moment offers potential, a chance to grow, to learn, to overcome. Embrace the uncertainty, the fog, and overcome different challenges along the way. One of them could be yourself. Your journey is unique the more you discover yourself. As your different powers/stats grow, your choices will make more of a significance in the world. So don't let fear paralyze you, but overcome it for it is also a worthy challenge to endure.  Step into the fog, face your demons, and become more and more the writer and the hero of your own story and your own origins.

(More articles I wrote on spirituality: https://www.philosocom.com/post/issues-with-spirituality https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-arcane-and-causal-fallacy Enjoy!) BG 5.27-28: Shutting out all thoughts of external enjoyment, with the gaze fixed on the space between the eye-brows, equalizing the flow of the incoming and outgoing breath in the nostrils, and thus controlling the senses, mind, and intellect, the sage who becomes free from desire, fear, and anger, always lives in freedom. "The fact that we can access our inner world through dreams or similar means is like having 1/60th of prophecy. While this may not seem like much, paying attention to our feelings can grant us access to a part of our whole being,  enabling us to grow as human beings and more. Surrounded by all that exists, we can draw inspiration from our behavior and come to a future that aligns more with the overall picture ." -- Mr. Roland Leblanc (Directory On Dreams) (Background music) ******************************* Everywhere I look... shadows. Not the kind that dance on walls at night, but the ones that cling to the edges of reality itself and surround it psychopathically. A reality beyond the smaller one we live in.  I used to think the world was a solid, physical place of facts and figures. However, connecting to my intuition , it feels like a poorly-made stage set, a backdrop for some grand, unknowable play. A giant void encompassing the pretentious theatre we call real life. It started with a strange sensation. Disconnected. Like I was peering through a dusty window at a life that wasn't quite mine, merely learned by others that it is. Now I realize how true human connection is by large a delusion. A delusion created by mental constructs, AKA illusions. Only rarely a true connection lies, one that's on intuition, not on mere pleasantries or transactionality. How can we trust our minds when they do not tell us a concrete reality, as much of what we think about the impressions we receive? My eyes felt miles away, not part of me.  Nowadays, I don't feel anything as part of me, of an inner core, maybe of my soul.  Like they were trapped in a cage of my own making - the cage of logic and reason. It was terrifying, a profound loneliness that settled deep in my bones. I used to feel that emotion. An uncanny, profound emotion beyond society and solitude. Such an emotion, felt beyond the veil of my momentary daily life, allowed me to study the power of the void. The world, the one I thought I knew, felt like a dream.  One filled with a hollowness that merely pretended to be of concrete value.   I even slapped on my knee once to test my true care of sensation. Although the pain was sharp, my ascetic lifestyle turned me into a largely oblivious sage, who sees most emotion as but a distraction from his work. I may be happy and over-energetic at times. However, I am well aware these are meddlesome veils that distract me from seeing reality more clearly, using both reason and intuition. Society, who engineers and manipulates itself on the empowerment and repression of specific emotions in its members... of course they would be a distraction as well. Only those who care enough to help my health , the infrastructure imperative for my philosophic work, they are truly the ones worthy of my time and attention. The rest of this false matrix is either a distraction or a necessary evil. A pressure often thummed on my forehead, causing me headaches I discarded as with much of my pain , like a trapped bird trying to break free. Could it be...? The legends of a Third Eye, a gateway to realms burdened by emotions that are there to lose?   To touch it mentally, offered no physical sensation, beyond further pain and further pain, necessary for liberation . As my mind buzzed with the possibility of something more... Something greater than all of this! They say the Third Eye awakens with intuition , a surrender to the whispers of the unseen. And this... this gateway... it promises a new reality, that is merely left unseen. It is a layer of existence stacked upon all the conventional ones in reality's intricacy.   Even this screen, the comforting click of the keys...  a mere interactive, metaphysical fabrication , as it tires my eyes, yet my brain sees beyond these eyes, a world beyond. I, the one who scoffed at such notions with physicalism, now find myself seeing the waking world as a painted hologram.    