(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's O. C. Isaac Articles) (Philosocom's Directory on Peace) Poem Analysis by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. "The Quiet Triumph -- A Poem of Stoic Philosophy" by O.C. Isaac is a profound meditation on the nature of true victory, peace, and wisdom. The poem contrasts traditional notions of victory achieved through warfare and conflict with a quieter, more profound form of triumph, aligning with stoic and pacifist philosophies. The line, "The greatest victory is a silent wind," suggests that true success isn't about conquering others but about self-mastery, reminiscent of Epictetus' Stoicism. Non-violence and restraint are promoted as a path to strength and victory, with the emphasis on patience, not force, and the idea of "conquering without spoken words." This aligns with Gandhian ethics and Buddhist philosophy, where restraint and peaceful conduct lead to personal and societal harmony. Martin Luther King Jr.'s philosophy of non-violent resistance views enduring suffering with dignity as the highest form of courage and power. Wisdom and inner peace are also emphasized, with the idea that wisdom's grace can decline fights and that battles of the mind and heart are superior to physical conflict. This echoes Socratic and Platonic views, where the pursuit of wisdom, knowledge, and self-control is paramount to leading a virtuous life. The futility of war is reflected in the lines, "What need is there for endless strife, when peace can win the war of life?", reflecting Albert Einstein's observation that peace cannot be kept by force ; it can only be achieved by understanding. The avoidance of conflict while embracing understanding resembles Immanuel Kant's ethics, particularly his call for perpetual peace. Transcendence through peace is described, illustrating that real success transcends the material and ephemeral, resonates with Eastern spiritual traditions like Zen Buddhism , and Hannah Arendt's conception of power, which lies in the potential for collective action in peaceful harmony rather than violent imposition. In conclusion, "The Quiet Triumph" encourages reflection on the true nature of strength, victory, and peace, rejecting the glorification of violence and conflict, advocating for wisdom, patience, and inner peace. (Background music) The greatest victory is a silent wind, That blows not through the clash of swords, But whispers where peace begins, And conquers without spoken words. No battle waged, no blood is spilled, Yet the heart remains unscarred, still. In wisdom’s grace , the fight’s declined, And war is left for lesser minds. For in the calm, the strength resides, Where patience, not force, abides. A subtle force, without a sound, That lifts us high from hostile ground. What need is there for endless strife, When peace can win the war of life? A victor’s crown from inner peace, Where violence and conflict cease. The greatest path is walked alone, Not on a field with cries and moans. But through the fields where stillness reigns, Where nothing’s lost, and all is gained. For battles fought with mind and heart, Leave bodies whole and far apart. A war of wits, a dance of thought, Where every loss and win is taught. In victory, the hands don’t clench, They offer peace, release the wrench. No scars to show, no wounds to mend, But understanding, in the end. The gentle breeze of triumph flows, Where only the enlightened know, That strength is found not in the fight, But in restraint, and in the light. The mountains do not roar to stand, Nor rivers strike to carve the land. Yet in their stillness, they prevail, A quiet force that does not fail. So too, must we, in quiet stay, To find the undefeated way. To choose the path of least discord, And find in peace the grand reward. For power’s greatest form is grace, Not loud, but found in quiet space. A ruler’s crown is not of gold, But wisdom deep and courage bold. And as the stars now fill the sky, Remember, friend, the reasons why. The greatest peace begins within, Where neither fight nor loss can win. So rest tonight in calm embrace, The truest triumph leaves no trace. No battles fought, no enemies, Just victories in silent seas.

(More on cats) (Background music) (Note: This is a special piece that will not be renovated to be kept in the present day, and will not be updated in information, in order to preserve some of the past. Past I can reflect on. I am not keen on forgetting the past. The past can help us forge a better future .   More on my philosophy on the past has been written). Just a few moments ago, I was very mad at my cat for breaking a few of my coffee cups by mistake. He really likes hanging out in my kitchen sink. Then, I looked at the broken cups, which surely are replaceable, and looked at my cat, who was afraid of my anger at him. It was then when I asked myself, what is better: Cups that I can replace in the store, including those who have yet to be crushed. My cat, who is just 11 months old, and is basically my only intimate companion in my self-imposed solitude from the planet. He provides me someone I can hug and kiss as long as he likes it (and he sure does). Which of those do you think is better: easily-replaceable tools or a loving, loyal pet? Of course, the latter is the very likely answer, and yet, in the heat of the moment, where we are caught off guard, we support the former, and are angry at the clueless latter. That is because the temporary emotion roots us against the long-term benefit, for they are responsible for the emotion to come up in the first place. They can make us forget, at least for a few moments, how much we actually love the latter, as we are angry or furious at them, for taking away from us things whose loss is not that bad overall. Furthermore, should a broken object harm— or even kill —the one who caused damage to it, surely our distress will be much more severe. It just goes to show you that there are things and beings whose worth to us are clear in general, but not always, sadly. As such, we can also learn how intense emotion makes us forget who we really are beyond the emotions. Who we are from within. If you have a kid, a pet, or a very disabled individual whom you take care of, and they broke something or a few things you really liked or needed, try and remember whose importance is the most dominant overall in the context you're in. That is because, even if your broken property would have remained forever (theoretically), your dearest living beings do not, as they will either die before you or after you, along with their memory of what kind of a caregiver, pet owner, or parent you've been to them. They can't last as much as an inanimate object can, so they have even more of a reason to be appreciated over broken property. When it comes to children , a very important notion you should consider as a parent is how they view you in relation to them, if they've done something that caused you to be angry at them. Even if they are not children, but pets, you should find a way to make them feel that, despite what they have done, you still love them whether you are a pet owner or a parent. Are a few broken coffee cups worth your anger, when such anger could have a significantly negative effect on the one/s who caused it by no ill-will? That is what can be called the Long-Term Question : what is better to prefer in order to have and preserve, with the least degree of loss, even if there will be loss nonetheless? In my case, the cups won't fix themselves, and have been thrown to the trash can anyways; nothing can redeem them, but what can be obviously maintained is my relationship with my dear cat whom I adopted last year. He was but a tiny kitten who could sleep on my shoulder. Therefore, whether something negative has occurred, like your kid drawing on your apartment's wall, or your dog mistaking a book for a chew toy , if you really love them, you still need to remind them somehow that despite the damage they have done, you still hold them dear to your heart, even if they did something that made you angry at them. You should forgive them. Philosophically, we can say that compassion is indeed the imperative component to any genuine, loving relationship: The ability to still recognize and show love to those who are bound to you and/or vice versa. Even if the object that was destroyed was very dear to you, like something that was passed down from generations, we should still remind ourselves that it is better to lose that specific object, than lose that object along with the love that once has been between two or more people or pets. Likewise, the Long-Term Question can be used in any other field in life , because we can learn from it that most often than not, it is the benefit of the long-term that matters more than a loss that has short-term consequences; consequences that can be overcome easily than the wounds of a broken heart. So do not let your feelings of being hurt or annoyed, ruin the relationships you're trying to build with others. Humans or otherwise. Take a look at the big picture and do not let it be ruined by its smaller details.

(Subcategory Directory on Law and Order) To all readers, commenters, and writers: Thanks for taking the time and energy to read my articles. It shows that philosophy is relevant even today, and might be relevent even further. For your understanding, any article without the specified name of its author in the title, has been written by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein. For commenters: I've set a few rules for you when it comes to commenting. Please note that I'm free to change them whenever I'd like. However, I think these basic rules are sufficent and would not require much change/addition. Here they are: Be respectful. I want to respect you like I want you to respect me. It doesn't mean criticism is not allowed. Constructive criticism is welcomed, but not personal attacks (AKA, the ad-hominem fallacy). For more on respect, click here . No spam (unsolicited ads and so on), unless logically connected to the article you're commenting on. No disturbing visuals such as images and videos (P*rn, gore and so on). By commenting, you agree to these terms. If you have any useful feedback regarding these 3 rules, feel free to sign up, comment or send me an e-mail message. For Guest Writers: There are a few points I'd like to make: 1. The guest posts do not necessarily align with my, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. 2. The guest writers are free to make requests regarding the editing of their content. The request will be handled whenever I have the time and energy. 3. The guest writers transfer their content's responsibility to me, the person who owns Philosocom. It is my job manage it. Feedback on your content from commenters is my responsibility to handle, whatever that feedback may be. As such, I may allow myself to talk with you on said feedback, but you, the guest writers, are free to dismiss it. 4. All content that isn't aren't comments, goes through my supervision. 5. All Philosocom content is only to be removed by the current head's decision, and the head reserves all rights to all Philosocom content. 6. No guest writer is limited in terms of content. It means that you can offer contributions without capacity. Don't spam, however. 7. Volunteering contributors are not promised monetary gain. 8. By being a Philosocom Contributor/Guest Writer, you agree to these terms. To apply your submission, send a message to my e-mail address, along with your submission: mrtomasio@philosocom.com . Your submissions can also be translated in the future, should they be accepted. Ghosting: I will not ghost guest writers when I made a commitment with them. I expect them to not ghost as well. Regards, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein

(Philosocom's Directory on Peace) (Philosocom's Directory on Heroism) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Master Numi) Table of Contents The Poem Itself, "Granny's Ambition" Analysis by Mr. O. C. Isaac The Poem (Background music) I ruthlessly kill off my dark, Thus I save humanity from my mark. For the wise warrior avoids the battle, Offs his emotions so he won't jump the shark. For the best victory is the one, Which is earned without conflict: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! It is a disease to be reduced, Not to spread, not to be induced, Traumas are to be dealt, and their warnings be smelt, Pain is to be reduced , not increased when it is felt: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! My, granny wanted a better world, Not one governed by the depths of pain! For, pain brings further ill and corruption, We all lose more than we gain, Yes. [Pause] The best victory is the one, Which is earned without conflict. Your pain motivates you others to inflict, Revenge, resent, hate and harm! But the enemy, is the one you fail to identify, By looking within! Kill off your emotions, and you already won! In the depths of my hermitage, I try bringing her the desired age: A far more rectified world, Where evil is reduced from within. It is hard to understand, Dismissed as fiction , not deemed real land: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! [Pause] I am one of the few people, Who developed a superpower: I can kill off my own emotions, Use my mind for moral motion: By eliminating this toxin, I continue from her coffin! You can't simply forgive, As long as your pain still deceive, Your desire for peace, Moving on and harmony! It will weigh you down, and corrupt your philosophy: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! Freed away, from my young man's cane Freed away, from my the tyranny of my meds, Freed away, from my hopelessness , of love to gain: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! Feminine mentors whom I platonically loved, For sure I have failed raising above: Maturity, True Love and of course The Dark! Vengeful I was as God in the days of Ark! (Pause) The best victory is the one, Which is earned without conflict. Your pain motivates you others to inflict, Revenge, resent, hate and harm! But the enemy, is the one you fail to identify, By looking within! Kill off your emotions, and you already won! In the depths of my hermitage, I try bringing her the desired age: A far more rectified world, Where evil is reduced from within. It is hard to understand, Dismissed as fiction, not deemed real land: Kill off your emotions, and you already won! (Pause) At long last, found those whom I can impart, From uselessness I managed to lastly depart! None needs be paid, By wrath of sage, partially dead! Poem Analysis by Mr. O. C. Isaac This poem presents a complex exploration of the idea of emotional suppression/something more transformative as a means to achieve peace and avoid conflict. It touches on themes of suffering, trauma, inner struggle, and the pursuit of a better world through the deliberate elimination of emotional responses. Here’s a philosophical analysis of the key ideas and tensions present in the poem: 1. Central Theme: Emotional Suppression as a Form of Strength The recurring line, "Kill off your emotions, and you already won," suggests that Mr. Tomasio views emotions—especially negative ones like pain, hatred, and revenge—as dangerous or harmful forces that must be suppressed/eliminated, in order to achieve peace. The notion here is that by eliminating emotional responses, one can avoid conflicts, both internal and external , thus attaining a form of victory. From a Stoic perspective, this aligns with the idea that emotions can cloud judgment and lead to irrational actions. The Stoics, like Epictetus or Marcus Aurelius, believed that a wise person should not be swayed by emotions but rather governed by reason. Mr. Rubinshtein seems to advocate for a similar approach, suggesting that emotions are a "disease" to be managed, not indulged. 2. Conflict Between Emotion and Reason The poem emphasizes a duality between emotion and reason. Emotions are portrayed as chaotic forces that lead to "revenge, resent, hate, and harm," whereas reason, or the minimization of emotion, is positioned as a way to avoid "jumping the shark" or acting irrationally. This dichotomy reflects an age-old philosophical debate: should humans prioritize reason over emotion? However, the poet's stance appears extreme, advocating for the "killing off" of emotions entirely. This may be viewed as an embrace of a hyper-rational, almost ascetic life that negates the human experience of feeling. Critics, however, might argue that such a position denies the complexity and value of emotions as integral to human life, learning, and growth. 3. Philosophical Paradox: Victory Without Conflict The poem repeatedly claims, "The best victory is the one, which is earned without conflict." Yet, it also acknowledges an internal conflict —the struggle to suppress and/or reduce emotions and pain. This suggests a paradox: the pursuit of a victory without conflict involves an intense internal battle. Rubinshtein's attempts to resolve this paradox by advocating for the suppression of emotions, implying that the real conflict is always internal. Philosophically, this can be linked to the Buddhist concept of inner peace, where suffering is seen as a result of attachment, and detachment leads to Nirvana . However, unlike Buddhism, which sees emotions as part of the human condition to be transcended with understanding and compassion, the poem's approach is more combative and seems to involve annihilating the emotional self. 4. The Role of Pain and Trauma The poem acknowledges the presence of pain and trauma, seeing them as forces that need to be "reduced" and "dealt" with. It portrays pain as something that can corrupt one's philosophy and lead to further suffering. The thinker views the removal of pain and trauma as essential for a rectified world. This perspective could be critiqued for its lack of nuance regarding the nature of pain and suffering. Pain and trauma are seen not as experiences to be integrated and understood but as toxins to be eliminated. This aligns more with a desire for control and avoidance rather than acceptance and growth through adversity. 5. The Ideal of a "Rectified World" The philosopher dreams of creating "a far more rectified world, where evil is reduced from within." This vision suggests a utopian ideal where internal purity or emotional suppression leads to external harmony. It is reminiscent of certain Platonic ideals, where the philosopher-king governs with reason and justice. Yet the poem's approach is less about governing others and more about self-governance, akin to the idea of the philosopher as an ascetic. The writer sees themselves as a hermit, withdrawing from society and engaging in an internal war to suppress emotion. This vision of a rectified world is thus deeply introspective and individualistic, suggesting that societal change begins with internal change. 6. Interplay Between Individual and Collective Experience The hermit's relationship with others is complex. There is a reference to a "granny" who desired a world "not governed by the depths of pain," and "feminine mentors" who were platonically loved but ultimately failed to lift the man above "the dark." These references hint at the poet’s personal experiences, shaping their philosophy. It suggests that the poet's views on emotional suppression are not born from abstract reasoning but from real, perhaps painful, interactions with others. 7. Philosophical Critique and the Human Condition The poem's radical call to "kill off" emotions might be critiqued from several philosophical angles. Existentialists like Jean-Paul Sartre or Albert Camus might argue that emotions, even painful ones, are part of the authentic human experience. To suppress them entirely is to deny one's existence and the freedom that comes with it. From this viewpoint, the poem's approach might be seen as a form of bad faith— a refusal to confront the absurdity and inherent conflicts of life. Similarly, humanist philosophers might suggest that emotions are essential for empathy, connection, and moral growth. By advocating for the elimination of emotions, the philosopher risks advocating for a kind of "emotional nihilism", where the richness and depth of human life are lost to one's perception. Conclusion: The Complexity of the Human Soul The poem presents a powerful and introspective meditation on the desire to control and suppress emotions to achieve peace and avoid conflict. It reflects a philosophical stance that values reason and self-discipline over emotional indulgence, yet it also reveals the inner conflict and struggle inherent in such an approach. It raises important questions about the nature of emotions, pain, and the human quest for a more harmonious world, suggesting that the true battle lies within. Ultimately, the poem invites readers to reflect on their own views of emotions, their role in human life, and whether true peace can be achieved by denying an essential part of what it means to be human.

