How Money Corrupts: Capitalism, Alienation, and Mother 3's Tazmily Village

How Money Corrupts -- Thoughts & History on Mother 3's Tazmily

(For Philosocom's directory for articles on money, click here)

(Philosocom's Directory on MOTHER 3)

(Corruption Directory)

(Background music)

A philosophical look at how the introduction of wealth and technology can rot a society from the inside out.

There is an old cliché that claims money is the "root of all evil." I fundamentally disagree. People can be evil regardless of monetary gain. Some lack the basic empathy required to prevent their own cruelty, while others simply find the act of doing evil inherently rewarding.

However, it is undeniable that money can corrupt. And by corruption, I am referring to a specific moral deterioration.

While the philosophy of ethics holds no universal agreement on what exactly constitutes "morality," modern society generally agrees on a few baselines. Caring for others' feelings, volunteering for the benefit of the community, and prioritizing human connection over personal gain are widely seen as moral acts.

The true fault does not lie in the physical existence of money, but in the specific temptation of greed—the desire to acquire wealth at the direct expense of that morality.

The Cost of Caring vs. The Pursuit of Wealth

Caring for others requires a highly valuable resource: Time. When a society becomes hyper-fixated on financial gain, time spent caring for others is suddenly viewed as a loss of potential revenue.

If you view life strictly through the lens of capital, maintaining a friendship can be seen as a "waste of time" compared to the pursuit of greater wealth.

Those who prioritize endless labor over community volunteering are making a conscious calculation: they value the capitalization of financial opportunities over the people around them.

Nowhere is this tragic transition illustrated better than in the video game Mother 3, through the story of a commune known as Tazmily Village.

Tazmily Village: The Moneyless Utopia

Before its corruption, Tazmily was a classless society of volunteers that functioned entirely without currency.

If you walked into the village inn, there was no need to pay for a room. The residents didn't even know what money was. They operated on a system of mutual survival and community loyalty. The "need" for money is, in essence, subjective. Currency is just a piece of paper (or today, digital data). It only holds power because the global population collectively agrees to believe in its necessity. Tazmily had no such belief.

They lived this way because they were survivors of a past apocalypse. To prevent humanity from repeating the mistakes that destroyed their old world, they intentionally erased their own memories. They forgot the concept of money, greed, and advanced technology so they would not be tempted by them again.

The Pigmask Army and the Mechanics of Dehumanization

Tazmily's naive purity began to rot with the arrival of a strange man named Fassad. Pretending to desire the best for the village's future, he offered them a massive technological leap forward. Because the villagers had erased their memories of why technology destroyed them in the past, they blindly accepted his deal.

With Fassad came his enforcers: The Pigmask Army.

The Pigmasks are perhaps one of the most uncanny and original concepts in fiction. They are human men dressed in pink, WW2-style military uniforms, wearing pig-shaped gas masks, and communicating through actual pig snorts. They are physically unfit, and some constantly carry pork snacks.

They celebrate the idea of the pig as a noble animal, completely willingly dehumanizing themselves. They perfectly represent the slur of the "capitalist pig"—mindless consumers, marching in uniform, fat on excess, behaving like pigs waiting to be slaughtered by the very system they serve.

The Illusion of Progress and the Rise of Alienation

This dehumanized faction did not conquer Tazmily with a military strike; they conquered it with the high-tech propaganda of materialistic dreams.

They introduced money. They built railways. They handed out "happy boxes" (televisions). The societal shift was devastating and absolute:

• The Death of Community: Before the Pigmasks, everyone in Tazmily knew everyone else. Once money was introduced, residents became nameless, alienated neighbors. There was no longer a logistical need to rely on each other.

  
  

• The Apathy of Labor: Citizens became exhausted from working in the newly built mines and factories.

  
  

• The Rise of Indulgence: To cope with their exhaustion and alienation, they spent their newly earned salaries at local clubs, becoming numb, apathetic, and addicted to recreational indulgence.

  
  

The Capitalist Mirage of New Pork City

Tazmily's story ends when almost the entire population abandons the village for a promised "Utopia" called New Pork City—a blatant parody of New York City and modern hyper-capitalism.

New Pork City is a pretentious mirage. It sells a dream that doesn't actually exist. Many of the towering, impressive buildings are literally just fake wooden cutouts. Meanwhile, the actual citizens are forced to live in filthy, poor apartments located down in the sewers. The dream is a lie, accessible only to the invisible elite.

The tragic irony of Mother 3 is that Tazmily’s survival mechanism became its undoing. The survivors erased their memories to avoid chasing delusional, destructive dreams. However, the fatal flaw of forgetting your history is that you forget the very lessons meant to protect you.

Unable to remember the dangers of greed, they willingly walked right back into the slaughterhouse. And by the end of the story, the world is destroyed all over again.

Mr. John Duran's Quote For The Ending

Behold! The highest force and tool for absolute manipulative evil ever crafted. It's insidious, crafty, powerful and has sealed the doom of billions on this planet. It has been used for the complete manipulation of every culture and species on Earth. Its worst evil is its touted as something good for us.

Mr. Nathan Lasher's Feedback:

Money is neutral. It itself is neither good nor evil. It is only a tool which can be used to facilitate good or evil. Find $100 on the ground. Pick it up, is your mind instantly on good or bad thoughts? No, you're just happy you just found it. Whether you are a good or bad person will determine which way you will lean towards. All money does is allow a person to do more evil or more good.

Shouldn’t morality be as simple as saying it is the act of bringing no overall negativity to anything material, living or non-living, in the universe, including yourself? It's really simple seeing morality in this way.

If you aren’t hurting anyone in any way you are living a moral life. Starting here is something anyone can do. You don’t have to be Mother Teresa to live a moral life.

Doing a good act doesn’t necessarily mean a person is moral. “Good” acts can be done for selfish reasons. Being moral in the best way possible requires a person to use their intelligence to determine which acts they can do will do the most good.

The best advice I have for living a greed free life is to find a good reason behind everything you do.

When you realize money is only an asset, whose importance is only as great as we place on it, you realize it only serves a few minor purposes. To exchange your asset, money, for a different kind of asset, food, clothing, utility bill, you start to realize that the only reason you need money is [to exchange it for other assets].