There were moments, starting from a younger age, where I felt the observer within, the essence of me, shift from my internal world , observing the bigger, empty reality that surrounds me.  No longer behind my eyes, but my whole being, expanding itself in its energy , becoming part of a greater cosmic force.   My entire life was spent dreaming within and without dreams. The world as a vast, unknowable, empty dreamscape we merely fool ourselves to be greater in essence than it really is. My depression began when I understood this as a child . All people see are impressions they mistake for reality. That is why many of them would blow things out of proportion. I did so too, until connecting to such moments, helped me let go from such an absurd grandiose mental reception. The aftershocks linger as a weight of a mind as fatigued as that of an old man.  Random flashes where the world seems to glow in energies I was taught to repress, were a reminder of the veil that separates this realm from the next.  Even my damn video games feel different, as they were the ones that helped me realize this reality is often as empty, truly as a video game world or a movie.  Less a matter of thumbs on a controller, more a connection forged with the expanding, lonely-at-the-top mind. Perhaps this newfound intuition is what I need to truly fulfill my purpose , my calling as a philosopher.   To unravel the mysteries that have always lurked in the shadows of the lights casted by societal productions.  The world is not what it seems.  There's something... something beyond, pressing against the edges of perception . It can become clearer the more we turn to hermits. I enjoy and embrace the shadows, as I too attempt to delve into the mysteries that lie beyond the veil.  The intuition of them, grow stronger with each article I write and renovate. I... I can't help but feel compelled to listen. Can't help, but overcome my own willpower , and become more attuned with it.

(Background music) Why Solitude Can Be a Way to Self-Discovery The term "looking within" is not meant to be taken literally. It does not mean seeing your internal organs, but rather seeing yourself beyond the sphere of societal interactions and day-to-day regularity. It means seeing yourself as a distinct individual with a degree of depth that is often overlooked. There are many ways to discover the deeper aspects of yourself, and many of them involve voluntary isolation , or solitude. This is because when you are alone, there are fewer things and beings to distract you from what you are doing. Solitude can provide the concentration and silence necessary for self-reflection. Any activity, like writing, which is solitary , can lead to self-discovery. Cultivating Self-Awareness The deeper aspects of yourself are always present within you, regardless of the situation. It is simply that we do not regularly pay enough attention to them, due to the necessity of focusing on other things for our survival and development. Free time is therefore a good means of looking within. If you ask a random person what they are thinking about, they are likely to not know what to answer. This is because we as humans are always producing and experiencing thoughts . But without enough awareness, we cannot describe them or what they entail. Dedicate some time to listening to your thoughts, and even record them in whatever form you choose. Your thoughts are the gates to the desired aspects of the self you may be looking for: The ideal self. You can thus know that you have looked within yourself in a sufficient manner when you are able to properly describe what you’re thinking about when asked so in whatever situation. You can see it as a test of the current capacity of your self-knowledge . Have someone ask you this exact question from time to time ("What you've been thinking about?"), and you may be able to pass this test, the more you practice focusing and/or recording your thoughts and feelings. It's just like any other test that requires an immediate answer. Learn to look within yourself naturally, and you'll gain the great benefit of explaining yourself to those who fail to understand you properly. Demonstrating your strengths and weaknesses is better than simply saying you have them in general. Understanding ourselves better can further increase harmony in society when it allows us to better put boundaries and find common ground with others. As such, looking within is also capable of generating altruistic value. Feedback by Mr. Nathan Lasher Self-Discovery doesn’t have to be an internal thing you are trying to figure out through solitude. Yes, time to yourself is important, but if one would like to truly know themself simply do so by going out and experiencing life. How you react to it all will give you a good idea of the type of person you are. It's all about trial and error. Go out and try something, see in which ways you can be better and go out and try again until you're satisfied with the outcome than go out and try something new. Experience can do stuff which self evaluation will never be able to do alone. Must give your mind the proper demonstration of who you are. You won’t know what type of person you are if all you’ve ever done was stay at home.  