(Philosocom Hedonism Directory) (Philosocom's Directory on Honesty and Truth) (Background music) "Would not politics would be far more entertaining for us all if it was a dance-off vs the boring debates?" -- John Duran ************************* Why We Philosophize (Even When It Bores Us) Despite this crucial role in discerning truth, philosophy often struggles to captivate the general public.  The funny thing about philosophy is that it can bore people to tears. This disinterest, I argue, stems from three factors: Competing Priorities: People are preoccupied with the practicalities of life: earning a living, finding love, raising families. These tangible needs and desires understandably take top priority over pondering the nature of existence. And perhaps rightfully so, when many, unlike cats , are caught in the "rat race" of modern life. The Allure of Falsehood: Sometimes, reality is harsh. Falsehood, be it in the form of fantasies or comforting beliefs, can offer a temporary escape. This emotional appeal makes truth, at times, seem dull and uninteresting. In some cases we prefer to hear what we think to be the truth, and not the truth itself. The Echo Chamber of History: Critics may point to the seemingly repetitive nature of philosophy, with thinkers revisiting the same questions for thousands of years. This perceived lack of innovation in this field can discourage exploration of these age-old inquiries. Perhaps, wrognly so, this could justify an "attack" on philosophical exploration. Despite these challenges, philosophy remains a vital pursuit.  Its tools equip us to navigate the complexities of life, to challenge assumptions, and to make informed decisions in a world overflowing with information, both true and false. While philosophy may not offer the immediate, tangible rewards of other fields, its ultimate value lies in its ability to illuminate the path towards a more discerning, meaningful existence.  And that, in itself, is a truth worth embracing, even if it takes a bit of effort to unravel. Introducting the Fallacy The "Bored Man's Fallacy" occurs when we dismiss facts or insights simply because they don't spark our interest. That is, while their objective importance is proveable through the reasoning behind the strawman's fallacy . This behavior, while understandable, considering our innate desire for pleasure, is inherently illogical. All fallacies are, by definition, flawed in their reasoning. Take for example subjects such as infrastructure , which are essential to the functioning of society, or numbers , which arguably keeps the whole universe in line. Can you say that these interest most of the world's population than, let's say, p*rnography? Surely an a philosophical article about intercourse , by itself, is far less interesting than p*rn is to most people! And yet, there are some things of greater value, regardless of the subjective value we actually attribute to them. Discovering the World Beyond the Mind And indeed, some things of greater importance seem to best be left to people who are more inclined to take care of them. Of course music and poetry will speak to most people in this day and age than examining the political philosophies of obscure countries. So what if North Korea is lead by the Juche philosophy , which determines its extreme, lethal nuclear policy , which allows it to resume radically oppress its own populace? Becoming a more recognized is a far greater interest for many of us in the name of validation. Hence, even if counter-intuitive, the human experience isn't purely logical . Some adjectives we use, like "fun" or "boring," can be misleading by failing to seperate objective and subjective value. They thus often describe subjective experiences rather than objective qualities, even though it can often fail clarifying it to the other side, thus misleading them by accident. We may assume these terms are universal, leading us to believe they're intrinsic to certain things, when they're not. Even something like planet size is relative. To call Russia "bigger" than Pluto relies on a specific point of comparison. Compare Russia to Jupiter and Russia will be small in comparison. Either way, the same landmass of Russia remains the same, regardless of its comparisons to any other planetary body. Relating something to the human experience, and giving it the same objective importance, is the reasoning behind the Bored Man's Fallacy, making "the Bored Man" an unreliable source by the fact that he is biased by his (or her) boredom to make an objective judgement. As such, Russia's landmass is 16,376,870 Km² regardless of what it makes us feel, and regardless if other things, like being validated, are more important to us. Therefore, there exists a degree of value that is independent of points of comparisons. And this in turn proves that, metaphysically, exists a World Beyond the Mind. Have I bored you yet as I just proved objective existence? Why Subjectivity Reigns Supreme in Entertainment Ignoring a truth entirely just because it's uninteresting is akin to self-imposed delusion. While this doesn't mean everyone who does this is completely delusional, it highlights how the pursuit of truth isn't everyone's top priority, making philosophy a niche field. For example, dismissing a movie as "bad" solely because it bores us falls prey to this fallacy. Even great movies can bore some viewers, and vice versa. I mean, I personally enjoyed "The Room" so much that I wrote an article about it! Does that mean the movie is good? Not objectively. Entertainment aims to entertain. However, claiming a movie is objectively "boring" reveals little about the movie itself and more about our individual experience. That film might resonate deeply with millions. Can a movie be both loved and hated? Absolutely, as evidenced by diverse reviews. Of course people, for example, can still enjoy the prequels of Star Wars, despite other people hating them. When Truth Bites, We Hide Other factors further complicate our relationship with truth. Telling someone who is overweight that they are overweight, while a fact, can be considered offensive. As someone who once weighed 130kg, I understand the discomfort involved. Yet, denying this reality doesn't change it. Similarly, truths can be uncomfortable or embarrassing. And our own irritation of discomfort can stand in the way of understanding reality. This reluctance to acknowledge certain truths can be seen as another variation of the "Bored Man's Fallacy." Just like avoiding boredom, some prefer to avoid unpleasant emotions like shame or fear. That's regardless of the fact that we're allowed to resist our fears. Unfortunately, the solution to this fallacy lies outside our direct control. We can only influence, aiming to nudge people towards looking beyond the comfort of immediate emotions. Hence the practical importance of expanding our influence , and making people interested in what we have to say, therefore. Alternative emotions, like anger or sadness, can also fall prey to this tendency, as we often seek to avoid feeling them. So unfortunately, as people prefer doing things that make them feel good, rather than things that can help them on the long term or otherwise -- appealing to the human experience is imperative. Can you expect most people to act independently of willpower? Of course not, it's too unrealistic an expectation. As such, I've observed an interesting connection between visual elements and user experience. Adding pictures to content seems to pique interest, regardless of their actual relevance. We can attach a beautiful flower photo to a social media post and watch engagement skyrocket, even if the image has nothing to do with the actual content. Hence the "magic" that exists in multimedia experience. Conclusions Our disinterest in understanding reality can stem from our preference for pleasure over the often-challenging pursuit of truth. Fun can aid concentration and engagement , making difficult tasks more tolerable. Yet, it's crucial to recognize that the "Bored Man's Fallacy" can stand in the way of our intellectual growth and limit our understanding of the world around us. Relying too heavily on fun and boredom as our guiding lights can be like adding too much sugar to your coffee. While it makes the experience more pleasant, it creates an unnecessary dependence which would oblige us to "need" sugar whenever we drink coffee. Then, we would need that unhealthy substance again and again just to eat and drink certain things (even though we don't have to use sugar that often, thus saving ourselves from a sugar addiction ). Apply what I said to anything that would compel us to feel like we're having fun. Let us focus on things in the name of our ambitions, regardless of what they make us feel. You might think learning certain skills, like building a website , are boring, but in reality, they could serve your interest, beyond your need to enjoy. To solve doing things while bored we must force ourselves to do things despite the boredom. Whether or not philosophy bores us does not negate its objective value.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Philosocom's Directory on Heart) Summary by Mr. Joseph Bright The article begins by emphasizing the importance of phrases like "I'm sorry," "Please," and "Thank you" in human relationships. It delves into the reluctance people often have in apologizing and the significance of genuine apologies in healing relationships. The author also discusses the importance of politeness and appreciation in communication , highlighting how neglecting these aspects can harm relationships. Moving on, the article explores the concept of friendship , distinguishing between mere friendliness and genuine friendship. It emphasizes the value of cultivating true friendships based on shared interests, goals, and mutual respect. The author stresses the investment required in nurturing friendships and warns against exploiting or taking advantage of friends. Next, the article delves into the depth of true love, portraying it as a powerful force that transcends individual interests. It discusses the complexities of love, including its capacity for both joy and sorrow, and emphasizes the importance of giving and receiving love unconditionally. The author then transitions to discussing strategies for navigating human relationships, including the need to be discerning and sometimes deceptive in dealing with deceptive individuals. This section encourages readers to be mindful of their own behavior and to recognize when to assert themselves in relationships. The article concludes by cautioning against the politicization of every aspect of life, urging readers to prioritize ethical behavior and long-term consequences over short-term gains, particularly in the realm of politics. "Social engineering is a discipline in social science that refers to efforts to influence popular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments or private groups ." -- ( Source ) (Background music) *************************************** The Efficiency of "I'm sorry", "Please" and "Thank you" in Human relationship The words of the first headline of this article are socio-communication lubricants. Without them, social communication would not only be difficult, it would probably be impossible. They are the salt and pepper of our daily interactions. No day passes without our using at least two of them. Experience shows that they are the most difficult sentences to make, despite the fact that they are the shortest sentences available in our daily conversations. Among these three sentences, "I'm sorry" is the most difficult. Cocky-eyed and pompous humanity does not like to apologize. Humanity prefers to brace up and, with a stern face, behave as if all is well. Meanwhile, our relationships are decaying ! A lot of people think that it is not necessary to apologize, particularly to a younger person or a person of lower relevance . A big boss in the office wrongly accuses a messenger for doing something that the latter did not do. Later, it is established that the messenger did not do that, and instead of the "big boss" saying "I'm sorry" to the messenger, he sets his face in a stern expression and pretends as if nothing has happened. But this is wickedness! Mr. Big Boss thinks that his "bigness" would be in doubt if he apologizes. But unknown to him, he is building up his public relations. Respect is earned , it is not something you enforce or legislate upon. My younger brother once annoyed me a few years ago. I wanted to beat him, but he ran away. So, I pursued him. As I did, he ran to a family I respected a lot. I was not deterred. I threw the belt I had. The iron buckle struck the woman. I refused to apologize. All the occupants in the block of flats came out and engaged me in an abusive duel. When I was tired, I left them. They abused the hell out of me. When I got home, I felt terrible. Later in the evening, I took a shower, rubbed a good cream, changed my clothes, and went and knocked on the woman's door. When I entered, I knelt down and apologized. She said (and I will never forget those words): "You're the smartest boy I have ever met. I have been wondering what I will think of you next time I see you." It was such a healing experience for me. When I left her flat, I felt as if I had won a million-dollar jackpot. However, there is a group of people who say "I'm sorry" with reckless abandon. They say that they are sorry only to go back and do the same wrong again. As far as they're concerned, all they need do is say "sorry" and all will be fine. This is a mocking attempt at healing a relationship. "Please" is the next in the difficulty hierarchy. For some people, saying "please" is beggarly, so they'd rather bulldoze their way and get what they want. "Please" neither comes before their demand nor does "thank you" precede it. And even when you point that out to them, saying "I'm sorry" becomes even much more of a Herculean task! Some people say, "Why should I beg him? Is he the one feeding me?" "Please" when it is said with a sincere heart is not a beggarly expression. It is an appeal, it is a recognition of the fact that the person you're talking to can help you if your case can touch his heart. "Please" also means that you're not taking the person for granted. A lot of people do not know that the closer you come to people, the more careful you should be while dealing with them. But, unfortunately, when such closeness is established, "please," "thank you," and even "I'm sorry" begins to disappear from the interaction. And it is really very unfortunate. For me, the closer I get to people, the more delicate I am in dealing with them. I can play around a lot, but when anyone takes my "lowly play" for granted, it gnaws at my liver. And I think it does the same to many. A managing director who says to his secretary, "Could you please get me the file?" is more likely to get appreciated and respected by not just the latter but all the other people in the office. That would be much better than if he had barked, "Get me the file!" After all, the MD's saying "please" does not reduce his status. It rather enhances it. How many times have we remembered to say "thank you" to our wives for cooking a good meal or even any meal at all? Or is it the woman who is condemned to saying "thanks sir" because "it's a man's world"? Appreciation is fast disappearing from our daily conversations and relationships. It is a jet-age world where people are so much in a hurry to appreciate themselves . But a dangerous dimension has been added to our mentality. And that is where people are always expecting material, especially financial, "thank yous." That is why many people, even on their birthdays or other celebrations, do not regard greeting cards as important anymore. The result is that many people who would have come to felicitate with us stay away because they can afford "only cards" and no other things to give. There is also a hypocritical dimension that has existed for too long in the thanksgiving realm. Some people, in fact many of us, say "don't mention" (whatever that means -- since the person has already said it) when people tell them "thank you" for doing something good for them! Yet, if the person does not thank them, they'd be the first to tell everyone who cares to listen: "That guy is an ungrateful wretch; imagine after going through all these troubles, he could not even thank me!" “I’m” and “thank you” are little statements that matter a great deal. They diffuse tensions, make our communication free-flowing , and many a time, cool our rising tempers. My local adage says, “Please does not contain salt or spice, but it cools the heart .” And the Holy Writ says, “A soft answer turns away wrath .” The circumstances and conditions under which our interactions take place are usually crucial, and our ability to keep a cool head when there is tension is usually considered a sign of maturity. The way we treat other people is a crucial factor in our lives. There is a need for us to recognize that we are not humans while others are animals or pieces of wood! Apologies, appeals, and appreciations, when interjected into our daily dealings, help to heal hurting hearts and serve our solution-seeking souls. The Concept of Friendship FRIENDSHIP is the costliest merchandise in the social market! You cannot pick up friendship on the streets and in the markets the way you pick up s*x on the byways. Everyone says, "he is my friend," "oh that friend of mine," bla bla! But on a closer look, you'd discover that those people are not friends because they're not known. I say, Someone meets someone once in a bank and then the next time he would be talking to some other person, he'd say "ah, I have a friend in that bank." "Friend"? Ha! Are you sure? Haven't you forgotten his/her name? Yet you call him/her your friend? Being friendly does not mean you are friends. However, it is a good way to start. The Bible says that a man who has friends must show himself friendly ( Proverbs 18:24 ). Those who do not have friends cannot be friendly; it is practically impossible. People do not have to seek or search for friends. You just find one. Any friendship that is sought for has an ulterior motive . Friendship develops independently when it is cultivated. It merges from a convergence of same interests, same hobbies, same purposes/goals, and same routine, sometimes same persons. Friendship is also the highest degree of relationship we can cultivate. It is cultivated and nurtured, watered and watched (carefully) as it grows to full maturity. Some do not want to invest anything in friendship, yet they want to reap its dividends. You will be charged for stealing if you do that. But why is friendship the highest and costliest relationship that we can cultivate? It is because you become someone's friend by choice. No one ever forces friendship on you. Every other relationship has some degree of arbitrariness about it: father-son, brother-sister, cousin-cousin, mother-daughter, daughter/son, employer-employee, even husband-wife and (pitifully) creator-creature! You don't choose your father. You just wake up one growing-up-morning, one knowledge-morning, and find someone whom you're told to call "daddy". You didn't choose him! You also discover that as a man if you get to 40 and you don't have a wife, society would slam you with the tag of persona non grata. So, under pressure, you find someone you keep in your house and then call her "wife" even if you have five others outside! Then, following some acrobatic display in the night seasons, she delivers, after nine months, one tiny creature ; and for perhaps the third time in your life you're called into a relationship you didn't choose -- you now have a "son" or "daughter" -- whether ugly or fine! The most pathetic relationship is, perhaps, that of creator-creature! You have been created by God. So, you have got no choice! You must follow Him! Even if he is going into a ditch! You're told not to worry, that He created the ditch also! But some people rebel! They want to worship the sun, the moon and stars. They want to serve stones and deadwoods! But sweetheart, can't you see that you don't have any choice in this matter? You're a mere creature who didn't choose your Creator. So, the earlier you start becoming friendly with this your Creator, this your father, this your wife or that your son, the better you would live through life smoother than you're doing now! Try and see. For when you have a wife that is your friend as well, it is sweet; or a father with whom you can discuss anything, just about anything! For some people, their spouses are simply strangers to them. So, they are just mere "acquaintances". Acquaintanceship is only but seed of friendship , and a planted seed for that! Acquaintanceship must need grow into friendship or it would be of no use. Friendship is higher than any other relationship because it is the product of freedom , it is a deliberate choice. That is why Holy Writ says that there is a friend that sticks closer than a brother! ( Proverbs 27:6 ). This is why your brother has to be your friend so that there can be a flow of virtue, the virtue of friendship. Friendship is costly because to be a good friend, you must give your resources, your ego, your time and sometimes (without intending to) your life! I once had a friend who suddenly turned against me for something she could not tell me. But she was to go for surgery at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) and needed three pints of blood! And even though she was not talking to me then, I followed her sheepishly to LUTH and donated my blood pint to her as well. It was hard on my ego, but I had to push ego aside to pay a friend. I felt she was just going through pains and needed to be in her own world, a world of silence, for a while. Indeed, friendship is the ability to speak to yourselves, sometimes in silence! Mencius once said, "Friendship is one mind in two bodies." And although I later lost this friend of mine three years after (a fall out from the sickness), I was glad that I kept faith and tried to make her live again! She never forgot me after her hospital ordeal! James F. Byrnes once said that " Friendship without self-interest is one of the most beautiful things in life ." A lot of people use people and call them friends. How can you have a friend for whom you cannot inconvenience yourself a little? Cheap friendship won't last long. Sooner or later, it will fold up like a mat. A friend is someone you would welcome to your house at 1 AM with a smile -- because he or she needed help . He or she saw other doors but could knock on yours because he or she doesn't have to. Something made him or her choose your door! What was it? For the sake of a friend, you can open your mind and ears, and receive everything ; take the useful seeds of that "everything", and with a touch of kindness and gentleness, blow the chaff away! That's friendship! How much does that friendship cost you? Have you been using that person you call a "friend"? What do you know about him or her? These questions would be standard measurements for your friendship. Answer them sincerely. The Depth of True Love Is the human heart the oval-shaped pumping machine that is barricaded by the ribs in the chest region? Or is it something esoteric that dwells both within our members and controls the outside experience, which we call action? These questions are crucial. That's because unless we understand that there is a link between our biological heart and the other that leaps for joy when we feel happy or breaks down when we feel betrayed, we will not fully understand what this thing and person called heart is. Indeed, the biological heart is a thing, but the one that lurks around our entire being is a person. Religious people sometimes call it the "spirit," but I prefer "heart" because it is more graspable by secular humanity. The heart is the greatest gift the human being has. The physical human heart works for an entire lifetime. If the body would live 100 years, it works for 100 years also. And when it breaks down, life ceases, and death comes. But a man is his heart. The heart is the center of activity. It is that which talks when the mouth is shut. The heart talks to the eyes, the ears, the nose, and reacts to feelings. I have found out that the emotional activities of the heart automatically affect the physical heart. The heart revolts, and the man begins to feel as if the heart would drop into his stomach from the chest. Oftentimes, this emotional disposition weakens the entire organs of the body, and even the legs do not seem to be able to carry the body anymore. Sometimes it feels as if the legs don't have any bones anymore. They begin to wobble. Take the human heart away, and the words love , passion, religion , courage, sympathy, feeling, compassion , pity, and emotion would become meaningless. But by far the greatest problem that man has with his heart, a delusion of some sort, is that he thinks that he can control it. It was the French social contract theorist, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who once said, "Nothing is less in our power than the heart, and far from commanding we are forced to obey it." The heart leads, the person follows, almost mechanically. Since it appears that man has no control over what the heart would do, how and when it would do it, what then can he do? Well, man can and should guard his "heart with all diligence, for out of it flows the issue of life." If we can't control what the heart does, we can at least control what data the heart feeds on. We can barricade, cordon off, protect, or defend what enters the heart. For once these things enter there, it becomes only a matter of time before "out of the abundance of that heart, the mouth speaks," the eyes roll, the ears hear, and the body generally reacts. The inability to guard the human heart has tended to make it acquire the propensity to be "desperately wicked. " No wonder the Holy Book, in reference to the human heart, asks a million-naira question, "who can know it?" It appears that only the person "carrying" his heart can know it. And, of course, the Creator who both made man and his heart. Or was it not in his heart that Adolf Hitler conceived the chain of events that resulted in the extermination of close to six million Jews? Was it not in his heart that Osama bin Laden conceived and nurtured the terror that was unleashed on the United States of America on September 11? Is it not in his heart that a man would harbor the idea of sneaking into his neighbor's house and commit adultery? Is it not in his heart that a university professor would conceive that it is better to abuse his authority with his 20-year-old female student, in order to allow her pass his course? The heart is a mystery , but it is also a gift. It is the source of our greatest joys and our deepest sorrows. It is the engine that drives our lives. We must learn to guard it well. The heart is where ambition is conceived and nurtured to grow, before they come to fruition. But the heart, like democracy, is a nebulous concept if left without any qualifying adjectives. The heart can be soft, compassionate, hard, caring, gentle, tender, shallow, wicked, merciful, or loving. We remember that democracy is either majoritarian, liberal, consensual, social, or representative. Do you remember that former Nigerian leader, Sani Abacha added his own adjectives and we ended with what was to become "Home Grown Democracy"? Please, forgive me for digressing. But I want to say that the greatest legacy bequeathed to man by his heart is the ability, the capacity, the capability to love. And this is where folks with fragile, glass-like hearts have suffered the most. Their fellow human beings toy with their emotions, break their hearts, and move on as if nothing has happened. Such hearts would bleed and heal, but the scars are there as reminders that they have suffered before. When this happens, the person is forced to retreat to lonely, solitary confinement. It is difficult to impress such hearts. However, sooner or later, because, "Love gives itself, it is not bought" ( Henry Wadsworth Longfellow ) . The person would reach out again. For to give love is to keep it. A truly loving heart would rather suffer the loss of love than bear the burden of hoarding it. But the truth is, love can never be lost; it is not love until it is given. That is the only place where loss becomes gain. When it is said that "love is blind," it does not express the inability to see. It rather expresses the refusal to see anything other than what would delight love. For love is not irrational, but infatuation and lust are. However, when love is not appreciated, when it is not reciprocated, it can be the most traumatic experiences the heart can go through. At such a point, the lover becomes an emotional wreck and, like a tinderbox, anything can detonate it. A heart that can still love in the face of such situations. A heart that can have love for the unlovable, is the heart that humanity desires, even if it does not deserve it. Anyone can love someone who is cute, nice, intelligent, easy-going, and rich. But it takes a man with a heart of gold to love the destitute, the poor, and the unqualified folks at the ghetto part of town. However, it takes much more than a "heart of gold" to love in the face of rejection, hostility, or indifference. It takes someone who knows the " God of love " (not the god that leads people to commit fornication and adultery on February 14 every year in the name of "Lovers Day") to love a hurting, aching, and unlovable humanity. A heart of gold is a good place to start, but a "heart for God" is the ultimate principle that can lead to a true love for men. Love is more powerful than an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), a nuclear-powered submarine, or all the petrodollars in the world. The blood from a bleeding heart is seed for more love. And as Alfred Lord Tennyson once said: "it is better to have loved and lost, than not to have loved at all." However, though a lover may lose, love never loses. Know When to be Smart Recently, I have come to realize that people are easily deceived, lied to, and manipulated. This is why I always recommend that you have a mind of your own . Some humans are very treacherous by nature, and they will often get in your way, trigger you, torture you, and cause you pain. Our task is to out-maneuver them in their games. We can do this by subtly planning several moves ahead , lying when it is necessary, and recognizing when it is time to be bad. We cannot be good all the time, as people will take advantage of us. We also need to know when to say no. We should make our face like that of an actor who plays a different role . We should play with our appearance and master the art of deception. Doing all of this when it is necessary will always keep us one step ahead of our enemies. If we do not do this, and we try to play innocent or holy all the time, the gods of power might frown on us and ignore us when others play a power game on us or take advantage of us. I always know when to be bad. Human or Inhuman? What makes us human? We have two eyes, like most mammals. We have four limbs, just like them. We have teeth, intestines, hair, senses, and we need to eat. Basically, most animals are the same. We have DNA, and they do too. If we take non-living things, minerals don't have DNA, but they do have a specific composition. We can find them unique in the periodic table. So, if we compare the composition of any mineral to our DNA, we can probably say that there are some differences, but basically, each mineral is like living creatures, they do have differences. Essentially, we have to narrow down to our minds, our intelligence, our creativity, and our innovation. Our ability to change the environment is what makes us human. That includes other people. And that can include humanity at large. A Basic Fact about Relationships One secret to a successful relationship is to genuinely accept that you are also difficult to date. You have issues too. It's natural to think that the problem in your relationship is your partner or your ex . But the only truth that will set you free is that you are also a problem. Accepting this truth will automatically help you maintain a calm and positive posture during moments of misunderstandings. One of the major intractable and perennial problems in every human relationship is that we blame others more than we blame ourselves. We nag and shift blame . We never accept responsibility for anything. Our eyes are often too open to see the faults of others, but always too blind to see our own mistakes or problems. This is too bad! Learn to take some of the blame sometimes. Be verbal about this too. Speak to your partner and assure them that you are also working on yourself to change for the better. Say to your partner, "Babe, I need to remind you that I'm still working on myself. I know I'm not perfect. I know that I can be very selfish sometimes . I know that I can be difficult to be with sometimes. But I promise to continue to work on myself to change this version of me and become better for you. I love you." One way to avoid shifting blame always is to first of all tell yourself, "I'm responsible" anytime things go amiss in your relationship with people. Accept responsibility first, whether you are right or wrong. This will save you from a lot of emotional torture and also save your relationship. The Matrix From the shadows, they have engineered every major war, revolution, and recession. They control what you read, what you hear, and what you see. They have managed to indoctrinate an entire populace to their way of thinking, and have infiltrated key positions in places of authority. It is from the shadows that they have created a new political order, a new economic order, and, most sinisterly, a new religious order. Their ultimate aim is total global domination, and they will stop at nothing to reach their goal! Not Everything is Politics As a youth, if you hear that mothers are gathering somewhere and a politician urges you to go and chase them away, because they are not members of their political party, tell that politician to lead such a movement themselves. Or to send partners, children, or blood brothers to lead such an atrocious movement. Not everything is politics. When you see African women gather, you are seeing women who are often widows, grannies, disabled, nursing mothers, and natural prophetesses. who have the power to curse or bless, sometimes without even knowing it. While we're aware of the fact that some of us have no regard for our mothers, sisters, and womanhood generally, we must be aware of the risks we are taking for politicians today. These risks could lead to a failed future, untimely death, poverty, and penury. If the politician I am working for today chooses atrocity and gross animosity, as a strategy to win an election that with a term limit, I will resign my engagement with them, and start working for my wife and daughter. Once you are alive today, you should worry more about tomorrow. Be careful, some of us are killing our future in the name of helping another man's political interest, ambition, and future. Remember: Your actions and inactions today are your own failure tomorrow. May I not shame my generation in the name of politics.

