The Paradox of Modern Liberty: When Freedom Becomes a Dictatorship of the Many

The Paradox of Modern Liberty: When Freedom Becomes a Dictatorship of the Many

Disclaimer: This article critiques a pervasive philosophy, not the American people or nation. My aim is to analyze how a certain worldview has shaped public discourse and societal norms, not to express anti-American sentiment.

(Philosocom's Subcategory Directory on Freedom)

(Background music)

The Flaw in "Western Benevolence": A Personal Revelation

For years, I identified as a Westerner – a modern, benevolent thinker unbound by local tradition. Yet, as I delved deeper and observed those who championed this "enlightened" perspective, I encountered an unfortunate contradiction.

Far from the open-mindedness I expected, I found traits of inconsideration, elitism, and a surprising intolerance for anything different or eccentric.

It was then I recognized a fundamental flaw in contemporary Western culture. The term "benevolence," I realized, often masks a condescending elitism, enforced by rigid norms that reject genuine pluralism and inclusivity.

The New Imperialism: Financial Materialism as Global Philosophy

Today, America, in its global influence, mirrors ancient empires like Rome. But instead of military conquest, its "imperialism" is waged through financial materialism. It advocates a mainstream philosophy that equates wealth with happiness and success – a theory repeatedly disproven by countless unsatisfied rich individuals.

Dare to criticize this philosophy, and you'll immediately see my point. While it's culturally acceptable to critique nations like the DPRK or Russia, questioning the "land of infinite possibilities" often invites immediate backlash online. Voicing a dissenting opinion, a basic right, is treated as a defiant act requiring "courage."

Contemporary Freedom: A Dictatorship of the Majority

This is the hypocrisy of modern liberty: you are free to express yourself, but only if your opinions align with the popular consensus. Deviate, and the digital (and sometimes physical) mob attempts to "eat you alive," employing cyber-violence and demands to "keep things to yourself." This is harassment, a crime, yet it's normalized.

True democracy isn't merely majority rule; it's measured by its capacity to accept and protect minority expressions. When the many suppress the different, the liberty we praise becomes a thinly veiled dictatorship of prevailing norms.

We admire these norms, yet they stifle the very freedom they claim to uphold. Imagine walking down the street in a monk's gown – your right, certainly, but brace for the societal pressure and ridicule. This fear of being different fuels an anti-democratic herd mentality.

Beyond the Echo Chamber: Why Popularity Isn't My Priority

The world is not a bespoke order tailored to your preferences. You cannot expect universal agreement, nor should those who dissent be shamed into compliance.

My writings prioritize truth over popularity for precisely this reason. Why should anyone think or speak exactly as you do? To demand conformity is to treat human thought like a fast-food order – expecting every author to deliver the exact "hamburger" you desire. However, in philosophy, the truth is prioritized more than catering, and the truth is often uncomfortable.

The fault in contemporary liberty comes when those who voice the truth are persecuted and excluded from the public space, something that can be seen in what is known as cancel culture.

Since I research the truth and that requires solitude, the hectic life within popularity is but a distraction.

Reclaiming Identity: From Westerner to Eastern Ascetic

This inherent flaw in what I call "Western Benevolence" has led me to redefine my identity. No longer a "Westerner," I embrace my Eastern roots (Romania and Poland) and the ascetic behavior I've inherited – from my dietary choices to finding contentment in sufficiency.

The North American philosophy of "everything should go my way" – a condescending, hedonistic entitlement, often devoid of responsibility for consequences – has fostered a toxic, insensitive world.

It's a world quick to mock and shame the eccentric, indifferent to the real suffering, panic attacks, or even attempts on one's own life that result from such social crushing. This pseudo-liberty demands "hearing what I want when I want," prioritizing emotional comfort over reason.

The Call for Truth Acceptance Over Emotional Comfort

True liberty must be founded on reason, not the shifting sands of emotion, which are quick to cancel out thoughts and opinions one doesn't like because they're uncomfortable to hear. To be swayed by fleeting feelings and comfort bias, leads to the subversion of freedom and to bias towards opinions just because they are comfortable to hear. Therefore, acting on emotion, or purely on emotion, is unwise; logical consistency is paramount if we wish to preserve our freedoms.

The pervasive philosophy of our time often refuses the simple act of respectful disagreement, leading to wasteful and hateful arguments both online and offline. The intellectual non-conformist suffers, while the entitled "Walmart customer" of life, demanding absolute compliance, triumphs. It's a fundamental failure to reject all human thought that doesn't go along with what we'd like to hear just because it is uncomfortable. That is especially true when it is normalized.