Knowing yourself is not some difficult thing. If you ever want to know who you are, do nothing , pay attention to your actions for one day. Don’t change anything other than noting down the action and reason why you did it. Learn the reason why you do things and you will know the type of person you are.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's O. C. Isaac Articles) (Subcategory On Memory, Nostalgia and the Unconscious) (Villainy/Anti-Villainy Directory) (Audiobook verison of the game at hand) ********************************* Article Synopsis by Mr. J. Igwe And Co. Mr. Ogbule Chibuzo Isaac's article, "Philosophical Complementary on Silent Hill 2," provides a comprehensive analysis of the philosophical underpinnings of the game. The article explores various philosophical themes, such as existentialism, moral ambiguity , reality, and psychoanalysis, providing a comprehensive overview of the game's rich narrative. Isaac's discussion on existentialism and identity is particularly engaging, connecting James Sunderland's journey to broader existential themes. He also highlights the game's challenge to traditional notions of morality, prompting readers to question their own ethical frameworks. Psychoanalysis and the unconscious mind are also explored, with Isaac's incorporation of Freud's theories and the exploration of the unconscious mind providing a robust framework for understanding the game's symbolic elements. The article also highlights the game's ability to engage players on a philosophical level by drawing connections between the game's themes and broader philosophical questions. Isaac's writing style is clear, articulate, and engaging, balancing detailed analysis with accessible language, making complex philosophical concepts understandable to a broad audience. By framing Silent Hill 2 as more than just a video game, Isaac invites readers to explore the intersection of philosophy and interactive media, encouraging a deeper engagement with the game and opening the door for further scholarly exploration of video games as a medium for philosophical inquiry. Overall, Isaac's article is a thought-provoking and well-crafted piece that offers valuable insights into the philosophical dimensions of Silent Hill 2.   (Background music) The major aspects of philosophy that can be found in Silent Hill 2 include metaphysics, ethics, and existentialism. A popular survival horror video game released in 2001, offers a rich and deeply philosophical experience that delves into various existential and psychological themes. As with any form of art, interpretations may vary, but here are some common philosophical views that players and critics have discussed in relation to Silent Hill 2: Existentialism and Identity Existentialism is centered on the individual's quest for meaning and purpose in an otherwise seemingly absurd and indifferent world. James 's journey to Silent Hill can be seen as an embodiment of this search. He is driven by an overwhelming desire to understand the contents of the letter, which leads him into the depths of his own consciousness, seeking answers and validation for his actions and emotions. Existentialism emphasizes the importance of authenticity , being true to oneself , and taking responsibility for one's actions. James's experiences in Silent Hill force him to confront his actions, whether they are absolute or subjective . Moral Ambiguity and Guilt: Silent Hill 2 invites players to question traditional notions of morality and judgment. As they progress through the game, players may find themselves empathizing with James' guilt and conflicted emotions, challenging the idea of absolute right and wrong. Silent Hill 2 often blurs the lines between right and wrong, good and evil. The characters in the game are complex and flawed, and their actions are often driven by guilt and trauma. This ambiguity raises philosophical questions about the nature of morality and whether it is absolute or subjective . The Nature of Reality: Silent Hill 2's exploration of the nature of reality is rooted in the human psyche and the ways in which our experiences, emotions, and memories can shape our perception of the world. It is a game that challenges players to confront their own fears and insecurities while offering a unique and thought-provoking narrative experience. The town of Silent Hill itself is a manifestation of the characters' subconscious and desires. This surreal and nightmarish setting raises questions about the nature of reality , the mind's ability to construct its own reality , and the blurred boundaries between dream and waking life . Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious: Silent Hill 2 incorporates elements of psychoanalysis and explores the concept of the unconscious mind throughout its narrative. Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theories heavily influence the game's themes, character motivations, and symbolic representations. Here's how psychoanalysis and the unconscious play a significant role in Silent Hill: At the heart of Silent Hill 2's narrative is the theme of repressed memories and guilt. James Sunderland, the protagonist, struggles with repressed memories of his wife, Mary, and the guilt he feels over her death. The town of Silent Hill becomes a manifestation of his unconscious mind, creating a world where he must confront his suppressed emotions and face the truth he has been avoiding. The creatures and environments in Silent Hill 2 are symbolic representations of James' inner turmoil. For example, the Pyramid Head monster embodies James' guilt and self-punishment for his actions. The game uses these symbolic representations to externalize James' internal conflicts and desires, making the unconscious manifest in the physical world. The Otherworld , the nightmarish and twisted version of Silent Hill, can be seen as a representation of the unconscious mind breaking through into reality. It is a place where James' suppressed emotions and memories become manifest in terrifying and distorted forms. However, Silent Hill 2's use of psychoanalytic themes and the exploration of the unconscious mind add depth and complexity to its narrative. It delves into the inner workings of the human psyche and challenges players to confront the darker aspects of their own minds. Silent Hill 2 contains many symbolic and psychological elements that invite psychoanalytical interpretations. The game's monsters, environments, and puzzles can be seen as representations of the characters' repressed fears, desires, and traumas, inviting players to delve into the depths of the unconscious mind. Notably; Silent Hill 2 holds significant gip on philosophy for several reasons: Exploration of Complex Themes: The game delves into profound philosophical themes, such as existentialism , psychoanalysis , and moral ambiguity , providing players with an interactive experience that encourages introspection . By immersing players in the protagonist's psychological journey, it challenges them to grapple with questions about human nature , guilt , identity , and the meaning of existence . Psychological Realism: Silent Hill 2 portrays the human psyche in a raw and realistic manner, confronting players with the dark and unsettling aspects of the mind. It brings to the forefront the complexities of human emotions, traumas, and desires, offering a unique medium through which players can explore the intricacies of the unconscious and its impact on behavior and perception. Blurring the Line Between Reality and Illusion: The game blurs the boundaries between reality and illusion , making players question the nature of truth and the reliability of their own perceptions. This aspect reflects philosophical discussions about the nature of reality, subjective experience, and the limitations of human consciousness. Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Choices: Silent Hill 2 presents players with moral dilemmas and forces them to make difficult choices that affect the outcome of the story. By engaging players in morally ambiguous situations, the game encourages them to contemplate the nature of morality and the consequences of their actions, echoing ethical debates in philosophy. In all, Silent Hill 2 is not just a video game, but also an embodiment of psychology and philosophy. It is, perhaps, one of the deepest games in gaming history, in terms of these two departments.

(Background music) As someone who has taken personality quizzes since early adolescence, I can testify that there were a lot of them that helped me a lot to better understand who I am. However, there were also a lot that were nonsensical; either childish, simplistic, or a mere marketing attempt to attract traffic from various platforms. Whatever the case may be about the general opinion towards them, some of them are actually pretty useful in the quest towards self-discovery. However, when it comes to aspects such as medicine and psychology, I'd recommend treating them with a grain of salt . Don't expect them to replace a psychologist or a doctor, no matter how much the results have convinced you that you have a certain syndrome, illness, and so on. You should also consider this when trying out such quizzes: they might be incorrect even if you answer them truthfully. Even quizzes that strive for individual accuracy won't necessarily hit the spot as they pretend to. Anyone can create a personality quiz, just like anyone can create any type of quiz, online. In order to find a quiz that will serve your purposes as best as possible, you will have to dig deeper into the internet than just the first or two pages of search results. After all, the internet prioritizes websites that are best optimized for search , not necessarily those that are the most comprehensive or provide the best functionality. Also, keep in mind that taking a single quiz will not always be enough for