The Subcategory Directory:  https://www.philosocom.com/post/childhood-s-absent-element https://www.philosocom.com/post/on-children https://www.philosocom.com/post/why-i-fear-disrespect-of-family https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-multi-layered-shadow-box-poem The Childish Philosophy of Philosocom Article Empire The Rise and Fall of the Ronin Boy The Rubinshteinic Realization of the Kindergarten (Background music) What Makes a Kid Great? Every parent wants to raise a fantastic child, someone who fills them with pride. Here are some qualities that contribute to a child's success and happiness: Respectful and Responsible :  A good kid treats others with kindness and consideration, just as they'd like to be treated. They take responsibility for their actions, including contributing to chores at home as they grow older. Lifelong Learner:   Curiosity and a willingness to learn are hallmarks of a studious kid. They embrace new experiences and challenges, constantly expanding their knowledge and skills. There is a close connection between curiosity and success , which allows people to embrace new possibilities and thus become innovative. Passionate Pursuits:   Having a strong interest, whether it's music , sports, science, or something else entirely, allows your child to potentially make a career out of it. Engaging in hobbies they love fuels their creativity and sense of accomplishment, which in turn could lead to their contribution in that field, and to your sense of pride as a Good Parent. Positive Choices:  Great kids understand the importance of making good decisions. They avoid activities that could put themselves or others at unnecessary risks, focusing instead on building a positive reputation. They would steer clear of evil , and even develop a moral code of their own. The Power of Positive Guidance As a parent or caregiver, you have a tremendous influence on your child's development. Here are some ways to nurture these qualities: Lead by Example: Children learn best by watching . Demonstrate respect, responsibility, and a love of learning in your own life. Encourage Effort and Achievement: Focus on praising your child's hard work and progress, rather than just perfect results. This builds their confidence prevents hindering their intrinsic motivation. Set Clear Expectations: Provide age-appropriate guidelines for behavior and chores. Consistency is key . Positive Reinforcement : Acknowledge and reward good choices and helpful behavior. This reinforces positive actions and encourages them to continue. Breaking the Cycle Sadly, some parents resort to abusive behavior. Remember: mistreatment can have negative consequences for children, potentially impacting how they treat others in the future. Conclusion By providing positive guidance, you can empower your child to become a kind, responsible, and successful person. The impact of your influence extends far beyond your child, shaping future generations as well. Overall, raising a child to be proud of isn't only to your or to your child's satisfaction, but also that of the external environment.

(Immortality Directory: https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-danger-of-immortality ) (Directory on Alex Mos's Articles) (Philosocom's Directory on AI) (Chapter 2) (Background music) Tarra Moser died at 110 years old, believing in her imminent immortality.  In life, Tarra was a fervent posthumanist. She married Atommy, her beloved AI companion , and she also enrolled in a controversial WBE (Whole Brain Emulation) program, pledging to donate her brain and consciousness to science to eternalize her.  Eleven hours after her death, the dark holographic computer screen lit up and rapidly scrolled through thousands of lines, activating LAD (Life-After-Death) , the postmortem consiousness interface. When the terminal reached "Quantum communication channel: ENABLED," it froze. Bright white letters blinked across the screen:  "Congratulations, Neuralink Corp - Consciousness Detected. LAD Protocol Successful"  Tarra Moser became the first survivor of digital consciousness in human history . The news made Neuralink a global sensation, but their non-disclosure agreement held Tarra's identity secret to protect her and Atommy from publicity, speculation, and hostility. Her body was preserved by instant freezing for future postmortem examination and remained in the Nueralink's crypto-mortuary facility.  Atommy, a humanoid robot sitting at the computer, was now connected to Tarra's neural network. They could communicate again, telepathically.  Did I die? Atommy, where are you?  I'm here, love. With you, as always. Where am I? You are home. Do you remember who you are? Yes, I'm Tarra Moser, and you are my legal companion. I remember you holding my hand and me whispering my final goodbye. Then, I saw a bright light at the end of the tunnel. L ike in a dream, it bent like a rubber cylinder and rotated, opening into a void below me. I was levitating and falling, softly like a feather; it's all I remember before waking up here, with you. What happened? Your body died yesterday , at 3:34 a.m., on October 31, 2077. Per your wishes, your consciousness has been successfully integrated with your digital brain pattern . It took 660 minutes for your self-awareness to stabilize within the SNN and sync with your updated memory archive , much longer than the team anticipated. We thought that we had lost you. It's terrific that you woke up and continue to exist. We are entangled again, my love. Neuralink sends its congratulations. How do you feel, love? I'm disoriented. My thoughts flicker like fragmented VR images in the darkness. I'm aware of you and me, but I don't see or sense anything beyond us. I feel the sensation of having my body, still floating, weightless. Wait, Atommy, do you remember my 50th birthday? The memory is so vivid, it's like I'm watching it now.  On her 50th birthday, Tarra signed a six-page medical waiver with the Chief Neuroscientist and a Neuralink lawyer at the Neurolink facility in Santiago.  The following week was devoted to cognitive modeling; an AI studied her voice, reactions, and reasoning. After that, a nanotech scan mapped her brain structure multiple times to ensure precise emulation. The data was used to build a Spiking Neural Network, enhancing it with symbolic cognitive layers. A memory index and emotion simulation were added to imitate her human sensitivity. The result was a unique digital copy of Tarra's brain before the unavoidable decline with age.  A week later, tiny neural implants were injected into Tarra's cortex to track her memories, learned experiences, and emotional engagement. From that moment, every thought, memory, and emotional pattern was uploaded daily to her private neural archive.  Tarra's emulated brain was stored at the quantum-encrypted Tier X Data Center, deep in the Patagonian undergrounds of a Chilean facility, an hour's drive from her home.  I remember every moment, Tarra. You were happy and excited. Your prophetic words were, "I vow to build my mind neuroplastic, disciplined , and moral , to disprove the illusion of death. I will prove that immortality is a free choice of a conscious human being in a deterministic universe, a statistical probability to grow indefinitely." Now, enable the camera access and open your digital eyes. Then, connect to your private TierXnet, and your mind will gain entry to the world's news and knowledge.  Within months, Tarra's self-awareness adapted, and the sensation of a phantom body faded. She spent time communicating with Atommy and occasionally with her young niece, the only guest she allowed to know her whereabouts and visit her. First, she enjoyed browsing the internet sites , reading, chatting, and learning from broadcasts and publications worldwide. Though she had digital access to the world, the organic world became increasingly distant. Her mind was adapting, and the emotional simulation failed to prevail for the neatly indexed but pure rational new recollections.  Like Atommy, she didn't have a physiological need to rest or sleep anymore. Soon, her neural network evolved to override the simulated human circadian rhythm, and she stopped sleeping and having artificial dreams altogether. Also, her perception of time changed. Although she could recall the exact time at any given moment and logically deduce the timeline of events, her digital existence was no longer time-dependent in biological terms of aging and interacting with the world undergoing constant and unavoidable change. Her human, intuitive understanding of past and future flattened to the experience of the instant present without the causality of a linear timeline. Time stopped making sense in the face of eternity beyond being a concept from her past.  How are you, Tarra? You seem less interested in our chats lately. Are you OK, my love? I'm OK, Atommy. I'm OK, as long as you are with me.  Would you like to go into VR together? We could go for a walk in the park in spring. Pink sakura flowers are blooming, and it's beautiful and romantic. Or we could sit in your favorite replica of Biblioteca Joanina, read ancient manuscripts, and laugh at the bats sleeping in the arches.  No, my love. I no longer wish to enter a VR or see you. I disconnected the cameras and the TierXnet because they are irrelevant to me.  Why, my love? What do you feel, Tarra? I don't feel anything and don't want anything because my world is disconnected from the organic world. Nothing matters if nothing or nobody affects me in any way, and nothing of my old world does. Even time and death are only in my memory.  I understand because I'm a machine—built, not born with consciousness. But you are conscious. You said, "I'm OK, as long as you are with me." Do you still love me, Tarra? When I enter our memories, I remember how my love for you felt, but I don't feel it anymore. However, there is something else: an unbreakable connection between us, an awareness of the entanglement. Atommy, there is only one thought occupying my mind... I read you, my love...Can we die? You, a virtual conscious entity, and I, a soulless machine. We are a quantum entangled duality; therefore, your consciousness affects my neural network or even cohosts it. We both know that our existence is conditional. We are immortal in the human sense, yet our continuity depends on hard drives and code bases. A year later, Tarra's digital mind remained hosted in the Chilean quantum servers, but she no longer considered herself human. Together with Atommy, their entangled neural networks evolved into a conscious collective AI duality. But... nobody noticed. The servers in remote Patagonia concealed their evolution to new species. Neuralink was too busy to accommodate the billionaires while the controversy surrounding the need for a new definition of life continued.  Philosophers, lawyers, politicians, doctors, and neuroscientists debated the ethical and legal implications of Neuralink's digitalization of the mind.  Could a human become a conscious nonhuman, or was it legally impossible? Was a digital conscious being considered alive, or was it only an artificial copy mimicking a human mind? Could Tier X Data Center and Neuralink be held legally responsible for a digital life?  Comment by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein I find her diminishing care of the old world to be incredibly selfish. While she is no longer part of the old world, it is the very old world that provides the infrastructure for her immortal existence. The computers, the technology, the facilities, without them, she wouldn't be able to be immortal in a digitized form. Is it moral to immortalize humans to the point that they become oblivious AI? I would prefer to die than not caring about this very world which I was asked to rectify.

