The Fallacy of Destiny: Why Reality Has No Plot Armor
- Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein

- Oct 15, 2021
- 3 min read
Updated: 9 minutes ago

Introduction
Arguably, the most problematic individuals are those who believe they are the protagonists of a cosmic story. They believe they are guided by a mystical force called "Destiny," a force so powerful it acts as a shield against death until their "purpose" is fulfilled.
This belief is dangerous. It encourages unnecessary risk-taking under the false assumption that fate will intervene to save them. As a result, people suffer unnecessarily from their own reckless misadventures, believing they are protected when they are merely lucky.
The Fiction of "Plot Armor"
In literature and film, this concept is known as Plot Armor. Plot armor creates an artificial rule: Characters deemed essential to the story cannot die until the story allows it. A hero can walk through a hail of bullets and survive, not because of skill, but because the writer needs them for Chapter 10.
Reality doesn't necessarily have a writer. Reality has necessarily has physics.
The Logic of the Tank: Physics vs. Potential
The flawed reasoning behind "Destiny" is easily exposed by a simple thought experiment: The Tank Scenario.
Imagine two people standing in the path of a moving tank:
An Ordinary Clerk: He has no grand ambitions and little impact on history.
The Future Savior: A scientist destined to discover the cure for cancer in ten years.
If the tank runs over both of them, they both die.
The tank does not scan their brains for "potential contribution to humanity." The tank does not check their "destiny file." The tank only respects the laws of mass and velocity.
The Logic of Indifference: The laws of physics are indifferent to human value. The future cancer-cure inventor will not be saved by his potential importance. Accidents do not discriminate based on social status, IQ, or moral virtue.
The Destiny Delusion
The concept of destiny is logically flawed because it treats Future Potential as Present Protection.
It suggests that because you might do something great in the future, you cannot be killed in the present. This reverses cause and effect. You do not survive because you have a destiny; you only have a destiny if you survive.
Destiny is not a shield; it is a retrospective label. We look at people who survived great dangers and say, "They were destined to live." We ignore the thousands of equally talented people who died young in the same dangers. This is known as Survivorship Bias.
The Disappointment of Reality
This is why reality often feels disappointing or "wrong" compared to fiction.
Fiction is structured, fair, and narratively satisfying.
Reality is chaotic, unfair, and indifferent.
When a celebrated figure (like Mother Teresa) or a world leader faces a car crash or a virus, they are exactly as vulnerable as an ordinary merchant. No amount of perceived importance generates a force field.
Why, then, do we complain that things "aren't supposed to be this way"? Why do we think there is a Plan? There is no plan that overrides the laws of nature.
The Real Alternative: Survivability
I have come to question the concept of a predetermined destiny for greatness because it provides zero guarantee of survival. No angels will catch me if I fall off a cliff. The supposed greatness of my future thoughts will not stop a bullet.
Therefore, we must replace the myth of "Plot Armor" with the reality of Survivability.
Since we cannot rely on fate, we must rely on Optimization.
Prioritize Well-being: Health, strength, and safety are not just lifestyle choices; they are survival tactics.
Mitigate Risk: Avoiding unnecessary danger increases your statistical chance of living long enough to do something great.
Survivability is the only realistic alternative to plot armor.
To optimize our potential, we must strive to extend our lifespan through discipline and caution, not through faith in a story that hasn't been written yet. Even the most powerful world leaders can die in a heartbeat.
Do not trust your destiny to keep you safe. Trust your caution.







Comments