self-discovery. Take as many quizzes as you see fit that can serve as a testimonial to the results of the previous quizzes. The more quizzes you take, the more likely you are to get similar, if not identical, results. A quiz does not have to match a specific theme (for example, "What kind of intellectual are you?"), but taking quizzes from multiple themes can also lead to similar results (a quiz titled "What should your job be?" could in theory reveal similar insights to the previously-stated quiz). As I took more of them throughout the years, they helped me better understand my intellectual aspect and how it can also be useful to others. It helped me realize that I am introverted, sensitive, and so on. As I grew up, I have seen that most of these results were true. However, this could be because I spent a long time finding appropriate, serious quizzes, and not those that appear more childish, like those with emoticons, emojis, memes, and gifs. Those ultimately only hurt the credibility of the authors, and even though they have marketing potential, I hardly use them myself in public forums/platforms such as this website. In conclusion, personality quizzes can be very insightful, but in order to make the best of them, one should dedicate some time to finding them by being selective and by experimenting with several of them. They are not perfect, but they do have some philosophical value – through helping us understand who we are, our place in this world, and even help us find jobs that fit us as distinct individuals. A small warning: personality quizzes should serve as an aid, and they are not a divine revelation. Use your judgment, and maybe consult with other people as well about the results. This whole endeavor could be pretty useful for anyone who seeks to understand themselves beyond the daily framework of life. Here are some additional points that you may want to consider when taking personality quizzes: Value of honesty: It is important to be honest when answering personality quizzes. If you try to answer in a way that you think the test wants you to answer, the results will be meaningless. Research the quiz:  Before taking a quiz, research the methodology used. Review the feedback of those who took it or even read online articles about it that will overall give you a less biased approach.

(Philosocom Success Subcategory) (Philosocom's Directory on Failure) (Background music) A street survivalist who rarely shows himself . Despite his appearance, he's actually fairly rich. -- The Sujimon Sujidex ( A Fictional Directory for "Super Jittery Men" on this "Sujimon", Yakuza 7: Like a Dragon) The " Invested Vagabond " is a very special enemy in one of the video games I've been playing recently. I'm bringing this character up because of the symbolism I find within him. The "Invested Vagabond" is your archetypical hermit from days of old. Think Yoda or Obi-Wan from Star Wars—that's the guy, with the same old rags and all. The thing is, the game he's in is not some sci-fi world or a fantasy world, but instead in contemporary Japan. He has a cane and his appearance is dirty, with a wild-looking face like a caveman. Compared to the other enemies in the game, which are already unique, the Invested Vagabond is different, but not in an edgy or pretentious way. He looks like he belongs in a cave rather than the underground of a Japanese city where he dwells. In short, he is like the Hermit in the respective tarot card within a contemporary setting. The Invested Vagabond is a special enemy because he is a symbol of challenge and investment. He takes interest in each fight he appears in, or else he would stay in the shadows where recluses like him choose to belong. If you manage to defeat him, which is difficult regardless of your power, he will give you a lot of rewards. However, if he loses interest in the fight, he will run away like a coward, never to return during that fight. For some reason, he is extremely resilient. No matter how good your weapon is, each hit will only make him lose a tiny portion of his health bar. There appears to be nothing you can do to increase the damage dealt to him, but pure chance of a deadly strike. In more advanced terms, he is basically a " Tank ", or a character whose purpose is to absorb damage while the other characters on his side attack you with less risk of being hurt themselves. He is both a hermit and someone with great contribution to any fight he decides to join. He can be a frustrating figure. You can invest the majority of your fight in trying to defeat him, only for him to eventually decide to ditch the fight, thus wasting your time and effort. If he ditches the fight, there is nothing you can do to prevent or restore his decision. Other than that, he is largely absent, found almost entirely in the deep underground network of a Japanese city featured in the game, making him a relatively rare encounter. The Invested Vagabond is a symbol of challenge and investment. He is a test of your skill, patience, and willingness to risk failure