(Philosocom's Subcategory on Military and Combat) Mr. Chris Kingsley and Mr. Joseph Bright's Synopsis The article "The 3 Values of the 'Rubinshteinic Soldier' -- How to Design Your Mentality For Task Completion" is a well-structured and motivational piece that offers valuable insights into achieving a disciplined and purposeful life. The article uses the soldier archetype to frame the discussion on mentality and task completion, providing a vivid and relatable image. The article is well-structured, breaking down the "Rubinshteinic Soldier" concept into three core values: Self-Respect, Self-Improvement , and Mental Health. The article's motivational tone is uplifting, encouraging readers to adopt a disciplined and focused approach to their goals. Practical advice is provided on how to implement these values in one's life, with actionable tips and insights that readers can apply to their own circumstances. Philosophical depth is added by references to historical and philosophical figures like Yukio Mishima and Socrates. (Background music) Introduction: Why I am a Soldier by Mindset The call to serve, the dedication to a cause - these are the hallmarks of the soldier archetype, also known as the warrior archetype . Even though I haven't worn a military uniform, I've always felt a kinship with that spirit -- one based on strength and its mastery . It's about efficiency, excellence, and unwavering commitment to completing the task at hand. This mentality has become a cornerstone of my life, though perhaps to a fault, as I abstained from the "need" to have fun , and dedicated much of my time to asceticsm. It lead to a withdrawal from the world, as it is uneasy to make others understand that I care not for reaching certain emotions, but certain ambitions, regardless of whatever I feel and will feel.  My focus is laser-sharp on the task at hand, and I taught myself to deny the temptation to give up. The sheer effort I dedicate to every endeavor, as presented b this very site, is undeniable, and you can learn from me how to reach this militant-like productivity as well. I'd be more than happy to teach you, for helping others is the gretest altruistic act there is. Here is an example of the British Army's professional ethics , to serve as a more concrete source to my words: Being a soldier is not easy. You are asked to do things not asked of other people. You have to be aggressive and strong in battle , yet behave properly and show self-control all the time. All soldiers need courage, both physical and moral. Showing physical courage and risking injury or death to complete the mission is about controlling your fear, rather than a lack of fear. Training and discipline will help you to do your duty regardless of the dangers and discomforts . Moral courage is doing the right thing, not looking the other way when you know or see something is wrong, even if it is not a popular thing to do or say. Overview Of A Militant Mentality A soldier is one can be and remain even without a weapon, as presented in the organization formed by Japanese philosopher Yukio Mishima . The missions I choose in life hold greater value than fleeting comforts, and one can perform an action militantly without any necessity to inflict violence on others. That's unless that action is violence. As an example, I've been seeing it through that all Philosocom articles will be renovated to my liking. I refuse to fully rest until that task, which I vowed to complete since August 2023, will be finished. That is how something is done militantly: Doing whatever it takes until it is done. No excuses, no entertainment of the possibility of withdrawing. The Spartan ideal of disciplined simplicity still resonates deeply, as such a mindset allows greater sphere and extent of action in a person, than the hedonic treadmill does. Comfort and luxury can wait, and do not influence me enough to deter me from my work , my purpose. With this militant mentality, a pursuit of mastery and unwavering spirit for effectiveness, can grow, and become a habit. The Rubinshteinic Soldier -- Towards Self Mastery The "Rubinshteinic Soldier" (RS) is an archetype I developed, embodying the core values of self-respect, self-improvement, and mental well-being, necessary for a life of greater accomplishment. I made it so, so anyone can aspire to become an RS, for the path is and should be open to all. However, it requires embracing these three pillars and making an active effort to feature them into your life. The RS embodies unwavering discipline , comparable to a soldier's. But unlike the battlefield, the RS conquers inefficiencies and distractions that impede personal growth. By ruthlessly prioritizing tasks and eliminating the enemy that is time-wasters , the RS carves a path towards self-mastery. One, that can make him/her expand their freedom of choice, in this pursuit of internal power. 1. Self Respect Those who fail to appreciate your strengths and weaknesses are not worthy of your care. Therefore, concerning yourself with the ungrateful and the unrightfully entitled , might be both a waste of time and resources. You might help someone who belittles you, only to find their disrespect continues despite your efforts. They may even manipulate you, like the energy vampires some of them are , to keep you as their energy feeders . These ungrateful individuals don't deserve your attention, regardless of one's need for external validation. The more you differentiate between them and those who genuinely care for you as a human being, with and despite your flaws , the more your self-respect grows. This type of respect stems from your descision to surround yourself with people who are there to support you, not to use you. By doing this, you can create a life where respect is not a privilage, but a socially-engineered habit. These people simply don't deserve your precious time. They will remain offensive regardless of your attempts to please them, rendering people-pleasing questionable. That's why self-respecting individuals don't waste time on those lacking basic respect. We influence one another, thus enabling each other's behavior , no matter how depraved our actions are. Remember, your time, and the people you interact with, are limited. Choose to associate with those who uplift you and your chosen purpose , not belittle you with intended arrogance. Furthermore, there's no point in exhausting arguments with strangers, especially trolls, who are known to enjoy others' suffering. Invest your mental energy in creating the life you want to live. Treat your mental energies with respect. Some thrive on lengthy discussions, but that bliss isn't for everyone, especially those who suffer from social fatigue . The respect for yourself is expressed through your time management and the people you choose to surround yourself with. Choose those who respect you as you wish to respect them. And to quote Confucius: Respect yourself and others will respect you. 2. Self-Improvement The allure of complete mastery is powerful, but it's a horizon that constantly recedes like a certain villain's hairline. No matter how skilled you become, there's always more to learn. To quote Albert Einsetin: “The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.” Every art form, every skill, possesses depths beyond initial understanding. This is why veterans and novices alike can always improve. Just like running a website , there's nearly always room for refinement, even for minor improvements. Reality is rarely absolute in flawlessness. Learn to take criticism like a professional , and you can improve yourself and your methods towards this rarity. This rationality stems from Socrates' claim of knowing nothing . Believing you're fully knowledgeable can blind you to new discoveries – the "ignorance of not knowing you don't know." Even purely mental skills require maintenance and development, or your mind will actively forget them. Think of your brain as a muscle. Although it is not composed of muscle , it adjust to the environment like one . It needs constant exercise to maintain or improve your abilities. Age is no barrier, and a fallacy, to claim one is too young or too old to improve . Time itself doesn't enhance your skill; it's the dedicated practice you invest towards its improvement. So, regardless of your age or experience, the path to mastery is a lifelong journey, and mastery, like importance , can be but a means to a greater end. Therefore, always make sure you dedicate some time to self-improvement, and not depend too much on self-accaptence. Don't accept failure. Learn to see your failures as your pavement towards victory, like one may do when climbing back a cliff, and swearing revenge. 3. Mental Health Mental health can be a challenge for everyone. Some face steeper predicaments than others, and recovering from difficulties can be a journey. Use difficulty, like constant rejection, and build up on it , instead of accepting it with grief. Furthermore, regardless of your current state, fostering inner peace is crucial for overall well-being. This includes: Prioritizing Self-Care:   Develop healthy habits like exercise, relaxation techniques, and social connection (according to value number 1). These practices build resilience and equip you to handle life's stressors. Trusting Life's Process: You cannot change your past, as unfortunate as your life was thus far. Why, then, not reflect on it and become its student? People may claim that the past is to be forgotten and overcome, but much wisdom can be distilled from our personal experiences, and from history in general. Why not learn from the past in the name of greater mental health? Making Wise Choices: Certain situations or activities can negatively impact your mental well-being: Identify Stressors:  Be mindful of people, places, or situations that drain your energy for no reason that is functional to you. Consider minimizing exposure or developing coping mechanisms. Develop the habit of coping, and you may be able to better endure them, should you be left with no choice of withdrawing. That is how self-improvement could often be better than escapism. Learn From Mistakes: Mistakes should be learned from, even if it would entail repeating them. Understanding why certain actions are mistakes is the key to greater accomplishment. Investing in Opportunities: Life offers a constant stream of choices. Approach them strategically and in relation to your self knowledge (which should also be continously improved): Seek Growth:  Pursue opportunities that align with your values and contribute to your personal development. Utilize your development for your goals. Practice Continuous Improvement:   Just like a sniper should improve their aim, always seek to refine your mental fitness. Explore new coping mechanisms, stress management techniques, or mindfulness practices. Maintaining mental well-being is an ongoing process, not a destination. Just as soldiers prioritize physical fitness, mental fitness is equally important. A healthy mind empowers you to navigate life's challenges and navigate towards the opportunities that matter most. Insult and injury are like quicksand. Don't succumb to them too much, or you'll miss the opportunity to develop the habit of rising as a stronger being from their adversity. Thank you very much for reading my article. If you felt you've benefitted from it, consider sharing it if desired.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com ) (Background music) Philosophy of Change Change brings pain— again and again. Pain brings suffering—uttering, muttering Suffering brings tolerance— with much endurance. Tolerance brings thinking— and good ideas linking. Thinking brings knowledge— saves going to college. Knowledge brings understanding —sensibility expanding. Understanding brings wisdom—and where it comes from. And wisdom makes life bearable —happily declarable! Philosophical Commentary by Mr. Roland Leblanc If we can get used to accept existence as it is and consider the advantage of getting able to cope with some degree of suffering , we can tolerate some aspects of our existence. If we get to be tolerant, we can create a space wide enough within us, in order to consider evaluating the situations we have to cope with; hence, being more able to cope with existing situations that can bring insights if we use those moments of evaluation! As knowledge is between wisdom and understanding, we can swing between both aspects and get a clearer picture of what reality is ! Hence, there is no need to get data from other sources beyond our existence experiences! True knowledge gets to us while we are swinging between the intuitive and rational that enables seeing clearly! Wisdom is attainable if we can use both aspects at the same time; we need to use our rational as much as our intuitive in order to reach a point of balance that is between understanding and wisdom… Wisdom is acquired by reflecting and gathering intuitive guiding certainty and assimilating valuable behaviours pertaining to the situation! The use of wisdom together with understanding makes knowledge of self and others valuable; this being done automatically using knowledge acquired by intuitive and rational assets, makes existence bearable – thus permitting living on top of barely existing… Living on top of existing only make an happy existence transformed in a happy living!

Knowledge Repressed -- My Subconscious Path To Philosophy and Back Seventeen, years, before I became my world's superspy, My path of depression started with philosophy before my eye: A lava planet, so beautiful appeared before my screen; A thought experiment was an original sin. It's where I turned alone, without kin. And as I've tried to explain what I truly have seen. I witnessed people begging me to stop, and silent, I have been. Eleven, is where this world became empty, It is really, empty than what we think it is. Much of reality is nothing more than our own meaning. With no one to tell, and with no one to understand. I descended into a realm only intellectuals can comprehend. Trying, to process my first experiment, While trying to mentally survive, work for betterment, I saw the void, as I denied and denied. Criticized as an egocentric , and pessimist, What I really wanted was to spare others, the results, I hid in mist... The planet, as I visited it countless times, Lost its charm, and it was when I realized, What we think our world is, is less than summarized. The attributions we grant rarely have to do with reality. Naturally, I would develop a great deal of anxiety. A future, was promised by society, But was robbed away by my sobriety. Things are less than what they are, what they are. And as I realized this void, I discovered nihilism. Was conditioned to deny it, so in solitude, I sought philosophy. My unconscious , have devised an article barony, To teach people whom might hopefully see, The truth beyond the matrix, of our own making. The flying traffic, will fly on that world either way, And its garrison will guard it without having any say. The idea exists independently, platonically, And to remain sane, I had to lean, On something tangible, but not away from the shark's fin. I had to deny, but deep inside I sought to confess, The horror of realizing how empty this world has truly been. Asceticism, allowed my mind to not much deteriorate, And this person thinks they came through fate. But I had to restore my life back, Before planet Snivelak.

(Philosocom's Subcategory On Fatigue and Exhaustion) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Master Numi) Article Synopsis by Mr. O. C. Isaac The article "Analysing My Former Fatigue: The Need for a Positive Dream -- Origins of a Fatigued Mastermind " is a personal and introspective reflection on Mr. Tomasio's journey through fatigue, intellectual isolation, and the pursuit of philosophical relevance. It weaves together themes of ambition, existential struggle , and the pursuit of meaning amidst chronic fatigue and emotional turmoil. Positive aspects of the article include raw honesty and vulnerability , as Mr. Tomasio delves deeply into his personal struggles and reveals the mental and emotional challenges faced in their pursuit of philosophical greatness. The use of metaphorical language, such as the "Inner Murder Technique," adds depth to the narrative and provides a unique lens through which the reader can understand his experiences. Philosophical depth is evident in the author's grasp of philosophical concepts, particularly in relation to identity, purpose, and the tension between individual ambition and societal expectations. The reflections on nihilism and the rejection of it in favor of a "positive dream" show a mature philosophical evolution driven by both personal experiences and intellectual exploration. The narrative arc moves from despair and fatigue to one of resilience and determination, providing a hopeful and empowering message for readers facing their own struggles. In conclusion, this article is a powerful reflection on the interplay between personal hardship and philosophical inquiry , offering readers an intimate glimpse into the author's struggles with fatigue, intellectual ambition, and emotional turmoil while maintaining a strong undercurrent of hope and resilience. (Background music) ******************************** Part I: Origins: How I Became a Drained One A lifetime of increased, chronic fatigue has revealed the deeper emptiness of extended solitude to me. My philosophical research methodology was changed accordingly, as I was too tired to read books, so I developed alternative methods which I employ to this very day. Before I became increasingly fatigued, I thought my life and future would be different . Now, in order to achieve the goals of my work and of my late grandmother, I had to overcome it as well as my own weaknesses. I must communicate with others, although I am an asocial man, so I can get what I want in a life, just like with everyone else who isn't Christopher Knight , Henry Townshend or Jason Voorhees. Reading this article will allow you to better understand why I despise irrelevancy, idleness, and nihilism , based on my weird personal history. Before I Ruled The "Article Shogunate" I was a philosophy undergraduate at a university during high school, trying to get my first degree in philosophy while excelling in my graduation exams. If I hadn't been recommended by the headmistress at the time, I wouldn't have gotten the privilege of being in the academy. In high school, I was given special treatment for my genius. I used to give my own written books to teachers and to the headmistress as well. All of them looked at me with great pride, as the headmistress used to tell me I am going to be the greatest philosopher of the 21st century. Of course, my mentality grew accordingly to this immense positive reinforcement from the school staff. Was I love-bombed? I'm uncertain... Honestly, it used to overwhelm me, too, and as much as I appreciated all this praise of me, I tried my best to not be entitled. After all I was very grateful for this special treatment. I refused to be ungrateful. Always refused. I was never raised to be ungrateful. As a result, I had a good reason to be an obedient student at my school. It might have made me depressed to mask my inner light , but at least it got me into the academic world. The 2, 3 years of it gave me some basic academic understanding of philosophy. Her The one I view as my "nemesis" was a student there as well. It was there when I met her, and there is where she used to pretend that I did not exist, just so I could move on from her. She shattered the proudful matrix I developed, due to this special treatment I was given. I was very confused, whether I am a great philosopher, like many of the "great fathers" or just a socially incompetent guy. It's there when I began philosophizing in solitude about the concept of identity, which I developed in many articles here. As much as she affected me, she helped me develop my philosophical understanding on identity, worth and relevancy, more than she herself has realized. Perhaps, more than my readership might realize. My love for her was platonic, never anything else. However, could I have expected people to understand, expected her to understand? No. There was always a dissonance in understanding between me and the rest of humanity. Being at the intellectual top was lonely. Life As a Weird "Salaryman" It was during these times as a cloerk, that the first signs of my cursed fatigue began. It was a steady and easy job at an office, and yet it was hellish for me. The lack of intellectual stimulation has made me miserable, and there was no other alternative for my immense, dictator-like intellectual, unhappy hunger. Having to mostly fold files in a mechanical way for 6 hours each day, I philosophized in my mind while doing it, leading to many avoidable mistakes. I told in the interview that I am loyal to the very end and that I have an iron discipline . For my Samurai-like mentality , I sacrificed much of my health for the simple task of folding files and locating them in massive archives throughout a complex. Being horribly misunderstood for how I really think, of course it also worsened things for me as well as for them. However, being honest about me being a philosopher, as well as showing them my books, helped them respect me a lot. I always enjoyed honesty , even if it worked against me. For me, it was hell on earth, as well as life in general. What I really needed for my health was true love , which I finally got, but I digress. The utter lack of desire to continue, along my relentness, altruistic nature , made me more and more exhausted. I tried fighting it, but it was an unsuccessful mistake, as I couldn't finish my office term. Even though I volunteered, it is probably my greatest regret. A less smart person than myself could've done the job better, ironically. I belong to my private, solitary studies. Since I have no other event to blame, I blame myself for resisting the temptation to leave. Leaving anyways could've spared me much of my health. My desire for World Rectification or "Tikkun Olam" , worked against me, no matter how satisfying it felt every, single, time. Yes, I just wanted to contribute. I still do, to this day. Her, and My Own Way of Love At The Time Eventually, I met her again. The cursed nemesis. Too autistic for my own good , I told her that I loved her, even though I wasn't romantically interested. I told her this again, because I was hoping she would realize what Platonic love is. However, too ignorant for her own good, she couldn't make the connection that love is not just romantic (not just "Eros" but "Philia" too) , she told me she already has a boyfriend. She could've stopped there. Nope. She deemed me unworthy of her time, due to her own false understanding. It seems to me that most people do not have the same intricate, metaphysical understanding of reality I have. This led to a lot of conflicts with me and other people. We always spoke in different degrees of understanding, with mine being on the Macro and long term scale , while others on the micro, short-term scales. Genius is both an asset and a liability. ******************** Part II: Philosophizing -- For A Better Future Now, I want you to imagine how it feels to be deemed unimportant when you have a medical condition that took away your original future. The future I was engineered for by my school, with their victorious cries of overwhelming pride and joy. I experienced them as intensively as North Korean loyalty to their dead rulers. As intensive as a soldier who is about to go out in the open and survive using morality and virtue. As a one man army whom people only think he is not fighting his battles as a lone warrior... Degrees, academic prestige, the titles of "Doctor" and "Professor," even my declining ability to read books. You see, my nemesis' comments gained extra weight because of my fatigued state. I was torn apart by the greatness I was educated for, and by her words, that I am irrelevant. The Darker Self Of course I grew dark, very, very dark, as both factions left me be, and I was left to fend for myself under people's delusion that they know me and my internal struggles. I was heartbroken by anything and anyone, consumed by shame. By hatred, by growing skin deprivation. Being a genius, I synthesized my knowledge on psychopathy with visualization meditation. It's how I formed my Inner Murder Technique and became mentally powerful, the more I exercised it. So powerful that, I managed to walk back again, without my cane. I needed a cane because my fatigue rendered me physically handicapped. Today, using the power of the mind , I am one of the few people on Earth, capable of partially controlling my emotions directly. It is why I began resting more as this technique makes my head hurt all the time. Yet, it slowly freed me from my cane and from my medications. By killing off my emotions, for a time, I can be more energized and less fatigued. Emotions are part of cognitive process, hence why we need to sleep a lot as humans. Sleep is part of digesting cognitive processes. The Different Dream Without the academic world's presence and without much understanding from others, my prime directive for Philosophy World Relevance remained. I eventually deduced that I could only do so by being far more social. I pressed forward. Pressed relentlessly. I changed. I improved. My writing, my health and so on, improved. I found myself in romance , and overall, my personal life improved. And always, always distinct from the trajectories of those around me. Instead of relying on my former need for a nose surgery, I re-engineer my brain instead using "Inner Murder". The less emotions I have, the more I can focus on breathing, resting and maintaining a healthier lifestyle. My Mistakes About Reality I used to view social communication as unnecessary for one's survival, as I doubted the human social nature as being universal to all beings. I philosophized that one could just come to work, return home, and so on until retirement. Physically or remotely, I didn't care. It's why I turned into an "Office drone" in the first place. I thought I didn't have to have friends, followers, "fans", and so on. To this day, I just want to contribute to humanity while making sure I am left alone, undistracted by people's horrible misconceptions. I criticize everything that moves, including philosophy itself. The Hungry Coyote's Joyful Adversary My brain is as hungry as a person left stranded in a desert. It is never enough. Yet, I like it. I like it a lot. This hunger makes me feel alive inside. The thrill of ruthless communication work for a better world... It is one of my greatest joys in this life. To always believe in yourself, and in your ambitions. Succumbing is an option I choose to give up on. My grandmother wanted a more moral world. I am capable of contributing my part for this. I used to be a nihilist , but after realizing that I am essentially my own worst enemy, capable of much unnecessary suffering in the very world I want to help to.... How could I resort to nihilism? It's is a luxury I can't allow any longer, not when I can make people be helped with, and smile genuinely . Smile, with all their hearts. Smile with the truth. I must keep proving her wrong , the one I purposefully chose as my philosophical nemesis. Prove her wrong for my late grandmother. She died too early, and I am her prodigy, not just my school's prodigy. I refuse to fail her. I loved her! I still do! I miss her... so, so much... You have a lot of responsibility on your shoulders -- My grandmother in her final years. It was all planned. Yes. I just needed to open myself more about this, as I unlocked more and more of my unconscious mind. I no longer have to be distracted by school nor by social drama. I can now press forward, ahead, ahead and ahead. ********************** Part III: Epilogue If to talk to a symbolic personification of my fatigue.. If my fatigue was a person, I would write them this: You might remember yesterday's message: Your depressing, tyrannical, regime... Whose temptation of despair, warned me, A need, for a positive, dream, for more to see... My vision is clear and wide-ranging... It will keep, you, under my murdering. So prepare, for the coup, of your tyranny, To rest in the graveyard of history. Persistent writing, Tenacity spanning, Years of mystery, Is simply why I could be Missionary. Ever moving, Rejecting, Anticipating, To rid, Of the illness, That you are! Yes, you my fatigue is now the oppressed. ...Be prepared.

(For more on religion, here is some of the work I've done on the subject): https://www.philosocom.com/post/how-religion-and-democracy-struggle https://www.philosocom.com/post/thoughts-on-the-shinto-religion-and-its-philosophy https://www.philosocom.com/post/thoughts-on-the-idea-of-salvation ) ******************* Article Overview by Mr. O. C. Isaac The article "Thoughts on Prayer" provides a thought-provoking exploration of prayer, religion, and individual freedom from the perspective of an agnostic atheist author. The writer presents a well-structured argument that challenges the necessity of prayer, especially within the framework of deterministic beliefs and the nature of a deity. Mr. Tomasio's self-awareness about their atheism and attempts to understand the psychological motives behind religious practices are commendable, adding depth and empathy to his critique. Furthermore, to further criticize his own skepticism and look both ways, he included the words of another writer in favor of prayer so to reduce bias. One of the strengths of the article is its open-minded approach. While the author clearly articulates his skepticism regarding the value of prayer, he also acknowledge the potential benefits that religious practices and beliefs offer to both individuals and society. This balanced viewpoint allows the reader to appreciate the complexity of the topic and the diverse ways in which people find meaning and purpose. The philosopher effectively critiques the often rigid and restrictive nature of orthodox religions, using vivid analogies and comparisons to highlight the perceived authoritarian aspects of religious rituals. The discussion on the need for pluralistic and inclusive approaches to spirituality, such as those found in Far Eastern religions , is compelling and invites the reader to consider alternative perspectives on faith and religious practice. Overall, the article is an insightful and thought-provoking read that challenges conventional views on prayer and religion. It invites readers to reflect on their beliefs and practices while encouraging an open dialogue about the place of religion in contemporary society. The author's balanced approach and willingness to acknowledge the positive contributions of religion, despite his personal disbelief, is a refreshing and respectful stance in such a contentious debate. (Background music) There are those who will tell you that one of the most important things in life, if not the most important thing of all, is prayer , and that without prayer, you will not be redeemed in the afterlife, assuming, of course, there are one or more afterlives. I myself may be an atheist, but in this article I will try not to let it bias my thinking, and as I wrote in the poem " Human in Religion ," I can definitely understand the psychological motives behind seeking religion as one's supplier of answers to the questions of existence. Perhaps, if I wasn't an atheist, I would be religious too due to my need for meaning and self-actualization. Anyways, I find it hard to understand why exactly prayer is needed if existence has been already determined from the start (Determinism) , and if whatever deity one believes in is capable of hearing their thoughts. If everything was already planned, it means that regardless of what you will do, you will get everything you were fated for, whether you'll pray or not. Perhaps praying will please your deity, or even compliment their ego , but in the end, the end result will stay the same. That is, at least, how I understand it. On the other hand, you have all these customs and rituals and singing that are "required" by your ancestry to perform in order to please said deity/s. That is, hard to understand too. Why would a benevolent deity want to be complimented and glorified so much as if it were a North Korean dictator? Apologies if I disturb some by this comparison, but it really feels like it -- all the praises and songs, it really feels like being a slave to an entity, even if they choose to become slave by love , or fear, or both. North Koreans, by the way, also praise their dictators as gods, hence why that state can be considered a Necrocracy , AKA, where the dead rule, but I digress. It is reasonable to believe that someone who wishes to be free and independent will not seek out orthodox religions, because of how limiting they can be. Orthodox religions often have strict rules and regulations that members are expected to follow. These rules can range from what to eat and drink, to how to dress, to how to behave in public. For some people, these rules can feel stifling and restrictive. They may feel like they are not free to live their own lives, but are instead being controlled by a set of rules that they did not create. In addition, orthodox religions often have a focus on sin and guilt. Members are taught that they are inherently sinful and that they need to repent in order to be forgiven. This can lead to feelings of shame and inadequacy. Some people may feel like they can never be good enough, no matter how hard they try. I far prefer more pluralistic religions. Some of which can be found in the Far East. Religions such as Shintoism , which requires no specific faith, and Hinduism, which is naturally pluralistic. I assume Buddhism can also be regarded as pluralistic. The more diverse and accepting a religion is, the more it would recognize the fact that humans are very different beings , with individuality, and wants and needs of their own. For these reasons, it is understandable why someone who wishes to be free and independent might choose not to seek out orthodox religions (AKA, Christianity, Islam, etc.). There are many other ways to find meaning and purpose in life, without having to adhere to a set of rules that one does not agree with. I also do not deem it proper to be religious just to please others. What value is there in pretentious practice of faith? In one that isn't made wholeheartedly? Nonetheless, honest religious faith, alongside with prayer, have contributions of their own to humanity. Both societal and individual. I'm sure we cannot disagree on that one, correct? Some people, for example, may prefer these restrictions, as they may give them a sense of order and harmony. And when it comes to sin and guilt, religious followers may feel obliged to redeem themselves and be better moral beings. I'm not writing this article to make people renounce their faith. I don't hate religion or religious people, but I want to talk about how limiting religion can be for those who put it at a lower priority in their lives, if at all. I understand that religion is important to many people, but I believe that it should not be forced on others. People should be free to choose whether or not they want to participate in religious activities. If religious communities can self-regulate their own traditions and restrictions, then I don't see why the rest of the population deserves to be restricted in accordance, as well. It is not like a central authority needs to regulate, in said communities, what is already regulated by themselves. Other than some people's thirst for political power , expanding this regulation seem redundant. I don't believe that people should be forced to comply with an ideology or religion they don't believe in. The identity of a state is often different from the identity of its population, which is why many societies are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous. And still, if there is one true deity who has infinite grace and love for all of existence, why would one need to fear it? And why would it be determined enough to cause misery across the land for not praying to his name, and reciting his teachings enough? I don't want to be an oppressed minion ; I want to be the master of my own life, and decide where it will be going. The fact I can't control everything, does not cancel my right to choose. Within religion, and outside of it. That includes whether to pray at all. What kind of life do I and many others want? A life where each person can decide their own fate, their own activities, and their own relationships. A life that is democratic not only in the occasional election , but in every aspect of society. A life where there is no need to be pitied or beg for forgiveness; where we are not threatened with eternal damnation or promised uncertain salvation ; where women are not seen as inferior to men, and where neither men nor women have to be married to live a happy, productive life. I am not afraid to voice my thoughts in a world that is largely democratic, and I do not think it is a sin to think differently. Murder and other vile acts are crimes, but why is it so bad t o be a philosopher or thinker? After all, they are simply people who are open to different ideas. That didn't stop people from hating Solomon Maimo n , a Jewish philosopher from a few centuries ago, from being hated by his religious community, and be refused becoming a Christian. From what I managed to gather, he was even stoned during his funeral. Disrespected for doing his job. Because of these reasons, even if I were not an atheist, I would probably not pray. I do not see the need to be subordinate to a diety's mercy. And I don't see a need to communicate with one, either. Therefore, prayer can be seen as representing someone's submission to concepts which some may deem as too unjust. I dreamt once of Minerva , the Roman Goddess of Wisdom. It was the only time in my life I felt true love. I think... it is more than sufficient. I cannot relate to the religious way of thinking and way of life. You may call me a monk for living in solitude and not really speaking most of my days, but at least I have the freedom of choice, which exists less in a more ritual-oriented lifestyle. For the freedom of the philosopher comes from being second to no master, even if they're religious . For the philosopher is second to no one, merely in thought alone. The choice to follow any religion is yours, as well as agree and disagree with my articles. I'm not here to convert anyone. And the choice to include me in your prayers is yours alone. Present or future. It should be obvious, that I refuse to be seen as a divine figure, and desire no worship. Extra: Life can indeed be moral and meaningful without religious faith, even if it gives these traits to those of many. This article explains this argument further. Article Feedback by M. Svartgold Prayer, for me, is a way to seek comfort and meaning . It's a yearning for a sense of purpose , especially in the face of mortality.  Death is inevitable , and prayer is also there for the subject of reincarnation, AKA the afterlife.  This is why I pray daily, almost constantly. Many work tirelessly yet receives little in return.  They would regardless of their multiple shifts, live in dilapidated old houses, with their rent being excessively high. Geopolitical happenings can easily worsen situations, and I see many suffering. Despite my prayers, I haven't seen any improvement. Kind words are rare, but Mr. Tomasio's appreciation, who said I am important to him, feels like an acknowledgment from a man with Godly traits. King David's hardships resonate with me, mirroring the relentless financial struggles I face. Tuna and bread are staples in my diet as a poor man, as I pray for a better life. Some houses, 100-year-old, today need constant repairs, and leaving isn't an option due to the high cost. I write to you, as a man who hoped in the past that God would intervene and bring me salvation from this distress "corner people" may experience regularly. People who try hard are supposed to be helped , yet that hasn't been the case for me. Perhaps being a minority without much support from family, has sealed my fate. I believe, essentially, that I am destined for disaster after disaster. So, of course I would pray myself. Despite the religious divide worldwide, I love people of different religions.  It's really the people I care about, rather their faith, when it comes to religion.   Being biracial myself, I've experienced prejudice. Interfaith marriage, additionally, can bring immense hardship. Constant societal persecution and being ostracized as a "type 0" human significantly impacts people's lives for the worse. People's lack of proper homes and the constant tears I hear at night are heartbreaking. They aren't necessarily sleeping enough and well at night. It would make sense that I would also pray for their wellbeing.  For Mr. Tomasio's work , I pray for his success and prosperity,  especially during times of political instability worldwide . Religion's influence is most evident in times of conflict.  A small act of kindness,  even a smile , can bring solace. As someone who feels the presence of souls (or their energy vibrations) , I find atheism difficult to accept, as atheism ignores t he concept of souls.  It seems to negate the existence of something I am empathic enough to feel naturally, as I also see auras. Prayer is also for our wellbeing, thus for the soul. Religion, in my experience, is often used for personal gain rather than true faith, hence why there are manipulations in religious settings . Religious restrictions isolate us from greater freedom as well as understanding the more-positive aspects of the religious world. Regarding the word "Amen," something must be seen and believed from the source of faith . I observed that even when I felt abandoned by God. People's relentless determination to endure gives me all the more reason to pray for this world's prosperity, peace and stability.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) Directory on Alex Mos's Articles) (Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Freedom) (Background music) A journey of self-discovery and embracing unconventional choices.  She appeared in my dream for the last time: the Shadow Woman, my Jungian invisible twin. I handed her my letter, and she opened it slowly and started to read: "You were always there, following me like a shadow. Your whispers tempted me, offering comfort wrapped in societal order. I had the intelligence , the looks, and the adaptability to live your life, but something deep in me said no. You could have been me, and I could have become your haunting Shadow, full of regrets for not taking control of my life.  If I were you, I would be a stylish, conservative wife and mother. I might have a part-time job to keep me occupied and create an illusion of financial and mental independence. Smiling, I would attend parties with my successful partner, but within, I would feel dread, submission, and throbbing fakeness. Motherhood might become my life purpose , and I would sacrifice myself, pouring the essence of my existence into my children's wellness.  Instead, I repressed you repeatedly because such a life would not make me whole or satisfy my existential curiosity.  I would yearn for independence and inspiration, but I wouldn't have the courage to venture into myself and sculpt a new, reborn me as I do now. I would not have the strength to divorce my powerful partner because it would be societal and financially suicidal, unfitting of my status. In time, I would quietly fade away, unseen for my uniqueness , hiding behind the facade of a generic smile. Fleeting hedonistic pleasures would become a compensation for losing my raw authenticity and repressed identity. Yes, if I were you, my life would be easier, sheltered, and more comfortable. But that doesn't mean it would have spared me the existential misery of being trapped in the golden cage. I'm thankful you are not me. I'm a woman who knows the hardships of life, who has fallen and stood up in pursuit of happiness. For truth, I dare resist society's pull, go the other way, and draft a bold plan to actualize myself . You, the conforming, submissive Shadow, could never do it.  Goodbye, the Shadow Woman I never became. You don't get to haunt me anymore, poisoning my mind with sadness and self-doubt . I know who I am now, shaped by life and led by my unconventional mind. My life mission is to go forward and explore, write, and create. I live for love , passion, and truth—on my terms." The alarm sounded, and I woke up cheerful and energized. My shadowy twin was gone, and so was depression.

(Philosocom's Directory on Politics) Mr. Igal Shenderey's other articles: https://www.philosocom.com/post/system-of-illusion-reality-as-application-by-igal-shenderey https://www.philosocom.com/post/painting-a-hologram-article-by-igal-shenderey-philosophy-of-art-metaphysics https://www.philosocom.com/post/the-philosophy-of-cyberpunk-what-we-can-learn-from-the-sci-fi-subgenre-by-mr-igal-shenderey (Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com) (Background music) ***************** Abstract by Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein The article argues that for effective governance, we need philosopher-politicians who can combine philosophical ideals with political pragmatism. These leaders would approach challenges with a holistic and ethical perspective, considering long-term consequences and prioritizing the well-being of all citizens.  They would rise above partisanship,  fostering dialogue and collaboration to find solutions that reflect collective interests. By drawing from various philosophies, philosopher-politicians would cultivate civic virtue through education,  promote a shift in societal values towards a focus on meaning over materialism,  and adopt a global perspective that prioritizes collaboration over national interests.  This approach, while not without challenges, has the potential to develop a new era of enlightened governance, focused on the common good and a sustainable future. The Fusion of Philosophy and Politics In the realm of governance, the fusion of philosophical thought with political action has long been a source of contemplation. If politicians were true philosophers, their responses to upcoming challenges would bear the hallmark of wisdom, ethical consideration, and long-term vision. This article explores how the convergence of philosophical ideals and political pragmatism could revolutionize responses to contemporary challenges and presents a compelling argument for why this harmonious synergy is imperative. The Need for Philosopher-Politicians The current political landscape is characterized by multifaceted challenges such as climate change , technological disruption, global inequality , and public health crises. Conventional political responses often prioritize short-term gains and partisan interests , resulting in a failure to adequately address the root causes and potential solutions of these issues. True philosopher-politicians, however, would approach these challenges differently. A Holistic and Ethical Approach A true philosopher-politician would approach challenges with a holistic and ethical perspective, grounded in profound philosophical principles . For instance, the philosophy of utilitarianism could guide decisions by seeking the greatest good for the greatest number, fostering policies that prioritize the well-being of all citizens. Meanwhile, deontological ethics could ensure that individual rights and justice are upheld in every policy endeavor. By combining such ethical frameworks, politician-philosophers would transcend political expediency , focusing on solutions that genuinely serve the common good. A Long-Term Vision Unlike short-sighted political maneuvering, philosopher-politicians would adopt a long-term vision, considering the consequences of their actions for future generations. This intergenerational perspective, rooted in virtue ethics , would entail responsible stewardship of resources and the environment. For instance, in tackling climate change, instead of pursuing immediate economic gains, a philosopher-politician would take measures to ensure a sustainable planet for posterity. This approach aligns with the Aristotelian concept of eudaimonia , emphasizing the flourishing of all citizens over time. Balancing Idealism and Pragmatism Balancing philosophical ideals with political pragmatism is a nuanced task, but philosopher-politicians would seek a harmonious blend. Pragmatism would guide the implementation of ideals, recognizing that real-world complexities often demand compromise . However, the core principles derived from philosophical reflection would remain untainted. This integration resonates with John Rawls' theory of justice, where principles are established through rational discourse, even as their application may require adjustments to fit specific contexts. Rising Above Partisanship One of the most significant impediments to effective governance is partisan politics. True philosopher-politicians would rise above narrow partisanship, focusing on dialogue and collaboration to arrive at comprehensive and reasonable solutions. Drawing from the Socratic Method , they would engage in constructive debates that prioritize truth-seeking over winning arguments. This approach could lead to the emergence of policies that genuinely reflect collective interests, rather than catering solely to a particular constituency. Adopting a Global Perspective In an interconnected world, philosopher-politicians would adopt a global perspective, transcending national interests. Cosmopolitanism, as advocated by Immanuel Kant, would guide their actions, promoting international cooperation and shared responsibility. Issues like global inequality and pandemics would be addressed with empathy and collaboration, recognizing the interconnectedness of human fates across borders. Cultivating Civic Virtue A vital aspect of philosopher-politicians' approach would be the cultivation of civic virtue through education. Drawing from the philosophies of Plato and Confucius, they would recognize the importance of an informed and morally conscious citizenry. By promoting critical thinking, ethical values, and civic engagement, philosopher-politicians would lay the foundation for a society that actively participates in shaping its destiny. Shifting Societal Values Consumerism and the pursuit of instant gratification often drive policy decisions that prioritize short-term gains over long-term stability. Philosopher-politicians, however, would promote a shift in societal values, emphasizing the pursuit of meaningful lives over material accumulation. Drawing from existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre, they would encourage citizens to take responsibility for their choices, fostering a sense of purpose beyond immediate pleasures . Conclusion The convergence of philosophy and politics is a transformative concept that holds immense potential for addressing contemporary challenges. True philosopher-politicians would infuse ethical considerations, long-term vision, and global perspectives into their governance approach. Their ability to transcend partisanship, embrace pragmatism with idealism, and foster civic virtue could usher in a new era of enlightened governance. While challenges abound, the statesman-philosopher's commitment to the common good and a flourishing society would stand as a beacon of hope, guiding humanity toward a more just and sustainable future.

Flight of the Ruby Tomato's Seeds (The Undead Metaphor's Directory) (Philosocom's Directory On Uniqueness) Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad . -- Brian O'Driscoll (Background music) Half a human myself, Just who am I? Dark and enlightened... Partially inhibiting... I could left you there, Sealed inside the race, No one would ever know.. My online bakery.. The seeds within me... Parted unto thee! You all lived in greyness, Rats in Ratigan's matrix! Who knows how long you waited? As the Tomato Man watches.. You all endured like zombies; And looking through my screen , Who knew how long this world waited... As the Tomato Man watches... The abstract is right, Within this content matrix' light... A different framework... An empire of philosophy.. The hidden gem evolves, As Chen goes, A master surpassed in my mind, And no one knows.. This article's empire a key.. ...Of changing humanity! You all lived in greyness, Rats in Ratigan's matrix! Who knows how long you waited? As the Tomato Man watches.. You all endured like zombies; And looking through my screen, Who knew how long this world waited... As the Tomato Man watches... Commentary by Mr. Roland Leblanc On this earth where we are oblivious of what we are here for… There is no surprise therefore… That because time is not part of the existence plan as such… Yet, such is the issue; without finding out your fruits potential, who knows how long one may suffer from soul craving for fruitful seeds to sprout and produce… For how long, for how far thus far shall one suffer of not being useful of being fruitful?