in favor of great bonuses. He is also a reminder that the rewards of success are often worth the risk. Since some rewards deserve to have resources sacrificed for, some risks are worthy to be taken. If you defeat him while in battle, your reward is guaranteed -- a chance of becoming significantly stronger from the particular fight. If you are willing enough to take the challenge of defeating, then you should do so, even when the odds are basically against you, due to his possible decision to ditch the fight at any time. It could be in a minute or two, but regardless, it is essentially fighting against a randomized limit that can be over at any time. Similar to real life, when contacts may ghost you no matter how much you care for them. A sad reality. The reason why he reminds me of a certain person, is because they both chose to ditch me, and in both cases, I cannot do anything to restore it. If I did things otherwise, perhaps she would continue to stay in my life to this very day. Unrequited love may happen when you make the wrong choices with the other person. Stalking, as presented in this story, is a dangerous, irrational way of loving someone. And it won't get the other person to love you back, either. Love has its own share of wise and unwise decisions, even if it "breeds madness" Even in the irrationality of love, one must make wise decisions, and wise decisions are made by rationality. It is known as practical reasoning. As such, there is also wise planning that can defeat this Vagabond enemy more quickly, thus reducing the chance of them escaping. Practical reasoning applies in both departments, whether one is invested in love or in gaming. And like with the Invested Vagabond, it can be too late. I can only imagine the opportunities I would've had if I had made certain decisions at certain moments before her departure. If I only said one word instead of the other, one thing instead of what I actually said, then perhaps my life would've been different. And yet, love clouds our judgement, as it did with mine. The Invested Vagabond was invested in the fights he featured in, just as the few women I've had in my life were invested in mine. Somehow, I've failed both kinds often. This enemy symbolizes the guilt of a missed opportunity that will never return (unless you fight another Vagabond in his stead later in your adventure to the depths of the underground). But unlike video game enemies, each woman is a unique person. Watching the cursed Vagabond appear before me, I can't help but feel melancholy, whether or not I manage to actually beat him in a fight. If I fail, I will be reminded of my own failure as a man; if I beat him, I will be reminded that I could have done other things in my own life to "win" the hearts of the very few loved ones I had in my life. A love interest is a special someone , just like this enemy, and even more than him. They are not to be taken lightly, both because of their potential, and because of how easily that potential can slip away, like sand in the wind. No matter how much you invest yourself in them, nothing will ensure their presence in your company. However, should you manage to "win," then they can change your world, transform you, and make you more experienced ("leveled-up" in gaming terminology). It is never easy... Due to the uncertainty of romantic relationships, I've decided to stop looking for them for around 8 years of my life, simply because of how unstable they can be, both practically and emotionally. I didn't want to be "invested" in them because that opportunity could easily go down the drain, along with all the investment I myself have made in them. Failure is so frustrating. This enemy is an incarnated oxymoron—a great and wasteful opportunity at the same time . If you invest too much of your time in him, he may escape while the other enemies beat you down without your retaliation, as your retaliation has been invested in him, not them. Imagine being so close to defeating him, only to find him escaping. By the same token, imagine nurturing a connection with a woman, only to find out she ghosted you, despite the time and efforts you put into her. Both cases remind us of how powerless we are against two things: Chance/luck, and the heart of another. In true love, you must accept the reality of another. And if they leave your presence permanently, the most painful aspect in true love is to let go. It's all up to your priorities and your philosophy in life, whether to invest or not in others on a deeper level. Investment, in general, is a gamble . Hence the practicality of philosophy in general—it helps you live better and in line with the truths of life. Perhaps, there are times where gambling resources, even if the only resource is time itself, is worth the bother. The choice is up to you . Either focus on making attempts, even if you fail, or choose to retreat to only that which is certain even if those are less bountiful. If we are prepared for yet another failure, we may not be as disappointed as otherwise.