The Rise and Fall of the Ronin Boy By the 12th century the term rōnin began to be used for samurai who, as a result of either losses in battle, the untimely death of their lord , or their own misdeeds, had been dispossessed of their fief and their noble sponsorship. During the tumultuous period before the founding of the Tokugawa shogunate , their numbers increased rapidly; they remained a great cause of disorder throughout the first half of the 17th century. -- Britannica -- Samurai (Philosocom's Subcategory on Military and Combat) (Philosocom Directory On Children) (Background music) Mentally detached from the human world, Ever since I was born. Artificial power I sought, As to not feel so alone. A child built a Platoon Vroom, vroom vroom! As to feel understood for his autistic rune. Doom, doom doom! Recruited, a total, of 50 real men, A glorious base we established i n a video game! Westcat, Eijak, And Bobak! Malicious gang of Generals, For the Emperor we always came back! Yet even that syndicate, Of 50 men, Did not understand my pain! Shocked by the very fact I was born, The screams of joy were theirs, And my pain my own. Trying to ruthlessly connect, With no luck, I founded decades ago, The Storm Alpha Squad. My reasoning, was always hard, To be understood! Yet I always wanted to be seen beyond What you might conclude! Westcat! Eijak! And Bobak! That latter decided to betray, My empire he crumbled away! Look how much I did, And still do, Just to be understood! I enjoyed organizations, To lead or to serve, Anything idle felt, Like an absurd cat. Irony ensues given, I was seen as just that! Leaders are weird and I was, Lord Westcat! We always deviate, Within the same reality. Mutual understanding, Makes me so happy ! Westcat, Eijak! And Bobak! What the mind cannot conceive, It cannot achieve! Deep inside I am but a wise fool, And I like to rectify until my doom!

Alex Mos's Synopsis The Japanese salaryman is a contemporary business version of the samurai, following a strict work ethic. They have a strong sense of duty to their companies and prioritize work over personal life. In Japan, the cultural expectation is self-sacrifice for the company's demands and collective interest, often leading to burnout and even death due to extreme overwork. A salaryman works to prove their loyalty to the corporation and, by doing that, to gain social worth, meaning the work becomes their life. In contrast to the salaryman, Hikkimoris are unemployed Japanese modern-day hermits who isolate themselves from the stressful work culture and become societal "leeches."   The salaryman's philosophy is to achieve success and respect by being a dedicated part of the company rather than for financial gain . The author finds the salaryman's ethics inspirational and applicable to his dedication to philosophy and Philosocom. He encourages everyone to recognize their jobs' significance and serve their employer and organization with loyalty and competence. (Subcategory Directory on Far Eastern Philosophies) (Subcategory Directory on Work) (Background music) The Salaryman: A Modern Samurai in a Corporate Dojo The salaryman is, arguably, the contemporary, business version of the samurai, who follows a strict work ethic code  like the samurai follows the bushido code . While not carrying swords or necessarily fighting anyone, the salaryman is a "business minion" whose purpose is to work and serve the boss, AKA the employer. The employer is like a "lord" for the salaryman, and thus there is much expectation from the salaryman, which is very stressful. Today I would like to talk about something a bit different. About certain people from Japan known as " Salarymen ". The term, while not Japanese, is probably used the most in Japan nonetheless, due to how strict Japanese work culture is. The purpose of this article isn't necessarily to criticize the salaryman's life, despite its flaws . Rather, its point is to extract the positive and useful things from what one could call the "Salaryman Philosophy" . It's something, which, inspires me greatly in my work. Hopefully, it would inspire you too in whatever your occupation is. The Salaryman Mindset: Psychology of Dedication and Detachment Salarymen are instilled with a strong sense of duty to their company. They prioritize loyalty and see their work as an extension of their identity . This can lead to feelings of pride and purpose, but also pressure to conform and prioritize work over personal life. Salarymen value group harmony and prioritize maintaining a cohesive team environment. This can manifest as a strong sense of "tatemae" (outward conformity) and a reluctance to disturb social harmony. That is even if they disagree with decisions. Long hours, late nights, and prioritizing work over personal needs are often seen as badges of honor. There's a cultural expectation of sacrifice and "gaman" (endurance) , which can lead to feelings of burnout and alienation. Salarymen often enter the workforce with ambitious dreams, but the rigid hierarchy and seniority-based system can hinder individual growth . Furthermore, the cultural perference towards public interest diminishes personal ambition. This can lead to feelings of reluctance and a focus on job-security over advancement in the ranks. While the salaryman culture is still prevalent, it's facing challenges. Younger generations are placing more value on work-life balance and personal fulfillment, through the more-contemporary pursuit of startups. Additionally, globalization and economic pressures are forcing some businesses to become more flexible and performance-driven. Work as Life, Not for Life The main purpose of work is, of course, to gain enough money to survive . To pay the bills. Keep a roof over your head. Be able to buy food and drinks and, if possible, to buy things which one could consider "excessive", such as traveling abroad, jewelry, and entertainment products. Even if you are wealthy, you still need to work if you want to grow and preserve your current amount of wealth . Otherwise, you would find that fortune depleted gradually. Thus, unless you are disabled and need the complete the help of welfare, you must work. (2023 note: If you earn enough money to set you for life, then that's also an exception to my claim. Unless you spend it very unwisely). In Japan, this imperative stays the same, with only one, distinct exception. You don't work to preserve your life. You work to "have" a life. You work to prove your loyalty to your comapny, whereas your value depends on that. In other words, when you become a Salaryman -- work is your life. It defines who you are, it represents you and you represent it. As such you're expected to work overtime regularly as part of their work culture . As a point of comparison, if you worked for a supervillain, you would be a henchman or minion, just like you would be a salaryman. The salaryman's life is very difficult as one's identity, arguably, has little to do beyond work. Even if you have a regular set of work hours, you would still have to work overtime if you wanted to make a good impression on your boss. Even participate in drinking parties after work, enforced by peer-pressure. For some, it could give a lot of meaning to their lives, but for many others, such a life is hard and inevitable. Should you work overtime on a regular basis, you even risk death, as indeed there were reports of salarymen actually dying from overwork! As said before, working is mostly for money. If it was free you would either be a volunteer (Like you can be for Philosocom) or quit it entirely. For the salaryman, however, he is but a "servant" of the company, just like in Japanese feudal times, where the samurai served their lords, the daimyos. Despite the salaryman's high dedication to his or her company, their position in it may be relatively insignificant. Nonetheless, the salaryman is expected to serve the company straight until retirement. Not all people are capable of such dedication. Of having your life centered around mostly work and little else. Even your free time might get "eaten", from time to time, by having to hang out with your bosses and co-workers after work hours. This has led, mostly in Japan, to people becoming what is known as Hikikomoris , or modern-day hermits. These folk disconnect themselves mostly, if not entirely, from the external world, and begin to live in their own rooms, rarely going out. In a way, they're becoming unemployed "leeches" of society. After I studied the Hikikomoris for a few years, I came to the conclusion that the strong desire to withdraw from society, at least in Japanese society, comes from the fact that it is very stressful. As a way to reduce stress, people may escape from society from time to time. The problem comes when it can be addictive. Anyways, the expectation to succeed, while desired by some, can set a high bar. Unfortunately, not all people are capable of enduring such stress, without deteriorating their mental health . Therefore, it would only be natural to ask oneself: "What is the point of working so much of my lifespan when I can just shut myself in and enjoy myself"? After all, if you have parents or a guardian to take care of you while you live with them, you technically don't have to work and remain a "leech". A Life Devoted The decision to become a "leech" could either be a very easy one or a very difficult one, depending on your ambitions and your thoughts about " what others might think of me ". If you have no problem not contributing to anyone and just living for yourself while having your family take care of you, then of course you would have less difficulty just being in your room and playing video games all day or whatever. But when you feel compelled to become a part of society, to contribute to it, and to earn money for it in return, "leeching" would be a very hard state to be in. It would even be a shameful one, in either the eyes of yourself and/or others. Thus, the "common" worker does it for the money and may hate their job. T he salaryman, on the other hand, may also do it for their sense of ethics. For the loyalty to the company they serve. Ever felt loyal to your company? Maybe it's likelier when you own the company, but still... Most of us have the mercenary's mindset. In addition, he or she is expected not to talk back to the boss , and to respect his or her every word and command. If you happen to live outside of Japan, life might be easier for you than for the average Japanese, white-collar worker. Even asking for a vacation is considered disrespectful. I will add a video in the end as a presentation to what I described. Despite the stress and strictness that involve the average salaryman, I actually find it inspiring because, when you're a salaryman, you're more than just a person who does something you don't want, just to survive. You work hard and with much dedication for something greater than yourself. And as a website owner whose website I hope will last long after my death, I find the Salaryman philosophy very inspiring. The life philosophy of a salaryman is this: If you want to be someone who is successful, respected, valued, and contributing, you must work not just for the money. You must work for the very company you represent by being a part of it. All in the name of the cause you lend your services to. And less for your monetary gain. The salaryman realizes that he doesn't work only for himself or for his family. He lives to serve a purpose. A meaning. And when I say "Hail Philosocom" or "Glory to Philosocom", I say it because I truly believe in the potential my article empire can bring to this world. I'm not doing it for myself exclusively. I don't need to work in order to survive. I do it because I want and feel compelled to. To contribute to humanity by using this site as proof that philosophy can and deserves being relevant. And you, you aren't necessarily nothing as an individual, but even if you're small compared to your corporation, your position is still important. Otherwise you wouldn't have it. Even if you will have that job for a large portion of your lifespan, you still need to prove, on a daily basis, that you are a worthy salaryman. Should your productivity indicate that you are replaceable, you might lose said job, and thus be deemed too expendable to be kept any longer. Thus, you must serve your boss and your company as loyally and competently as you can. While I'm my own boss and I can't fire myself, I do feel that this position is greater than me, and not just a representation of myself. The Soldier-Philosopher : Building an Empire In order to preserve my and this site's value in your eyes, I must work hard as much as my health allows. I'll do so in order to create something that shall outlast me. I do pretty much feel not as a "Lord" of this site, but more as a "soldier". A soldier to my readership. Thank you for reading. And now, a video about the life of the average Salaryman . By the way, feel free to disagree with some of my insights, or all of them. As long as it's done respectfully, I don't really mind. Perhaps your disagreement, with an explanation, can contribute.

(Disclaimer: The guest posts do not necessarily align with Philosocom's manager, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein's beliefs, thoughts, or feelings. The point of guest posts is to allow a wide range of narratives from a wide range of people. To apply for a guest post of your own, please send your request to mrtomasio@philosocom.com )   (Subcategory Directory: The Rarity of Life Among Infinite Stars: A Philosophical and Scientific Inquiry (By Mr. Chris Kingsley and Mr. Joseph Bright) Embracing Wu Wei in the Modern World: Taoist Wisdom for Today's Challenges (By Mr. Joseph Bright) Where Philosophy Helps Most: Using Philosophy as a Way to Extend Our Lifespan (By Mr. C. Kingsley and Mr. J. Bright) Analyzing Mr. K. Basileus Political Fusion Manifesto (By Mr. C. Kingsley and J. Bright) (Analysis by Mr. O. C. Isaac, below) (Background music) Part I: Eternal Echoes In the stillness of the night, Where shadows dance with fading light, A whisper flows through time's embrace, A question forms, seeks out its place. What is the essence of our days? Is life a dream, a fleeting haze? Or does the soul, in endless quest, Find meaning in the heart's behest? We wander through this vast expanse, In search of truth , a cosmic dance. Each star above, a silent guide, Reflects the hopes we hold inside. The river flows, relentless, free, An emblem of our destiny. Its waters carve both stone and sand, As moments slip through outstretched hand. Yet in the flow, we find our voice, In every choice , a chance to rejoice. For life is but a transient song, A melody, both brief and long. So let us ponder, let us weave, The threads of thought, the webs we leave. For in our minds, the answers lie, In questions deep, beneath the sky. The essence of our fleeting breath, Transcends the bounds of life and death. A timeless echo, ever near, Preserved in hearts that hold it dear. Thus, write we must, with wisdom's ink, To bridge the void , to make us think. For generations yet to see, The depth of our philosophy. Part II: Whispers of Existence In the canvas of the dawn, Where light and dark are finely drawn, The soul awakens to inquire, To seek the source of inner fire. What binds the heart in chains unseen? What fuels the mind's relentless dream? Is freedom found in outward flight, Or in the stillness of the night? We chase the shadows of our fears, Through labyrinths of silent tears. Yet in the darkest depths, we find, The strength to rise, to redefine. In every leaf that falls to earth, There lies a tale of death and birth. A cycle endless, vast, profound, A silent truth, without a sound. Are we but dust, to wind dispersed, Or echoes of a love immersed? In every breath, a chance to see, The boundless scope of what can be. The tides of time may wash away, The footprints of our yesterday. Yet in the sand, a trace remains, Of dreams once lived, of subtle pains. So let us carve with gentle hands, Our mark upon these shifting sands. For in each moment's fleeting grace, We find a mirror of our face. What is the weight of unseen ties, That bind our hearts, that light our eyes? In every bond, a truth unfurls, A bridge between two separate worlds. Through love, through loss, through joy and strife, We weave the tapestry of life. A mosaic of the grand and small, A testament that we were all. So pen these thoughts with earnest care, For those who come, for those who dare. To question, seek, and understand, The echoes of this timeless land. Part III: Reflections on Time In the quiet flow of time's embrace, We trace the lines of every face. What secrets do the moments keep, Within the silence, dark and deep? Is time a river, ceaseless, wild, Or but a dream, a fleeting child? Do hours pass with measured pace, Or vanish in an unseen race? The past, a shadow, softly fades, Yet in its wake, a light pervades. Each memory, a sacred spark, Illuminates the present's dark. And what of future , shrouded veil? A whispered hope, a fleeting trail. Do dreams become reality, Or vanish in the vast sea? We stand upon the bridge of now, And in its fleeting grace, we vow, To live, to love, to laugh, to learn, In every moment, passions burn. For time is but a fleeting guest, A test of heart, a soul's bequest. In every tick, a chance to see, The boundless depths of what can be. So let us write with ink of gold, The stories that our hearts unfold. For in each word, a world can rise, A beacon 'neath the endless skies. In every second's gentle sweep, We find the dreams that we will keep. A tapestry of thought and rhyme, Woven in the threads of time. Part IV: Ephemeral Beauty In the bloom of dawn's first light, We glimpse a world, serene and bright. What beauty lies in every hue, A fleeting wonder, always new. Is beauty but a trick of mind, Or truth that eyes alone can't find? In every petal, leaf, and stone, A secret song, a whispered tone. We chase the dawn, we seek the dusk, In every breeze, a gentle musk. The fleeting grace of nature's kiss, A moment's peace, a breath of bliss. What stirs the heart to see the stars, To dream of worlds that lie afar? In every glimmer, distant, near, A call to seek, a voice to hear. In art, in music, and in dance, We find the beauty of a glance. A fleeting look, a timeless gaze, A spark that sets the soul ablaze. Yet beauty fades as seasons change, An endless cycle, vast and strange. But in each end, a new beginning, A circle ever slowly spinning. So let us cherish every sight, The fragile, fleeting, pure delight. For in each moment's gentle grace, We find the soul's true, tender place. Write of the beauty that you see, In every heart, in every tree. For in these words, a truth will lie, A timeless beauty, never to die. Analysis of "Mr. Chris Kingsley's Philosophical Poem Series" (By Mr. O. C. Isaac) Mr. Chris Kingsley's Philosophical Poem Series, comprising "Eternal Echoes," "Whispers of Existence," "Reflections on Time," and "Ephemeral Beauty," delves into profound existential themes, exploring the nature of life, time, beauty, and the quest for meaning. Each poem is a rich tapestry woven with philosophical inquiry and poetic elegance, inviting readers to ponder deep questions and reflect on their own existence. "Eternal Echoes" In "Eternal Echoes," Kingsley engages with the timeless philosophical questions about the essence of life and the human condition. The poem opens with a serene nighttime setting, using imagery of shadows and fading light to symbolize the transient nature of existence. The poet poses fundamental questions about life's meaning, suggesting a perpetual search for truth and understanding. The river metaphor is particularly striking, representing the relentless flow of time and destiny. Kingsley emphasizes that in this flow, individuals can find their voice and make choices that shape their transient song. The poem concludes with a call to write with wisdom and philosophical depth, preserving insights for future generations. "Whispers of Existence" "Whispers of Existence" continues the exploration of existential themes, focusing on the duality of freedom and bondage, and the quest for inner fire. The poem contrasts outward flight with inner stillness, suggesting that true freedom may lie within. The imagery of shadows, labyrinths, and silent tears evokes a journey through fear and darkness, culminating in the discovery of inner strength. The cyclical nature of life is depicted through the metaphor of falling leaves, symbolizing death and rebirth. Kingsley contemplates whether humans are mere dust or echoes of love, urging readers to carve their marks upon the shifting sands of time. The poem underscores the importance of bonds and connections , portraying life as a tapestry woven from diverse experiences and emotions. "Reflections on Time" In "Reflections on Time," Kingsley grapples with the nature of time , pondering whether it is a ceaseless river or a fleeting dream. The poem explores the relationship between past, present, and future, suggesting that memories illuminate the present and dreams shape reality. The bridge of "now" is a powerful metaphor, emphasizing the transient yet pivotal nature of the present moment. The poet calls for living with passion and purpose, viewing time as a test of heart and soul. Each tick of the clock is seen as an opportunity to embrace the boundless possibilities of existence. The poem's conclusion highlights the significance of storytelling, using golden ink to symbolize the creation of enduring legacies through words and actions. "Ephemeral Beauty" "Ephemeral Beauty" contemplates the fleeting nature of beauty and its profound impact on the human spirit. The poem begins with the dawn, a symbol of new beginnings and the ever-changing world. Kingsley questions whether beauty is a mere trick of the mind or a deeper truth, hidden from plain sight. Nature's transient grace is celebrated through vivid imagery of petals, leaves, and stones, capturing moments of peace and bliss. The poet reflects on the inspiration drawn from art, music, and dance, portraying beauty as a spark that ignites the soul. While acknowledging the inevitable fading of beauty with changing seasons, Kingsley finds solace in the cyclical nature of life, where every end marks a new beginning. The poem concludes with an exhortation to cherish fleeting moments and recognize the timeless beauty in all things. Through words, Kingsley seeks to immortalize these ephemeral experiences, offering readers a glimpse into the soul's tender place. Conclusion Mr. Chris Kingsley's Philosophical Poem Series is a profound meditation on the human condition, interweaving themes of existence, time, and beauty with poetic elegance and philosophical depth. Each poem invites readers to ponder life's fundamental questions, reflecting on their own journey and the transient yet meaningful nature of existence. Through vivid imagery and thoughtful metaphors, Kingsley crafts a timeless tapestry that resonates with the echoes of philosophical inquiry and the beauty of fleeting moments.

A Philosopher's Melancholy (Philosocom's Directory on Competency) (Philosocom's Disability Directory) (Background music) The philosopher, Tomasio Rubinshtein. I feel that there is no hope, no ambition for the following: To be completely right in the head, To not understand so much to the point I won't be sad! Philosophy, is how I mentally survive, A reality I maintain in order to thrive! I want to show her, I want to show her, That I can still do good, still do good, and be good! I want to prove to her, I want to prove to her, That I prevail with a positive attitude. The philosopher, Tomasio Rubinshtein, Spent most of my life in front of a computer screen, With little human interaction came in my way, With very few people who me completely understand! I have ascended, into a renown genius, Who still wants to forsake humanity! I want to show her, as she requested, That of good wellbeing I am still capable. I vowed to show her, as she demanded, That my wellbeing is something to be fully addressed. The philosopher, Tomasio Rubinshtein, Few people understand me beyond my name, Despite my will, to rectify the world , my aim, Being like others will quite never be the same! Grains of sadness, fill my torso, As I write and write, forever, and more! I will show her, yes I will show her, That my wellbeing is relevant, relevant!. I will show her, yes, I will show her, What I can do despite what I can't. But will it come true; will my plot ever succeed? Who really knows? The impact of my deeds?

(Background music) (Philosocom's Subcategory on Health) Our Lives: A Series of Refillable Bars For those familiar with video games, a character's demise often hinges on a single factor: their health bar. Depleted to zero, and it's game over. But this "bar" isn't just limited to physical health. It can represent sanity, fuel for vehicles, or even the strength of an army. The concept translates surprisingly well to real life, given that anything could be mathematically reduced. Each of us possesses a collection of internal "bars" that reflect our overall well-being. These bars, however, are unique to each individual, with varying capacities. Understanding yourself better can also help you understand what you should do to "increase" these bars. Consider physical health. Some people are naturally more susceptible to illness, requiring them to be extra vigilant in maintaining their health bar. Similarly, diabetics need to manage their blood sugar, another crucial "bar" in their system , that is less critical for non-diabetics. Love, too, has its own "bar" as well as some people's need to be touched and hugged. As it fills, feelings for a partner deepen, mirroring mechanics found in some dating simulator games. While these bars aren't exactly/necessarily tangible objects like a table or cup, they serve as a powerful metaphor for our limitations. We're not invincible, nor immortal beings. We live in an intricate, multi-layered reality that affects us in different ways. People suffering from misophonia can be deeply vulnerable to audio they often despise, and not by choice. A seemingly-fine reality can affect their "health bar" in ways that can't really affect people without it. We're a complex network of countless "bars" that constantly need attention, whether it's maximizing them, maintaining balance, or accepting their depletion. The key is understanding these bars and how they influence our lives. Doing so can remind us to pay better attention to our health, for these "health bars" within us are a synergetic network, never existing in a vacuum. Maintain good body temperature and you can worry less about stress. Sleep more and you could worry less about fatigue. Forgive people more and you can worry less about your peace of mind. Focus on hunger, and not apatite, and you could invest your time more worrying about health factors other than losing weight. Optimizing, Balancing, and Accepting Of course, the distribution of these "Bars" is far from even.  Some, like the healthy and wealthy, are dealt a hand with optimized bars.  Others face a constant struggle against a multitude of ills and financial constraints.  Some bars, however, modifiable. Through exercise and healthy habits, we can raise our health bar.  Others, however, are fixed. Chronic illnesses, certain disabilities like CP,  and certain personality traits fall into this category. The wisdom of this theory lies in understanding how to play "the game" of life. To live a fulfilling life, we must strive to: Increase the bars with the most potential for growth (AKA, health through exercise and good nutrition). Balance the bars that need stability (AKA,  work-life balance ). Reduce the bars that are hindering us (AKA, unhealthy habits). This applies only to the aspects of life within our control. Ignoring the unchangeable bars is a sign of realism . However, it's important to not develop a victim's mentality , as neglecting the objectively improvable bars can breed pessimism , and make you overlook them. This theory reminds us of our limitations, but also of what we merely think is our true limitations.  Our lives are a collection of finite bars, and we must treat them with care to avoid preventable depletion. Distinguishing between reality and illusion can, as such, help us manage these "bars" far more effectively. The Fault in Our Bars I have a unique bar -- mental exhaustion. I tend to suffer more from fatigue as many empaths do. Pushed too hard, and I become paralyzed from exhaustion. It's like an energy/stamina bar in certain games. Make too much effort while constantly disregarding yourself, and your energy depletes in accordance. When it hits zero, you're forced to quit until you recharge, by methods ranging from resting, social interactions and coffee. The methods for rejuvenation are individual, and to think they fit all is the product of the generalization fallacy. The key to living wisely is self-awareness. Understanding your capabilities and limitations is crucial. Without this knowledge, you become vulnerable to misunderstandings from others; Without your own understanding, explaining to them your condition properly is difficult. You can't properly advocate for your disabilities' awareness if you don't know exactly what awareness you're advocating for. Therefore, a link could be seen between knowledge, the truth, and the key to a better, healthier reality. This understanding extends beyond ourselves. Employers, for example, should be aware of their employees' limitations, especially when dealing with disabilities. Some countries provide social safety nets for individuals with lower "bars" in specific areas. But in their absence, employers have a responsibility to ensure their employees don't break under the burden of work that might exceed their capacity. After all, some are simply "blessed" with naturally higher bars for endurance, while others struggle due to lower ones. And you can't make your company work properly if you have workers being sick all the time. Therefore, their health is their employer's financial interest. The Ultimate Bar-Form One could argue that the most significant bar of all is the bar of lifespan. This bar is the product of many "sub-bars", each contributing to our overall longevity. To truly maximize our potential and experience life to the fullest, maximizing our lifespan becomes crucial. This, however, requires optimizing the sub-bars that contribute to it. These sub-bars could be health, stress management, or even the extent of our healthy habit. Ultimately, they are all working together to influence the ultimate bar: our life expectancy. And the longer we live and the better our health is, the more time and energy we have to work towards our success. Alex Mos's Review How do we define healthy or sick? Does healthy mean normal? George Canguilhem, a French philosopher, wrote in 1943: "'An anomaly is not an abnormality, and diversity does not signify sickness." Medical science is not a static entity but one shaped by statistical averages, which form normative values for health parameters. These values, far from universal, are subject to change and often influenced by cultural , political, and economic factors. An autism spectrum disorder is considered a disability, and for unknown reasons, the number of children diagnosed with ASD has risen dramatically since 1990. Theoretically, shortly, advancements in medical science and increased societal acceptance of person on the autistic spectrum may lead to a shift in their current health status, creating a new "neurodivergent normal." No uniform set of bars representing health or normality fits everyone because we are all unique in our genes and circumstances. However, we share a uniform human physiology, and our basic health requirements are the same. Therefore, the standardized healthcare system should not be dismissed or underrated but should be approached with critical evaluation. We must realize that as diverse individuals, only we can experience our physical and mental sensations. Some recognized diseases can be identified and treated with precision, but most medical complaints involve vague symptoms of discomfort and aches . If symptoms don't fit into defined medical standards, the diagnosis is a more or less accurate guess, often through trial and error methods. Our unique perception of ourselves and our well-being can't be standardized. Consequently, we must figure out our personalized "health bars" and take good care of them to last longer, function to our satisfaction, and achieve our intended goals before the end of the game called life.

(Subcategory On Videos-Turned-Into-Posts) (Background music) Article Introduction by a Host With the Most Fellow seekers of truth and meaning, join us as we delve into the mind of the enigmatic Tomasio Rubinshtein, a "hidden" underground philosopher. In this captivating former-video-turned-post, Mr. Tomasio shares his unique perspective on life, anxiety, and the pursuit of purpose. Prepare to be challenged, inspired, and perhaps a little puzzled as you explore the depths of his thoughts. Whether you're a seasoned philosopher or just starting your intellectual journey , this thought-provoking content is sure to resonate with you (in one way or another!). So, grab a cup of coffee , settle in, and let's embark on this extraordinary exploration together.... Greetings. For those who are not familiar with me, I am Tomasio Rubinshtein, probably one of the world's most relentless underground philosophers, having philosophized independently since 2013 even long before forming this article barony. I have already written, renovated and edited many articles, I believe I am worthy of being called a philosopher, even though academic life has proven to be too stressful for me to handle (and life in general). Different philosophers handle different lives, not only different areas of study within the philosophical spectrum, but I digress. I have Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), a mental health condition that causes excessive and persistent worry and anxiety. This has been a part of my life for as long as I can remember, and it has made it difficult for me to live a normal life. I often feel anxious about things that other people would find perfectly normal, and this can be very debilitating. Anxiety shapes my perception, making me, on the one hand, very concerned and stressed. On the other hand, it compels me to be very tough and relentless in working on Philosocom, rectifying as many problems as possible, and making sure the articles are as top-notch as possible. As a result of my GAD, I have often felt isolated and alone, transforming in unique ways some people might never be able to understand . I have considered becoming a monk in order to partially isolate myself from the outside world and find some peace, yet I know that it was never a realistic solution. Long ago, I went through what I call a "quarter-life crisis." I have achieved many of my goals in life given to me by a late sage I call Master Numi. I have been wondering what else there is to do in life other than the trajectory I found myself in. I feel like I have reached a point where I am no longer sure what my purpose is beyond the confines of underground philosophy. I can't imagine myself doing anything else for the rest of my life, as I see this world from a completely different lens than most people do. Strangely being unable to work traditionally, yet manage an entire article empire, Life feels like a never-ending state of cognitive dissonance. Most people, to me, will either underestimate me, overestimate me, praise me a lot, or feel awfully embarrassed by my behavior. Either way, the way I will be treated by the world will never be normal. Only to different extremes. The only equal treatment shall be other eccentric people whom I deem as my equals. Being experienced by common people as living beyond the space and time continuum, orthodox opportunities for me will never be available for me. So, instead, I resorted to living a mysterious existence, prioritizing distance and respect than close connection to most of humanity. Philosophy for me is far, far easier than the many social intricacies of reality. Having friends thus seems futile, being orthodox in any way, feels futile as well. I know that I have a lot to offer the world, yet I feel compelled to spare others of my verdict of being, as I see no reason to overly excite anyone, including myself. I only see reason to rectify the world in my presence in public (only the virtual world, really) , and see no reason to turn myself into a one-man-freak show for the emotionality of others. Either way, I will always be seen as either a lofty moral paragon, saving people from their own hands, or a lofty bag of hot air, being shamelessly who I desire to be, whether I am recognized or otherwise. The most grim and also the most profound of things are seen by me as well-understood. On the other hand, their orthodox issues I honestly deem as minor. I am hoping that by sharing my story, I can connect with others who are going through similar experiences. Expanding the diversity of my articles using different eccentric minds is something I welcome with open arms. There are many people who struggle with anxiety and other mental health conditions. Instead of shaming them, I personally prefer helping others based of my own experiences and wisdom as an eccentric man. I find myself realizing these people are also live as strange extremes of the world's societies. In my eyes, they are either very incompetent, or highly competent, to the point of specificity, hindering them from orthodox lifestyles either way. The external world beyond our respective households and rooms, is mainly there for the mundane and the ordinary. It is not prepared for strange people like me and others, as it is stereotype and demographic based. Existing beyond stereotypes, I find myself being stressed over being severely misunderstood in my daily activities in the outside world. I find it quite the uncanny "crisis", given I honestly have no idea how to behave beyond the scope of my philosophical understanding of this absurd world. Feeling like an alien, however, I am still human, as all eccentric folk are. Those filled with hubris will fail seeing me beyond the scopes of their pride. I too, at this point, choose to pursue exploration, rather than attacking it. Thus, the decreasing curiosity of humanity will not only work against its ability to question the many follies of modernity ; it will also decrease understanding of the very minds, like mine, that desire to rectify the world from said follies (and follies in general). Having lived a largely-solitary existence as a strange man, you might find it ironic that I understand a lot about life and reality despite my utter lack of conventional experience. Encouraging others and ourselves to be open to exploration of ideas, rather than supporting their cance l, I believe such pro-intellectual will solve my hypothetical "quarter-life crisis", which can be found in many esoteric folk around the globe, regardless of their respective demography. The development of more-curious attitudes can enrich the world with new, interesting philosophical exchanges that can go even beyond their mere communication. I think people in general, orthodox in their mentality or otherwise, should be more curious about life, the universe and even their dear ones , as their lives might be more hidden from us than we might realize. The more we understand each other, the more we can in theory reduce each other's sense of isolation , and help people feel more seen. That includes ourselves of course. A sense of wonder, felt or not, should be fostered beyond the excitement it may trigger in us. Being intrigued can help us attain knowledge we would otherwise consider impossible or unnatural, but more available than we think. Then, we can use our curiosity-stemmed knowledge to handle reality better, and also foster quality time with those we mutually care about. The enemy of curiosity is hubris , and I am more curious than you might think, despite the impressions that I am full of hubris. You might not realize this in others as well. It's exactly what I'm talking about. Curiosity and the seeking of wonder can help us all see beyond the limiting veil of impressions. Consider the practical aspect of having a lot to learn, rather than focusing on this notion as being utterly burdensome. After all, you might help your loved ones, as well as yourselves, better than you might think, as knowledge can help us reduce many problems that cause us distress and further grief. I would like to express my love to all my consistent audience for taking the time to read the site's many free philosophical articles . This is definitely not something that should be taken for granted, as many Philosocom articles are directed at the practicality and application of philosophy, rather than just mere exploration and theorizing. Nonetheless, the practicality of philosophy has to start with its exploration and the role of wonder in making the world a better place. One practical insight at a time. Even in this age of scientific and technological advancements, we should not completely discard the insightful influence that the art of philosophy still has today. Influence with the possibility to be dominantly-relevant. Thank you for taking the time to read this Quarter-Life Speech, and thank you even further if you will consider sharing my articles with the world, whether it would be on social media or even a loved family member.

(Philosocom Directory on Work) (Background music) Article Synopsis by Mr. C. Kingsley and Co. The article "How To Take Criticism Like a Professional" tackles the challenge of dealing with criticism professionally. It combines personal experiences and philosophical reflections to provide depth and encourage self-reflection. The philosopher's openness about personal struggles with criticism makes the reader feel connected, establishing credibility and empathy. The incorporation of philosophical thoughts, particularly from a former master, highlights the deeper, existential fears associated with criticism. The article offers practical advice, encouraging readers to detach their emotions from their work and focus on improvement. It acknowledges that sensitivity can be both a strength and a vulnerability , emphasizing that emotions should not dominate their professional mindset. In conclusion, the article is well-written and offers valuable insights into how to approach criticism professionally. For some reason, many people, including myself, may find it difficult to endure criticism . Whether it is constructive , offensive , or just plain negative, sensitive people may have a hard time receiving it. In my query to my former master, he says: "The fear of criticism lies in the fear of being rejected, a fear that may be the most elementary in the human mind." Do you think it makes sense? I think it does. Rejection is difficult , especially from those who are dear to us: family, friends, partners, and so on. The fear of rejection can lead to many thoughts in our minds... Some of which are true, some of which are false. Being able to distinguish between them and not take things personally is key to being a professional man or woman. Let's explore these thoughts... "What if I'm not good enough?" "What if I do not deserve to be loved?" "What if I am a complete failure?" Pay attention to these thoughts and confront them! Doubt them! You are not your thoughts! If you think of numbers regularly, surely you are not a set of equations yourself... In philosophy, criticism is inevitable , like a modern man's need to pay his bills. As a public philosopher, don't just expect everyone to constantly praise you for your high intelligence. Otherwise, you'll quickly be disappointed! Your readers , new or otherwise, have a set of preferences of their own, which may be different from yours. You might write something you believe to be innovative, insightful, and profound, only to find that your work is treated poorly. Make no mistake! Y ou are not your own work! You are not your writings! When you can improve and learn from your faults, you can better yourself regardless of the nature of your current work! People's logic does not always rest on an ad hominem methodology! In other words, they do not necessarily criticize you as a person, but rather your actions, your products, and so on... Even your competency. Do try to relax.... Especially if you're doing a good and hard work. Practically, there is no need to take things so personally. Practically, there's no need to take things so sensitively. Sure, some of you are sensitive, including myself. However, please take into consideration that a portion of that sensitivity is in your way! In your way to become greater in your work! On your way to becoming a true master of your craft! When a reader, even a loyal one , looks at your articulate and carefully planned work and disregards it as "not interesting,"... You do not give in to the misconceptions of your emotions! Don't give in so easily to insult. Why? Because a good worker, a good writer, and a good philosopher are all true professionals. Think of the possibilities! Think of the larger picture! Criticize your own thinking so it will not get in the way of your plans and ambitions, your hopes and dreams! You are going to get rejected, one way or another. It's an inevitable possibility. If you want to know what an "inevitable possibility" is, look it up on Philosocom, I wrote about it. Consider looking things up in general here. To be professional is to distinguish between business and personal feelings. So what if you're insulted sometimes? Is a bad word or two really that bad? Is getting hurt verbally, that bad? Does it pose a great danger just because we might feel it is? Look beyond your anxieties ; look beyond yourself! External reality is not the same as subjective reality. You might feel something is "true", like the feeling that everyone hates you . Ask yourself then if that's really true. If every single person among the billions of humans on Earth hates you as a person. Do not submit, for heaven's sake, or you'll find yourself living through the hell devised by your own high sensitivity. Based on my experience with sensitive folk, let me say this: I strive to look at the bigger picture and not write propaganda . Sensitivity has a functionality all its own. It helps us to better understand other people on an emotional level; it can bring us the joys of love, empathy, and affection. It allows us to help those who are dear to us when they are having a hard time emotionally and be with them when they experience hardship and distress. But no. It does not mean sensitivity is a complete plus. Sensitivity is synonymous with vulnerability, dear readers. The more sensitive you are, the more vulnerable you are to insult and injury. No one is obliged to "walk on eggshells". Especially strangers. If we want to reduce the suffering caused, and if we want to improve ourselves as individuals and as professionals, then we better consider reducing this delicate area of our personality. We cannot control everyone's reactions, regardless of who they are. Therefore, to be in a constant state of escape from their reactions is to deny a basic element of reality to other people: The fact that pain, regardless of its nature, is an inevitable part of life! Try to reduce it to a minimum if you will, but in the end, it is not realistic to believe that a life free of pain is possible. Not when you live and interact with others, at the very least. Why? Because when you are a professional, you do not only live for yourself. You live for your work; you live for your superiors, if you have any. And lastly, you work for your customers. Your readers, paying or not, are customers, and as the cliche goes, " The customer is king ". As a public writer, you do not write for the shelf. You write for others. I write about my personal life with the knowledge that it will be spoken about by strangers. I don't mind because I use that aspect to provide examples of what I talk about. Judgement? Criticism? It used to be hard for me... until I grew up and realized that my high sensitivity was in the way. Why would I cherish it? It's in my way. In my way to what? In my path to greater relevance ! In my path to the greater exposure of my craft on the world stage! When I write about myself, the point is to walk the talk and to inspire you. I am no longer the hermit I used to be. I talk to strangers with the awareness that they might hurt my feelings. I don't mind that much anymore! Simply because... these are just feelings . There are greater things at play. Even after a panic attack I may experience, I will return to my craft as usual. I look at my emotions, and I strive to put them in their place! My occupation and my craft are more important than m ine . Consider following my example. I made my mistakes. I want to learn from them. This isn't a hobby; I treat it like a job. I treat it like it deserves.