(Philosocom's Directory on Beauty and Art) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Health) Article Synopsis by Ms. Gabbi Grace The article "Health, Body and Delusion - How Your Body Image Depends On You" explores the relationship between body positivity and self-perception. It provides a comprehensive overview of body positivity, addressing psychological and societal influences , and the internal struggle individuals face. The article encourages self-empowerment by emphasizing the importance of cultivating healthy self-esteem and appreciating oneself, empowering readers to take control of their self-image and self-worth. The article critiques societal norms, highlighting cultural variability of beauty standards and debunking the myth of a universal ideal body. It also offers a balanced perspective on health and appearance, encouraging readers to pursue a healthy lifestyle while maintaining a positive body image. Overall, the article provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between body image and self-perception. It has the potential to be a highly impactful piece that encourages readers to embrace body positivity and self-acceptance. (Background music) Part I: Body Positivity: More Than Looks "People need to realize that models get [professional] hair and makeup, incredible lighting, and we know how to pose. I’ve been doing this job for almost 10 years so I know how my body looks good from different angles. But I don’t look like that in real life. I’m like every other girl; there are things I wish I could change about my body, but I try not to think about them too much." -- Sara Sampaio Even the most conventionally attractive people can struggle with crippling self-doubt, while those deemed "unattractive" by societal standards can cultivate a greater sense of self-appreciation. This is because our perception of our bodies is often a self-reflection , a psychological construct rather than a purely physical one. Body positivity , at its core, transcends the limitations of the physical. It's not about ignoring health concerns or pretending medical issues don't exist. It's about recognizing that our self-image, that critical voice in our heads, can be wildly out of sync with reality. True body positivity goes beyond aesthetics . It focuses on building healthy self-esteem, independent of the clothes we wear or the shape we perceive in the mirror. It's about accepting and appreciating ourselves for who we are, not just the vessel we inhabit. The Mental Dimension of Body Image Whether or not we choose to accept who we are is our prerogative because our lives, like our bodies, belong to us, and are not the property of others. As such, while the freedom of expression allows anyone to criticize and judge us, it's our choice to whether or not to accept who we are. That is whether or not we wish work towards what we wish to become. Thus, we need to create this mental barrier between our sense of self and between what others think of us. While both of these are equally legitimate perceptions , People are allowed to judge us the same as we are allowed to heavily disagree with them. As such, the ability to sustain a good body-image is also a matter of resolve, a mental struggle towards being confident within our own skin. The more mental strength we'll be able to gather, the more we could withstand and recognize the existence of opinions which would disapprove of us. And by "us" I refer to either of those: Who we currently are, What we might become, should we fail to meet societal expectations. What we might become, should we succeed to meet societal expectations. The mental and social struggle in this issue cannot be denied therefore, as we will be judged either way. In people's company, that is an inevitable possibility. Part II: The Internal Battle -- Making the Clear Sense of Distinction There's a misconception that "body positivity" is society fixing a problem for individuals. The reality, is might be more about an internal, personal struggle towards finding inner peace . It's a battle fought within each of us, regardless of our physical appearance, and often regardless of external validation. Here are some points that need to be known to fully understand this body-mind issue: Beyond Aesthetics:  True body positivity isn't about forcing someone to believe they are "beautiful." It's about dismantling the false idea that self-worth necessarily correlates with physical perfection. In reality, however, the happiness that comes with a good sense of self worth, as well as happiness in general, is subjective to the individual . It would be illogical to expect that the same goals give all people happiness once they're achieved, thus the path of happiness is based on self-knowledge, and not on social trends. The Impact of Looking Within:   While our self-image is internal, it bleeds into the external world. Low self-esteem can lead to social withdrawal , impacting relationships and productivity. By cultivating the inner strength to exist despite the external significance, we can reduce its overall influence on our mentality by refusing to comply and submit to it. When you fully understand every part of yourself you are less likely to be impacted by the world around you. You can become more sure of yourself, and your assertiveness can be used as protection. From Apathy to Empathy:  In a world defined by its general apathy to individuals, it's often unrealistic to expect empathy from others, and that especially includes strangers and those who refuse to understand us properly. If anything, the best thing we could do is to not be disappointed by this fact, but work towards giving empathy to ourselves. To accept ourselves despite our flaws, and choose to work on these flaws should we ever decide to. We do not have to