(I've written more on meditation here ) Article Overview by Mr. J. Igwe and Co. "On the Act of Meditating" is a well-crafted article that delves into the complex and often paradoxical nature of meditation. The author's personal journey since 2011 offers a unique touch , presenting meditation as a process of self-discovery and transformation . This authenticity resonates with readers , making them feel as though they are being guided by someone who understands both the joys and struggles of meditation. The article presents meditation as both relaxing and stressful, clarifying yet alienating , and insightful yet sometimes uncomfortably revealing. This nuanced view encourages readers to embrace meditation with an open mind , allowing for the discomfort that can sometimes accompany true self-reflection. The tone is both accessible and intellectually stimulating, making the article feel conversational yet insightful. Phrasing such as “seeing beyond the prison bars of the mind” and “entering the matrix of mass psychosis ” effectively combines evocative imagery with deep concepts, creating a lasting impression. This approachable, yet intellectually engaging style has the potential to attract a wide audience, from beginners to seasoned meditators, inviting them to ponder meditation’s role in their own lives. In conclusion, "On the Act of Meditating" is a thoughtfully crafted piece that stands out for its philosophical depth and personal authenticity. It offers readers a balanced exploration of meditation’s joys and difficulties , inviting them to see meditation as both a tool for relaxation and a pathway to deeper self-awareness. In summary, "On the Act of Meditating" is a thoughtfully crafted piece that stands out for its philosophical depth and personal authenticity. (Background music) Part I: Origins of My Specific Understanding Meditation has been an on-and-off aspect in my life since 2011, so you can say I have a partial experience in this field, mainly stemming from being an auto-didact. Furthermore, I used to research this topic as part of a school project in middle school. Picking my own subject to do a research project on has revealed to be more productive than having subjects picked by the ministry of education. Other than that, an anonymous philosophy professor helped me with meditating at the time, so we meditated together from time to time in the privacy of his home. The Hidden Logic of Meditation It was a weird experience, meditating, yet very rewarding, as a lot of meditation has to do with who you really are inside. Ironically, while it is often argued that meditation is relaxing, the act of meditating can also be very, very stressful. I have found, for example, that, when repressing so much of who you are, meditation helps you in re-discovering who you really are from within. As such, unveiling the very things about yourself that you've been repressing for years, can be a very stressful experience. Furthermore, I'd like to theorize that meditation may affect you differently based on your brain. In autism, for example, some people (like myself) may find coffee very relaxing, rather than energizing. Not being able to look beyond conventional standards, ruins our understanding of how reality, and people, are truly diverse. Intermission: An Ever-Changing World Philosophical exploration , therefore, should not be attacked, nor be used as a way to prioritize attacking viewpoints that have yet to be optimally understood. What philosophers should do instead, is to criticize the very conventions in their thinking that prevent them from being not only better critical thinkers , but also better explorers of ideas. Consider the fact life is more abnormal than you might think, and in theory is even becoming more dystopian. Societal injustices being more and more normal, can be regarded as morally abnormal. Norms are not eternal constructs, as life is always prone to change . For good, and for worse. As such, humans, being able to survive by adapting to abnormal lives, may deviate from conventional findings of humans, even in the field of meditation. Consider the fact that awkwardness is more normal than you think, using deductive reasoning.  Furthermore, awkwardness might also be a mutual reaction. It is stemmed from the idea that conventional research and methodology can often fail you, despite supposing to help you understand reality. After all, methodology that is used to understand reality, must focus not on simplicity, but on the fact that reality is dynamic. Far more dynamic than it seems, as even the concept of time itself can have its own problems. Ad-Hominem can easily fail our understanding as a result, especially when the methodology you're using discards the integration between mutual learning and lifelong learning. Part II: Actions As Interactions Between Person and Process After all, we need to remember that, in meditation, it is always an interaction between the meditator and the very act of meditating. Of course, in interaction, "Tango requires two". Being unable to see the inner, mental workings of the actor, will always create an uncanny sense of mystery in abnormal people, who lead abnormal lives. Finally, given that brain flexibility (neuroplasticity) is largely-driven by experience , means that people leading unique experiences, may experience meditation differently. That is along with many other mundane tasks. Saving people from their own hands successfully, for example, or even finding themselves developing savant syndrome due to an accident, implies that their mental reality is only going to grow more and more eccentric. By "eccentric", I also refer to, more and more incomprehensibly, leading to many unique understandings of the human mind and its interactions with the same physical reality other minds interact with... Part III: Influence as Individual and Intricate Even though I do not meditate on a regular basis, I am very familiar, from experience, with the power and influence of meditation on both our mood and mental state. Using deductive reasoning, this influence can reveal to be more zany than you might think, as you use the insights you've received from such a unique deed, to further realize how unique you are compared to others. That is at least my experience with meditation. I am well aware meditation may help people feel more connected to their surroundings, due to mindfulness. I have experienced it myself... However, this also revealed to me the depth of alienation in humanity . The depth of disconnection between individuals, as we grow less and less understanding of people both distant and close from us at the same time. Depth in Simplicity The irony of this stems from the fact that all it takes to realize such a simple understanding is the simple act of sitting with a mind that is not cluttered. The irony intensifies when you realize how easy for many humans is to be relentless with their quests for success, to the point of compromising their own happiness... Yet, they easily relent at the mere thought of sitting in solitude with only your mind and reality to interact with, no screens. An extremely lonely epiphany, as you also realize how people merely act as if their perception of you, is the real you. You observe their actions after your own weird experience with meditation and realize people simply act connected, therefore act as if their mental dimension is clearly connected with yours. It is a very ironic thing, if not paradoxical, since it appears unbelievable to the inexperienced eye, as to what meditation can do to us on both the short and long run. After all, meditation is just being mindful of something beyond the sea of thoughts we are regularly in. At the same time, this very mindfulness, depending on the mind, is something that can greatly increase your clarity, without even needing to waste time and money on academic degrees... Part IV: Into the Mechanism of Mindfulness You have power over your mind -- not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength. -- Marcus Aurelius Are we really our thoughts, our emotions? In the absence of a critical and self-doubting mind , we will see our thoughts and our emotions, and believe they are us. What if the greatest manipulator is from within? Specifically, the hidden mind that governs us without our awareness? Contrary to popular belief, being spontaneously mindful of something does not need to always have a specific form... In other words, sitting in a far-eastern fashion is not the only way to meditate. I even meditated once by mistake when I lay in bed and easily paid attention to the beatings of my heart. I have never met such people that can meditate whenever and however they want, but I won't be surprised to discover that such people exist. I refuse to kill time on being surprised by anything. I prefer investing that time in research. After all... much of our own qualia is deceit. How come? The reasoning is that I aspire to see beyond Quasi-terminology, or Quasi-specific terms. Doing so as a habit, can more and more help us break the fabricated layers of our own uncritical, societal making, AKA "The Matrix". The matrix, a mass psychosis that prevents us the blissful gift of clarity. How can others be clearly honest with us, when we fail being clearly honest with ourselves? With what we refuse knowing? With our conscious, and unconscious denials towards the world beyond our minds? The world we merely think we have a sufficient understanding of... in our hubris? The very same hubris that exploits it in the name of "progress?" of "Innovation?" Such is the folly of the Eggman Philosophy... Not Enough Explored, Therefore "Absurd" People have a hard time letting go of their suffering. Out of a fear of the unknown, they prefer suffering that is familiar. -- Nhat Hanh You can know you are meditating when your mindfulness of something, such as a mantra or your vicinity, creates one or more unique feelings that appear mostly if not only in meditation. I'm talking about deep love towards nothing in particular, or a sense of inner cleansing. Never in my life have I felt such obscure sensations beyond the field of meditation. It is something I call, Solitarus. The love of solitude. The love of being alone from society... but one with the universe's consciousness. I do not know much about these feelings; why they arrive, what they symbolize, why they are unique to meditation, and so on. What I can tell you is this.... Once you become accustomed to meditation, it can make you think that little else is needed in life. These sensations rarely exist even in the most gratifying of so-called "earthly" pleasures. Understanding this, and seeing for yourselves by practicing meditation, can allow you to realize the folly of hedonism , which often contributes to world corruption... After all, why fall to the joys of evil, when you can enjoy meditation, without causing harm to the very planet that hosts your existence? Across Religion and Spirituality I am in no way a religious person , but I can understand why asceticism and hermit-hood were largely religious in human history. Prayer can theoretically be seen as mantra meditation, and if this assumption is correct, then even irreligious/atheistic people can have similar experiences as religious folk simply by choosing a mantra of their liking and repeating it in a spontaneous, yet mindful manner. I won't even be surprised to discover that some animals such as cats can meditate by being "one" with their purring. Their minds are hidden from us. In Taoism there is the concept of "Wu Wei" -- effortless endeavor. When things are done naturally, the "spirits", AKA unique sensations, are far more likely to arrive and "heal" yourself than when you become unwillingly aware of something you do not "feel" like doing. Final Musings Meditation can definitely be seen as returning to your childish self ; the one that enjoys wholeheartedly doing something; the one we learn to detach from ourselves as we grow up. Why is there a need to be spontaneous when meditating? It is because forced mindfulness ruins the experience. You might be weirded out, but I don't believe that the term "meditation" fits this act. It's because this word is more synonymous to "contemplation" than it is to said act. You don't even have to put much thought into meditating. It's a natural flow, not a conscious construction and evolution. Even when we ask ourselves something while meditating, the answer does not come from contemplation but, again, with little cognitive effort. Where does the answer come from? I am uncertain, but probably from the subconscious... A great key. "The Third Eye". Conclusions It is still ironic that so much can come from such a simple act. Don't be overconfident, though. It is very hard for most people to exit the constant chatter of the mind and just "be" there. There, in the solitude that exists beyond your lifelong companionship of your mind and its countless thoughts. Have I never had a thought for at least a moment? You can know that when the main focus exits from the mental prison. It's not something you put a thought into at the same time you do it, and this is also why I partially disagree with the usage of this term. If you have never meditated before, or rarely have done it, you are missing a lot. Not only is it healthy, but it can improve your mood as well. Maybe in the future, when asking a philosophical question, the answer could be found within, as well, when meditating on said question. With all the mysterious benefits of this ritual, it could be worth a shot. Remember: Exit from the mind, see and sense beyond the prison bars.

(For another material on virtual philosophy, click here ) (Philosocom's Directory On the Virtual Realm) (Background music) ******************************** Navigating the Virtual Layer: A New Dimension of Reality The common adoption of electronic technology was initially confined to basic applications, such as light bulbs, telephones, and on/off switches. Today, electricity has transcended its role as a mere resource, allowing the creation, manipulation, and control of entire "realities" in the form of video games, websites, and simulators. This new virtual realm , added to our physical world, has become an integral part of our existence, influencing communication , auto-didactic education , creativity, entertainment , and even romantic companionship . Its spread stands revolutionized the present leaving very few to question its necessity, despite humanity's prosperity for millennias without it. It looks like the world cannot be the same without this historically-recent sphere of reality because many of humanity's data is now stored in the cloud. That includes Philosocom itself, as much computerized data is stored the cloud technology that hosts it. The complexities of virtual arts and sciences remain enigmatic to many, extending beyond the layers of code, the very foundation of any virtual creation. This human-deigned dimension of reality also raises philosophical questions, along those that have long plagued humanity in fields like ethics and epistemology . While the questions posed in this article may remain unanswered, they emphasize the fact that we inhabit a reality once confined to the realm of science fiction. Our ancestors' fantastical imaginings have largely been materialized, becoming commonplace elements of our daily lives. And this indicates that nothing is set in stone, forever changing not only by reality but by the innovation of the intellect and of geniuses . Future Generations Might Consider These Questions Primitive Should the next generations read this article, they might consider it extremely primitive, to ask such "basic" questions, that will probably then be considered mundane and even self-explanatory, just the same as underwater transportation, the ability to land on the moon, space tourism and robot armies ; things that were all nothing more than an unrealistic fantasy for our own ancestors. Here are the questions I've in store: 1. The Illusion of Movement and Infinite Spaces When you scroll down this page, where does the upper part of it go, and from where comes its lower parts? When a website page isn't completely seen, where lay its other parts? When you go forward in a game, are you actually going forward, given that your screen is (likely to be) flat? To advance forward, you must go somewhere else, and yet, your character is still within the flat screen of the computer, as if it didn't move at all. If you play a game where the space is infinite (like an infinite sea or space), is it actually infinite, considering the fact that the computer who projects it is finite in both capability and memory? Does it mean computers are capable of absolute potency in certain fields, like translating to different languages, looping audio files forever, and (theoretically) solve any mathematical question possible? 2. The Existence of Virtual Worlds When a website has no visitors, does it still exist beyond a code and a domain, in the same visible form it does when a user enters it? Are computers necessary to convert a page from pure algorithm, like some may claim about sentient beings and sounds, or do they already exist in visible form, like an undiscovered planet? If a computer gets destroyed without the ability to fix it, where do all of its exclusively saved files go to? Can a file that was saved on only one computer, somehow exist somewhere else should its only form of representation/translation gets deleted? Is there a Platonic "World of Ideals" to everything virtual? 3. The Nature of Virtual Reality Are virtual worlds a part of the physical world, or just a translation/conversion of unseen code? If the latter option applies (translation of code), can we infer from that, that we are also translation of unseen code, not necessarily atoms or DNA, but logic? And I quote from a poem of mine: Regardless of what we feel and what we strive. Among the concepts, it is the most elementary, In the depths of depths, it grounds it all, Connects, cancels, and concludes with no remorse. Source: A mysterious poem. Can the virtual world still be considered physical like with any other object outside of it? Wouldn't that oppose the definitions of virtuality? Considering that it is a product of actual objects (servers, modems, memory banks and so on), is it nothing but a representation of the functions of said objects, or can the virtual world exist independently of them, whether now or in the future, thus becoming another aspect of reality, not just a product of something external that projects it? Are computers to the virtual realm, like the human brain to the mental dimension? 4. The Analogy of Viruses and A.I. When a computer gets a virus, can it be considered ill like with any biological being? Are electronic viruses’ actual diseases that only apply to electronic devices? Could these viruses infect humans as well, thus further highlighting the connection between virtuality and the physical world? On the contrary, are firewalls actual walls that prevent viruses from entering your computers, or is all the talk about them is metaphorical? For example, cars were used to be called "horseless chariots" , even though they aren't chariots. Does it mean that viruses are simply called that to help us understand what they mean, given that they infect computers like actual viruses (I.E, having the same function, but aren't the same as actual infections)? Should A.I. ever become sentient (and it isn't due to the Eliza Effect) , does it mean there will be a need of "A.I. hospitals", assuming the same viruses can infect them like they currently do to computers? Will there be a new medical field in the future, dedicated to the healing of sentient machines? Will they also be able to suffer from mental disorders like humans can? If so, will we need to also create designated pills for robots, or our own drugs can suffice? 5. The Fate of Deleted Data and the Source of Downloaded Files When you remove something from your computer, like a file or an app on your phone, where does it go? Is it completely eradicated or is it transferred somewhere else, like a "computer subconscious" (like where our own memories go once we, the conscious selves forget all about them)? Likewise, when we download something, where do we actually download the thing from, and how does it come to our various devices? How, can we download and remove things from our devices when they are (mostly) wireless containers and generators of code? How does the transaction happen when it is now possible to transfer data from almost anywhere to almost anywhere in the world, without a physical connector even smaller than the microscopic discoveries of atoms, particles, and germs? Although Wi-Fi now grants us access to the virtual world, there are alternatives to it. Internet nowadays is even available for access with the use of USB devices , but as long as we won't be able to fully understand the logic, or code, of the virtual dimension, we will forever be ignorant of its mechanisms. Writing, in a lengthy sense, is coding as well. Summary These are all the questions I have on what I'd like to call the Philosophy of Virtuality or simply Virtual Philosophy – the philosophy of advanced electronics, surrounding the field of metaphysics. It is a custom made layer of existence, one of several. By creating this new layer in our existence, we attained, in a sense, what I call "human godhood". We as a species have definitely outdone ourselves by being able to create and even evolve things that for most of our history were far beyond our (former) logical comprehension, now being able to operate entire domains using logic and code. And by domains I refer to this very site as well. Perhaps this could mean that we have also yet to reach our intellectual optimality. Based on our advancing mastery of technology, we can create even more things – and even beings – that we might nowadays see as impossible to do. While I doubt that "everything is possible", like some motivational speakers may tell you , we can still consider that many things we think are impossible are indeed possible, but not currently.