fully accept our flaws when we can muster, by desire, to change these flaws through training and discipline. Either way much of our ability to empathize with ourselves depends on our resolve to do so. We're the first people who can love our own selves. Health Beyond Appearance:  Health is crucial for a productive society, and body positivity can be a gateway to healthier choices. When we accept our current state of our bodies, we're more likely to take care of our bodies – physically and mentally -- to preserve it. Role model Kim Alexis claims: "I remember trying every fad diet … starving myself for four days in a row. I remember trying the Atkins diet, which was low carbohydrate, high protein. If I didn’t drop ten pounds in a week, I was on to another diet. I think I was a normal person before I started screwing around with all these diets.... [I've suffered] long-term health effects from the crazy diets.” Breaking the Materialistic Machine:  Society isn't just a "profit machine." It thrives on a diverse and fulfilled population, who can contribute to others despite financial profit being made. Body positivity empowers individuals to pursue their passions. Our bodies are there as tools to help us achieve our hopes and dreams, and it's why the body is capable of much adaptability. Part III: Reframing the Discourse Let's shift the focus from body image to a healthier lifestyle. Encouraging healthy habits – whether we're individuals talking to friends, parents raising kids , teachers guiding students, or content creators influencing followers – is a far more productive approach. Over time, this can positively impact body image on a broader scale, than trying to be pleasing to the demands of large-scale organizations and corporations. They don't necessarily care about your individual uniqueness, as much as they seek to turn a profit like the average business. Here are points to consider for a healthier mindset, which can improve body image more effectively: Obsession vs. Appreciation: Constantly obsessing over minor imperfections is a drain on time and energy. However, a healthy level of self-awareness is important. The key lies in appreciating our bodies for what they can do, rather than solely focusing on appearance. By improving our self esteem we can live in greater harmony with our imperfections . We could also thrive alongside them, if they don't serve as significant obstacles in our path to self-actualization Criticizing the Ideal Body Myth: The concept of an "ideal" body is a cultural mirage that won't necessarily bring you the happiness you seek. Firstly, there's no universal standard for beauty, as different cultures, and individuals have varying preferences. Some women, for example, were found to be attracted more to overweight men . That's despite the fact that an ideal, stereotypical body isn't overweight. Imagine showing people from around the world a range of physiques – who they find attractive will differ greatly. In Tajikistan, for example, unibrows are considered a "symbol of feminine beauty and purity" . Conversely, fashion models who appear unhealthily thin in Western cultures are stereotypically presented as the epitome of female beauty. We can therefore deduce that an "ideal body" is not objective but is subject to perception. Understanding Modeling: Models showcase clothing, not human ideals. They're essentially "human clothes hangers." They are there to influence you to buy clothing and accessories, not to tell you what you should become or look like. They are there to inspire you to buy, not to inspire you to follow their example, as the default definition of a role model suggests. They only necessarily model appearance. The rest of their functionality is attributed subjectively. While modeling can be lucrative, it doesn't contribute significantly to society beyond vanity . There are far more impactful and valuable ways to contribute to the world. As such, pure beauty deserves to be criticized. The Delusion of Looks: People can be delusional about their appearance in both positive and negative ways. Some believe they need improvement despite being attractive to many people, while others believe they deserve admiration for external qualities that aren't there. However, to play the devil's advocate, delusions can be used as a self-defense mechanism . To quote Jess C. Scott: “What’s the whole point of being pretty on the outside when you’re so ugly on the inside?” Conclusions Ultimately, the choice on our bodies, both in perception and action, is ours. We can succumb to unrealistic beauty standards, or we can cultivate a healthy self-image that values our bodies for their capabilities and focuses on overall well-being. To expand and utilize our lifespan and our mental health, we can promote healthy living and self-acceptance. We can work towards a society where everyone thrives, not just in terms of social worth, but in all aspects of life. Our choice forever begins on the individual's consent. Respecting other people is also expressed by respecting their consent. Your self-worth is defined by the width of your belly only if you choose to. With your permission you can choose to focus on other aspects of who you are, such as the strength of your will and the vastness of your potential. Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback You begin to understand self worth when you start to fully understand yourself and what you have to offer to the world. When you realize stuff of this nature, people's opinions mean little as they can’t take away from facts. It really does boil down to presenting yourself in a way that you want other people to see and think of you as. Any time you let others decide your worth you will always be in for a disappointment. Create a value that other people can’t so easily deny.